欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (03): 471-476.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00471

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

花生根边缘细胞发育影响因子的分析

张裕晨;马伯军*;顾志敏;施美凤   

  1. 浙江师范大学化学与生命科学学院,浙江金华321004
  • 收稿日期:2007-07-21 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-03-12 网络出版日期:2008-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 马伯军

Factors Associated with Root Border Cell Development in Peanut

ZHANG Yu-Chen,MA Bo-Jun*,GU Zhi-Min,SHI Mei-Feng   

  1. College of Chemistry and Life Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinghua 321004, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2007-07-21 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-03-12 Published online:2008-03-12
  • Contact: MA Bo-Jun

摘要:

以花生品种新昌小京生和江西一把抓为材料,采用种子悬空气培法,研究了根边缘细胞(BC)的数目、活性及其影响因子。结果表明,花生根长为1 mm时开始产生BC,当根生长到13~17 mm时,BC数达最大值,约10 000个。在根边缘细胞的发育过程中,根冠果胶甲酯酶(PME)的活性与根BC发育、诱导存在密切的相关性,说明PME在BC产生、发育和游离过程中起着重要作用。BC释放出的胞外抑制剂不但可以抑制BC的产生而且还能降低其活性,且浓度越高抑制作用越强烈。与BC活性相比,胞外抑制剂对BC的产生影响更大。高温和低温环境不但抑制花生根的生长,而且影响花生根BC的产生速度、最大值及其活性。与对BC产生的影响相比,温度对BC活性影响较大。根尖黏液层渗透势的维持可以使BC在较长时间内维持高活性。

关键词: 花生, 根边缘细胞, 发育调控, 根尖分生组织, 胞外抑制剂

Abstract:

Border cells (BCs), originated from root-cap meristem, are a kind of active cells deposited in the periphery of roots to protect the root tips from extracellular biotic and abiotic stresses. Some investigators believe it is a constitutive expression in BC’s production, while others suggest that it is an induced process regulated by intro- and extro-signals. BCs in different plant species show completely different responses to temperature stress. In this paper, we investigated the factors associated with the production and development of BCs in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), which had never been reported before. Two peanut cultivars, Xinchang Xiaojingsheng and Jiangxi Yibazhua were employed and their seeds were aerobic cultured after imbibition. The BC number and activity (percentage of BC survival/total) as well as their responses to pectin methylesterase (PME) activity, BC liquor, temperature, and osmotic potential were measured. Under normal cultural condition, the number of BCs increased with the development and elongation of the root. The first BC formation almost synchronously occurred with root tip emergence. When the root length was 13–17 mm at 25℃, the number of BCs reached the maximum (about 10 000 BCs). When the BCs were removed from root tip, a new generation of BCs was induced within 72 h. During this period, the PME activity increased quickly to the maximum within 4 h and then decreased to pre-induction background levels subsequently, suggesting that the PME may play an important role in production and development of BC. The number and survival percentage of detached BCs were significantly different when the roots cultured in the media with three different BC liquor concentrations containing extracellular inhibitor of BC. The extracellular inhibitor of BC released could inhibit not only the production of BC but also its activity, and the inhibition was strong with the increment of the concentration. The extracellular inhibitor affected more greatly on BC production as compared with the BC activity. Temperature directly or indirectly affected the root growth, and regulated the production and development of BCs. Both high and low temperatures inhibited the root growth and affected the production rate, maximum number, and activity of BC, and low temperature had more severe harmness to the development of the peanut root. Temperature had greater impact on BC activity as compared with secretion rate of BC. The activities of detached BCs in different culture conditions show significant difference. The survival percentage of detached border cells was significantly higher under culture in the aerobic or mannitol than in MS medium or ddH2O, suggesting that maintenance of mucus layer osmolarity in root apex can maintained the survival percentage of BCs at a high level within a relative long time. The results supported the hypothesis of induced model of BC formation that regulated by the intrinsic and extrinsic signals.

Key words: Peanut, Root border cell, Development control, Root apical meristem, Extracellular inhibitor

[1] 郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[2] 陆一楚, 李振影, 买春海, 赵晓蕊, 王利祥. 夜间复合体关键基因AhLUX1正向调控花生结瘤的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1658-1668.
[3] 谷春苗, 王润风, 黄璐, 刘浩, 鲁清, 李海芬, 李少雄, 何双呈, 洪彦彬, 陈小平, 谭斌, 余倩霞. 花生WOX基因家族的全基因组分析及不定芽再生候选基因的鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1326-1340.
[4] 于天一, 王春晓, 肖丽, 钟召迪, 王宣仓, 赵勇, 路亚, 吴月, 吴正锋. 不同结瘤特性花生品种氮素累积、产量及品质特性对氮肥用量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 881-894.
[5] 张胜忠, 李国卫, 戈立江, 王菲菲, 胡晓辉, 苗华荣, 李燕, 钟文, 陈静. 花生机械脱壳损伤相关农艺指标筛选与QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 644-652.
[6] 王菲菲, 张胜忠, 杨贵华, 苗华荣, 胡晓辉, 张则林, 刘莎莎, 乔利仙, 单世华, 陈静. 331份花生种质苗期耐盐性综合评价和强耐盐种质鉴选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 279-294.
[7] 金欣欣, 宋亚辉, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 王瑾. 高产高油高油酸花生品种的生长发育及干物质生产特征[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 191-201.
[8] 迟晓元, 刘庆, 张君, 赵旭红, 李美, 于天一, 潘丽娟, 许静, 姜骁, 殷祥贞, 马俊卿, 陈娜. 不同花生品种(系)耐盐碱性田间鉴定及各性状指标相关性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 85-98.
[9] 孙辰硕, 张月, 田泽锴, 晏立英, 康彦平, 陈玉宁, 王欣, 淮东欣, 王前前, 姜慧芳, 罗怀勇, 黄莉, 廖伯寿, 王志慧, 雷永. 花生种质果柄强度的遗传分化与主要影响因子分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 118-130.
[10] 万书波, 张佳蕾, 高华鑫, 王才斌. 中国花生高产栽培研究进展与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1703-1711.
[11] 郭腾达, 崔梦杰, 陈琳杰, 韩锁义, 郭敬坤, 吴晨迪, 付留洋, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 张新友. 花生磷脂酰肌醇转运蛋白基因AhSFH的克隆及其响应黄曲霉菌侵染的表达特征分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1489-1500.
[12] 李文佳, 廖泳俊, 黄璐, 鲁清, 李少雄, 陈小平, 金晶炜, 王润风. 花生开花时间的全基因组关联分析及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1400-1408.
[13] 林伟津, 郭泽佳, 刘浩, 李海芬, 王润风, 黄璐, 余倩霞, 陈小平, 洪彦彬, 李少雄, 鲁清. 花生荚果产量相关性状QTL定位与候选基因分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 969-981.
[14] 迟晓元, 毕竞男, 赵健鑫, 陈娜, 潘丽娟, 姜骁, 殷祥贞, 赵旭红, 马俊卿, 许静. 花生荚果力学特性评鉴及早熟种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 943-957.
[15] 晋高锐, 吴小丽, 邓丽, 陈玉宁, 喻博伦, 郭建斌, 丁膺宾, 刘念, 罗怀勇, 陈伟刚, 黄莉, 周小静, 淮东欣, 谭家壮, 姜慧芳, 任丽, 雷永, 廖伯寿. 兼抗黄曲霉侵染和产毒高油酸花生新种质的创制与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 687-895.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!