欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (05): 887-895.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00887

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同氮吸收效率品种油菜氮素营养特性的差异

曹兰芹1,2，伍晓明2，杨睿1，田阳阳1，陈鲜妮1，陈碧云2，李亚军1，高亚军1,3,*   

  1. 1 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院，陕西杨凌 712100；2 中国农业科学院油料作物研究所，湖北武汉 430062；3 农业部西北植物营养与农业环境重点实验室，陕西杨凌 712100
  • 收稿日期:2011-09-06 修回日期:2012-01-19 出版日期:2012-05-12 网络出版日期:2012-03-05
  • 通讯作者: 高亚军, E-mail: yajungao@nwsuaf.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由教育部“新世纪优秀人才支持计划”项目(NCET-08-0465)，西北农林科技大学“创新团队建设计划”(2010-1)和西北农林科技大学“青年学术骨干支持计划”(2007)项目资助。

Differences of Nitrogen Status between Different N-uptake-efficiency Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars

CAO Lan-Qin1,2,WU Xiao-Ming2,YANG Rui1,TIAN Yang-Yang1,CHEN Xian-Ni1,CHEN Bi-Yun2,LI Ya-Jun1,GAO Ya-Jun1,3,*   

  1. 1 College of Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; 2 Institute of Oil Crop Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430062, China; 3 Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and the Agri-environment in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling 712100, China
  • Received:2011-09-06 Revised:2012-01-19 Published:2012-05-12 Published online:2012-03-05
  • Contact: 高亚军, E-mail: yajungao@nwsuaf.edu.cn

PDF

1647

被引次数

26

摘要： 采用土培盆栽试验，在不同供氮水平下对50份甘蓝型油菜进行氮吸收效率筛选，并比较其不同品种的氮素营养特性。结果表明，油菜的氮素营养特性表现出一定的品种差异，其中根系氮累积量及其占总吸氮量的百分比变异系数最大，超过50%，而生长前期植株含氮量的变异系数最小。不论氮素供应水平高低，油菜氮高效品种的总吸氮量和各器官的氮素累积量均显著高于氮低效品种，其中根系氮素累积量的差异最大，而果荚氮素累积量的差异最小；氮高效品种根系中累积的氮素比例均显著高于氮低效品种，而果荚中累积的氮素比例均显著低于氮低效品种；氮高效品种营养生长阶段地上部的含氮量与氮低效品种的差异不显著，而地上部的氮素累积量显著高于氮低效品种；营养生长阶段功能叶片的SPAD值也显著高于氮低效品种。随着供氮水平的改变，氮高效品种各器官的含氮量、氮素累积量和氮素分配比例的变化幅度均显著高于氮低效品种。不同品种油菜氮素营养指标的显著差异为通过遗传改良途径培育作物新品种和提高作物氮肥利用效率提供了基础。

关键词: 油菜(Brassica napus L.), 氮吸收效率, 品种, 含氮量, 氮素累积量, SPAD

Abstract: A pot experiment was conducted to test nitrogen (N) uptake efficiency (NUE) of 50 rapeseed cultivars at two N application levels. The differences of N status indexes between high-nitrogen-efficiency-genotype (HNEG) and low-nitrogen-efficiency-genotype (LNEG) were analyzed. The results showed that N status varied dramatically among different genotypes. The greatest variance was found on N accumulation in root and ratio of N accumulation in root to total N uptake (>50%) while the least variance was found on N content of aboveground part of rapeseed during vegetative stage. At two N application levels, HNEG had significantly greater total N uptake and N accumulation in different parts of plant than LNEG. The maximum difference of N accumulation was found in root between HNEG and LNEG while the minimum difference of N accumulation was found in silique. The ratioof N accumulation in root to total N uptake for HNEG was higher than that for LNEG. The ratio of N accumulation in silique to total N uptake was higher for LNEG than for HNEG. During vegetative stage, no significant difference of N content of aboveground parts was found between HNEG and LNEG. However, HNEG had remarkable higher N accumulation in aboveground parts and higher SPAD value of leaves than LNEG. Changes of N supply level led to the greater changes of N content, N accumulation and the ratio of N accumulation in any part to total N uptake for HNEG than those for LNEG. Significant differences of nitrogen status between different rapeseed cultivars provide a basis to create new crop varieties for increase nitrogen use efficiency.

