欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 1856-1863.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01856

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

反义Trxs基因导入对弱筋小麦豫麦18淀粉积累及淀粉合成关键酶表达的影响

任江萍,王亚英,王新国,王娜,陈新,孟晓丹,李永春,尹钧*   

  1. 河南农业大学 / 国家小麦工程技术研究中心, 河南郑州 450002
  • 收稿日期:2013-01-04 修回日期:2013-05-25 出版日期:2013-10-12 网络出版日期:2013-08-01
  • 通讯作者: 尹钧, E-mail: xmzxyj@126.com, Tel: 0371-63558203
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(30771332和30971771)资助。

Effects of Antisense Thioredoxin s on Starch Accumulation and Expressions of Enzymes Related to Starch Synthesis in Weak-gluten Wheat Cultivar Yumai 18

REN Jiang-Ping,WANG Ya-Ying,WANG Xin-Guo,WANG Na,CHEN Xin,MENG Xiao-Dan,LI Yong-Chun,YIN Jun*   

  1. Henan Agricultural University / National Engineering Research Centre for Wheat, Zhengzhou 450002, China
  • Received:2013-01-04 Revised:2013-05-25 Published:2013-10-12 Published online:2013-08-01
  • Contact: 尹钧, E-mail: xmzxyj@126.com, Tel: 0371-63558203

摘要:

以转反义硫氧还蛋白基因小麦TY18-99和TY18-100及其相应未转基因对照为材料,于2007—2009年通过盆栽试验系统研究了反义Trxs基因(anti-Trxs)导入对弱筋小麦豫麦18籽粒灌浆过程中淀粉积累、淀粉合成关键酶活性以及淀粉合成酶基因表达的影响。结果表明,反义Trxs基因对小麦籽粒淀粉积累有一定的正效应。2个转基因株系的总淀粉和支链淀粉的积累速率较对照显著提高;在整个籽粒形成过程中,反义Trxs基因导入显著提高了淀粉分支酶(SBE)活性。在籽粒灌浆中期和后期,反义Trxs基因导入显著提高了腺苷二磷酸葡萄糖焦磷酸化酶(AGPase)和可溶性淀粉合酶(SSS)活性,降低了颗粒束缚型淀粉合酶(GBSS)活性。实时荧光定量RT-PCR分析表明,反义Trxs基因促进了AGPase、SBE I和SSS (SSS I、SSS II和SSS III)基因的表达,抑制了GBSS I基因的表达。上述结果说明,反义Trxs基因导入后促进了AGPase、SBE I和SSS基因的转录,从而使籽粒灌浆期间的淀粉积累速率发生了改变,最终显著提高了总淀粉和支链淀粉的含量,降低了直链淀粉含量,进而提高了淀粉的支/直比,这可能是转基因小麦淀粉品质改善和产量提高的主要原因。

关键词: 小麦, 反义Trxs基因, 淀粉合成酶

Abstract:

To clarify the functional mechanisms of starch accumulation by the antisense-thioredoxin s (anti-Trxs) gene into wheat, we conducted a pot experiment using two transgenic wheat lines, TY18-99 and TY18-100, and their wild type “Yumai 18” from October 2007 to June 2009. The effects of the anti-Trxs on starch accumulation and key enzymes involved in starch synthesis were compared between the transgenic lines and the wild type. Results indicated that the rates of starch and amylopectin accumulations in grain were significantly higher in the transgenic lines than in the wild type. During the whole grain-filling period, activity of starch-branching enzyme (SBE) in the transgenic lines increased significantly by 49.2% compared with that in the wild type. At late grain-filling stage, activities of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase) and soluble starch synthase (SSS) in the transgenic lines increased by 45.8% and 16.0%, respectively. However, activity of granule-bound starch synthase (GBSS) in the transgenic lines had no significant variation. The real time RT-PCR assay indicated that the introduction of anti-Trxs resulted in increased expressions of SSS (SSS I, SSS II, and SSS III), SBE I, and AGPase genes and reduction of GBSS I transcription. Therefore, the enhanced expressions of AGPase, SBE I, and SSS may be the main reason for the increase in starch synthesis in anti-Trxs transgenic lines.

Key words: Wheat, Anti-sense thioredoxin s gene, Starch synthesis enzymes

[1]Joudrier P, Gautier M, Lamotte F D, Kobrehel K. The thioredoxin h system: potential applications. Biotechnol Adv, 2005, 23: 81–85



[2]Kobrehel K, Boihon C, Yee, Buchanan B B. Role of the NADP/thioredoxin system in reduction of α-amylase and trypsin inhibitor proteins. J Biol Chem, 1991, 266: 16135–16140



[3]Kobrehel K, Wong J H, Balogh A, Kiss F, Yee B C, Buchanan B B. Specific reduction of wheat storage proteins by thioredoxin h. Plant Physiol, 1992, 99: 919–924



[4]Ballicora M A, Frueauf J B, Fu Y, Schurmann P, Preiss J. Activation of the potato tuber ADP-glucose pyrophosphatase by thioredoxins. J Biol Chem, 1999, 275: 1315–1320



[5]Wong J H, Cai N, Balmer Y, Tanaka C K, Vensel W H, Hurkman W J, Buchanan B B. Thioredoxin targets of developing wheat seeds identified by complementary proteomic approaches. Phytochemistry, 2004, 65: 1629–1640



