欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 952-957.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00952

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

小麦籽粒淀粉分支酶同种型SBE IIb 的亚细胞定位及遗传多样性

赵法茂1，蔡瑞国2，毕建杰3，肖军1，王宪泽3,*   

  1. 1泰山学院生物系，山东泰安271021；2河北科技师范学院农学系，河北昌黎066600；3山东农业大学作物生物学国家重点实验室，山东泰安271018
  • 收稿日期:2008-09-07 修回日期:2009-02-17 出版日期:2009-05-12 网络出版日期:2009-03-23
  • 通讯作者: 王宪泽，E-mail:xzwang@sdau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家“十一五”科技支撑计划项目（2006BAD04B01），泰山学院引进人才项目（Y2008-2-6)资助。

Subcellular Localization and Genetic Polymorphism of Isoform of Starch Branching Enzyme（SBE IIb）in Wheat Grain

ZHAO Fa-Mao1,CAI Rui-Guo2,BI Jian-Jie3,XIAO Jun1,WANG Xian-Ze3*   

  1. 1Department of Biology，Taishan College，Tai'an 271021，China；2Agronomy Department，Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology，Changli 066600，China;3State Key Laboratory of Crop biology，Shandong Agricultural University，Tai'an 271018，China
  • Received:2008-09-07 Revised:2009-02-17 Published:2009-05-12 Published online:2009-03-23
  • Contact: WANG Xian-Ze，E-mail:xzwang@sdau.edu.cn

PDF

1858

被引次数

1

摘要：

以70个有代表性的小麦品种，采用SDS聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE)方法检测淀粉粒结合SBE IIb的品种间差异；并对SDS-PAGE凝胶中SBE IIb进行回收、复性和酶活性测定。结果表明，淀粉粒结合蛋白(SGP)中分子量为85 kD的SGP-2是与淀粉粒结合的SBE IIb，具有淀粉分支酶活性；SBE IIb从淀粉粒释放并去除SDS后活性立即恢复，其活性高峰出现在花后21 d左右；SBE IIb在小麦籽粒发育早期开始表达，不同发育时期表达量有差异，但其表达图谱在品种间没有差异，即编码SBE IIb的基因位点不具有品种的遗传多态性。

关键词: 小麦, 淀粉粒结合蛋白（SGP）, SBE IIb, 遗传多态性

Abstract:

To elucidate subcellular localization and genetic polymorphism of SBE IIb, the isoform of starch branching enzyme (SBE), in wheat grain and make insight into molecular mechanism of amylopectin biosynthesis. We identified the differences of SBE IIb among 70 wheat varieties using SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), recovered SBE IIb from polyacrylamide gel and determined its enzymatic activities. The expression levels of SBE IIb were examined during grain-filling period. The result indicated that starch granule-bound protein SGP-2, was granule-associated SBE IIb with molecular weight of 85 kD. It possessed SBE activity when SDS was removed by acetone precipitation, which reached the highest activity at the 21th day after anthesis. SBE IIb expressed at early developing stage of wheat grain and expression quantity exhibited differences in different developing periods. Notably, the expression profile of SBE IIb showed no differences among 70 varieties.

Key words: Wheat(Triticum aestivum L.), Starch granule-bound proteins(SGP), SBE IIb, Genetic polymorphism


[1] Baga M, Glaze S, Mallard C S, Chibbar R. A starch branching enzyme gene in wheat produces alternatively spliced transcripts. Plant Mol Biol, 1999, 40: 1019–1030

[2] Yao D-N(姚大年), Li B-Y(李保云), Zhu J-B(朱金宝), Liang R-Q(梁荣奇), Liu G-T(刘广田). Study on main starch properties and predictive indexes of noodle quality in common wheat. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1999, 32(6): 84–88(in Chinese with English abstract)

[3] McCormick K M, Panozzo J F, Hong S H. A swelling power test for selecting potential noodle quality wheats. Aust J Agric Res, 1991, 42: 317–323

[4] Mu-Forster C, Huang R, Powers J R, Harriman R W, Knight M, Singletary G W, Keeling P L, Wasserman B P. Physical association of starch biosynthetic enzymes with starch granules of maize endosperm. Plant Physiol, 1996, 111: 821–829

[5] Satoh H, Nishi A, Yamashita K, Takemoto Y, Tanaka Y, Hosaka Y, Sakurai A, Fujita N, Nakamura Y. Starch-branching enzyme I-deficient mutation specifically affects the structure and properties of starch in rice endosperm. Plant Physiol, 2003, 133: 1111–1121

[6] Guan H P, Preiss J. Differentiation of the properties of the branching isozymes from maize (Zea mays). Plant Physiol, 1993, 102: 1269–1273

