欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (11): 2131-2137.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.02131

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    

我国不同麦区小麦品种的面粉溶剂保持力

张勇1,2，金艳1，张伯桥2，张晓2，徐亮1，徐扬1，程顺和2,*，徐辰武1,*   

  1. 1扬州大学农学院, 江苏扬州225007; 2江苏里下河地区农业科学研究所 / 农业部长江中下游小麦生物学与遗传育种重点实验室, 江苏扬州225007
  • 收稿日期:2011-12-28 修回日期:2012-06-30 出版日期:2012-11-12 网络出版日期:2012-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 程顺和, E-mail: yzcsh1939@126.com; 徐辰武, E-mail: qtls@yzu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK2011429), 国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-3-1-1)和国家“十二五”科技支撑计划项目(2011BAD35B03-3)资助。

Solvent Retention Capacities of Varieties from Different Wheat Regions in China

ZHANG Yong1,2,JIN Yan1,ZHANG Bo-Qiao2,ZHANG Xiao2,XU Liang1,XU Yang1,CHENG Shun-He2,*,XU Chen-Wu1,*   

  1. 1Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225007, China; 2 Lixiahe Region Institute of Agricultural Sciences of Jiangsu Province / Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement in Middle and Lower Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangzhou 225007, China
  • Received:2011-12-28 Revised:2012-06-30 Published:2012-11-12 Published online:2012-09-10
  • Contact: 程顺和, E-mail: yzcsh1939@126.com; 徐辰武, E-mail: qtls@yzu.edu.cn

PDF

1204

被引次数

7

摘要：

溶剂保持力(SRC)是评价软麦品质的一项重要指标。为了解我国不同麦区小麦品种溶剂保持力的差异, 2008—2009和2009—2010生长季测定了181个小麦品种的4种溶剂保持力, 并分析其遗传变异及不同麦区品种SRC特点。结果表明, 4种SRC值在品种、年度和麦区间均差异显著 (P<0.01或P<0.05), 此外, 年份´品种和年份´麦区的互作效应也达显著水平(P<0.01)。主成分分析表明, 仅主成分1的特征值大于1.0, 其对方差的解释率为72.3%；根据主成分综合得分对供试品种聚类, 结果显示各麦区品种SRC值变异明显, 存在不同SRC类型的品种资源, 低SRC品种在长江中下游麦区相对较多, 而中、高SRC品种多分布于黄淮麦区。筛选出阿勃、法展5号、淮麦17、宁麦3号、宁麦6号、皖麦48、选7、扬麦13、扬麦17、郑麦004等低SRC品种, 可用于弱筋小麦品种选育和品质改良。

关键词: 麦区, 小麦, 面粉, 溶剂保持力

Abstract:

Solvent retention capacity (SRC) is an important index for predicting flour functionality in soft wheat, which includes water SRC, 50% lactic acid SRC, 5% sodium carbonate SRC, and 50% sucrose SRC. To understand the SRCcharacter of wheat varieties in China, We measured four types of SRC in 181 varieties from different wheat regions in 2008–2009 and 2009–2010 growing seasons. According to analysis of variance, all types of SRC were significantly influenced by genotype, year, and wheat region (P < 0.01 or 0.05). Besides, the interactions of genotype ´ year and year ´ wheat region were also significant (P < 0.01). The principal component analysis showed that component 1 had initial eigenvalue higher than 1.0, and explained 72.3% of total SRC variance. The result of clustering based on principal score showed that there was obvious variation of SRC among the 181 varieties, and each wheat region contained varieties with different SRC characteristics. The Middle and Low Yangtze Valleys Autumn-Sown Spring Wheat Zone had more genetic resources with low SRC than other wheat regions, and varieties with medium and high SRC were mostly distributed in the Yellow and Huai River Valleys Facultative Wheat Zone. A few varieties with low SRC were selected, including Abbondanza, Fazhang 5, Huaimai 17, Ningmai 3, Ningmai 6, Wanmai 48, Xuan 7, Yangmai 13, Yangmai 17, and Zhengmai 004, which can be used in breeding and quality improvement of weak-strength wheat.

