欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (01): 29-33.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00029

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

圆锥小麦四排穗性状基因的遗传及分子标记分析

张瑞奇，王秀娥，陈佩度*   

  1. 南京农业大学 / 作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室 / 细胞遗传研究所，江苏南京 210095
  • 收稿日期:2012-05-29 修回日期:2012-08-15 出版日期:2013-01-12 网络出版日期:2012-10-08
  • 通讯作者: 陈佩度, E-mail: pdchen@njau.edu.cn; Tel: 025-84396026
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由南京农业大学青年科技创新基金项目(KJ2011002)资助。

Inheritance and Mapping of Gene Controlling Four-Rowed Spike in Tetraploid Wheat (Triticum turgidum L.)

ZHANG Rui-Qi,WANG Xiu-E,CHEN Pei-Du*   

  1. National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Cytogenetics Institute, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
  • Received:2012-05-29 Revised:2012-08-15 Published:2013-01-12 Published online:2012-10-08
  • Contact: 陈佩度, E-mail: pdchen@njau.edu.cn; Tel: 025-84396026

RichHTML

PDF

1965

被引次数

5

摘要：

四排穗(four-rowed spike, FRS)性状是超数小穗(supernumerary spikelets, SS)性状的一种类型，表现为在一个穗轴节片上近垂直地着生2个无柄小穗，从而增加了小穗数和穗粒数，对提高产量有一定的潜力。为了解圆锥小麦0880 FRS性状的遗传特征，将0880与正常穗(normal spike, NS)圆锥小麦0879杂交，构建了遗传群体，并对0880 (FRS) × 0879 (NS)与0879 (NS) × 0880 (FRS) F1、F2及F2:3植株的穗部性状进行了调查。结果显示，正反交组合的F1植株均表现为正常穗，F2群体中正常穗与四排穗符合3∶1的分离比例，表明0880的四排穗性状由隐性单基因控制，将该基因定名为frs1；细胞质对frs1无显著影响。采用已定位于普通小麦A组与B组的SSR分子标记并结合混合分组分析法(BSA), 筛选出32个在双亲及F2单株构建的四排穗型池和正常穗型池都具有多态性的SSR分子标记，利用JoinMap4.0软件构建了与frs1连锁的2A染色体11个SSR分子标记遗传图谱，其中SSR标记Xwmc598和Xwmc522位于frs1基因两侧，与该基因的遗传距离分别为4.0 cM和2.4 cM。利用2A染色体缺失系对这11个SSR进行物理定位，Xwmc598和Xwmc522均被定位在2A染色体短臂FL0.00~0.78区域。本研究的结果为frs1基因的精细定位及分子标记辅助选择奠定了基础。

关键词: 圆锥小麦, 超数小穗, 四排穗, 基因定位

Abstract:

In hexaploid wheat and tetraploid wheat the spike normally bears one spikelet per rachis node, and the appearance of supernumerary spikelets is rare. The morphological character of four-rowed spikes (FRS) is one type of the supernumerary spikelets traits, presenting as two spikelets per rachis node. Thus, the grain yield of FRS plants can be enhanced because the numbers of spikelets and seeds of FRS are increased. To understand the genetic basis of FRS trait, the tetraploid FRS cultivar 0880 was crossed reciprocally to normal-spike (NS) cultivar 0879. The phenotypic evaluation of F1, F2, and F2:3 generations was conducted under greenhouse condition. The results indicated that all F1 plants of the reciprocal crosses showed normal spike, indicating that the FRS trait was recessive to normal spike. In the reciprocal F2 populations, the ratios of normal spike to four-rowed spike were 3:1 according to Chi-square test. This indicates that FRS trait is controlled by a recessive allele without cytoplasm effect, and the data from reciprocal crosses could be pooled. This single recessive allele of the FRS trait was designated frs1. A total of 600 SSR markers located on A and B genomes of common wheat were used to amplify the 0880, 0879, four-rowed pool, and normal-spike pool. Among them, 32 SSR markers showed polymorphism between the four-rowed-spike pool and the normal-spike pool. Eleven markers were identified to be linked with the frs1 locus in a genetic map of chromosome 2A. Markers Xwmc598 and Xwmc522 were located on both sides of frs1 with genetic distances of 4.0 cM and 2.4 cM, respectively. The placement of flanking microsatellite loci into chromosome deletion bin 2AS5 (FL 0.00–0.78) delimited the physical location of frs1 to this region. This map provides a basis for fine mapping of frs1 and marker-assisted selection of FRS trait.

Key words: T. turgidum, Four-rowed spike, Supernumerary spikelet, Genetic mapping

[1]Yang X-Q(杨先泉)，Ren Z-L(任正隆). Discussion on classification and inheritance of multispikelet wheat resources. Southwest China J Agric Sci(西南农业学报), 1999, 12(2): 112–119 (in English with Chinese abstract)



[2]Gallavotti A, Zhao Q, Kyozuka J, Meeley R B, Ritter M K, Doebley J F, Pe M E, Schmidt R J. The role of barren stalk1 in the architecture of maize. Nature, 2004, 432: 630–635



[3]Komatsu K, Maekawa M, Ujiie S, Satake Y, Furutani I, Okamoto H, Shimamoto K, Kyozuka J. LAX and SPA: major regulators of shoot branching in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003, 100: 11765–11770



[4]Chuck G, Muszynski M, Kellogg E, Hake S, Schmidt R J. The control of spikelet meristem identity by the branched silkless1 gene in maize. Science, 2002, 298: 1238–1241



[5]Komatsu M, Chujo A, Nagato Y, Shimamoto K, Kyozuka J. FRIZZY PANICLE is required to prevent the formation of axillary meristems and to establish Xoral meristem identity in rice spikelets. Development, 2003, 130: 3841–3850



