欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (9): 2221-2227.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.11085

所属专题： 小麦：遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

基因聚合选育抗赤霉病小麦新品系百农4299

张一铎1(), 李国强1, 孔忠新1, 王玉泉2, 李小利2, 茹振钢2, 贾海燕1,*(), 马正强1   

  1. 1.南京农业大学作物基因组学与生物信息学中心 / 作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室, 江苏南京 210095
    2.河南科技学院小麦中心, 河南新乡 453003
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-29 接受日期:2021-11-29 出版日期:2022-09-12 网络出版日期:2022-12-27
  • 通讯作者: 贾海燕
  • 作者简介:E-mail: 2014201043@njau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0101802);国家自然科学基金项目(31930081);国家自然科学基金项目(30430440);现代作物生产(省部共建)协同创建中心

Breeding of FHB-resistant wheat line Bainong 4299 by gene pyramiding

ZHANG Yi-Duo1(), LI Guo-Qiang1, KONG Zhong-Xin1, WANG Yu-Quan2, LI Xiao-Li2, RU Zhen-Gang2, JIA Hai-Yan1,*(), MA Zheng-Qiang1   

  1. 1. Crop Genomics and Bioinformatics Center, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China
    2. Center of Wheat Research, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 450003, Henan, China
  • Received:2021-09-29 Accepted:2021-11-29 Published:2022-09-12 Published online:2022-12-27
  • Contact: JIA Hai-Yan
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFD0101802);National Natural Science Foundation of China(31930081);National Natural Science Foundation of China(30430440);Collaborative Innovation Initiative for Modern Crop Production

RichHTML

44

PDF

683

摘要：

小麦赤霉病是一种严重危害小麦生产的真菌性病害, 其抗性由多基因控制, 抗性机制复杂。type I (抗侵入)和type II (抗扩展)是小麦抵御赤霉病侵害的2种最主要抗性类型。在抗赤霉病育种中兼顾2种抗性, 对于保证生产上抗性的稳定和持久有着重要意义。在前期研究中, 作者所在课题组从小麦地方品种望水白中克隆了抗赤霉病扩展的主效QTL Fhb1, 精细定位了Fhb4和Fhb5, 获得了功能性/紧密连锁的分子标记。本研究利用这些标记, 以小麦品系NMAS022作为供体亲本, 现代小麦品种百农4199作为受体亲本, 通过分子标记辅助回交育种方法选育成了聚合望水白Fhb1、Fhb4、Fhb5的小麦新品系百农4299。与百农4199相比, 百农4299在2年的田间试验中type I抗性至少增加了73%~74%, type II抗性至少增加了83%~88% (以病小穗数计), 并且产量潜力也得到了提高。上述结果证明了通过分子标记辅助选择聚合不同类型抗赤霉病QTL以提高小麦赤霉病抗性的可行性。抗赤霉病小麦品系百农4299有望成为一个新的抗赤霉病小麦品种。

关键词: 小麦, 赤霉病, 抗病基因聚合, MAS, 百农4299

Abstract:

Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a devastating fungal disease in wheat production. Wheat FHB resistance is controlled by multiple genes and has complicated resistance mechanisms. Type I (resistance to invasion) and type II (resistance to expansion) are two main resistance types of wheat against FHB. Combining both types of FHB resistance in breeding is vitally important for the resistance durability and stability of cultivars. In fine mapping and cloning of type I resistance QTL Fhb4 and Fhb5 and type II resistance QTL Fhb1 in wheat landrace Wangshuibai, functional/tightly-linked molecular markers for them had been obtained. In this study, a new wheat line named Bainong 4299 was bred after introduction of these QTL from NMAS022 with the help of these markers and using modern wheat variety Bainong 4199 as the recipient parent. Compared with Bainong 4199, Bainong 4299 increased type I resistance by at least 73% to 74% and type II resistance by 83% to 88% increase (in terms of the number of diseased spikelets per spike) in two field trials. Moreover, its yield potential had moderate elevation. In conclusion, this study provided another successful illustration of marker-assisted selection and pyramiding of FHB QTL in improving wheat FHB resistance. Bainong 4299 had the potential to become a new FHB resistance cultivar.

