作物学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10): 1874-1890.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.04216
孟鑫浩1(), 张靖男1, 崔顺立1, Charles Y.Chen2, 穆国俊1, 侯名语1, 杨鑫雷1,*(), 刘立峰1,*()
MENG Xin-Hao1(), ZHANG Jing-Nan1, CUI Shun-Li1, Charles Y. Chen2, MU Guo-Jun1, HOU Ming-Yu1, YANG Xin-Lei1,*(), LIU Li-Feng1,*()
摘要:
花生荚果、种子性状与产量紧密相关, 是重要的农艺性状。为挖掘与荚果、种子性状紧密连锁的分子标记, 本研究以大果品种冀花5号和小果美国资源M130组配衍生的315个家系RIL8群体为材料, 利用SSR、AhTE、SRAP和TRAP等标记构建了一张包含363个多态性位点的遗传连锁图谱。该图谱共包含21个连锁群, 总长为1360.38 cM, 标记间平均距离为3.75 cM。利用完备区间作图法对2017—2018年5个环境的荚果、种子相关性状进行数量性状基因座(quantitative trait locus, QTL)分析, 共鉴定到97个与荚果、种子性状相关的QTL, 可解释的表型变异为2.36%~12.15%, 分布在A02、A05、A08、A09、B02、B03、B04、B08和B09等9条染色体上。其中, 9个与荚果长相关, 13个与荚果宽相关, 14个与荚果厚相关, 11个与种子长相关, 14个与种子宽相关, 13个与种子厚相关, 13个与百果重相关, 10个与百仁重相关; 4个主效QTL分别为qPWA08.1、qPTA08.3、qPTA08.4和qSWB08.5, 可解释的表型变异分别为10.02%、11.06%、12.15%和11.97%; 45个稳定表达的QTL在3个以上环境可被重复检测; 连锁群A02、A08、B02、B04和B08上存在QTL聚集区。另外, 检测到15对上位性QTL, 可解释的表型变异为10.23%~51.84%。研究结果将为花生荚果、种子性状的分子标记辅助育种提供重要的理论依据。
[1] | 禹山林. 中国花生品种及其系谱. 上海: 上海科技出版社, 2008. pp 353-465. |
Yu S L. Chinese Peanut Varieties and Their Lines. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 2018. pp 353-465(in Chinese). | |
[2] | Xiang D Q, Cao H H, Cao Y G, Yang J P, Huang L J, Wang S C, Dai J R. Construction of a genetic map and location of quantitative trait loci for yield component traits in maize by SSR markers. Acta Genet Sin, 2001, 28:778-784. |
[3] |
Varshney R K, Close T J, Singh N K, Hoisington D A, Cook D R. Orphan legume crops enter the genomics era! Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2009, 12:202-210.
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.12.004 pmid: 19157958 |
[4] | 方宣钧. 作物DNA标记辅助育种. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001. pp 305-336. |
Fang X J. Crop DNA Marker-assisted Breeding. Beijing: Science Press, 2001. pp 305-336(in Chinese). | |
[5] |
Wang B H, Guo W Z, Zhu X F, Wu Y T, Huang N T, Zhang T Z. QTL mapping of yield and yield components for elite hybrid derived-RILs in upland cotton. J Genet Genomics, 2007, 34:35-45.
doi: 10.1016/S1673-8527(07)60005-8 |
[6] |
Luo H Y, Guo J B, Ren X P, Chen W G, Huang L, Zhou X J, Chen Y N, Liu N, Xiong F, Lei Y, Liao B S, Jiang H F. Chromosomes A07 and A05 associated with stable and major QTLs for pod weight and size in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2018, 131:267-282.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-017-3000-7 |
[7] |
Wang Z H, Huai D X, Zhang Z H, Cheng K, Kang Y P, Wan L Y, Yan L Y, Jiang H F, Lei Y, Liao B S. Development of a high-density genetic map based on specific length amplified fragment sequencing and its application in quantitative trait loci analysis for yield-related traits in cultivated peanut. Front Plant Sci, 2018, 9:827.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00827 |
[8] |
Luo H Y, Ren X P, Li Z D, Xu Z H, Li X P, Huang L, Zhou X J, Chen Y N, Chen W G, Lei Y, Liao B S, Pandey M K, Varshney R K, Guo B Z, Jiang X G, Liu F, Jiang H F. Co-localization of major quantitative trait loci for pod size and weight to a 3.7 cM interval on chromosome A05 in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). BMC Genomics, 2017, 18:58.
doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3456-x |
[9] | 李英杰. 栽培种花生株高、分枝数及荚果性状QTL定位分析. 山东农业大学硕士学位论文, 山东泰安, 2016. |
Li Y J. QTL Analysis for Plant Height, Total Branching Number and Pod Traits in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). MS Thesis of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, Shandong, China, 2016 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[10] | 李振动, 李新平, 黄莉, 任小平, 陈玉宁, 周小静, 廖伯寿, 姜慧芳. 栽培种花生荚果大小相关性状QTL定位. 作物学报, 2015, 41:1313-1323. |
Li Z D, Li X P, Huang L, Ren X P, Chen Y N, Zhou X J, Liao B S, Jiang H F. Mapping of QTLs for pod size related traits in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Acta Agron Sin, 2015, 41:1313-1323 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[11] | 吕维娜. 花生栽培种SSR遗传连锁图谱构建及重要产量性状QTL定位分析. 郑州大学硕士学位论文, 河南郑州, 2014. |
Lyu W N. Contruction of Genetic Linkage Map Based on SSR Markers and QTLs Identification for Major Yield Traits in the Cultivated Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). MS Thesis of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 2014 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[12] | 成良强. 花生遗传图谱构建及产量相关性状的QTL分析. 中国农业科学院硕士学位论文, 北京, 2014. |
Cheng L Q. Construction of Genetic Linkage Map and QTL Analysis for Yield Related Traits in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). MS Thesis of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2014 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[13] |
Shirasawa K, Koilkonda P, Aoki K, Hirakawa H, Tabata S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa M, Kiyoshima H, Suzuki S, Kuwata C, Naito Y, Kuboyama T, Nakaya A, Sasamoto S, Watanabe A, Kato M, Kawashima K, Kishida Y, Kohara M, Kurabayashi A, Chika T, Tsuruoka H, Wada T, Isobe S. In silico polymorphism analysis for the development of simple sequence repeat and transposon markers and construction of linkage map in cultivated peanut. BMC Plant Biol, 2012, 12:80.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-80 pmid: 22672714 |
[14] | 姜慧芳. 花生种质资源描述规范和数据标准, 3-9. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006. pp 355-455. |
Jiang H F. Specification for Description and Data of Peanut Germplasm Resources, 3-9. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2016. pp 355-455(in Chinese) | |
[15] | 王亮, 杨鑫雷, Getahun A, 崔顺立, 穆国俊, 刘立峰, 李自超. 栽培种花生AFLP标记体系的优化及多态性引物筛选. 核农学报, 2017, 31:2087-2095. |
Wang L, Yang X L, Getahun A, Cui S L, Mu G J, Liu L F, Li Z C. Screening for polymorphic primer pairs and optimization of AFLP marker system in peanut. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2017, 31:2087-2095 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[16] |
Lin Z X, He D H, Zhang X L, Nie Y C, Guo X P, Feng C D, Stewart J M. Linkage map construction and mapping QTL for cotton fibre quality using SRAP, SSR and RAPD. Plant Breed, 2008, 124:180-187.
doi: 10.1111/pbr.2005.124.issue-2 |
[17] |
Yu J W, Yu S X, Lu C R, Wang W, Fan S L, Song M Z, Lin Z X, Zhang X L, Zhang J F. High-density linkage map of cultivated allotetraploid cotton based on SSR, TRAP, SRAP and AFLP markers. J Integr Plant Biol, 2007, 49:716-724.