[6]Chuck G, Meeley R B, Hake S. The control of maize spikelet meristem fate by the APETALA2-like gene indeterminate spikelet1. Gene Dev, 1998, 12: 1145–1154



[7]Dobrovolskaya O, Martinek P, Voylokov A V, Korzun V, Roeder M S, Boerner A. Microsatellite mapping of genes that determine supernumerary spikelets in wheat (T. aestivum) and rye (S. cereale). Theor Appl Genet, 2009, 119: 867–874



[8]Peng Z S, Yen C, Yang J L. Chromosomal location of genes for supernumerary spikelet in bread wheat. Euphytica, 1998, 103: 109–114



[9]Pennell A L, Halloran G M. Inheritance of supernumerary spikelets in wheat. Euphytica, 1983, 32: 767–776



[10]Klindworth D L, Williams N D, Joppa L R. Chromosomal location of genes for supernumerary spikelets in tetraploid wheat. Genome, 1990, 33: 515–520



[11]Sears E R. The aneuploids of common wheat. University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo, 1954. pp 3–58



[12]Endo T R, Gill B S. The deletion stocks of common wheat. J Hered, 1996, 87: 295–307



[13]Saghai-Maroof M A, Soliman K M, Jorgensen R A, Allard R W. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1984, 81: 8014–8018



[14]Somers D J, Isaac P, Edwards K. A high-density wheat microsatellite consensus map for bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 109: 1105–1114



[15]Klindworth D L, Williams N D, Joppa L R. Inheritance of supernumerary spikelets in a tetraploid wheat cross. Genome, 1990, 33: 509–514



[16]Yan X-H(闫晓华). Chromosome location of genes for ramified spikelet in bread wheat and the cloning gene of ramosa2. MS Thesis of Northwest Sci-Tech University, 2007 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]Rossini L, Vecchietti A, Nicoloso L, Stein N, Franzago S, Salamini F, Pozzi C. Candidate genes for barley mutants involved in plant architecture: an in silico approach. Theor Appl Genet, 2006, 112: 1073–1085
[1] 李世鹏, 陈才武, 张晶, 吕恬, 傅廷栋, 易斌. 基于改进U-Net++模型的油菜pol TCMS温敏两系育性等级鉴定及温度育性关系的量化研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1423-1434.
[2] 杨思杰, 杜启迪, 柴守玺, 熊宏春, 谢永盾, 赵林姝, 古佳玉, 郭会君, 刘录祥. 小麦小旗叶突变性状基因定位与遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1548-1557.
[3] 袁鑫, 赵卓凡, 赵瑞清, 刘孝伟, 郑名敏, 刘育生, 董好胜, 邓丽娟, 曹墨菊, 黄强. 一份玉米小籽粒发育突变体mn-like1的遗传分析与分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1569-1581.
[4] 苏帅, 刘孝伟, 牛群凯, 时子文, 侯雨微, 冯开洁, 荣廷昭, 曹墨菊. 玉米多叶矮化突变体lyd1的鉴定与基因克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1124-1135.
[5] 余瑶, 王紫瑶, 周思睿, 刘鹏程, 叶亚峰, 马伯军, 刘斌美, 陈析丰. 水稻类病变突变体lms1的表型鉴定与抗病分子机制分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 857-870.
[6] 杨晨曦, 周文期, 周香艳, 刘忠祥, 周玉乾, 刘芥杉, 杨彦忠, 何海军, 王晓娟, 连晓荣, 李永生. 控制玉米株高基因PHR1的基因克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 55-66.
[7] 唐杰, 龙湍, 吴春瑜, 李新鹏, 曾翔, 吴永忠, 黄培劲. 水稻OsGMS2基因的鉴定及其核不育系种子繁殖体系构建[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2025-2038.
[8] 王兴荣, 张彦军, 涂奇奇, 龚佃明, 邱法展. 一个新的玉米细胞核雄性不育突变体ms6的鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2077-2087.
[9] 林孝欣, 黄明江, 韦祎, 朱洪慧, 王子怡, 李忠成, 庄慧, 李彦羲, 李云峰, 陈锐. 水稻籽粒伸长突变体lgdp的鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1699-1707.
[10] 戴文慧, 朱琪, 张小芳, 吕沈阳, 项显波, 马涛, 陈宇杰, 朱世华, 丁沃娜. 一个水稻脆秆突变体bc21的鉴定和基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1426-1431.
[11] 严昕, 项超, 刘荣, 李冠, 李孟伟, 李正丽, 宗绪晓, 杨涛. 基于BSA-seq技术对豌豆花色基因的精细定位[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(4): 1006-1015.
[12] 李秋平, 张春龙, 杨宏, 王拓, 李娟, 金寿林, 黄大军, 李丹丹, 文建成. 水稻半育突变体sfp10的生理特征分析及基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(3): 634-646.
[13] 曹枭雄, 刘伊凡, 周玉强, 王婧, 吴宇锦, 王红武, 李坤, 刘小刚, 黄长玲, 刘志芳, 郭晋杰, 胡小娇. 一个玉米ZmMs7复等位基因突变体的遗传分析与分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(11): 2913-2922.
[14] 委刚, 陈单阳, 任德勇, 杨宏霞, 伍靖雯, 冯萍, 王楠. 水稻细长秆突变体sr10的鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(8): 2125-2133.
[15] 杜启迪, 郭会君, 熊宏春, 谢永盾, 赵林姝, 古佳玉, 赵世荣, 丁玉萍, 宋希云, 刘录祥. 小麦顶端小穗退化突变体asd1基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(8): 1905-1913.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2