Key words: wheat, Fusarium head blight, pyramiding of resistance genes, MAS, Bainong 4299

图1

百农4199、NMAS022、百农4299中Fhb1、Fhb4、Fhb5标记检测结果 M: DNA marker, 图片左侧的数字为条带分子量大小(单位: bp); 1: 百农4199; 2: NMAS022; 3: 百农4299; 望水白类型的目标条带分别在图中用箭头标出, 图片下方分别为引物名称。"

图2

百农4299的选育过程(a)及其供体亲本NMAS022 (b) n: 群体大小; 图片(b)拍摄于2020年5月4日, 江苏淮安。"

表1

百农4299及其轮回亲本的赤霉病抗性鉴定结果"

环境
Environment		 材料
Material		 赤霉病严重度
FHB severity		 病穗率
Percentage of infected spikes (%)		 病小穗数
Number of diseased spikelets		 病轴长
Length of diseased rachides (cm)
2019-2020淮安
2019-2020 Huai’an		 百农4199 Bainong 4199 2.23±0.11 38.5±1.8 5.8±0.6 4.1±0.5
百农4299 Bainong 4299 0.10±0.02** 10.2±2.2** 1.0±0.0** 0.8±0.1**
2020-2021南京
2020-2021 Nanjing		 百农4199 Bainong 4199 3.44±0.14 42.3±2.1 8.2±0.1 4.1±0.1
百农4299 Bainong 4299 0.11±0.01** 11.5±1.3** 1.0±0.0** 0.6±0.0**

图3

百农4299 (左)及其轮回亲本百农4199 (右)在田间自然发病状态下的赤霉病抗性表现 图片拍摄于开花后21 d, 2021年江苏南京。"

表2

百农4299及其轮回亲本的农艺性状和产量鉴定结果"

