欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2): 514-528.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.34086

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    

氮肥和缩节胺对棉花纤维产量及品质时间分布的影响

李志坤1,2,**(), 贾文华1,3,**(), 朱伟1, 刘伟1,*(), 马宗斌1,*()   

  1. 1河南农业大学农学院, 河南郑州 450046
    2浙江省农业技术推广中心, 浙江杭州 310020
    3河南省种业发展中心, 河南郑州 450046
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-21 接受日期:2023-09-13 出版日期:2024-02-12 网络出版日期:2023-09-21
  • 通讯作者: *刘伟, E-mail: liuwei0205@henau.edu.cn;马宗斌, E-mail: zongbinma@henau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李志坤, E-mail: wdlzk@sina.cn;贾文华, E-mail: 13523476880@163.com
    **同等贡献
  • 基金资助:
    河南省科技攻关项目(222102110435);河南省现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金项目(S2013-07-G04)

Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and DPC combined application on temporal distribution of cotton yield and fiber quality

LI Zhi-Kun1,2,**(), JIA Wen-Hua1,3,**(), ZHU Wei1, LIU Wei1,*(), MA Zong-Bin1,*()   

  1. 1College of Agriculture, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, Henan, China
    2Zhejiang Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Hangzhou 310020, Zhejiang, China
    3Henan Province Seed Industry Development Center, Zhengzhou 450046, Henan, China
  • Received:2023-05-21 Accepted:2023-09-13 Published:2024-02-12 Published online:2023-09-21
  • Contact: *E-mail: liuwei0205@henau.edu.cn; E-mail: zongbinma@henau.edu.cn
  • About author:**Contributed equally to this work
  • Supported by:
    Science and Technology Research Program of Henan Province(222102110435);Special Fund for Henan Agriculture Research System(S2013-07-G04)

RichHTML

12

PDF

376

摘要：

棉花伏前桃、伏桃、早秋桃和晚秋桃(“四桃”)的时空分布不同, 但目前“四桃”的纤维产量和品质差异及其对氮(N)肥与缩节胺(DPC)配施的响应鲜见报道。2015—2017年, 在郑州市黄河滩区采用双因素裂区设计, 以3个N肥用量为主区, 即不施N肥(N0)、常量施N(N1)和过量施N(N2), 用量分别为0、225和450 kg hm-2; 以3个DPC用量为副区, 即不喷施DPC (D0)、常量DPC (D1)和过量DPC (D2), 用量分别为0、75和150 g hm-2。研究了N肥与DPC配施对棉花纤维产量及品质时间分布的影响。结果表明, (1) N1处理的“四桃”纤维产量比N0和N2处理分别增加36.79%和3.27%, N2处理减产不显著; D1处理比D0和D2处理分别增产17.53%和8.50%, D2处理减产达到显著水平; N1D1组合产量最高, 其余组合减产1.15%~51.53%。N1D1组合的伏前桃、伏桃、早秋桃和晚秋桃产量分别占8.89%、45.35%、33.41%和12.36%, 伏桃和早秋桃是产量主体, 但早秋桃的成产强度大。随着施N量增加, 早秋桃和晚秋桃的纤维产量占比增加, 而随着DPC用量增加则表现相反。(2) N肥用量和DPC用量均对纤维长度、整齐度、比强度和马克隆值有显著影响, 但对纤维伸长率影响达不到显著水平。N1处理和D1处理的纤维品质综合表现最优, 但D0处理马克隆值最佳。N肥与DPC用量互作对“四桃”的纤维比强度和马克隆值有显著影响, 其中, N1D1处理“四桃”的比强度和马克隆值均表现最优, 而N2D2处理“四桃”的比强度和马克隆值表现最差。此外, 过量施N和过量喷施DPC均会升高马克隆值。(3) “四桃”的纤维品质存在差异。伏前桃的纤维品质除马克隆值最优外, 其纤维长度、整齐度和比强度最差; 伏桃和早秋桃的纤维长度、整齐度和比强度最优, 但马克隆值表现最差, 伸长率居中; 晚秋桃的伸长率最优, 其余品质指标均居中。研究结果丰富了“四桃”产量和品质差异的相关理论, 并为棉花合理施N和喷施DPC以及“四桃”纤维的合理利用提供了科学依据。

关键词: 棉花, 氮肥, 缩节胺, 四桃, 纤维产量, 纤维品质

Abstract:

