欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (05): 887-895.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00887

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同氮吸收效率品种油菜氮素营养特性的差异

曹兰芹1,2，伍晓明2，杨睿1，田阳阳1，陈鲜妮1，陈碧云2，李亚军1，高亚军1,3,*   

  1. 1 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院，陕西杨凌 712100；2 中国农业科学院油料作物研究所，湖北武汉 430062；3 农业部西北植物营养与农业环境重点实验室，陕西杨凌 712100
  • 收稿日期:2011-09-06 修回日期:2012-01-19 出版日期:2012-05-12 网络出版日期:2012-03-05
  • 通讯作者: 高亚军, E-mail: yajungao@nwsuaf.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由教育部“新世纪优秀人才支持计划”项目(NCET-08-0465)，西北农林科技大学“创新团队建设计划”(2010-1)和西北农林科技大学“青年学术骨干支持计划”(2007)项目资助。

Differences of Nitrogen Status between Different N-uptake-efficiency Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars

CAO Lan-Qin1,2,WU Xiao-Ming2,YANG Rui1,TIAN Yang-Yang1,CHEN Xian-Ni1,CHEN Bi-Yun2,LI Ya-Jun1,GAO Ya-Jun1,3,*   

  1. 1 College of Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; 2 Institute of Oil Crop Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430062, China; 3 Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and the Agri-environment in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling 712100, China
  • Received:2011-09-06 Revised:2012-01-19 Published:2012-05-12 Published online:2012-03-05
  • Contact: 高亚军, E-mail: yajungao@nwsuaf.edu.cn

PDF

1081

被引次数

26

摘要： 采用土培盆栽试验，在不同供氮水平下对50份甘蓝型油菜进行氮吸收效率筛选，并比较其不同品种的氮素营养特性。结果表明，油菜的氮素营养特性表现出一定的品种差异，其中根系氮累积量及其占总吸氮量的百分比变异系数最大，超过50%，而生长前期植株含氮量的变异系数最小。不论氮素供应水平高低，油菜氮高效品种的总吸氮量和各器官的氮素累积量均显著高于氮低效品种，其中根系氮素累积量的差异最大，而果荚氮素累积量的差异最小；氮高效品种根系中累积的氮素比例均显著高于氮低效品种，而果荚中累积的氮素比例均显著低于氮低效品种；氮高效品种营养生长阶段地上部的含氮量与氮低效品种的差异不显著，而地上部的氮素累积量显著高于氮低效品种；营养生长阶段功能叶片的SPAD值也显著高于氮低效品种。随着供氮水平的改变，氮高效品种各器官的含氮量、氮素累积量和氮素分配比例的变化幅度均显著高于氮低效品种。不同品种油菜氮素营养指标的显著差异为通过遗传改良途径培育作物新品种和提高作物氮肥利用效率提供了基础。

关键词: 油菜(Brassica napus L.), 氮吸收效率, 品种, 含氮量, 氮素累积量, SPAD

Abstract: A pot experiment was conducted to test nitrogen (N) uptake efficiency (NUE) of 50 rapeseed cultivars at two N application levels. The differences of N status indexes between high-nitrogen-efficiency-genotype (HNEG) and low-nitrogen-efficiency-genotype (LNEG) were analyzed. The results showed that N status varied dramatically among different genotypes. The greatest variance was found on N accumulation in root and ratio of N accumulation in root to total N uptake (>50%) while the least variance was found on N content of aboveground part of rapeseed during vegetative stage. At two N application levels, HNEG had significantly greater total N uptake and N accumulation in different parts of plant than LNEG. The maximum difference of N accumulation was found in root between HNEG and LNEG while the minimum difference of N accumulation was found in silique. The ratioof N accumulation in root to total N uptake for HNEG was higher than that for LNEG. The ratio of N accumulation in silique to total N uptake was higher for LNEG than for HNEG. During vegetative stage, no significant difference of N content of aboveground parts was found between HNEG and LNEG. However, HNEG had remarkable higher N accumulation in aboveground parts and higher SPAD value of leaves than LNEG. Changes of N supply level led to the greater changes of N content, N accumulation and the ratio of N accumulation in any part to total N uptake for HNEG than those for LNEG. Significant differences of nitrogen status between different rapeseed cultivars provide a basis to create new crop varieties for increase nitrogen use efficiency.

