欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 2183-2191.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.02183

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

超高产夏玉米花粒期不同部位叶片衰老与抗氧化酶特性

王永军1,2,3,杨今胜2,袁翠平3,柳京国2,李登海2,*,董树亭1,*   

  1. 1作物生物学国家重点实验室 / 山东农业大学农学院, 山东泰安 271018；2山东登海种业股份有限公司 / 山东省玉米育种与栽培技术重点实验室, 山东莱州 261448；3吉林省农业科学院 / 玉米国家工程实验室, 吉林长春 130033
  • 收稿日期:2013-03-04 修回日期:2013-06-09 出版日期:2013-12-12 网络出版日期:2013-10-01
  • 通讯作者: 董树亭, 李登海, E-mail: stdong@sdau.edu.cn, Tel: 0538-8245838 / 0535-2788917
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(30900878和31201159)，国家科技支撑计划项目(2013BAD07B02和2011BAD16B10)和山东省泰山学者专项(ts200648033)资助。

Characteristics of Senescence and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities in Leaves at Different Plant Parts of Summer Maize with the Super-high Yielding Potential after Anthesis

WANG Yong-Jun1,2,3,YANG Jin-Sheng2,YUAN Cui-Ping3,LIU Jing-Guo2,LI Deng-Hai2,*,DONG Shu-Ting1,*   

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology / College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China; 2 Shandong Denghai Seed-Breeding Co. Ltd. / Key Laboratory of Maize Breeding and Culture of Shandong Province, Laizhou 261448, China; 3 Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences / National Engineering Laboratory for Maize, Changchun 130033, China
  • Received:2013-03-04 Revised:2013-06-09 Published:2013-12-12 Published online:2013-10-01

RichHTML

PDF

1543

被引次数

26

摘要：

为探讨超高产玉米叶源衰老特征, 揭示其抗氧化关键酶及膜脂过氧化特性, 为玉米衰老调控和高产栽培提供依据, 本研究在大田条件下, 以我国创高产纪录的夏玉米为例, 从单株水平上对高产纪录试验(EHYR)和普通生产田(MCFF)玉米叶片衰老及抗氧化酶特性比较表明, EHYR产量达19 349 kg hm-2, 是MCFF的2.28倍。MCFF和EHYR叶片分别在开花后30 d和50 d进入速衰期, MCFF叶片衰老比EHYR提前20 d；速衰期EHYR叶面积降幅比MCFF低5.7%。EHYR在籽粒灌浆后期, 中上部叶片净光合速率较高, 可溶性蛋白含量明显高于MCFF, 而MDA含量则维持较低水平。在叶片衰老过程中, 自开花后20 d开始, EHYR上部和中部叶片SOD活性较高, 下部叶片则以SOD、POD和CAT三者活性较高；MCFF仅中部叶片POD和CAT活性较高。EHYR叶片衰老程度与CAT活性极显著负相关, MCFF叶片衰老与SOD和POD活性显著负相关, 且二者叶片衰老进程中SOD、POD、CAT的直接作用大于间接作用。与MCFF相比, EHYR叶片除具较高SOD和POD活性外, 在籽粒灌浆后期同时保持较高CAT活性和可溶性蛋白含量是降低膜脂过氧化程度, 延缓叶片衰老的重要原因。开花后20 d是EHYR与MCFF叶片衰老出现差异的生理临界点, 因而在此时期之前调控更有利于延缓衰老。

关键词: 夏玉米, 超高产, 开花后, 叶片衰老, 抗氧化酶

Abstract:

