作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (01): 105-111.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.00105
杨宇虹1,陈冬梅2,晋艳1,王海斌2,段玉琪1,郭徐魁2,何海斌2,林文雄2,*
YANG Yu-Hong1,CHEN Dong-Mei2,JI Yan1,WANG Hai-Bin2,DUAN Yu-Qi1,GUO Xu-Kui2,HE Hai-Bin2,LIN Wen-Xiong2,*
摘要: 烟草连作障碍是制约烟草产量与品质的关键因素。以连作12年的烟草土壤为对象,施用不同肥料, 调查施肥后的土壤对连作烟草作物的生长、土壤微生物功能多样性的影响及其对土壤化感自毒的调节作用。结果表明,烟草根际土壤化感自毒潜力以施用常规复合肥最大,施用农家肥最小。基于Biolog平板法的微生物功能多样性研究表明,施用常规复合肥利于氨基酸类、胺类物质为碳源的微生物生长;施用有机肥利于羧酸类物质为碳源的微生物生长;而施用农家肥则利于糖类、脂肪酸、酚酸类物质为碳源的微生物生长。土壤微生物利用单一碳源的主成分分析结果表明,与碳源利用相关的主成分1、主成分2可分别解释变量方差的74.37%和25.63%。在主成分分离中有主要贡献的是糖类、脂肪酸类、酚酸类碳源。相关性分析结果显示,烟草土壤的化感自毒潜力与以糖类和酚酸类物质为碳源的微生物AWCD值呈显著正相关,而与以脂肪酸类物质为碳源的微生物AWCD值呈显著负相关。此外,农家肥施用最利于微生物生长,有机肥次之,常规复合肥最差。
[1]Jin Y(晋艳), Yang Y-H(杨宇虹), Duan Y-Q(段玉琪), Kong G-H(孔光辉). Effect of rotational cropping and continuous cropping on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco. Southwest China J Agric Sci (西南农业学报), 2004, 17(S1): 267–271 (in Chinese with English abstract) [2]Freddy A. Common bean response to tillage intensity and weed control strategies. Cropping Syst, 2001, 93: 556–563 [3]Yu J Q. Autotoxic potential in vegetables crops. In: Narwal S S ed. Ailelopathy Update-Basic and Applied Aspects, 1999. pp 149–162 [4]Zhang X-L(张晓玲), Pan Z-G(潘振刚), Zhou X-F(周晓锋), Ni W-Z(倪吾钟). Continuous cropping obstacle and autotoxicity. Chin J Soil Sci (土壤通报), 2007, 38(4): 267–271(in Chinese with English abstract) [5]Wu F-Z(吴凤芝), Zhao F-Y(赵风艳), Gu S-Y(谷思玉). Effect of the continuous cultivating cucumber on the bio-chemical properties of soil in the plastic greenhouse. System Sci Comprehensive Studies Agric (农业系统科学与综合研究), 2002, 18(1): 20–22 (in Chinese with English abstract) [6]Pan M-Y(盘莫谊), Zhang Y-Z(张杨珠), Xiao N-Q(肖嫩群), Tan Z-J(谭周进). Effect of continuous cropping tobacco on the microbes and enzyme activities in dry land soil. World Sci-Tech R&D (世界科技研究与发展), 2008, 30(3): 295–297 (in Chinese with English abstract) [7]Chen D-M(陈冬梅), Ke W-H(柯文辉), Chen L-L(陈兰兰), Huang J-W(黄锦文), Wu W-X(吴文祥), Chen T(陈婷), Zhang Z-Y(张重义), Lin W-X(林文雄). Diversity of bacterial community in rhizosphere soils under effects of continuously planting burley tobacco. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2010, 21(7): 1751–1758 (in Chinese with English abstract) [8]Xue X-P(薛小平), Zhang Q(张琴), Chen Y(陈懿), Wang M-S(王茂胜), Pan W-J(潘文杰), Li J-X(李继新). Effects of fertilization and microorganism on growth of continuous cropping tobacco seedling. Acta Agric Jiangxi (江西农业学报), 2008, 20(9): 1–4 (in Chinese with English abstract) [9]Wang C(王超), Wu F(吴凡), Liu X-L(刘训理), Liu B(刘兵). Tobacco rhizosphere microorganism in different fertility of soil. Chin Tob Sci (中国烟草科学), 2005, (2): 12–14 (in Chinese with English abstract) [10]Guo H-H(郭汉华), Yi J-H(易建华), Jia Z-H(贾志红), Sun Z-J(孙在军), Li H-W(李挥文). Effect of fertilizaion on tobacco growth and microbe quantity in rhizosphere soil. Tob Sci Technol (烟草科技), 2004, (6): 40–42 (in Chinese with English abstract) [11]Wu J-F(吴建峰), Lin X-G(林业贵). Effect of soil microbes on plant growth. Soils (土壤), 2001, (1): 18–21 (in Chinese with English abstract) [12]Guo H-X(郭红祥), Liu W-Q(刘卫群), Jiang Z-S(姜占省). Effect