欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (12): 2126-2133.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.02126

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

水分胁迫条件下“洛旱2号”小麦根系的基因表达谱

李永春1;孟凡荣2;王潇1;陈雷1;任江萍1;牛洪斌1;李磊1;尹钧1,*   

  1. 1 河南农业大学国家小麦工程技术研究中心，河南郑州450002；2 河南农业大学生命科学学院，河南郑州450002
  • 收稿日期:2008-04-21 修回日期:2008-07-15 出版日期:2008-12-12 网络出版日期:2008-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 尹钧
  • 作者简介:李永春(1971-),男,山西离石人,博士,副教授,主要从事小麦功能基因组学及分子育种研究
  • 基金资助:

    河南省科技厅项目(062311600);国家"十一五"科技支撑计划重大项目(2006BAD02A07-4)

Gene Expression Profiling in Roots of Wheat Cultivar “Luohan 2” under Water Stress

LI Yong-Chun1,MENG Fan-Rong2,WANG Xiao1,CHEN Lei1,REN Jiang-Ping1,NIU Hong-Bin1,LI Lei1,YIN Jun1*   

  1. 1 National Engineering Research Center for Wheat, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan; 2 College of Life Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan, China
  • Received:2008-04-21 Revised:2008-07-15 Published:2008-12-12 Published online:2008-10-10
  • Contact: YIN Jun

PDF

1803

被引次数

25

摘要：

为探讨小麦水分胁迫反应的分子调控机制，以抗旱小麦品种“洛旱2号”根系为材料，采用Affymetrix小麦基因芯片比较了20% PEG6000溶液处理后根系及对照的基因表达谱。结果表明，洛旱2号根系中受水分胁迫诱导而上调和下调表达的基因分别有3 743个(4 074个探针组)和4 573个(5 043个探针组)，下调表达的基因远远多于上调表达的基因，其中上调2倍以上的1 593个(1 716个探针组)，下调2倍以上的2 238个(2 451个探针组)。通过Affymetrix 的NetAffx Analysis Center查询和NCBI的BLASTX分析，差异表达2倍以上的基因中有619个已注释了功能，利用MIPS数据库将注释基因分为10类，包括生物代谢、逆境胁迫反应、细胞组分生成、蛋白合成、细胞信号交流、细胞运输、转录相关、细胞分裂和蛋白质加工等。差异表达16倍以上的基因中有32个已注释了功能，其中与逆境胁迫反应相关的基因16个，与生物代谢相关的基因5个。利用实时定量RT-PCR对8个代表性候选基因在水分胁迫条件下的差异表达特性分析表明，其结果和芯片杂交分析的结果基本一致。

关键词: 水分胁迫, 洛旱2号, 基因差异表达谱, 实时定量RT-PCR, 基因芯片

Abstract:

High-through microarray technology is a powerful tool for analyzing gene expression profiles of plants exposed to abiotic stresses. To investigate the molecular mechanisms of water-stress response in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), the transcript profiles in 20% PEG 6000 treated roots and control roots of a wheat cultivar ‘Luohan 2’ were comparatively studied using the Affymetrix wheat GeneChip. Analysis of the microarray data showed that there were 3 743 genes (4 074 probe sets) induced and 4 573 genes (5 043 probe sets) repressed in roots under water-stress. Generally, the down-regulated genes were greater in quantity than up-regulated genes. Among these differentially expressed genes, 1 593 and 2 238 genes (1 716 and 2 451 probe sets) were up- and down-regulated exceeding 2 folds, respectively. Through the sourcing annotations directly from Affymetrix website (www.affymetrix.com/analysis/) in tandem with BLASTX analyzing using the Affymetrix probe set sequences, 619 candidate genes were annotated. The functional classification of annotated genes were performed based on literature searches of the functional categories described in the MIPS database and the 619 annotated genes were classified into 10 functional categories, involving in metabolism, stress response, biogenesis of cellular components, protein synthesis, cellular communication, cellular transport, transcription, cell division, protein processing, and others. Thirty-two up- or down-regulated genes with over 16-fold change ratios were annotated. A half of them belonged to the stress response category, and another five were associated with metabolism. In addition, the differential expression patterns of eight representative candidate genes were confirmed by real-time quantitative RT-PCR and the results showed that the expression changes of these candidates were generally consistent with the microarray results detected by Affymetrix GeneChip.

Key words: Water stress, Luohan 2, Gene differential expression profile, Real-time quantitative RT-PCR, Gene chip