Grain yield improvement of maize (Zea mays L.) has been evidently associated with delayed leaf senescence during the grain-filling period after anthesis. The object of this study was to explore senescence characteristics and antioxidant enzyme activities after flowering in different position leaves of summer maize with high yield record for providing references of regulating the leaf senescence and achieving the higher yield in China. A field experiment planted Denghai 661, a new hybrid with high-yielding potential, was carried out to compare the experiment of maize with high yield record (EHYR) and the maize grown in conventional farmers’ field (MCFF) in individual level from 2005 to 2007. And the parameters related to the leaf senescence, such as leaf area (LA), LA reduction, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), soluble protein content, activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT), and malondialdehyde (MDA) content, were determined in this research. The grain yield of EHYR was 2.18 times greater than that of MCFF, reaching 19 349 kg ha-1. The rapid senescence time of EHYR leaves and MCFF leaves were found at 30 and 50 days after anthesis, respectively. Therefore, the leaf senescence of EHYR was 20 days earlier than that of MCFF. At the rapid senescence stage, the leaf area reduction of EHYR was 5.7% lower than that of MCFF. During the later period of leaf senescence, the net photosynthetic rate was higher in top and middle leaves than in bottom leaves. Furthermore, the soluble protein content in leaves of EHYR was higher than that of MCFF, but the MDA content was on the contrary. At 20 days after anthesis, the SOD activities in top and middle leaves of EHYR were higher than those of MCFF, while the SOD, POD, and CAT activities in bottom leaves of EHYR were higher than those of MCFF. On the contrary, the POD and CAT activities in middle leaves of MCFF were higher than those of EHYR. Results of both correlation analysis and path analysis indicated that the leaf reduction was negatively correlated with the CAT activity significantly in EHYR, also with the SOD and POD activities significantly in MCFF, and the direct effects were higher than the indirect effects of SOD, POD, and CAT in both EHYR and MCFF. Compared with MCFF treatment, besides higher SOD and POD activities, EHYR had higher CAT activities and soluble protein content resulting in declined lipid peroxidation during grain-filling period, which caused delayed leaf senescence and leaf senescence degree. There were obvious differences at 20 days post-anthesis in maize leaf senescence physiologically. Between EHYR and MCFF suggesting that the 20–30 days after anthesis is a critical period, and all the related agronomy measures should be recommended to be taken before this phase in maize production.

Key words: Summer maize, Super-high yielding potential, After anthesis, Leaf senescence, Antioxidant enzyme

[1]Gardner F P, Pearce R B, Mitchell R L. Physiology of Crop Plant. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1985. pp 3–30



[2]Li S-K(李少昆), Wang C-T(王崇桃). Potential and Ways to High Yield in Maize (玉米高产潜力途径). Beijing: Science Press, 2010. pp 217–354 (in Chinese)



[3]Tollenaar M, Daynard T B. Leaf senescence in short season maize hybrids. Can J Plant Sci, 1978, 58: 869–874



[4]Valentinuz O R, Tollenaar M. Vertical profile of leaf senescence during the grain-filling period in older and newer maize hybrids. Crop Sci, 2004, 44: 827–834



[5]Rajcana I, Dwyerb L M, Tollenaara M. Note on relationship between leaf soluble carbohydrate and chlorophyll concentrations in maize during leaf senescence. Field Crops Res, 1999, 63: 13–17



[6]Feller U K, Soong T S, Hageman R H. Leaf proteolytic activities and senescence during grain development of field-grown corn (Zea mays L.). Plant Physiol, 1977, 59: 290–294



[7]Gan S, Amasino R M. Inhibition of leaf senescence by autoregulated production of cytokinin. Science, 1995, 270: 1986–1988



[8]Guo Y, Gan S. Leaf senescence: signals, execution, and regulation. Curr Top Dev Biol, 2005, 71: 83–112



[9]Lim P O, Kim H J, Nam H G. Leaf senescence. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2007, 58: 115–136



[10]Pastori G M, IHppi V S. Antioxidative protection in a drought-resistant maize strain during leaf senescence. Physiol Plant, 1993, S7: 227–231



[11]Hodges D M, Andrews C J, Johnson D A, Hamilton R I. Antioxidant enzyme responses to chilling stress in differentially sensitive inbred maize lines. J Exp Bot, 1997, 48(310): 1105–1113



[12]Colomb B, Kiniry J R, Debaeke P. Effect of soil phosphorus on leaf development and senescence dynamics of field-grown maize. Agron J, 2000, 92: 428–435