doi: 10.1111/jipb.2007.49.issue-5 |
[18] | 崔顺立, 刘立峰, 陈焕英, 耿立格, 孟成生, 杨余. 河北省花生地方品种基于SSR标记的遗传多样性. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42:3346-3353. |
Cui S L, Liu L F, Chen H Y, Geng L G, Meng C S, Yang Y. Genetic diversity of peanut landraces in Hebei province revealed by SSR markers. Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42:3346-3353 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[19] | JoinMap 4.0 Software for the Calculation of Genetic Linkage Maps in Experimental Populations. Wageningen: Kyazma B V, 2006. |
[20] | Kosambi D D. The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Ann Hum Genet, 2011, 1:172-175. |
[21] |
Voorrips RE. MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered, 2002, 93:77-78.
pmid: 12011185 |
[22] | 陈建国, 朱军. 籼粳交稻米蛋白质含量的基因型与环境互作效应的分析. 作物学报, 1999, 25:579-584. |
Chen J G, Zhu J. Analysis of genotype by environment interaction for protein content in indica-japonica crosses of rice(Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agron Sin, 1999, 25:579-584 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[23] | 刘雪海, 田俊芹. 花生品种主要性状遗传力和遗传进度的估算. 华北农学报, 1981, 1(2):48-50. |
Liu X M, Tian J Q. Estimation of heritability and genetic progress of main traits of peanut varieties. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 1981, 1(2):48-50 (in Chinese). | |
[24] |
Meng L, Li H H, Zhang L Y, Wang J K. QTL IciMapping: Integrated software for genetic linkage map construction and quantitative trait locus mapping in biparental populations. Crop J, 2015, 3:269-283.
doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2015.01.001 |
[25] | 张志勇. 水稻粒型和粒重性状的主效QTL定位研究. 厦门大学硕士学位论文, 福建厦门, 2008. |
Zhang Z Y. Mapping of Major QTL for Grain Shape and Weight Traits in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). MS Thesis of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China, 2008 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[26] |
Varshney R K, Bertioli D J, Moretzsohn M C, Vadez V, Krishnamurthy L, Aruna R, Nigam S N, Moss B J, Seetha K, Ravi K, He G, Knapp S J, Hoisington D A. The first SSR-based genetic linkage map for cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2009, 118:729-739.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0933-x pmid: 19048225 |
[27] |
Lu Q, Liu H, Hong Y B, Li H F, Liu H Y, Li X Y, Wen S J, Zhou G Y, Li S X, Chen X P, Liang X Q. Consensus map integration and QTL meta-analysis narrowed a locus for yield traits to 0.7 cM and refined a region for late leaf spot resistance traits to 0.38 cM on linkage group A05 in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). BMC Genomics, 2018, 19:887.
doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5288-3 |
[28] |
Liang Y B, Liang X Q, Chen X P, Zhou H Y, Li G Y, Shao X, Wen S J. Construction of genetic linkage map based on SSR markers in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Agric Sci China, 2008, 7:915-921.