of cake seed sesame fertilizer on soil microbe in root system of flue-cured tobacco. J Henan Agric Univ (河南农业大学学报), 2002, (4): 344–347 (in Chinese with English abstract) [13]Xia Z-Y(夏振远), Li Y-H(李云华), Yang S-J(杨数军). Effects of microbial fertilizer on flue-cured tobacco on field. Chin Tob Sci (中国烟草科学), 2002, (3): 28–30 (in Chinese with English abstract) [14]Lin R-Y(林瑞余), Rong H(戎红), Zhou J-J(周军建), Yu C-P(于翠平), Ye C-Y(叶陈英), Chen L-S(陈良生), Lin W-X(林文雄). Impact of rice seedling allelopathy on rhizospheric microbial populations and their functional diversities. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2007, 27(9): 3644–3654 (in Chinese with English abstract) [15]Tan X-M(谭秀梅), Wang H-T(王华田), Kong L-G(孔令刚), Wang Y-P(王延平). Accumulation of phenolic acids in soil of a continuous cropping Poplar plantation and their effects on soil microbes. J Shandong Univ (Nat Sci)(山东大学学报·理学版), 2008, 43(1): 14–19 (in Chinese with English abstract) [16]Zhang S-X(张淑香), Gao Z-Q(高子勤), Liu H-L(刘海玲). Continuous cropping obstacle and rhizospheric microecology: III. Soil phenolic acids and their biological effect. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2000, 11(5): 102–105 (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 谭雪莲, 郭天文, 胡新元, 张平良, 曾骏, 刘晓伟. 黄土高原旱作区马铃薯连作根际土壤微生物群落变化特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 682-694. |
[2] | 禹桃兵, 石琪晗, 年海, 连腾祥. 涝害对不同大豆品种根际微生物群落结构特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1690-1702. |
[3] | 岳丹丹, 韩贝, Abid Ullah, 张献龙, 杨细燕. 干旱条件下棉花根际真菌多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1806-1815. |
[4] | 戴良香, 徐扬, 张冠初, 史晓龙, 秦斐斐, 丁红, 张智猛. 花生根际土壤细菌群落多样性对盐胁迫的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1581-1592. |
[5] | 李鹏, 刘彻, 宋皓, 姚盼盼, 苏沛霖, 魏跃伟, 杨永霞, 李青常. 烟草非特异性脂质转移蛋白基因家族的鉴定与分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2184-2198. |
[6] | 张玮, 洪艳云, 刘登望, 张博文, 易图永, 李林. 施钙对酸性红壤花生根系内生细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(1): 116-124. |
[7] | 董庆园,马德清,杨学,刘勇,黄昌军,袁诚,方敦煌,于海芹,童治军,沈俊儒,许银莲,罗美中,李永平,曾建敏. 高抗黑胫病烤烟BAC文库的构建及分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6): 869-877. |
[8] | 罗俊,林兆里,李诗燕,阙友雄,张才芳,杨仔奇,姚坤存,冯景芳,陈建峰,张华. 不同土壤改良措施对机械压实酸化蔗地土壤理化性质及微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(4): 596-613. |
[9] | 衡友强,游西龙,王艳. 费尔干猪毛菜病程相关蛋白SfPR1a基因的异源表达增强了烟草对干旱、盐及叶斑病的抗性[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(4): 503-512. |
[10] | 陈杉彬, 孙思凡, 聂楠, 杜冰, 何绍贞, 刘庆昌, 翟红. 甘薯IbCAF1基因的克隆及耐盐性、抗旱性鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(12): 1862-1869. |
[11] | 马晓寒,张杰,张环纬,陈彪,温心怡,许自成. 通过外源MeJA抑制H2O2积累提高烟草的耐冷性[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(3): 411-418. |
[12] | 童治军,张谊寒,陈学军,曾建敏,方敦煌,肖炳光. 雪茄烟品种Beinhart1000-1赤星病抗性基因的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(3): 477-482. |
[13] | 李成江,李大肥,周桂夙,许龙,徐天养,赵正雄. 不同种类生物炭对植烟土壤微生物及根茎病害发生的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(2): 289-296. |
[14] | 谈欢,刘玉汇,李丽霞,王丽,李元铭,张俊莲. 马铃薯块茎花色素苷合成相关R2R3 MYB蛋白基因的克隆和功能 分析[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(7): 1021-1031. |
[15] | 王建伟,贺晓岚,李文旭,陈新宏. 小麦近缘属植物1-FFT基因的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(6): 814-823. |
|