[6]Li X M, Nield J, Hayman D, Langredge P. Cloning a putative self-incompatibility gene from the pollen of the grass Phalaris coerulescens. Plant Cell, 1994, 6: 1923–1932



[7]Li X M, Nield J, Hayman D, Langridge P. A self-fertile mutant of Phalaris produces an S protein with reduced thioredoxin activity. Plant J, 1996,10: 505–513



[8]Yin J(尹钧), Ren J-P(任江萍), Song L(宋丽), Li L(李磊), Shi X-Z(师学珍), Guo X-Y(郭向云). Regeneration culture from bombarded immature embryos of wheat and transgenic plant. Acta Bot Boreali-Occident Sin (西北植物学报), 2003, 23(9): 1565–1570 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9]Liu L(刘雷), Yin J(尹钧), Ren J-P(任江萍), Han J-F(韩锦峰). Effects of antisense trxs on germination of transgenic wheat seeds. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(8): 801–805 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]Li Y C, Ren J P, Cho M J, Zhou S M, Kim Y B, Guo H X, Wong J H, Niu H B, Kim H K, Morigasaki S, Lemaux P G, Frick O L, Yin J, Buchanan B B. The level of expression of thioredoxin is linked to fundamental properties and applications of wheat seeds. Mol Plant, 2009, 2: 430–441



[11]Ren J-P(任江萍), Wang N(王娜), Wang X-G(王新国), Li Y-C(李永春), Niu H-B(牛洪斌), Wang X(王翔), Yin J(尹钧). Effects of anti-sense thioredoxin s on grain yield and quality properties in two wheat cultivars with different quality types. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(11): 1877−1882 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]He Z-F(何照范). Analysis Techniques for Grain Quality in Cereals and Oils (粮油籽粒品质及其分析技术). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1985. pp 131–133 (in Chinese)



[13]Cheng F-M(程方民), Zhong L-J(钟连进), Sun Z-X(孙宗修). Effect of temperature at grain-filling stage on starch biosynthetic metabolism in developing rice grains of early-indica. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2003, 36(5): 492–501 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]Douglus C D, Tsung M K, Frederick C F. Enzymes of sucrose and hexose metabolism in developing kernels of two inbreds of maize. Plant Physiol, 1988, 86: 1013–1019



[15]Nakamura Y, Yuki K, Park S Y, Ohya T. Carbohydrate metabolism in the developing endosperm of rice grain. Plant Cell Physiol, 1989, 30: 833–839



[16]Zhao F-M(赵法茂), Qi X(齐霞), Xiao J(肖军), Wang X-Z(王宪泽). Improvemed method for determining starch branching enzyme activity. Plant Physiol Commun (植物生理学通讯), 2007, 43(6): 1167–1169 (in Chinese)



[17]Ni Z F, Sun Q X, Wu L M, Xie C J. Differential gene expression between wheat hybrids and their parental inbreds in primary roots. Acta Bot Sin, 2002, 44: 457–462



[18]Livak K J, Schmittgen T D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-delta delta C(T)) method. Methods, 2001, 25: 402–408



[19]Serrato A J, Cejudo F J. Type-h thioredoxins accumulate in the nucleus of developing wheat seed tissues suffering oxidative stress. Planta, 2003, 217: 392–399



[20]Stark D M, Tinunerman K P, Barry G F, Preiss J, Kishpre G M. Regulation of the amount of starch in plant tissues by ADP glucose pyrophosphorylaze. Science, 1992, 258: 287–292



[21]Crcsbie G B. Wheat Quality Trendsin Western Australia.In:Proc 39th Cereal Chemistry Conference, Perth, 1989. pp 59–65



[22]Kouich M, Koji K, Yuji A, Kawasaki T, Shimada H, Baba T. Starch branching enzymes from immature rice seeds.J Biochem, 1992, 112: 643–651



[23]Wang Y-F(王月福),Yu Z-W(于振文),Li S-X(李尚霞),Yu S-L(余松烈).Activity of enzymes related to starch synthesis and their effect during the filling of winter wheat.Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2003, 29(1): 75–81 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[24]Reeves C D, Krishan H B, Okita T W. Gene expression in development wheat endosperm. Plant Phsiol, 1986, 82: 34–40



[25]Li J R, Zhao W, Li Q Z, Ye X G, An B Y, Li X, Zhang X S. RNA silencing of waxy gene results in low levels of amylose in the seeds of transgenic wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Acta Genet Sin, 2005, 32: 846–854



[26]Nishi A, Nakamura Y, Tanaka N, Satoh H. Biochemical and genetic analysis of the effects of amylose-extender mutation in rice endosperm. Plant Physiol, 2001, 127: 459–472



[27]James M G, Robertson D S, Myers A M. Characterization of the maize gene sugary1, a determinant of starch composition in kernals. Plant Cell, 1995, 7: 417–429



[28]Meng L, Wong J H, Feldman L J, Lemaux P G, Buchanan B B. A membrane-associated thioredoxin required for plant growth moves from cell to cell, suggestive of a role in intercellular communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107: 3900–3905



[29]Guo H X, Zhang H Z, Li Y C, Ren J P, Wang X, Niu H B, Yin J. Identification of changes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seeds proteome in response to anti-trx s gene. PLoS ONE, 2011, 6: e22255

[1] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[5] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[6] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[7] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!