doi: 10.1016/S1671-2927(08)60130-3 |
[29] |
Hong Y B, Chen X P, Liang X Q, Liu H Y, Zhou G Y, Li S X, Wen S J, Holbrook C, Guo B Z. A SSR-based composite genetic linkage map for the cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genome. BMC Plant Biol, 2010, 10:17.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-17 |
[30] |
Huang L, He H, Chen W G, Ren X P, Chen Y N, Zhou X J, Xia Y L, Wang X L, Jiang X J, Liao B S, Jiang H F. Quantitative trait locus analysis of agronomic and quality-related traits in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2015, 128:1103-1115
doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2493-1 pmid: 25805315 |
[31] | 曾新颖, 郭建斌, 赵姣姣, 陈伟刚, 邱西克, 黄莉, 罗怀勇, 周晓静, 姜慧芳, 黄家权. 花生籽仁大小相关性状QTL定位. 作物学报, 2019, 45:1200-1207. |
Zeng X Y, Guo J B, Zhao J J, Chen W G, Qiu X K, Huang L, Luo H Y, Zhou X J, Jiang H F, Huang J Q. Identification of QTL related to seed size in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Acta Agron Sin, 2019, 45:1200-1207 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[32] | Gomez S M, Narayana M, Schubert A M, Ayers J, Baring M R, Burow M D. Identification of QTLs for pod and kernel traits in cultivated peanut by bulked segregant analysis. Electr J Biotechnol, 2009, 12:1-10. |
[33] | Yuan A P, Cao L Y, Zhuang J Y, Li R Z, Zheng K L, Zhu J, Cheng S H. Analysis of additive and AE interaction effects of QTLs controlling plant height, heading date and panicle number in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Genet Genomics, 2003, 30:899-906. |
[34] |
Specht J E, Chase K, Macrander M, Graef G L, Chung J, Markwell J P, Germann M, Orf J H, Lark K G. Soybean response to water. Crop Sci, 2001, 41:493-509.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2001.412493x |
[1] | 胡文静, 李东升, 裔新, 张春梅, 张勇. 小麦穗部性状和株高的QTL定位及育种标记开发和验证[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1346-1356. |
[2] | 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487. |
[3] | 李海芬, 魏浩, 温世杰, 鲁清, 刘浩, 李少雄, 洪彦彬, 陈小平, 梁炫强. 花生电压依赖性阴离子通道基因(AhVDAC)的克隆及在果针向地性反应中表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1558-1565. |
[4] | 于春淼, 张勇, 王好让, 杨兴勇, 董全中, 薛红, 张明明, 李微微, 王磊, 胡凯凤, 谷勇哲, 邱丽娟. 栽培大豆×半野生大豆高密度遗传图谱构建及株高QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1091-1102. |
[5] | 雷新慧, 万晨茜, 陶金才, 冷佳俊, 吴怡欣, 王家乐, 王鹏科, 杨清华, 冯佰利, 高金锋. 褪黑素与2,4-表油菜素内酯浸种对盐胁迫下荞麦发芽与幼苗生长的促进效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1210-1221. |
[6] | 刘嘉欣, 兰玉, 徐倩玉, 李红叶, 周新宇, 赵璇, 甘毅, 刘宏波, 郑月萍, 詹仪花, 张刚, 郑志富. 耐三唑并嘧啶类除草剂花生种质创制与鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1027-1034. |
[7] | 丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703. |
[8] | 宋仕勤, 杨清龙, 王丹, 吕艳杰, 徐文华, 魏雯雯, 刘小丹, 姚凡云, 曹玉军, 王永军, 王立春. 东北主推玉米品种种子形态及贮藏物质与萌发期耐冷性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 726-738. |
[9] | 黄莉, 陈玉宁, 罗怀勇, 周小静, 刘念, 陈伟刚, 雷永, 廖伯寿, 姜慧芳. 花生种子大小相关性状QTL定位研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 280-291. |
[10] | 张艳波, 王袁, 冯甘雨, 段慧蓉, 刘海英. 棉籽油分和3种主要脂肪酸含量QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 380-395. |
[11] | 李振华, 王显亚, 刘一灵, 赵杰宏. NtPHYB1与光温信号互作调控烟草种子萌发[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 99-107. |
[12] | 汪颖, 高芳, 刘兆新, 赵继浩, 赖华江, 潘小怡, 毕晨, 李向东, 杨东清. 利用WGCNA鉴定花生主茎生长基因共表达模块[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1639-1653. |
[13] | 王建国, 张佳蕾, 郭峰, 唐朝辉, 杨莎, 彭振英, 孟静静, 崔利, 李新国, 万书波. 钙与氮肥互作对花生干物质和氮素积累分配及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1666-1679. |
[14] | 石磊, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 高伟, 张忠信, 齐飞艳, 刘娟, 董文召, 张新友. 花生AhFAD2-1基因启动子及5'-UTR内含子功能验证及其低温胁迫应答[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1703-1711. |
[15] | 高芳, 刘兆新, 赵继浩, 汪颖, 潘小怡, 赖华江, 李向东, 杨东清. 北方主栽花生品种的源库特征及其分类[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1712-1723. |
|