[7] Morell M K, Blennow A, Hashemi B K, Samuel M S. Differential expression and properties of starch branching nzyme isoforms in developing wheat endosperm. Plant Physiol, 1997, 113: 201–208

[8] Regina A, Kosar H B, Li Z, Pedler A, Mukai Y, Yamamoto M, Gale K, Sharp P J, Morell M K, Rahman S. Starch branching enzyme IIb in wheat is expressed at low levels in the endosperm compared to other cereals and encoded at a non-syntenic locus. Planta, 2005, 222: 899–909

[9] Stinard P S, Robertson D S, Schnable P S. Genetic isolation, cloning and analysis of mutator-induced, dominant antimorph of maize amylose extenter 1 locus. Plant Cell, 1993, 5: 1555–1566

[10] Nishi A, Nakamura Y, Tanaka N, Satoh H. Biochemical and genetic effects of amylase-extender mutation in rice endosperm. Plant Physiol, 2001, 127: 459–472

[11] Tetlow I J, Wait R, Lu Z X, Akkasaeng R, Bowsher C G, Esposito S, Hashemi B K, Morell M K, Emes M J. Protein phosphorylation in amyloplasts regulates starch branching enzyme activity and protein-protein interactions. Plant Cell, 2004, 16: 694–708

[12] Nagamine T, Yoshida H, Komae K. Varietal differences and chromosome locations of multiple isoforms of starch branching enzyme in wheat endosperm. Phytochemistry, 1997, 46: 23–26

[13] Zhao F-M(赵法茂), Bi J-J(毕建杰), Li T-J(李天骄), Pang X-Y(逄孝云), Wang X-Z(王宪泽). Relationship between isozyme genotypes and activities of starch branching enzyme in wheat grain. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(11): 1850–1855 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14] Denyer K, Sidebottom C, Hylton C H, Smith A M. Soluble isoforms of starch synthase and starch-branching enzyme also occur within starch granules in developing pea embryos. Plant J, 1993, 4: 191–198

[15] Denyer K, Hylton C M, Jenner C F, Smith A M. Identification of multiple isoforms of soluble and granule-bound starch synthase in developing wheat endosperm. Planta, 1995, 196: 256–265

[16] Rahman S, Hashemi B K, Samuel M S, Hill A, Abbott D C, Skerritt J H, Preiss J, Appels R, Morell M K. The major proteins of wheat endosperm starch granules. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1995, 22: 793–803

[17] Laemmli U K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, 1970, 227: 680–685

[18] Yamamori M, Endo T R. Variation of starch granule proteins and chromosome mapping of their coding genes in common wheat. Theor Appl Genet, 1996, 93: 275–281

[19] Hager D A, Burgess R R. Elution of proteins from SDS-polyacrylamide gels, removal of SDS, and renaturation of enzymatic activity: Results with sigma subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase, wheat germ DNA topoisomerase, and other enzymes. Anal Biochem, 1980, 109: 76–86

[20] Dynan W S, Jendrisak JJ, Hager D A, Burgess R D. Purification and characterization of wheat germ DNA topoisomerase I (nicking-closing enzyme). J Biol Chem, 1981, 256: 5860–5865

[21] Li T-G(李太贵), Shen B(沈波), Chen N(陈能), Luo Y-K(罗玉坤). Effect of Q-enzymeon the chalkiness formation of rice grain. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1997, 23(3): 338–344 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[22] Takaoka M, Watanabe S, Sassa H, Yamamori M, Nakamura T, Sasakuma T, Hirano H. Structural characterization of high molecular weight starch granule-bound proteins in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Agric Food Chem, 1997, 45: 2929–2934

[23] Yamamori M, Fujita S, Hayakawa K, Matsuki J, Yasui T. Genetic elimination of a starch granule protein, SGP-1, of wheat generates an altered starch with apparent high amylose. Theor Appl Genet, 2000, 101: 21–29

[24] Baba T, Nishiara M, Mizuno K, Kawasaki T, Shimada H, Kobayashi E, Ohnishi S, Tanaka K, Arai Y. Identification, cDNA cloning, and gene expression of soluble starch synthase in rice (Oryza sativa L.) immature seeds. Plant Physiol, 1993, 103: 565–573

[25] Commuri P D, Keeling P G. Chain-length specificities of maize starch synthase I enzyme: studies of glucan affinity and catalytic properties. Plant J, 2001, 25: 475–486

[26] Regina A, Bird D, Topping D, Bowden S, Freeman J, Barsby T, Hashemi B K, Li Z, Rahman S, Morell M. High amylose wheat generated by RNA-interference improves indices of large bowel health in rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006, 103: 3546–3551
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2