[13]Borrás L, Maddonni G A, Otegui M E. Leaf senescence in maize hybrids: plant population, row spacing and kernel set effects. Field Crops Res, 2003, 82: 13–26



[14]Erley G S, Begum N, Worku M, Bänziger M, Horst W J. Leaf senescence induced by nitrogen deficiency as indicator of genotypic differences in nitrogen efficiency in tropical maize. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci, 2007, 170: 106–114



[15]Hu T, Yuan L, Wang J, Kang S, Li F. Antioxidation responses of maize roots and leaves to partial root-zone irrigation. Agr Water Manage, 2010, 98: 164–171



[16]Zhang R-H(张仁和), Zheng Y-J(郑友军), Ma G-S(马国胜), Zhang X-H(张兴华), Lu H-D(路海东), Shi J-T(史俊通), Xue J-Q(薛吉全). Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic traits and protective enzyme activity in maize seeding. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2011, 31(5): 1303–1311 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]Stoddart J L, Thomas H. Leaf senescence. In: Boulter D, Parthier B, eds. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1982. pp 592–636



[18]Betania F Q, Yoo-Sun N. Molecular aspects of leaf senescence. Trends Plant Sci, 2000, 5: 278–282



[19]Buchanan-Wollaston V. The molecular biology of leaf senescence. J Exp Bot, 1997, 48: 181–1991



[20]Dong S-T(董树亭). Eco-Physiology and Formation of Yield and Quality in Maize (玉米生态生理与产量品质形成). Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006. pp 3–43, 49–113, 347–416 (in Chinese)



[21]Fageria N K, Baligar V C, Clark R B. Physiology of Crop Production. New York, London, Oxford: Food Products Press, 2005. pp 72–82



[22]Bradford M M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein using the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem, 1976, 72: 248–254



[23]Giannopolitis C N, Ries S K. Superoxide dismutases: I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol, 1977, 59: 309–314



[24]Hernandez J A, Jimenez A, Mullineaux P, Sevilla F. Tolerance of pea (Pisum sativum L.) to long-term salt stress is associated with induction of antioxidant defenses. Plant Cell Environ, 2000, 23: 853–862



[25]Samantary S. Biochemical responses of Cr-tolerant and Cr-sensitive mung bean cultivars grown on varying levels of chromium. Chemosphere, 2002, 47: 1065–1072



[26]Heath R L, Packer L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplast: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acids peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys, 1968, 125: 189–198



[27]Wang Q-C(王庆成), Liu K-C(刘开昌). Theory and practices of high-yielding maize cultivation in Shandong. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2004, 12(suppl-2): 60–62 (in Chinese) 



[28]He P(何萍), Jin J-Y(金继运). Effect of N and K nutrition on changes of endogenous hormone and metabolism of active oxygen during leaf senescence in spring maize. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 1999, 5(4): 289–296 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[29]Crafts-Brandner S J, Poneleit C G. Effect of ear removal on CO2 exchange and activities of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase of maize hybrids and inbred lines. Plant Physiol, 1987, 84: 261–265



[30]Wang Y-J(王永军). Study on Population Quality and Individual Physiology Function of Super High-Yielding Maize (Zea mays L.). PhD Dissertation of Shandong Agricultural University, 2008 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[31]Huang Z-X(黄振喜), Wang Y-J(王永军), Wang K-J(王空军), Li D-H(李登海), Zhao M(赵明), Liu J-G(柳京国), Dong S-T(董树亭), Wang H-J(王洪军), Wang J-H(王军海), Yang J-S(杨今胜). Photosynthetic traits of over-15000 kg ha-1 summer maize hybrids during grain filling. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2007, 40(9): 1898–1906 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[32]Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutases. Annu Rev Biochem, 1975, 44: 147–159



[33]Islam M R, Hu Y, Mao S, Jia P, Enejid A E, Xue X. Effects of water-saving superabsorbent polymer on antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in corn (Zea mays L.) under drought stress. J Sci Food Agric, 2011, 91: 813–819