The temporal and spatial distribution of cotton pre-summer boll, summer boll, early-autumn boll, and late-autumn boll (“four peaches”) are different, but there are few reports on the difference of their fiber yield and quality, as well as response to nitrogen (N) rates and mepiquat chloride (DPC) application. From 2015 to 2017, we employed a split-plot design in randomized complete blocks in this work in the Yellow River beach area of Zhengzhou city. The main plots were assigned to N fertilizer rates, namely no N application (N0), normal N (N1), and excessive N (N2), with the rate of 0, 225, and 450 N kg hm-2, respectively. And the subplots to DPC dosages, namely no DPC (D0), normal DPC (D1), and excessive DPC (D2), with the dosages of 0, 75, and 150 g hm-2, respectively. The effects of N fertilizer and DPC combined application on temporal distribution of cotton yield and fiber quality were studied. The results showed that: (1) The fiber yield of N1 treatment increased by 36.79% and 3.72% compared with N0 and N2 treatments, respectively, and N2 treatment did not significantly decrease the yield compared with N1. The fiber yield of D1 treatment increased by17.53% and 8.50% compared with D0 and D2 treatments, respectively, and D2 treatment decreased the yield significantly compared with D1. The fiber yield of N1D1 combined treatment was the highest, and yield of all the other combined treatments decreased by 1.15%-51.53% compared with N1D1. The proportions of fiber yield of pre-summer boll, summer boll, early-autumn boll, and late-autumn boll with N1D1 combined treatment were 8.89%, 45.35%, 33.41%, and 12.36%, respectively. Both summer boll and early-autumn boll were main yield components, but the early-autumn boll had the highest intensity of yield formation in particular. And with the increase of N application rates, the proportions of fiber yield of early-autumn boll and late-autumn boll increased, but DPC application dosages showed the opposite characteristics. (2) With the exception of the fiber elongation, fiber length, fiber length uniformity, fiber strength, and micronaire value of “four peaches” were significantly affected by N fertilizer rates and DPC dosages. The optimal fiber quality was harvested with N1 treatment compared with N0 and N2 treatments, and D1 treatment showed the highest-grade fiber compared with D0 and D2 treatments, but the fiber micronaire values with D0 treatment was the best. N and DPC combined treatments had significantly interaction effect on fiber strength and micronaire value, and N1D1 had the best fiber strength and micronaire value with “four peaches” among the different treatment combinations, while N2D2 showed opposite trend. Moreover, the excessive using of N fertilizer and DPC led to the degradation of fiber micronaire value. (3) The fiber quality of “four peaches” were different. The fiber length, fiber length uniformity, and fiber strength of pre-summer boll were poor, but its micronaire value was higher grade, and the fiber quality of summer boll and early-autumn boll had exactly the opposite effect. As for fiber quality of late autumn boll, the elongation was the best, and the other quality index were in the middle. These findings enriched the theoretical basis of the yield and quality difference of cotton “four peaches”, and provided scientific supports for rational application of N and DPC in cotton fields and reasonable utilization of the fiber of cotton “four peaches”.

Key words: cotton, nitrogen fertilizer, DPC, four peaches, fiber yield, fiber quality

表1

供试土壤养分状況"

年份
Year		 有机质
Organic matter
(g kg-1)		 全氮
Total nitrogen
(g kg-1)		 碱解氮
Alkaline nitrogen
(mg kg-1)		 速效磷
Available phosphorus (mg kg-1)		 速效钾
Available potassium
(mg kg-1)		 pH
2015 9.60 0.56 56.0 4.6 83.0 8.3
2016 9.23 0.33 79.0 6.2 84.0 8.3
2017 9.42 0.58 57.0 4.3 92.0 8.4

表2

2015-2017年河南省棉花生长期月均基本气象数据"

年份
Year		 日均气温
Mean daily air
temperature
(℃)		 温度比常年
Mean daily
temperature than
the normal year (℃)		 月均降水量
Mean month
precipitation
(mm)		 降水比常年
Mean month
precipitation than the normal year (mm)		 月均日照时数
Mean month sunshine hours (h)		 日照比常年
Mean month sunshine hours than the normal year (h)
2015 22.1 0.0 81.2 -10.8 159.8 -20.6
2016 22.9 0.7 103.6 11.6 158.8 -21.7
2017 22.3 0.8 105.0 12.8 174.5 -3.4

表3

N肥与DPC配施对棉花“四桃”纤维产量的影响"