Key words: Rape seed, Nitrogen uptake efficiency, Cultivars, N content, N accumulation, SPAD

[1]Schjoerring J K, Bock J G H, Gammelwind L, Jensen C R, Mogensen V O. Nitrogen incorporation and remobilization in different shoot components of field-grown winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) as affected by rate of nitrogen application and irrigation. Plant Soil, 1995, 177: 255–264

[2]Wiesler F, Behrens T, Horst W J. The role of nitrogen-efficient cultivars in sustainable agriculture. Sci World J, 2001, 1(suppl-2): 61–69

[3]Malagoli P, Laine P, Rossato L, Ourry A. Dynamics of nitrogen uptake and mobilization in field-grown winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus) from stem extension to harvest. Ann Bot, 2005, 95: 853–861

[4]Hong J(洪娟). Screening of Nitrogen Efficient Germplasm and Preliminary Study on Its Physiological Mechanism in Rapeseed. MS Dissertation of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2007 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5]Song X-H(宋海星), Peng J-W(彭建伟), Liu Q(刘强), Rong X-M(荣湘民), Xie G-X(谢桂先), Zhang Z-H(张振华), Guan C-Y(官春云), Li H-S(李合松), Chen S-Y(陈社员). Nitrogen redistribution characteristics of oilseed rape varieties with different nitrogen physiological efficiency during later growing period. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2008, 41(6): 1858–1864 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6]Liu Q(刘强), Song H-X(宋海星), Rong X-M(荣湘民), Peng J-W(彭建伟), Xie G-X(谢桂先), Zhang Z-H(张振华). Studies on oilseed yield and nitrogen efficiency in different cultivars of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养肥料学报), 2009, 15(4): 898–903 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]Chen L-R(陈历儒), Wang J-Y(王继玥), Liao C-S(廖成松), Liu Q(刘强), Rong X-M(荣湘民), Peng J-W(彭建伟), Xie G-X(谢桂先), Song H-X(宋海星). Studies on the difference of nitrate uptake by seedlings of different oilseed rape varieties. Acta Agric Boreal-Occident Sin (西北农业学报), 2008, 17(5): 181–185, 228 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8]Liu Q(刘强), Song H-X(宋海星), Rong X-M(荣湘民), Peng J-W(彭建伟), Xie G-X(谢桂先). Differences in nitrogen use efficiency among different rape varieties and their physiological basis. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2008, 14(1): 113–119 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9]Liu D-P(刘代平). Comparative Studies on Characteristic of Nitrogen Uptake and Utilization and Differences of Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Different Oilseed Rape Cultivar. MS Dissertation of Hunan Agriculture University, 2006 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10]Song H-X(宋海星), Liu Q(刘强), Rong X-M(荣湘民), Peng J-W(彭建伟), Xie G-X(谢桂先), Guan C-Y(官春云), Chen S-Y(陈社员). Studies on nitrogen efficiency differences and its reason analysis in different oilseed rape cultivars. J Soil Water Conserv (水土保持学报), 2007, 21(5): 159–163 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11]Zhang Z-H(张振华). Studies on the relationship between the nitrogen distribution and the nitrogen physiological efficiency in oilseed rape. MS Dissertation of Hunan Agriculture University, 2007 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12]Kamh M, Wiesler F, Ulas A, Horst W J. Root growth and N-uptake activity of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) cultivars differing in nitrogen efficiency. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci, 2005, 168: 130–137

[13]Wiesler F, Behrens T, Horst W J. Nitrogen efficiency of contrasting rape ideotypes. In: Horst W J ed. Plant nutrition-food security and sustainability of agro-ecosystems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001. pp 60–61