[1]Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Gene networks in-volved in drought stress response and tolerance. J Exp Bot, 2007, 58: 221-227
[2]Micheletto S, Rodriguez-Uribe L, Hernandez R, Richins R D, Curry J, O'Connell M A. Comparative transcript profiling in roots of Phaseolus acutifolius and P. vulgaris under water deficit stress. Plant Sci, 2007, 173: 510-520
[3]Wang Z(王转), Zang Q-W(臧庆伟), Guo Z-A(郭志爱), Jing R-L(景蕊莲). A preliminary study on gene expression profile induced by water stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seed-ling. Acta Genet Sin (农业生物技术学报), 2004, 31(8): 842-849 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]Pang X-B(庞晓斌), Mao X-G(毛新国), Jing R-L(景蕊莲), Shi J-F(施俊凤), Gao T(高婷), Chang X-P(昌小平), Li Y-F(李彦舫). Analiysis of gene expression profile responded to water stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedling. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(2): 333-336 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Xu Z-D(许州达), Jing R-L(景蕊莲), Gan Q(甘强), Zeng H-P(曾海攀), Sun X-H(孙学辉), Leung H, Lu T-G(路铁刚), Liu G-Z(刘国振). Drought-tolerant gene screening in wheat by using rice microarray. J Agric Biotechnol (农业生物技术学报), 2007, 15(5): 821-827 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]Ruepp A, Zollner A, Maier D, Albermann K, Hani J, Mokrejs M, Tetko I, Güldener U, Mannhaupt G, Münsterk?tter M, Mewes H W. The FunCat, a functional annotation scheme for systematic classification of proteins from whole genomes. Nucl Acids Res, 2004, 32: 5539-5545
[7]Li Y C, Meng F R, Yin J, Liu H Y, Si Z F, Ni Z F, Sun Q X, Ren J P, Niu H B. Isolation and comparative expression analysis of six MBD genes in wheat. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2008, 1779: 90-98
[8]Bray E A. Molecular responses to water deficit. Plant Physiol, 1993, 103: 1035-1040
[9]Zhu J K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2002, 53: 247-273
[10]Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Gene expression and signal transduction in water stress response. Plant Physiol, 1997, 115: 327-334
[11]Xiong L M, Schumaker K S, Zhu J K. Cell signal during cold, drought, and salt stress. Plant Cell, 2002, (suppl): S165-S183
[12]Wang Y-F(汪耀富), Yang T-X(杨天旭), Liu G-S(刘国顺), Zhao C-H(赵春华), Wang P(王佩), Chen X-J(陈新建). Dif-ferentially expressed genes in tobacco leaves under osmotic stress. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33 (6): 914-920 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]Hundertmark M, Hincha D K. LEA (late embryogenesis abundant) proteins and their encoding genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Genomics, 2008, 9: 118
[14]Xu D, Duan X, Wang B, Hong B, Ho T, Wu R. Expression of a late embryogenesis abundant protein gene, HVA1, from barley confers tolerance to water deficit and salt stress in transgenic rice. Plant Physiol, 1996, 110: 249-257
[15]Wang J-Y(王静英), Li Y-C(李永春), Wang X(王潇), Meng F-R(孟凡荣), Ren J-P(任江萍), Niu H-B(牛洪斌), Yin J(尹钧). Cloning and characterizing of TaLEA4 gene in wheat. J Triticease Crops (麦类作物学报), 2008, 28(2): 183-186 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]Ramachandra R A, Chaitanya K V, Vivekanandan M. Drought- induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabo-lism in higher plants. Plant Physiol, 2004, 161: 1189-1202
[17]Crismani W, Baumann U, Sutton T, Shirley N, Webster T, Spangenberg G, Langridge P, Able J A. Microarray expres-sion analysis of meiosis and microsporogenesis in hexaploid bread wheat. BMC Genomics, 2006, 7: 267
[1] 许静, 潘丽娟, 李昊远, 王通, 陈娜, 陈明娜, 王冕, 禹山林, 侯艳华, 迟晓元. 花生油脂合成相关基因的表达谱分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6): 1124-1137.
[2] 李乐晨,朱国忠,苏秀娟,郭旺珍. 适于海岛棉指纹图谱构建的SNP核心位点筛选与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(5): 647-655.
[3] 赵仁欣,李森业,郭瑞星,曾新华,文静,马朝芝,沈金雄,涂金星,傅廷栋,易斌. 利用SNP芯片构建我国冬油菜参试品种DNA指纹图谱[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(7): 956-965.
[4] DO Thanh-Trung,李健,张风娟,杨丽涛,李杨瑞,邢永秀. 甘蔗与抗旱性相关差异蛋白质组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(09): 1337-1346.
[5] 武炳瑾,简俊涛,张德强,马文洁,冯洁,崔紫霞,张传量,孙道杰*. 利用90k芯片技术进行小麦穗部性状QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(07): 1087-1095.
[6] 刘凯,邓志英,李青芳,张莹,孙彩铃,田纪春*,陈建省*. 利用高密度SNP 遗传图谱定位小麦穗部性状基因[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(06): 820-831.
[7] 叶德练,齐瑞娟,管大海,李建民,张明才,李召虎. 免耕冬小麦田土壤微生物特征和土壤酶活性对水分调控的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(08): 1212-1219.
[8] 李长宁,谢金兰,王维赞,梁强,李毅杰,董文斌,刘晓燕,杨丽涛,李杨瑞. 水分胁迫下甘蔗差异表达基因筛选及激素相关基因分析[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(07): 1127-1135.
[9] 金秀锋,王宪国,任万杰,张晓科,谢惠民,范锋贵. 一个水分胁迫应答蛋白与小麦抗旱性的关系及其基因的定位[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(02): 198-204.
[10] 王卫锋,杨晓青,张岁岐,山仑. 剪根与水分胁迫对小麦单根和细胞导水率及TaPIP基因表达的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(08): 1462-1468.
[11] 李余良,刘建华,郑锦荣,胡建广. 高温胁迫下甜玉米雌穗发育基因差异表达谱分析[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(02): 269-279.
[12] 张智猛，戴良香，宋文武，丁红，慈敦伟，康涛，宁堂原，万书波. 干旱处理迫对花生品种叶片保护酶活性和渗透物质含量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(01): 133-141.
[13] 闫贵欣，陈碧云，许鲲，高桂珍，吕培军，伍晓明，李锋，李俊. 不同施氮水平下甘蓝型油菜发育种子中基因表达谱差异分析[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(11): 2052-2060.
[14] 冯晓敏，张永清. 水分胁迫对糜子植株苗期生长和光合特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(08): 1513-1521.
[15] 张智猛, 戴良香, 丁红, 陈殿绪, 杨伟强, 宋文武, 万书波. 中国北方主栽花生品种抗旱性鉴定与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(03): 495-504.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2