欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (09): 1579-1584.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01579

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

以EMS诱变创制软质小麦宁麦9号高分子量谷蛋白亚基突变体

张纪元,张平平,姚金保,杨丹,杨学明,马鸿翔*   

  1. 江苏省农业科学院 / 江苏省农业生物学重点实验室, 江苏南京 210014
  • 收稿日期:2013-11-25 修回日期:2014-06-16 出版日期:2014-09-12 网络出版日期:2014-06-27
  • 通讯作者: 马鸿翔, E-mail: hxma@jaas.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-3), 国家自然科学基金项目(31101146), 科技部农业科技成果转化基金(2012C1001009), 江苏省科技支撑项目(BE2013439)和江苏省农业自主创新专项(cx132021)资助。

EMS Induced HMW-GS Mutants from Soft Wheat Ningmai 9

ZHANG Ji-Yuan,ZHANG Ping-Ping,YAO Jin-Bao,YANG Dan,YANG Xue-Ming,MA Hong-Xiang*   

  1. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Agrobiology / Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
  • Received:2013-11-25 Revised:2014-06-16 Published:2014-09-12 Published online:2014-06-27
  • Contact: 马鸿翔, E-mail: hxma@jaas.ac.cn

RichHTML

PDF

2845

被引次数

14

摘要：

本研究旨在创制遗传背景一致的不同高分子量谷蛋白亚基(HMW-GS)缺失系, 为小麦品质研究和育种提供材料。将软质小麦品种宁麦9号, 用0.4% EMS溶液处理10 000粒种子, 获得3781个M1代单株, 采用“半粒法”对每个株系进行SDS-PAGE鉴定, 从中筛选出299个(7.91%) HMW-GS突变株, 包括HMW-GS缺失和分子量突变两种类型。其中, HMW-GS缺失突变176株, 突变频率为4.65%, 缺失亚基涉及Ax1、Bx7、By8、Dx2和Dy12, 突变频率为0.24%~3.28%; 分子量突变130株, 突变频率为3.44%。将突变体的具胚端种子于温室中繁殖获得M2代, 再次鉴定各株系的HMW-GS, 并经M3代验证, 最终获得Ax1、Dx2、Bx7、By8和Dy12缺失突变体, 及Ax1+By8双缺失突变体。用高效液相色谱(HPLC)分析这些突变体的谷蛋白大聚体(GMP)和谷蛋白/醇溶蛋白(GLU/GLI)比值, 发现不同缺失突变体的GMP含量都有不同程度的降低, 尤以Bx7亚基缺失突变体中GMP含量降幅最大, 高达42%。另外, 不同缺失突变体的谷蛋白总量和GLU/GLI比值也低于对照, Ax1+By8双缺失突变体的GLU/GLI比值最小。

关键词: 小麦, 甲基磺酸乙酯, 高分子量谷蛋白亚基, 谷蛋白大聚体

Abstract:

The objective of this study was to create a series of deletion lines of high molecular weight-glutenin subunit (HMW-GS) in similar backgrounds for wheat quality research and breeding. A total of 3781 M1 plants of Ningmai 9 (a soft wheat cultivar) were obtained from 10000 seeds induced by 0.4% ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS). The HMW-GS compositions of these plants were identified via SDS-PAGE using half seed. Two hundred and ninety-nine lines with a mutation percentage of 7.91% were found to be HMW-GS mutants, including HMW-GS deletion and molecular weight mutation. Among them, 176 lines were HMW-GS deletion mutants, with a mutation percentage of 4.65% containing subunits Ax1, Bx7, By8, Dx2, and Dy12, with the mutation percentages ranging from 0.24% to 3.28%. The mutants of molecular weight were 130 lines with a mutation percentage of 3.44%. Each of the half M1 seed with embryo was used to produce M2 generation in greenhouse. Homozygous deletion lines of HMW-GS Ax1, Dx2, Bx7, By8, Dy12, and Ax1+ By8 were detected using SDS-PAGE and confirmed in M3 generation. The content of glutenin macropolymer (GMP) and the ratio of glutenin-to-gliadin (GLU/GLI) ratio were determined using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The results showed that all the deletion mutants had lower GMP content than Ningmai 9, particularly, the Bx7 deletion line had the reduced GMP content of 42%. The GLU/GLI ratio of the deletion lines was also smaller than that of Ningmai 9, and the lowest GLU/GLI ratio was found in Ax1+ By8 deletion line.

Key words: Wheat, EMS, High molecular weight glutenin subunit, Glutenin macropolymer

[1]Branlard G, Dardevet M, Saccomano R, Lagoutte F, Gourdon J. Genetic diversity of wheat storage proteins and bread wheat quality. Euphytica, 2001, 119: 59–67



[2]Feiz L, Beecher B S, Martin J M, Giroux J. In plant a mutagenesis determines the functional regions of the wheat puroindoline proteins. Genetics, 2009, 183: 853–860



[3]李卫华, 胡志伟, 褚洪雷, 薛芳, 张东海. EMS对小麦产量和农艺性状诱变效应的研究. 种子, 2011, 30(2): 41–44



Li W H, Hu Z W, Chu H L, Xue F, Zhang D H. Study on the mutagenic effect of EMS on yield traits and agronomic characters of the wheat. Seed, 2011, 30(2): 41–44 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]Kuraparthy V, Sood S, Dhaliwal H S, Chhuneja P, Gill B S. Identification and mapping of a tiller inhibition gene (tin3) in wheat. Theor Appl Genet, 2007, 114: 285–294