[34]Ge T-D(葛体达), Sui F-G(隋方功), Bai L-P(白莉萍), Lü Y-Y(吕银燕), Zhou G-S(周广胜). Effects of water stress on the protective enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in roots and leaves of summer maize. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2005, 38 (5): 922–928 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[35]Shao G-Q(邵国庆), Li Z-J(李增嘉), Ning T-Y(宁堂原), Jiang B-J(蒋保娟), Jiao N-Y(焦念元). Effects of irrigation and urea types on ear leaf senescence after anthesis, yield and economic benefit of maize. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2009, 42(10): 3459–3466 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[36]Nie L-X(聂乐兴), Jiang X-Y(姜兴印), Wu S-H(吴淑华), Zhang J-W(张吉旺), Liu P(刘鹏). Effects of DA-6 on leaf photosynthetic carboxylase and protective enzyme activities and grain yield of high-yielding summer maize. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2010, 21(10): 2558–2564 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[37]Wang K-J(王空军), Hu C-H(胡昌浩), Dong S-T(董树亭), Liu K-C(刘开昌), Sun Q-Q(孙庆泉). Changes of the protective enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation after anthesis among maize varieties planted in different years. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1999, 25(6): 700–706 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[2] 张倩, 韩本高, 张博, 盛开, 李岚涛, 王宜伦. 控失尿素减施及不同配比对夏玉米产量及氮肥效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 180-192.
[3] 李静, 王洪章, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝. 夏玉米不同栽培模式花后叶片光合性能的差异[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1351-1359.
[4] 李增强, 丁鑫超, 卢海, 胡亚丽, 岳娇, 黄震, 莫良玉, 陈立, 陈涛, 陈鹏. 铅胁迫下红麻生理特性及DNA甲基化分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6): 1031-1042.
[5] 周宝元, 葛均筑, 孙雪芳, 韩玉玲, 马玮, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 黄淮海麦玉两熟区周年光温资源优化配置研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(10): 1843-1853.
[6] 马正波, 董学瑞, 唐会会, 闫鹏, 卢霖, 王庆燕, 房孟颖, 王琦, 董志强. 四甲基戊二酸对夏玉米光合生产特征的调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(10): 1617-1627.
[7] 陈晓影,刘鹏,程乙,董树亭,张吉旺,赵斌,任佰朝,韩坤. 基于磷肥施用深度的夏玉米根层调控提高土壤氮素吸收利用[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(02): 238-248.
[8] 王素芳,薛惠云,张志勇,汤菊香. 棉花根系生长与叶片衰老的协调性[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(01): 93-101.
[9] 万泽花,任佰朝,赵斌,刘鹏,张吉旺. 不同熟期夏玉米品种籽粒灌浆脱水特性和激素含量变化[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1446-1453.
[10] 田文刚,朱雪峰,宋雯,程文翰,薛飞,朱华国. 异源表达棉花S-腺苷甲硫氨酸脱羧酶(GhSAMDC1)基因提高了拟南芥抗盐能力[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(7): 1017-1028.
[11] 周宝元,马玮,孙雪芳,丁在松,李从锋,赵明. 冬小麦-夏玉米高产模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征研究[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(4): 589-600.
[12] 何宁,王雪扬,曹良子,曹大为,洛育,姜连子,孟英,冷春旭,唐晓东,李一丹,万书明,卢环,程须珍. 光温处理对小豆苗期生理性状及叶绿素合成前体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(3): 460-468.
[13] 高超,李学文,孙艳伟,周婷,罗纲,陈财. 淮河流域夏玉米生育阶段需水量及农业干旱时空特征[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(2): 297-309.
[14] 王洪章,刘鹏,贾绪存,李静,任昊,董树亭,张吉旺,赵斌. 不同栽培管理条件下夏玉米产量与肥料利用效率的差异解析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(10): 1544-1553.
[15] 陈晓影,刘鹏,程乙,董树亭,张吉旺,赵斌,任佰朝. 土壤深松下磷肥施用深度对夏玉米根系分布及磷素吸收利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(10): 1565-1575.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2