环境
Environment		 材料
Material		 株高
Plant height (cm)		 穗粒数
No. of kernels per spike		 单株穗数
No. of spikes per plant		 千粒重
1000-kernel weight (g)		 1 m2产量
Yield per square meter (g)
2019-2020淮安
2019-2020 Huai’an		 百农4199 Bainong 4199 80.2±1.2 54.4±1.8 12.1±0.6 44.2±0.4 984.5±3.5
百农4299 Bainong 4299 84.2±0.9** 55.0±1.9 12.0±0.9 48.4±0.5** 1002.0±4.2*
2020-2021淮安
2020-2021 Huai’an		 百农4199 Bainong 4199 82.0±1.2 42.3±1.6 4.4±0.8 46.3±0.4 845.9±5.8
百农4299 Bainong 4299 86.9±1.7** 39.0±1.6** 5.3±1.2 44.7±0.2** 874.8±3.4*
2020-2021南京
2020-2021 Nanjing		 百农4199 Bainong 4199 72.6±1.8 42.5±0.8 3.8±0.1 41.5±0.2 490±5.2
百农4299 Bainong 4299 72.0±1.2 37.1±1.1** 4.6±0.3 42.8±0.2** 520±4.7*
[1] Ma Z, Xie Q, Li G, Jia H, Zhou J, Kong Z, Li N, Yuan Y. Germplasms, genetics and genomics for better control of disastrous wheat Fusarium head blight. Theor Appl Genet, 2020, 133: 1541-1568.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03525-8
[2] Gilbert J, Tekauz A. Review: recent developments in research on Fusarium head blight of wheat in Canada. Can J Plant Pathol, 2000, 22: 1-8.
doi: 10.1080/07060660009501155
[3] 程顺和, 张勇, 别同德, 高德荣, 张伯桥. 中国小麦赤霉病的危害及抗性遗传改良. 江苏农业学报, 2012, 28: 938-942.
Cheng S H, Zhang Y, Bie T D, Gao D R, Zhang B Q. Damage of wheat Fusarium head blight (FHB) epidemics and genetic improvement of wheat for scab resistance in China. Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2012, 28: 938-942. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] 张爱民, 阳文龙, 李欣, 孙家柱. 小麦抗赤霉病研究现状与展望. 遗传, 2018, 40: 858-873.
Zhang A M, Yang W L, Li X, Sun J Z. Current status and perspective on research against Fusarium head blight in wheat. Hereditas (Beijing), 2018, 40: 858-873. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] Schroeder H W, Christensen J J. Factors affecting resistance of wheat to scab caused by Gibberella zeae. Phytopathology, 1963, 53: 831-838.
[6] Miller J D, Young J C, Sampson D R. Deoxynivalenol and Fusarium head blight resistance in spring cereals. J Phytopathol, 1985, 113: 359-367
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1985.tb04837.x
[7] Mesterházy A. Types and components of resistance to Fusarium head blight of wheat. Plant Breed, 1995, 114: 377-386.
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1995.tb00816.x
[8] Cuthbert P A, Somers D J, Thomas J, Cloutier S, Brulé-Babel A. Fine mapping Fhb1, a major gene controlling Fusarium head blight resistance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2006, 112: 1465-1472.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-006-0249-7
[9] Cuthbert P A, Somers D J, Brulé-Babel A. Mapping of Fhb2on chromosome 6BS: a gene controlling Fusarium head blight field resistance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2007, 114: 429-437.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-006-0439-3
[10] Qi L L, Pumphrey M O, Friebe B, Chen P D, Gill B S. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of alien introgressions with gene Fhb3for resistance to Fusarium head blight disease of wheat. Theor Appl Genet, 2008, 117: 1155-1166.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0853-9 pmid: 18712343
[11] Xue S, Li G, Jia H, Xu F, Lin F, Tang M, Wang Y, An X, Xu H, Zhang L, Kong Z, Ma Z. Fine mapping Fhb4, a major QTL conditioning resistance to Fusarium infection in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2010, 121: 147-156.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1298-5
[12] Xue S, Xu F, Tang M, Zhou Y, Li G, An X, Lin F, Xu H, Jia H, Zhang L, Kong Z, Ma Z. Precise mapping Fhb5, a major QTL conditioning resistance to Fusarium infection in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2011, 123: 1055-1063.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-011-1647-z
[13] Cainong J C, Bockus W W, Feng Y, Chen P, Qi L, Sehgal S K, Danilova T V, Koo D, Friebe B, Gill B S. Chromosome engineering, mapping, and transferring of resistance to Fusarium head blight disease from Elymus tsukushiensis into wheat. Theor Appl Genet, 2015, 128: 1019-1027.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2485-1 pmid: 25726000
[14] Guo J, Zhang X, Hou Y, Cai J, Shen X, Zhou T, Xu H, Ohm H W, Wang H, Li A, Han F, Wang H, Kong L. High-density mapping of the major FHB resistance gene Fhb7 derived from Thinopyrum ponticum and its pyramiding with Fhb1 by marker-assisted selection. Theor Appl Genet, 2015, 128: 2301-2316.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2586-x
[15] Somers D J, Fedak G, Savard M. Molecular mapping of novel genes controlling Fusarium head blight resistance and deoxynivalenol accumulation in spring wheat. Genome, 2003, 46: 555-564.
pmid: 12897863
[16] Jiang G, Dong Y, Shi J, Ward R W. QTL analysis of resistance to Fusarium head blight in the novel wheat germplasm CJ9306: II. Resistance to deoxynivalenol accumulation and grain yield loss. Theor Appl Genet, 2007, 115: 1043-1052.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-007-0630-1