年份
Year		 N肥用量
N rate		 DPC用量
DPC dosage		 伏前桃
Pre-summer boll		 伏桃
Summer boll		 早秋桃
Early-autumn boll		 晚秋桃
Late-autumn boll		 总产
Total yield
2015 N0 D0 84.56 d 453.06 e 239.12 e 107.93 d 884.67 d
D1 116.36 bcd 502.39 e 374.42 d 99.88 d 1093.04 cd
D2 136.80 abcd 536.36 de 475.16 c 102.04 d 1250.37 c
N1 D0 103.56 cd 727.90 ab 631.36 b 263.41 bc 1726.23 ab
D1 143.80 abc 785.28 a 769.66 a 241.10 c 1939.84 a
D2 173.72 a 749.25 ab 492.38 c 216.72 c 1632.06 b
N2 D0 118.18 abcd 469.21 e 637.20 b 347.60 a 1572.19 b
D1 167.61 ab 675.43 bc 714.48 ab 330.76 ab 1888.28 a
D2 155.61 abc 610.91 cd 615.89 b 201.06 c 1583.47 b
2016 N0 D0 112.51 b 526.11 c 185.78 c 120.84 cd 945.24 e
D1 186.22 a 645.01 c 372.77 bc 140.82 cd 1314.82 cd
D2 188.90 a 590.41 c 334.32 c 129.56 cd 1243.20 de
N1 D0 111.87 b 858.99 ab 363.23 bc 151.27 bcd 1485.39 cd
D1 193.54 a 1039.96 a 634.62 a 280.62 ab 2148.74 a
D2 192.43 a 961.56 a 535.18 ab 261.28 abc 1950.45 ab
N2 D0 180.25 b 687.62 c 551.70 ab 321.25 a 1655.81 bc
D1 191.08 a 896.86 ab 605.69 a 305.30 a 2050.05 a
D2 196.23 a 690.20 bc 539.52 ab 189.20 abcd 1615.15 bc
2017 N0 D0 117.22 b 493.17 c 237.99 c 150.53 cd 998.91 b
D1 165.97 ab 576.60 c 355.24 bc 130.74 de 1228.55 b
D2 172.21 ab 551.55 c 354.05 bc 91.65 e 1169.46 b
N1 D0 167.06 ab 788.61 ab 462.51 ab 157.22 cd 1575.40 a
D1 180.19 a 830.17 ab 545.75 ab 203.86 c 1759.97 a
D2 206.89 a 902.04 a 532.14 ab 164.11 cd 1805.17 a
N2 D0 148.87 ab 561.73 b 645.04 a 337.95 a 1693.59 a
D1 169.02 ab 783.42 ab 608.44 a 269.97 b 1830.84 a
D2 204.78 a 740.88 b 543.82 ab 171.29 cd 1660.77 a
平均值 N0 142.31 b 538.30 c 325.43 c 119.33 c 1125.36 b
Average N1 163.67 a 849.31 a 551.87 b 215.51 b 1780.36 a
N2 170.18 a 670.14 b 606.86 a 274.93 a 1722.11 a
D0 127.12 b 609.05 b 439.32 c 217.56 a 1393.05 c
D1 168.20 a 745.01 a 553.45 a 222.56 a 1689.22 a
D2 180.84 a 703.69 a 491.38 b 169.66 b 1545.57 b
变异来源 Y ** ** ** NS NS
Source of N ** ** ** ** **
variation D ** ** ** ** **
Y×N NS NS NS NS NS
Y×D NS NS NS NS NS
N×D NS NS ** ** *
Y×N×D NS NS NS NS NS

表4

N肥与DPC配施对棉花“四桃”纤维长度的影响"