Key words: Wheat region, Wheat, Flour, Solvent retention capacity

[1]Slade L, Levine H. Structure-function relationships of cookie and cracker ingredients. Cereal Chem, 1994, 8l: 261–266



[2]AACC. Approved Methods of the AACC, 10th Edn. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, MN, 2000



[3]Gaines C S. Collaborative study of methods for solvent retention capacity profiles. Cereal Food World, 2000, 45: 303–306



[4]Guttieri M J, Souza E. Sources of variation in the solvent retention capacity test of wheat flour. Crop Sci, 2003, 43: l628–l633



[5]Kweon M, Slade L, Levine H. Solvent retention capacity (SRC) testing of wheat flour: principles and value in predicting flour functionality in different wheat-based food processes, as well as in wheat breeding: a review. Cereal Chem, 2011, 88: 537–552



[6]Zhang Q-J(张岐军), Zhang Y(张艳), He Z-H(何中虎), Pena R J. Relationship between soft wheat quality traits and cookie quality parameter. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(9): 1125–1131 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]Ram S, Dawar V, Singh R P, Shoran J. Application of solvent retention capacity tests for the prediction of mixing properties of wheat flour. J Cereal Sci, 2005, 42: 261–266



[8]Walker C, Garland-Campbell K, Carter B, Kidwell K. Using the solvent retention capacity test when breeding wheat for diverse production environments. Crop Sci, 2008, 48: 495–506



[9]Zhang Q-J(张岐军), He Z-H(何中虎), Yan J(阎俊), Qian S-H(钱森和). Application of solvent retention capacity in soft wheat quality evaluation. J Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 2004, 24(4): 140–142 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]Yao J-B(姚金保), Souza E, Ma H-X(马鸿翔), Zhang P-P(张平平), Yao G-C(姚国才), Yang X-M(杨学明), Ren L-J(任丽娟), Zhang P(张鹏). Relationship between quality traits of soft red winter wheat and cookie diameter. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(4): 695–700 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]Xia Y-X(夏云祥), Ma C-X(马传喜), Si H-Q(司红起) , Qiao Y-Q(乔玉强), He X-F(何贤芳). Effects of genotype, environment and genotype × environment interaction on solvent retention capacity in common wheat. J Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 2008, 28(3): 448–451 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]Zhang P-P(张平平), Yao J-B(姚金保), Ma H-X(马鸿翔). Genetic analysis of solvent retention capacity in wheat. Jiangsu J Agric Sci (江苏农业学报), 2010, 26(6): 1170–1175 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]Xia Y-X(夏云祥), Ma C-X(马传喜), Si H-Q(司红起). Properties of solvent retention capacity in micro-core collections from Chinese wheat varieties. J Anhui Agric Univ (安徽农业大学学报), 2008, 35(3): 336–339 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]Xia Y-X(夏云祥), Ma C-X(马传喜), Si H-Q(司红起). Differences of solvent retention capacities (SRC)in wheat varieties and selection of wheat germplasm with low SRC. Jiangsu J Agric Sci (江苏农业学报), 2008, 24(6): 780–784 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]Qian S-H(钱森和), Zhang Y(张艳), Wang D-S(王德森), He Z-H(何中虎), Zhang Q-J(张岐军), Yao D-N(姚大年). Variation of pentosans and solvent retention capacities in wheat genotypes and their relationship with processing quality. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(7): 902–907 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]Bettge A D, Morris C F, Demacon V L, Kidwell K K. Adaptation of AACC method 56-l1, Solvent Retention Capacity, for use as an early generation selection for cultivar development. Cereal Chem, 2002, 79: 670–674



[17]He Z-H(何中虎), Lin Z-J(林作楫), Wang L-J(王龙俊), Xiao Z-M(肖志敏), Wan F-S(万富世), Zhuang Q-S(庄巧生). Classification on Chinese wheat regions based on quality. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2002, 35(3): 359–364 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]Yao J-B(姚金保), Ma H-X(马鸿翔), Zhang P-P(张平平), Yao G-C(姚国才), Yang X-M(杨学明), Zhang P(张鹏). Progress on soft wheat quality research in China. Jiangsu J Agric Sci (江苏农业学报), 2009, 25(4): 919–924 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[19]Gao M(高梅), Zhang G-Q(张国权), Ni F-Y(倪芳妍), Luo Q-G(罗勤贵), Wei Y-M(魏益民), Zhang J-S(张继澍). The relationship between micro-SRC value and wheat quality. J Northwest A&F Univ (Nat Sci Edn) (西北农业大学学报•自然科学版), 2006, 34(12): 87–91 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]Z hou M-P(周淼平), Wu H-Y(吴宏亚), Yu G-H(余桂红), Zhang X(张旭), Ma H-X(马鸿翔). Microdetermination of solvent retention capacity in wheat. Jiangsu J Agric Sci (江苏农业学报), 2007, 23(4): 270–275 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[21]Xia Y-X(夏云祥), Qiao Y-Q(乔玉强), Si H-Q(司红起), Chang-C(常成), Ma C-X(马传喜). Relationship on solvent retention capacity with kernel hardness and protein content of wheat whole meal. J Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 2009, 29(3): 429–432 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[22]Li B-B(李蓓蓓), Wang F-C(王凤成), Qi B-J(齐兵建), Zhang Z-X(张正骁), Wang Q-H(王庆荟). Study on the solvent retention capacity traits of wheat flour for crisp biscuit. Cereal Feed Ind (粮食与饲料工业), 2011, (9): 36–39 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2