[17] Jiang G, Shi J, Ward R W. QTL analysis of resistance to Fusarium head blight in the novel wheat germplasm CJ 9306: I. Resistance to fungal spread. Theor Appl Genet, 2007, 116: 3-13.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-007-0641-y
[18] Li C, Zhu H, Zhang C, Lin F, Xue S, Cao Y, Zhang Z, Zhang L, Ma Z. Mapping QTLs associated with Fusarium-damaged kernels in the Nanda 2419 × Wangshuibai population. Euphytica, 2008, 163: 185-191.
doi: 10.1007/s10681-007-9626-9
[19] Bonin C M, Kolb F L. Resistance to Fusarium head blight and kernel damage in a winter wheat recombinant inbred line population. Crop Sci, 2009, 49: 1304-1312.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2008.08.0459
[20] Jayatilake D V, Bai G H, Dong Y H. A novel quantitative trait locus for Fusarium head blight resistance in chromosome 7A of wheat. Theor Appl Genet, 2011, 122: 1189-1198.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1523-2 pmid: 21221526
[21] Szabó-Hevér Á, Lehoczki-Krsjak S, Varga M, Purnhauser L, Pauk J, Lantos C, Mesterházy Á. Differential influence of QTL linked to Fusarium head blight, Fusarium-damaged kernel, deoxynivalenol contents and associated morphological traits in a Fontana-derived wheat population. Euphytica, 2014, 200: 9-26.
doi: 10.1007/s10681-014-1124-2
[22] Wang H, Sun S, Ge W, Zhao L, Hou B, Wang K, Lyu Z, Chen L, Xu S, Guo J, Li M, Su P, Li X, Wang G, Bo C, Fang X, Zhuang W, Chen X, Wu J, Dong L, Chen W, Li W, Xian G, Zhao J, Hao Y, Xu Y, Gao Y, Liu W, Liu Y, Yin H, Li J, Li X, Zhao Y, Wang X, Ni F, Ma X, Li A, Xu S S, Bai G, Nevo E, Cao C, Ohm H, Kong L. Horizontal gene transfer of Fhb7 from fungus underlies Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat. Science, 2020, 368: eaba5435.
[23] 张宏军, 宿振起, 柏贵华, 张旭, 马鸿翔, 李腾, 邓云, 买春艳, 于立强, 刘宏伟, 杨丽, 李洪杰, 周阳. 利用Fhb1基因功能标记选择提高黄淮冬麦区小麦品种对赤霉病的抗性. 作物学报, 2018, 44: 505-511.
Zhang H J, Su Z Q, Bai G H, Zhang X, Ma H X, Li T, Deng Y, Mai C Y, Yu L Q, Liu H W, Yang L, Li H J, Zhou Y. Improvement of resistance of wheat cultivars to Fusarium head blight in the Yellow-Huai rivers valley winter wheat zone with functional marker selection of Fhb1 gene. Acta Agron Sin, 2018, 44: 505-511. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.00505
[24] Li G, Zhou J, Jia H, Gao Z, Fan M, Luo Y, Zhao P, Xue S, Li N, Yuan Y, Ma S, Kong Z, Jia L, An X, Jiang G, Liu W, Cao W, Zhang R, Fan J, Xu X, Liu Y, Kong Q, Zheng S, Wang Y, Qin B, Cao S, Ding Y, Shi J, Yan H, Wang X, Ran C, Ma Z. Mutation of a histidine-rich calcium-binding-protein gene in wheat confers resistance to Fusarium head blight. Nat Genet, 2019, 51: 1106-1112.
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0426-7
[25] Jia H, Zhou J, Xue S, Li G, Yan H, Ran C, Zhang Y, Shi J, Wang X, Luo J, Ma Z. A journey to understand wheat Fusarium head blight resistance in the Chinese wheat landrace Wangshuibai. Crop J, 2018, 6: 48-59.
doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2017.09.006
[26] Xue S, Li G, Jia H, Lin F, Cao Y, Xu F, Tang M, Wang Y, Wu X, Zhang Z, Zhang L, Kong Z, Ma Z. Marker-assisted development and evaluation of near-isogenic lines for scab resistance QTLs of wheat. Mol Breed, 2010, 25: 397-405.
doi: 10.1007/s11032-009-9339-y
[27] Zhang Y, Yang Z, Ma H, Huang L, Ding F, Du Y, Jia H, Li G, Kong Z, Ran C, Gu Z, Ma Z. Pyramiding of Fusarium head blight resistance quantitative trait loci, Fhb1, Fhb4, and Fhb5, in modern Chinese wheat cultivars. Front Plant Sci, 2021, 12: 694023.
[28] Ma Z Q, Sorrells M E. Genetic analysis of fertility restoration in wheat using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Crop Sci, 1995, 35: 1137-1143.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500040037x
[29] Bassam B J, Caetano-Anollés G, Gresshoff P M. Fast and sensitive silver staining of DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem, 1991, 196: 80-83.
pmid: 1716076
[30] 许峰, 李文阳, 闫素辉, 张从宇, 郑甲成, 杜军丽, 张子学, 时侠清. 小麦抗赤霉病主效QTL的聚合效应分析. 麦类作物学报, 2017, 37: 585-593.
Xu F, Li W Y, Yan S H, Zhang C Y, Zheng J C, Du J L, Zhang Z X, Shi X Q. Analysis of pyramiding effect of major QTLs for resistance to scab in wheat. J Triticeae Crops, 2017, 37: 585-593. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31] 李静静, 史娜溶, 杨孟于, 王金鹏, 孙道杰, 冯毅, 张玲丽. 抗赤霉病小麦优异新种质的分子标记辅助选择. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40: 261-269.
Li J J, Shi N R, Yang M Y, Wang J P, Sun D J, Feng Y, Zhang L L. Marker-assisted selection for Fusarium head blight resistance of wheat germplasms with excellent agronomy traits and seed quality. J Triticeae Crops, 2020, 40: 261-269 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32] 刘建军, 李豪圣, 陈雪燕, 贾海燕, 翟胜男, 郭军, 程敦公, 刘成, 曹新有, 刘爱峰, 宋健民, 刘佳, 楚秀生, 马正强. 利用分子标记辅助选择创制抗赤霉病小麦新品系. 山东农业科学, 2021, 53: 74-79.
Liu J J, Li H S, Chen X Y, Jia H Y, Zhai S N, Guo J, Cheng D G, Liu C, Cao X Y, Liu A F, Song J M, Liu J, Chu X S, Ma Z Q. Creation of new wheat lines with Fusarium head blight resistance through molecular marker-assisted selection. Shandong Agric Sci, 2021, 53(3): 74-79. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2