年份
Year		 N肥用量
N rate		 DPC用量
DPC dosage		 伏前桃
Pre-summer boll		 伏桃
Summer boll		 早秋桃
Early-autumn boll		 晚秋桃
Late-autumn boll
2015 N0 D0 29.63 a (c) 31.23 a (a) 30.17 abc (bc) 30.77 a (ab)
D1 29.94 a (a) 30.50 ab (a) 29.40 abc (a) 29.63 ab (a)
D2 29.80 a (a) 29.53 bc (a) 28.83 bc (a) 28.73 b (a)
N1 D0 29.97 a (a) 30.67 a (a) 30.50 ab (a) 30.67 a (a)
D1 29.73 a (a) 31.37 a (a) 30.73 a (a) 30.47 a (a)
D2 29.80 a (a) 28.83 c (a) 29.63 abc (a) 29.73 ab (a)
N2 D0 30.27 a (a) 30.60 a (a) 29.57 abc (a) 30.80 a (a)
D1 29.97 a (a) 30.37 ab (a) 29.50 abc (a) 29.97 ab (a)
D2 29.90 a (a) 28.90 c (a) 28.73 c (a) 29.70 ab (a)
2016 N0 D0 30.53 a (a) 30.87 ab (a) 30.30 a (a) 29.27 a (b)
D1 30.73 a (a) 30.40 ab (ab) 30.63 a (a) 29.07 a (b)
D2 30.47 a (a) 30.33 ab (a) 29.97 a (a) 28.90 a (a)
N1 D0 30.57 a (a) 30.73 ab (a) 30.80 a (a) 29.57 a (a)
D1 30.73 a (a) 29.93 ab (a) 30.60 a (a) 30.30 a (a)
D2 29.83 a (b) 29.63 b (b) 30.83 a (a) 28.77 a (c)
N2 D0 30.63 a (ab) 31.23 a (a) 30.13 a (ab) 29.37 a (b)
D1 29.63 a (a) 30.17 ab (a) 30.93 a (a) 30.13 a (a)
D2 29.83 a (ab) 30.33 ab (ab) 31.13 a (a) 29.07 a (b)
2017 N0 D0 27.97 a (a) 28.20 a (a) 28.13 a (a) 28.13 a (a)
D1 27.10 ab (a) 27.37 a (a) 27.97 a (a) 27.97 a (a)
D2 27.60 ab (a) 27.67 a (a) 28.00 a (a) 28.00 a (a)
N1 D0 26.63 b (b) 28.43 a (a) 27.47 a (ab) 27.57 a (ab)
D1 27.17 ab (b) 27.67 a (a) 27.33 a (ab) 27.33 a (ab)
D2 26.53 b (a) 27.20 a (a) 27.87 a (a) 27.87 a (a)
N2 D0 26.63 b (a) 27.27 a (a) 27.00 a (a) 27.00 a (a)
D1 27.07 ab (a) 27.10 a (a) 27.53 a (a) 27.53 a (a)
D2 26.47 b (a) 26.93 a (a) 27.57 a (a) 27.57 a (a)
平均值 N0 29.73 a 29.57 a 29.27 ab 28.94 a
Average N1 29.00 b 29.39 a 29.54 a 29.14 a
N2 28.93 b 29.21 a 29.12 b 29.01 a
D0 29.20 a 29.91 a 29.35 a 29.24 a
D1 29.54 a 29.43 b 29.40 a 29.16 ab
D2 28.91 a 28.82 c 29.17 a 28.70 b
变异来源 Y ** ** ** **
Source of N * NS NS NS
variation D NS ** NS *
Y×N NS NS * NS
Y×D NS * NS *
N×D NS NS NS NS
Y×N×D NS NS NS NS

表5

N肥与DPC配施对棉花“四桃”纤维长度整齐度的影响"

年份
Year		 N肥用量
N rate		 DPC用量
DPC dosage		 伏前桃
Pre-summer boll		 伏桃
Summer boll		 早秋桃
Early-autumn boll		 晚秋桃
Late-autumn boll
2015 N0 D0 78.47 ab (b) 82.37 c (a) 82.00 ab (a) 82.23 ab (a)
D1 79.80 a (b) 85.23 a (a) 81.03 abc (b) 81.13 c (b)
D2 79.67 a (ab) 82.47 c (a) 79.27 d (b) 80.07 d (ab)
N1 D0 79.10 ab (b) 83.63 b (a) 80.87 abcd (b) 82.93 a (a)
D1 80.97 a (c) 84.90 a (a) 82.63 a (b) 82.93 a (b)
D2 79.53 a (b) 82.80 bc (a) 80.13 cd (b) 82.80 ab (a)
N2 D0 79.77 a (b) 82.97 bc (a) 81.37 abc (ab) 81.67 bc (ab)
D1 79.97 a (b) 82.90 bc (a) 82.07 ab (a) 82.60 ab (a)
D2 76.87 b (b) 81.83 c (a) 80.73 bcd (a) 81.20 c (a)
2016 N0 D0 84.23 ab (a) 85.80 a (a) 85.40 a (a) 84.10 a (a)
D1 84.23 ab (ab) 84.83 ab (ab) 85.03 a (a) 82.60 a (b)
D2 84.43 ab (ab) 84.20 b (ab) 85.97 a (a) 80.47 a (b)
N1 D0 85.53 a (ab) 84.53 ab (bc) 86.40 a (a) 83.43 a (c)
D1 84.90 ab (a) 84.50 ab (a) 85.77 a (a) 84.27 a (a)
D2 84.90 ab (a) 84.90 ab (a) 85.37 a (a) 81.20 a (b)
N2 D0 85.07 ab (ab) 85.37 ab (a) 85.67 a (a) 83.403 a (b)
D1 84.90 ab (b) 84.67 ab (b) 86.17 a (a) 83.33 a (a)
D2 83.73 b (ab) 84.68 ab (ab) 86.33 a (a) 82.03 a (b)
2017 N0 D0 80.53 ab (a) 81.67 a (a) 80.03 b (a) 80.03 b (a)
D1 79.50 a (a) 78.77 b (a) 80.20 b (a) 80.20 b (a)
D2 79.40 a (ab) 79.23 b (b) 80.90 ab (a) 80.90 ab (a)
N1 D0 80.60 a (a) 79.90 ab (a) 80.50 ab (a) 80.50 ab (a)
D1 78.43 a (b) 80.50 ab (a) 81.13 ab (a) 81.13 ab (a)
D2 81.23 a (ab) 79.77 ab (b) 82.40 a (a) 82.40 a (a)
N2 D0 81.00 a (a) 80.30 ab (a) 81.23 ab (a) 81.23 ab (a)
D1 80.33 a (a) 78.57 b (a) 80.13 b (a) 80.13 b (a)
D2 78.57 a (b) 79.67 ab (ab) 81.93 ab (a) 81.93 ab (a)
平均值 N0 78.92 a 82.73 ab 82.20 b 81.30 b
Average N1 81.69 a 82.83 a 82.80 a 82.40 a
N2 81.13 a 82.33 b 82.85 a 81.97 ab
D0 79.37 a 82.95 a 82.61 a 82.19 a
D1 81.45 a 82.76 a 82.69 a 82.04 a
D2 80.93 a 82.17 b 82.56 a 81.44 a
变异来源 Y ** ** ** **
Sources of N NS NS * *
variation D NS ** NS NS
Y×N NS NS NS NS
Y×D NS ** ** **
N×D NS NS NS NS
Y×N×D NS * NS NS