Key words: Rape seed, Nitrogen uptake efficiency, Cultivars, N content, N accumulation, SPAD

[1]Schjoerring J K, Bock J G H, Gammelwind L, Jensen C R, Mogensen V O. Nitrogen incorporation and remobilization in different shoot components of field-grown winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) as affected by rate of nitrogen application and irrigation. Plant Soil, 1995, 177: 255–264

[2]Wiesler F, Behrens T, Horst W J. The role of nitrogen-efficient cultivars in sustainable agriculture. Sci World J, 2001, 1(suppl-2): 61–69

[3]Malagoli P, Laine P, Rossato L, Ourry A. Dynamics of nitrogen uptake and mobilization in field-grown winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus) from stem extension to harvest. Ann Bot, 2005, 95: 853–861

[4]Hong J(洪娟). Screening of Nitrogen Efficient Germplasm and Preliminary Study on Its Physiological Mechanism in Rapeseed. MS Dissertation of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2007 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5]Song X-H(宋海星), Peng J-W(彭建伟), Liu Q(刘强), Rong X-M(荣湘民), Xie G-X(谢桂先), Zhang Z-H(张振华), Guan C-Y(官春云), Li H-S(李合松), Chen S-Y(陈社员). Nitrogen redistribution characteristics of oilseed rape varieties with different nitrogen physiological efficiency during later growing period. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2008, 41(6): 1858–1864 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6]Liu Q(刘强), Song H-X(宋海星), Rong X-M(荣湘民), Peng J-W(彭建伟), Xie G-X(谢桂先), Zhang Z-H(张振华). Studies on oilseed yield and nitrogen efficiency in different cultivars of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养肥料学报), 2009, 15(4): 898–903 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]Chen L-R(陈历儒), Wang J-Y(王继玥), Liao C-S(廖成松), Liu Q(刘强), Rong X-M(荣湘民), Peng J-W(彭建伟), Xie G-X(谢桂先), Song H-X(宋海星). Studies on the difference of nitrate uptake by seedlings of different oilseed rape varieties. Acta Agric Boreal-Occident Sin (西北农业学报), 2008, 17(5): 181–185, 228 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8]Liu Q(刘强), Song H-X(宋海星), Rong X-M(荣湘民), Peng J-W(彭建伟), Xie G-X(谢桂先). Differences in nitrogen use efficiency among different rape varieties and their physiological basis. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2008, 14(1): 113–119 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9]Liu D-P(刘代平). Comparative Studies on Characteristic of Nitrogen Uptake and Utilization and Differences of Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Different Oilseed Rape Cultivar. MS Dissertation of Hunan Agriculture University, 2006 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10]Song H-X(宋海星), Liu Q(刘强), Rong X-M(荣湘民), Peng J-W(彭建伟), Xie G-X(谢桂先), Guan C-Y(官春云), Chen S-Y(陈社员). Studies on nitrogen efficiency differences and its reason analysis in different oilseed rape cultivars. J Soil Water Conserv (水土保持学报), 2007, 21(5): 159–163 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11]Zhang Z-H(张振华). Studies on the relationship between the nitrogen distribution and the nitrogen physiological efficiency in oilseed rape. MS Dissertation of Hunan Agriculture University, 2007 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12]Kamh M, Wiesler F, Ulas A, Horst W J. Root growth and N-uptake activity of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) cultivars differing in nitrogen efficiency. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci, 2005, 168: 130–137

[13]Wiesler F, Behrens T, Horst W J. Nitrogen efficiency of contrasting rape ideotypes. In: Horst W J ed. Plant nutrition-food security and sustainability of agro-ecosystems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001. pp 60–61