[5]崔秋华, 许耀奎. EMS处理小麦幼穗的细胞学效应及其对花药培养的影响. 核农学报, 1989, 3: 104–111



Cui Q H, Xu Y K. The cytological effect of EMS on spikes and its influence on anther culture of wheat in vitro treatments. J Nucl Agric Sci, 1989, 3: 104–111 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]赵天祥, 孔秀英, 周荣华, 高双成, 贾继增. EMS诱变六倍体小麦偃展4110的形态突变体鉴定与分析. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42: 755–764



Zhao T X, Kong X Y, Zhou R H, Gao S C, Jia J Z. Morphological identification and analysis of EMS mutants from hexaploid wheat cultivar Yanzhan 4110. Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42: 755–764 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]徐艳花, 陈锋, 董中东, 崔党群. EMS诱变的普通小麦豫农201突变体库的构建与初步分析, 麦类作物学报, 2010, 30: 625–629



Xu Y H, Chen F, Dong Z D, Cui D Q. Construction and Analysis of EMS induced mutant library of hexaploid wheat cultivar Yunong 201. J Triticeae Crops, 2010, 30: 625–629 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]Liu L, He Z H, Yan J, Zhang Y, Xia X C, Pena R J. Allelic variation at the Glu-1 and Glu-3 loci, presence of 1B.1R translocation, and their effects on mixographic properties in Chinese bread wheats. Euphytica, 2005, 142:197–204



[9]Singh N K, Shepherd K W, Cornish G B, A simplified SDS-PAGE procedure for separating LMW subunits of glutenin. J. Cereal Sci. 1991, 14:203–208



[10]Larroque O R, Gianibelli M C, Gimez Sanchez M, MacRitchie F. Procedure for obtaining stable protein extracts of cereal flour and whole meal for size exclusion HPLC analysis. Cereal Chem, 2000, 77: 448–450



[11]张鲁军, 焦浈, 史艳芹, 秦广雍. 小麦高分子量麦谷蛋白基因沉默研究进展. 麦类作物学报, 2009, 29: 1129–1133



Zhang L J, Jiao Z, Shi Y Q, Qin G Y. Advance in study of gene silencing of wheat HMW-GS. J Triticeae Crops, 2009, 29: 1129–1133 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]马惠平, 赵永亮. 诱变技术在农作物育种中的应用. 遗传, 1998, 20(4): 48–50



Ma H P, Zhao Y L, Yang G Y. Application of induced mutation technology for crop breeding. Hereditas (Beijing), 1998, 20(4): 48–50 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]王长里, 付晶, 杨学举. EMS诱导小麦突变体的研究及展望. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36: 8038–8039



Wang C L, Fu J, Yang X J. Study and prospect of EMS induction on wheat mutants. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2008, 36: 8038–8039 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]Feiz L, Martin J M, Giroux M J. Creation and functional analysis of new puroindoline alleles in Triticum aestivum. Theor Appl Genet, 2009, 118: 247–257



[15]Slade A J, Fuerstenberg S I, Loeffler D, Steine M N, Facciotti D. A reverse genetic, nontransgenic approach to wheat crop improvement by TILLING. Nat Biotechnol, 2005, 23: 75–81



[16]Ciaffi M, Tozzi L, Lafiandra D. Relationship between flour composition determined by size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography and dough rheological parameters. Cereal Chem, 1996, 73: 346–351



[17]Gupta R B, Khan K, MacRitchie F. Biochemical basis of flour properties in bread wheat: I. Effect of variation in the quantity and size distribution of polymeric protein. J Cereal Sci, 1993, 18: 23–41



[18]张平平, 肖永贵, 刘建军, 马鸿翔, 何中虎. SDS不溶性谷蛋白大聚体含量与和面仪参数的关系. 作物学报, 2008, 34: 1074–1079



Zhang P P, Xiao Y G, Liu J J, Ma H X, He Z H. Relationship between SDS-unextractable glutenin polymeric protein and mixograph parameters. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34:1074–1079 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[19]Gupta R B, Khan K, MacRitchie F. Biochemical basis of flour properties in bread wheats. Effects of variation in the quantity and size distribution of polymeric protein. Cereal Sci, 1993, 18: 23–41



[20]Huang D Y, Khan K. Characterization and quantification of native glutenin aggregates by multistacking sodium dodecyl sulfate polyaerylamide gelelectrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) procedures. Cereal Chem, 1997, 74: 229–234



[21]Zhu J, Khan K. Quantitative variation of HMW glutenin subunits from hard red spring wheats grown in different environments. Cereal Chem, 2002, 79: 783–786



[22]Weegels P L, Hamer R J, Scholfield J D. Functional properties of low Mr wheat proteins: effects on composition of the glutenin macropolymer during dough mixing and resting. Cereal Sci, 1997, 25: 165–173



[23]Weegels P L, Hamer R J, Scholfield J D. Functional properties of wheat glutenin. Cereal Sci, 1996, 23: l–18



[24]Weegels P L, Flissebaalje T, Hamer R. Factors affecting the glutenin macropolymer. Cereal Chem, 1994, 71: 308–309
[1] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[5] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[6] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[7] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2