表6

N肥与DPC配施对棉花“四桃”纤维比强度的影响"

年份
Year		 N肥用量
N rate		 DPC用量
DPC dosage		 伏前桃
Pre-summer boll		 伏桃
Summer boll		 早秋桃
Early-autumn boll		 晚秋桃
Late-autumn boll
2015 N0 D0 26.10 de (b) 29.43 ab (a) 30.03 ab (a) 28.97 cd (a)
D1 27.50 bc (b) 29.40 ab (a) 29.70 ab (a) 30.13 bc (a)
D2 26.27 cde (b) 29.60 ab (a) 28.03 b (ab) 28.07 d (ab)
N1 D0 27.73 b (b) 31.07 a (a) 29.50 ab (a) 30.77 ab (a)
D1 29.73 a (b) 30.47 a (a) 29.50 ab (b) 31.87 a (a)
D2 27.03 bcd (b) 28.13 bc (b) 27.90 b (b) 30.57 ab (a)
N2 D0 26.60 bcde (b) 30.07 a (a) 29.30 ab (a) 30.73 ab (a)
D1 27.07 bcd (c) 27.37 c (bc) 30.40 a (a) 29.37 bcd (ab)
D2 25.60 e (c) 26.53 c (bc) 27.90 ab (ab) 29.27 bcd (a)
2016 N0 D0 26.73 d (b) 28.13 bc (ab) 30.03 ab (a) 30.77 ab (a)
D1 27.30 bcd (b) 28.40 bc (ab) 29.70 ab (a) 27.73 cd (ab)
D2 26.87 cd (ab) 26.40 c (ab) 28.03 b (a) 25.70 de (b)
N1 D0 28.47 ab (ab) 27.70 bc (b) 29.50 ab (a) 29.83 abc (a)
D1 29.10 a (b) 31.20 a (a) 29.50 ab (b) 31.90 a (a)
D2 28.07 abcd (a) 28.00 bc (a) 27.90 b (a) 27.63 cd (a)
N2 D0 28.37 abc (a) 28.90 b (a) 29.30 ab (a) 29.70 abc (a)
D1 29.10 a (a) 29.10 ab (a) 30.40 a (a) 28.63 bc (a)
D2 26.70 d (ab) 27.03 bc (ab) 27.90 ab (a) 25.17 e (b)
2017 N0 D0 26.30 b (a) 26.90 b (a) 25.70 b (a) 26.37 bc (a)
D1 26.90 b (a) 26.60 b (a) 26.43 b (a) 26.77 bc (a)
D2 25.70 b (b) 25.97 b (b) 25.50 b (b) 27.50 ab (a)
N1 D0 27.33 b (a) 27.33 b (a) 26.97 b (a) 26.97 bc (a)
D1 29.40 a (a) 30.03 a (a) 28.90 a (a) 28.57 a (a)
D2 26.60 b (a) 27.63 b (a) 27.13 b (a) 26.47 bc (a)
N2 D0 26.43 b (a) 26.43 b (a) 26.40 b (a) 26.40 bc (a)
D1 26.43 b (a) 27.43 b (a) 26.83 b (a) 26.83 bc (a)
D2 25.63 b (a) 26.40 b (a) 26.47 b (a) 25.60 c (a)
平均值 N0 26.63 b 27.87 b 28.09 b 28.00 b
Average N1 28.17 a 29.06 a 28.92 a 29.40 a
N2 26.88 b 27.70 b 28.30 ab 27.98 b
D0 27.12 b 28.44 a 28.53 b 28.94 a
D1 28.06 a 28.89 a 29.29 a 29.09 a
D2 26.50 c 27.30 b 27.58 c 27.33 b
变异来源 Y NS NS NS NS
Source of N ** ** * **
variation D ** ** ** **
Y×N NS * * NS
Y×D NS ** NS **
N×D NS * NS **
Y×N×D NS NS NS *