[14]Ai T-C(艾天成), Zhou Z-A(周治安), Li F-M(李方敏), Li M(黎明). Rapid testing method for chlorophyll of wheat and other crops. Gansu Agric Sci Tech (甘肃农业科技), 2001, (4): 16–18 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15]Zhu Z-Y(朱哲燕), Bao Y-D(鲍一丹), Huang M(黄敏), Feng L(冯雷). Study of the relationship between the chlorophyll and the nitrogen content of oilseed rapes. J Zhejiang Univ (Agric & Life Sci) (浙江大学学报?农业与生命科学版), 2006, 32(2): 152–154 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16]Cao L-Q(曹兰芹), Wu X-M(伍晓明), Li Y-J(李亚军), Chen B-Y(陈碧云), Chen X-N(陈鲜妮), Tian Y-Y(田阳阳), Gao Y-J(高亚军). Relationships between genotypic differences of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) nitrogen uptake efficiency and economic characteristics. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2010, 32(2): 270–278 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17]Bao S-D(鲍士丹). The Soil and Agro-chemistry Analysis (土壤农化分析, 第3版), 3rd edn. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2000. pp 264–267 (in Chinese)

[18]Jackson W A, Pan W L, Moll R H, Kamprath E J. Uptake, translocation, and reduction of nitrate. In: Neyra C A ed. Biochemical Basis of Plant Breeding. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1986. pp 73–108

[19]Andersson A, Johansson E, Oscarson P. Nitrogen redistribution from the roots in post-anthesis plants of spring wheat. Plant Soil, 2005, 269: 321–332
[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[3] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[4] 闫岩, 张钰石, 刘础荣, 任丹阳, 刘洪润, 刘雪晴, 张明才, 李召虎. 冬小麦-夏玉米轮作“双晚”种植模式下的品种匹配与资源效率[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 423-436.
[5] 陈新宜, 宋宇航, 张孟寒, 李小艳, 李华, 汪月霞, 齐学礼. 干旱对不同品种小麦幼苗的生理生化胁迫以及外源5-氨基乙酰丙酸的缓解作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 478-487.
[6] 傅华英, 张婷, 彭文静, 段瑶瑶, 许哲昕, 林艺华, 高三基. 甘蔗新品种(系)苗期白条病人工接种抗性鉴定与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1531-1539.
[7] 习玲, 王昱琦, 朱微, 王益, 陈国跃, 蒲宗君, 周永红, 康厚扬. 78份四川小麦育成品种(系)条锈病抗性鉴定与抗条锈病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1309-1323.
[8] 董明辉, 陈培峰, 江贻, 曹鹏辉, 宋云生, 顾俊荣, 谢裕林, 乔中英, 张文地, 黄丽芬. 江苏太湖地区不同生育类型粳稻品种产量对不同播期气候因子的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 952-963.
[9] 许乃银, 赵素琴, 张芳, 付小琼, 杨晓妮, 乔银桃, 孙世贤. 基于GYT双标图对西北内陆棉区国审棉花品种的分类评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 660-671.
[10] 董玉新, 韦炳奇, 吴强, 张永平. 内蒙古平原灌区“春麦冬播”种植效应及品种适应性[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 481-493.
[11] 雷永, 王志慧, 淮东欣, 高华援, 晏立英, 李建国, 李威涛, 陈玉宁, 康彦平, 刘海龙, 王欣, 薛晓梦, 姜慧芳, 廖伯寿. 花生籽仁蔗糖含量近红外模型构建及在高糖品种培育中的应用[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 332-341.
[12] 张荣跃, 王晓燕, 杨昆, 单红丽, 仓晓燕, 李婕, 王长秘, 尹炯, 罗志明, 李文凤, 黄应昆. 甘蔗新品种及主栽品种对褐锈病抗性与Bru1基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 376-382.
[13] 刘少荣, 杨扬, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 康定明, 范亚明, 任洁, 江彬, 葛建镕, 成广雷, 王凤格. 基于农艺及品质性状与SSR标记的青贮玉米品种遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2362-2370.
[14] 吕国锋, 别同德, 王慧, 赵仁慧, 范金平, 张伯桥, 吴素兰, 王玲, 汪尊杰, 高德荣. 长江下游麦区新育成品种(系) 3种主要病害的抗性鉴定及抗病基因/ QTL的分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2335-2347.
[15] 仓晓燕, 夏红明, 李文凤, 王晓燕, 单红丽, 王长秘, 李婕, 张荣跃, 黄应昆. 甘蔗优良品种(系)对黑穗病的抗性评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2290-2296.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2