[14]Ai T-C(艾天成), Zhou Z-A(周治安), Li F-M(李方敏), Li M(黎明). Rapid testing method for chlorophyll of wheat and other crops. Gansu Agric Sci Tech (甘肃农业科技), 2001, (4): 16–18 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15]Zhu Z-Y(朱哲燕), Bao Y-D(鲍一丹), Huang M(黄敏), Feng L(冯雷). Study of the relationship between the chlorophyll and the nitrogen content of oilseed rapes. J Zhejiang Univ (Agric & Life Sci) (浙江大学学报?农业与生命科学版), 2006, 32(2): 152–154 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16]Cao L-Q(曹兰芹), Wu X-M(伍晓明), Li Y-J(李亚军), Chen B-Y(陈碧云), Chen X-N(陈鲜妮), Tian Y-Y(田阳阳), Gao Y-J(高亚军). Relationships between genotypic differences of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) nitrogen uptake efficiency and economic characteristics. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2010, 32(2): 270–278 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17]Bao S-D(鲍士丹). The Soil and Agro-chemistry Analysis (土壤农化分析, 第3版), 3rd edn. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2000. pp 264–267 (in Chinese)

[18]Jackson W A, Pan W L, Moll R H, Kamprath E J. Uptake, translocation, and reduction of nitrate. In: Neyra C A ed. Biochemical Basis of Plant Breeding. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1986. pp 73–108

[19]Andersson A, Johansson E, Oscarson P. Nitrogen redistribution from the roots in post-anthesis plants of spring wheat. Plant Soil, 2005, 269: 321–332
[1] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[2] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[3] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
[4] 于天一, 王春晓, 肖丽, 钟召迪, 王宣仓, 赵勇, 路亚, 吴月, 吴正锋. 不同结瘤特性花生品种氮素累积、产量及品质特性对氮肥用量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 881-894.
[5] 亓青松, 牛翔雨, 刘冰可, 康禄, 王琛, 封德顺. 小偃麦辐射诱变种质芽期和苗期耐盐鉴定、筛选及耐盐指标评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 389-404.
[6] 迟晓元, 刘庆, 张君, 赵旭红, 李美, 于天一, 潘丽娟, 许静, 姜骁, 殷祥贞, 马俊卿, 陈娜. 不同花生品种(系)耐盐碱性田间鉴定及各性状指标相关性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 85-98.
[7] 尹丽娜, 张锐, 陈国欢, 白磊, 李俊, 郭华春, 杨芳. 不同马铃薯品种块茎创伤愈合能力的比较[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2399-2411.
[8] 吴柳格, 陈坚, 张鑫, 邓艾兴, 宋振伟, 郑成岩, 张卫建. 近二十年国审冬小麦品种的产量与品质性状变化趋势研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1814-1826.
[9] 王天译, 杨绣娟, 赵佳佳, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 李晓华, 郝水源, 郑军. 山西小麦醇溶蛋白多样性及其对面粉品质效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1784-1800.
[10] 吕国锋, 范金平, 吴素兰, 张晓, 赵仁慧, 李曼, 王玲, 高德荣, 别同德, 刘健. 早熟小麦品种扬麦37主要目标性状的遗传构成分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1538-1547.
[11] 周科, 陈鹏飞. 耦合多源无人机遥感数据和机器学习方法的玉米SPAD估测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1389-1399.
[12] 晋高锐, 吴小丽, 邓丽, 陈玉宁, 喻博伦, 郭建斌, 丁膺宾, 刘念, 罗怀勇, 陈伟刚, 黄莉, 周小静, 淮东欣, 谭家壮, 姜慧芳, 任丽, 雷永, 廖伯寿. 兼抗黄曲霉侵染和产毒高油酸花生新种质的创制与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 687-895.
[13] 侯天钰, 杜孝敬, 赵志强, 热依木·艾尼瓦尔, 伊达耶图拉·阿不拉, 布哈丽且木·阿不力孜, 袁杰, 张燕红, 王奉斌. 粳稻品种芽期耐冷性评价及耐冷种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 812-822.
[14] 杨芳萍, 郭莹, 田媛媛, 徐玉凤, 王兰兰, 白斌, 展宗冰, 张雪婷, 徐银萍, 刘金栋. 甘肃省小麦地方品种春化光周期基因效应及抗寒性评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 370-382.
[15] 徐晓伟, 冯晶, 王凤涛, 童朝阳, 张建周, 李春盈, 蔺瑞明. 小麦地方品种蚕老麦成株抗条锈病QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2933-2943.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2