表7

N肥与DPC配施对棉花“四桃”纤维马克隆值的影响"

年份
Year		 N肥用量
N rate		 DPC用量
DPC dosage		 伏前桃
Pre-summer boll		 伏桃
Summer boll		 早秋桃
Early-autumn boll		 晚秋桃
Late-autumn boll
2015 N0 D0 4.63 cd (b) 5.07 a (a) 4.57 b (b) 4.43 c (b)
D1 5.07 a (a) 4.97 ab (ab) 4.97 a (ab) 4.87 ab (b)
D2 5.00 ab (a) 5.13 a (a) 5.17 a (a) 5.03 ab (a)
N1 D0 4.53 cde (a) 4.60 cde (a) 4.70 b (a) 4.77 bc (a)
D1 4.33 e (a) 4.40 e (a) 4.57 b (a) 4.43 c (a)
D2 4.93 ab (a) 4.93 ab (a) 5.10 a (a) 5.03 ab (a)
N2 D0 3.53 f (c) 4.57 de (b) 4.67 b (ab) 4.87 ab (a)
D1 4.43 de (b) 4.87 abc (a) 5.07 a (a) 5.03 ab (a)
D2 4.77 bc (b) 4.77 bcd (b) 5.13 a (a) 5.20 a (a)
2016 N0 D0 4.53 abc (ab) 4.83 a (a) 4.73 cd (a) 4.13 bcd (b)
D1 4.57 abc (a) 4.57 a (a) 4.80 cd (a) 3.73 d (b)
D2 4.60 abc (b) 4.87 a (ab) 5.20 ab (a) 3.87 cd (c)
N1 D0 4.30 c (ab) 4.43 a (a) 4.67 cd (a) 3.77 cd (b)
D1 4.37 bc (ab) 4.47 a (a) 4.53 d (a) 4.23 bc (b)
D2 4.87 ab (ab) 4.87 a (ab) 4.93 bc (a) 4.47 ab (b)
N2 D0 4.70 abc (ab) 4.70 a (a) 4.50 d (ab) 4.13 bcd (b)
D1 4.50 abc (b) 4.50 a (b) 4.97 abc (a) 4.57 ab (b)
D2 4.90 a (b) 4.90 a (b) 5.33 a (a) 4.77 a (b)
2017 N0 D0 4.53 cde (a) 4.67 d (a) 4.77 cd (a) 4.63 c (a)
D1 4.83 bcd (a) 4.73 cd (a) 5.00 abc (a) 4.93 abc (a)
D2 5.30 a (a) 5.10 abc (a) 5.20 ab (a) 5.20 a (a)
N1 D0 4.40 e (a) 4.73 cd (a) 4.67 cd (a) 4.73 bc (a)
D1 4.27 e (b) 4.63 d (a) 4.63 d (a) 4.73 bc (a)
D2 4.87 bc (a) 4.87 bcd (a) 5.27 a (a) 5.07 ab (a)
N2 D0 4.47 de (c) 5.00 bcd (ab) 4.57 d (bc) 5.13 ab (a)
D1 4.80 bcd (a) 5.17 ab (a) 4.90 bcd (a) 5.17 a (a)
D2 5.17 ab (a) 5.43 a (a) 5.20 ab (a) 5.20 a (a)
平均值 N0 4.79 a 4.88 a 4.93 a 4.54 b
Average N1 4.54 b 4.66 b 4.79 b 4.58 b
N2 4.59 b 4.88 a 4.93 a 4.90 a
D0 4.40 c 4.73 b 4.65 c 4.51 c
D1 4.57 b 4.70 b 4.83 b 4.63 b
D2 4.93 a 4.99 a 5.17 a 4.87 a
变异来源 Y * ** NS **
Source of N ** ** ** **
variation D ** ** ** **
Y×N ** ** NS NS
Y×D * NS NS NS
N×D ** NS ** NS
Y×N×D ** NS NS **

