作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (01): 105-111.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.00105
杨宇虹1,陈冬梅2,晋艳1,王海斌2,段玉琪1,郭徐魁2,何海斌2,林文雄2,*
YANG Yu-Hong1,CHEN Dong-Mei2,JI Yan1,WANG Hai-Bin2,DUAN Yu-Qi1,GUO Xu-Kui2,HE Hai-Bin2,LIN Wen-Xiong2,*
摘要: 烟草连作障碍是制约烟草产量与品质的关键因素。以连作12年的烟草土壤为对象,施用不同肥料, 调查施肥后的土壤对连作烟草作物的生长、土壤微生物功能多样性的影响及其对土壤化感自毒的调节作用。结果表明,烟草根际土壤化感自毒潜力以施用常规复合肥最大,施用农家肥最小。基于Biolog平板法的微生物功能多样性研究表明,施用常规复合肥利于氨基酸类、胺类物质为碳源的微生物生长;施用有机肥利于羧酸类物质为碳源的微生物生长;而施用农家肥则利于糖类、脂肪酸、酚酸类物质为碳源的微生物生长。土壤微生物利用单一碳源的主成分分析结果表明,与碳源利用相关的主成分1、主成分2可分别解释变量方差的74.37%和25.63%。在主成分分离中有主要贡献的是糖类、脂肪酸类、酚酸类碳源。相关性分析结果显示,烟草土壤的化感自毒潜力与以糖类和酚酸类物质为碳源的微生物AWCD值呈显著正相关,而与以脂肪酸类物质为碳源的微生物AWCD值呈显著负相关。此外,农家肥施用最利于微生物生长,有机肥次之,常规复合肥最差。
| [1]Jin Y(晋艳), Yang Y-H(杨宇虹), Duan Y-Q(段玉琪), Kong G-H(孔光辉). Effect of rotational cropping and continuous cropping on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco. Southwest China J Agric Sci (西南农业学报), 2004, 17(S1): 267–271 (in Chinese with English abstract) [2]Freddy A. Common bean response to tillage intensity and weed control strategies. Cropping Syst, 2001, 93: 556–563 [3]Yu J Q. Autotoxic potential in vegetables crops. In: Narwal S S ed. Ailelopathy Update-Basic and Applied Aspects, 1999. pp 149–162 [4]Zhang X-L(张晓玲), Pan Z-G(潘振刚), Zhou X-F(周晓锋), Ni W-Z(倪吾钟). Continuous cropping obstacle and autotoxicity. Chin J Soil Sci (土壤通报), 2007, 38(4): 267–271(in Chinese with English abstract) [5]Wu F-Z(吴凤芝), Zhao F-Y(赵风艳), Gu S-Y(谷思玉). Effect of the continuous cultivating cucumber on the bio-chemical properties of soil in the plastic greenhouse. System Sci Comprehensive Studies Agric (农业系统科学与综合研究), 2002, 18(1): 20–22 (in Chinese with English abstract) [6]Pan M-Y(盘莫谊), Zhang Y-Z(张杨珠), Xiao N-Q(肖嫩群), Tan Z-J(谭周进). Effect of continuous cropping tobacco on the microbes and enzyme activities in dry land soil. World Sci-Tech R&D (世界科技研究与发展), 2008, 30(3): 295–297 (in Chinese with English abstract) [7]Chen D-M(陈冬梅), Ke W-H(柯文辉), Chen L-L(陈兰兰), Huang J-W(黄锦文), Wu W-X(吴文祥), Chen T(陈婷), Zhang Z-Y(张重义), Lin W-X(林文雄). Diversity of bacterial community in rhizosphere soils under effects of continuously planting burley tobacco. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2010, 21(7): 1751–1758 (in Chinese with English abstract) [8]Xue X-P(薛小平), Zhang Q(张琴), Chen Y(陈懿), Wang M-S(王茂胜), Pan W-J(潘文杰), Li J-X(李继新). Effects of fertilization and microorganism on growth of continuous cropping tobacco seedling. Acta Agric Jiangxi (江西农业学报), 2008, 20(9): 1–4 (in Chinese with English abstract) [9]Wang C(王超), Wu F(吴凡), Liu X-L(刘训理), Liu B(刘兵). Tobacco rhizosphere microorganism in different fertility of soil. Chin Tob Sci (中国烟草科学), 2005, (2): 12–14 (in Chinese with English abstract) [10]Guo H-H(郭汉华), Yi J-H(易建华), Jia Z-H(贾志红), Sun Z-J(孙在军), Li H-W(李挥文). Effect of fertilizaion on tobacco growth and microbe quantity in rhizosphere soil. Tob Sci Technol (烟草科技), 2004, (6): 40–42 (in Chinese with English abstract) [11]Wu J-F(吴建峰), Lin X-G(林业贵). Effect of soil microbes on plant growth. Soils (土壤), 2001, (1): 18–21 (in Chinese with English abstract) [12]Guo H-X(郭红祥), Liu W-Q(刘卫群), Jiang Z-S(姜占省). Effect of cake seed sesame fertilizer on soil microbe in root system of flue-cured tobacco. J Henan Agric Univ (河南农业大学学报), 2002, (4): 344–347 (in Chinese with English abstract) [13]Xia Z-Y(夏振远), Li Y-H(李云华), Yang S-J(杨数军). Effects of microbial fertilizer on flue-cured tobacco on field. Chin Tob Sci (中国烟草科学), 2002, (3): 28–30 (in Chinese with English abstract) [14]Lin R-Y(林瑞余), Rong H(戎红), Zhou J-J(周军建), Yu C-P(于翠平), Ye C-Y(叶陈英), Chen L-S(陈良生), Lin W-X(林文雄). Impact of rice seedling allelopathy on rhizospheric microbial populations and their functional diversities. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2007, 27(9): 3644–3654 (in Chinese with English abstract) [15]Tan X-M(谭秀梅), Wang H-T(王华田), Kong L-G(孔令刚), Wang Y-P(王延平). Accumulation of phenolic acids in soil of a continuous cropping Poplar plantation and their effects on soil microbes. J Shandong Univ (Nat Sci)(山东大学学报·理学版), 2008, 43(1): 14–19 (in Chinese with English abstract) [16]Zhang S-X(张淑香), Gao Z-Q(高子勤), Liu H-L(刘海玲). Continuous cropping obstacle and rhizospheric microecology: III. Soil phenolic acids and their biological effect. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2000, 11(5): 102–105 (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 杨月, 张新新, 贺增辉, 李瑞东, 潘昱洁, 李嘉康, 杜薇, 徐大勇, 堵劲松. 基于高光谱成像的烟叶主要化学成分无损检测与可视化[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 922-935. |
| [2] | 詹戈锐, 余文, 李锋, 武明珠, 徐馨, 罗朝鹏, 巫升鑫, 杨军, 张智强, 王中. 烟草NtWRKY6基因响应ABA表达及其调控多酚合成的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 446-458. |
| [3] | 孔娜, 刘涛, 刘文婷, 陈刚, 文利超, 邓智超, 郭梅, 李伟, 郭永峰. 烟草NtCEP7基因克隆及其编码小肽在苗期抗旱中的作用分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 249-261. |
| [4] | 姬炫彤, 卞春松, 金黎平, 李森, 秦军红, 李广存. 不同耐旱型马铃薯根际微生物对干旱的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 165-177. |
| [5] | 吉白璐, 孙艺文, 刘万峰, 钱亚新, 蒋彩虹, 耿锐梅, 刘旦, 程立锐, 杨爱国, 黄立钰, 李晓旭, 蒲文宣, 高军平, 张强, 文柳璎. 烟草脂类合成关键基因NtLPAT的功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2527-2537. |
| [6] | 陈如雪, 孙丽芳, 张芯源, 牟海萌, 张永新, 袁丽雪, 彭仕乐, 王壮壮, 王永华. 秸秆还田与微生物菌剂配施对冬小麦旗叶碳氮代谢及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1901-1913. |
| [7] | 蒋雨洲, 王甲, 张宏媛, 冯文豪, 王鹏, 李玉义. 化肥配施有机物料对玉米田土壤细菌和真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1378-1388. |
| [8] | 黄梦欣, 庄灵玲, 程佩佩, 李秦, 徐建堂, 陶爱芬, 方平平, 祁建民, 张立武. 黄麻U6启动子克隆及其转录活性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1156-1165. |
| [9] | 庄玥茗, 宋毅, 陈航航, 陆志峰, 廖世鹏, 李小坤, 丛日环, 任涛, 鲁剑巍. 氮肥用量对油菜籽粒内生微生物及籽粒品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3357-3368. |
| [10] | 曾豫, 郭华春, 杨勇涛, 王玉龙, 何安乐, 王琼, 白磊, 李俊, 张锐. 马铃薯茎秆、叶片原位降解过程中的微生物群落演化规律[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3038-3051. |
| [11] | 陈佳伟, 林艳, 张明星, 周诗晶, 饶力群, 周池, 李鑫. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌YCH92对棉花根际土壤微生物群落及棉花产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2821-2835. |
| [12] | 钱玉平, 宿兵兵, 高吉星, 阮粉花, 李亚伟, 茅林春. 玉米大豆间作对喀斯特区土壤理化性质及微生物碳代谢特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 273-284. |
| [13] | 刘波, 池明, 曹梦琦, 唐达, 杨恒照, 张卫华, 薛聪. 过表达马铃薯StuPPO9基因对烟草抗旱能力的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2237-2247. |
| [14] | 郭春林, 林满红, 陈婷, 陈鸿飞, 林文芳, 林文雄. 根际微生物响应再生稻衰老的演变特征及其延效机制[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 2039-2052. |
| [15] | 孙美红, 王彩琴, 王蓉, 白文斌, 高振峰. Bacillus velezensis G-1·脂肽悬浮种衣剂的制备及其对高粱丝黑穗病菌的防侵染效果[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1467-1485. |
|
||