表8

N肥与DPC配施对棉花“四桃”纤维伸长率的影响"

年份
Year		 N肥用量
N rate		 DPC用量
DPC dosage		 伏前桃
Pre-summer boll		 伏桃
Summer boll		 早秋桃
Early-autumn boll		 晚秋桃
Late-autumn boll
2015 N0 D0 4.80 a (b) 5.17 a (a) 5.17 abc (a) 5.03 a (a)
D1 4.70 a (b) 5.17 a (a) 5.23 a (a) 5.13 a (a)
D2 4.77 a (b) 5.20 a (a) 5.10 bc (a) 5.10 a (a)
N1 D0 4.67 a (b) 5.17 a (a) 5.20 ab (a) 5.10 a (a)
D1 4.77 a (b) 5.13 a (a) 5.23 a (a) 5.17 a (a)
D2 4.60 a (b) 5.10 a (a) 5.17 abc (a) 5.10 a (a)
N2 D0 4.73 a (b) 5.20 a (a) 5.07 c (a) 5.13 a (a)
D1 4.70 a (b) 5.13 a (a) 5.20 ab (a) 5.13 a (a)
D2 4.70 a (b) 5.17 a (a) 5.17 abc (a) 5.17 a (a)
2016 N0 D0 4.13 a (a) 4.77 a (a) 4.60 a (a) 4.83 a (a)
D1 4.20 a (b) 4.53 a (a) 4.93 a (a) 4.47 a (b)
D2 4.23 a (b) 4.83 a (a) 4.63 a (ab) 4.97 a (a)
N1 D0 4.20 a (a) 4.30 a (a) 4.87 a (a) 4.97 a (a)
D1 4.63 a (ab) 4.43 a (b) 4.70 a (ab) 5.10 a (a)
D2 4.67 a (a) 4.57 a (a) 4.40 a (a) 4.87 a (a)
N2 D0 4.37 a (a) 4.43 a (a) 4.73 a (a) 4.87 a (a)
D1 4.53 a (a) 4.70 a (a) 4.63 a (a) 4.60 a (a)
D2 4.23 a (c) 4.40 a (bc) 4.90 a (ab) 5.10 a (a)
2017 N0 D0 6.57 a (a) 6.57 a (a) 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a)
D1 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a)
D2 6.57 a (a) 6.57 a (a) 6.57 a (a) 6.57 a (a)
N1 D0 6.60 a (a) 6.60 a (a) 6.57 a (a) 6.57 a (a)
D1 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a)
D2 6.60 a (a) 6.60 a (a) 6.60 a (a) 6.60 a (a)
N2 D0 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a)
D1 6.50 a (a) 6.57 a (a) 6.53 a (a) 6.53 a (a)
D2 6.50 a (a) 6.50 a (a) 6.57 a (a) 6.57 a (a)
平均值 N0 5.17 a 5.48 a 5.48 a 5.46 a
Average N1 5.25 a 5.38 a 5.47 a 5.56 a
N2 5.21 a 5.40 a 5.48 a 5.51 a
D0 5.18 a 5.41 a 5.47 a 5.51 a
D1 5.24 a 5.41 a 5.50 a 5.47 a
D2 5.21 a 5.44 a 5.46 a 5.56 a
变异来源 Y ** ** ** **
Source of N NS NS NS NS
variation D NS NS NS NS
Y×N NS NS NS NS
Y×D NS NS NS NS
N×D NS NS NS NS
Y×N×D NS NS NS NS
[1] 毛树春, 马小艳, 程思贤, 王文魁, 张亚林, 黄群, 吴冬梅. 我国高品质棉花产需分析与发展建议. 中国棉花, 2020, 47(3): 1-5.
Mao S C, Ma X Y, Cheng S X, Wang W K, Zhang Y L, Huang Q, Wu D M. Analysis and strategy for the production and demand of high-quality cotton in China. China Cotton, 2020, 47(3): 1-5 (in Chinese).
[2] 李付广. 全产业链布局推进中国棉花提质增效及提升国际竞争力. 农学学报, 2019, 9(3): 6-10.
Li F G. China’s cotton industry through construction of the whole industrial chain: improving quality and performance and enhancing international competitiveness. J Agric, 2019, 9(3): 6-10 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 唐淑荣. 中国棉花纤维品质综合评价与区域特征分布研究. 南京农业大学博士学位论文, 江苏南京, 2017.
Tang S R. Comprehensive Evaluation and Study on Regional Characteristics Distribution of Cotton Fiber Quality in China. PhD Dissertation of Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 2017 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 郭宏, 于霁雯, 裴文锋, 关永虎, 李航, 李长喜, 刘金伟, 王伟, 王宝全, 梅拥军. 南疆陆地棉杂种F2的遗传分析及遗传主效聚类. 作物学报, 2023, 49: 608-621.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.24008
Guo H, Yu J W, Pei W F, Guan Y H, Li H, Li C X, Liu J W, Wang W, Wang B Q, Mei Y J. Genetic analysis of F2 generation of upland cotton hybrids and main effect clustering in Southern Xinjiang, China. Acta Agron Sin, 2023, 49: 608-621 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] Sahar A, Zafar M M, Razzaq A, Manan A, Haroon M, Sajid S, Rehman A, Mo H J, Ashraf M, Ren M Z, Shakeel A, Yuan Y L. Genetic variability for yield and fiber related traits in genetically modified cotton. J Cotton Res, 2021, 4: 219-228.
[6] 韩慧君. 气候生态因素对棉花产量与纤维品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 1991, 24(5): 23-29.
Han H J. Effects of climatic-ecologic factors on cotton yield and fiber quality. Sci Agric Sin, 1991, 24(5): 23-29 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] Asif I, Dong Q, Wang Z, Wang X R, Gui H P, Zhang H H, Pang N C, Zhang X L, Song M Z. Growth and nitrogen metabolism are associated with nitrogen-use efficiency in cotton genotypes. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2020, 149: 61-74.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.02.002
[8] Mojtaba H, Sami U A, Ahad M. Cotton fiber quality response to nitrogen depends on source-sink process, boll growth habit, and weather condition. Ind Crops Prod, 2022, 186: 115279.
doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115279
[9] 马宗斌, 严根土, 刘桂珍, 黄群, 李伶俐, 朱伟. 施氮量对黄河滩区棉花叶片生理特性、干物质积累及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19: 849-857.
Ma Z B, Yan G T, Liu G Z, Huang Q, Li L L, Zhu W. Effects of nitrogen application rates on main physiological characteristics of leaves, dry matter accumulation and yield of cotton cultivated in the Yellow River bottomlands. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2013, 19: 849-857 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] 熊宗伟, 王雪姣, 顾生浩, 张立祯, 周治国. 中国主产棉区气象因子和纤维品质的相关性研究. 棉花学报, 2014, 26(2): 95-104.
Xiong Z W, Wang X J, Gu S H, Zhang L Z, Zhou Z G. Correlation between meteorological factors and cotton fiber quality in major cotton-producing regions of China. Cotton Sci, 2014, 26(2): 95-104 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] Luo Z, Hu Q Y, Tang W, Wang X W, Lu H Q, Zhang Z, Liu T, Kong X Q. Effects of N fertilizer rate and planting density on short-season cotton yield, N agronomic efficiency and soil N using 15N tracing technique. Eur J Agron, 2022, 138: 126546.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2022.126546
[12] Ma K, Wang Z H, Li H Q, Wang T Y, Chen R. Effects of nitrogen application and brackish water irrigation on yield and quality of cotton. Agric Water Manag, 2022, 264: 107512.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107512
[13] Tung S A, Huang Y, Hafeez A, Ali S, Liu A D, Chattha M S, Ahmad S, Yang G Z. Morpho-physiological effects and molecular mode of action of mepiquat chloride application in cotton: a review. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2020, 20: 2073-2086.
doi: 10.1007/s42729-020-00276-0
[14] 娄善伟, 高飞, 王崇, 田晓莉, 杜明伟, 段留生. 不同甲哌鎓滴施剂型筛选及其对棉花生长发育调控效果研究. 作物学报, 2023, 49: 552-560.
Lou S W, Gao F, Wang C, Tian X L, Du M W, Duan L S. Screening of different dropping formulations about mepiquat chloride and their effects on cotton growth and development. Acta Agron Sin, 2023, 49: 552-560 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] Mao L L, Zhang L Z, Jochem B E, Wopke V D W, Liu S D, Zhang S P, Wang B M, Li Z H. Yield components and quality of intercropped cotton in response to mepiquat chloride and plant density. Field Crops Res, 2015, 179: 63-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.04.011
[16] Shahbaz A T, Ying H, Saif A, Abdul H, Adnan N S, Ma X L, Shoaib A, Muhammad S C, Liu A D, Liu J H, Zhang Z, Yang G Z. Mepiquat chloride effects on potassium acquisition and functional leaf physiology as well as lint yield in highly dense late-sown cotton. Ind Crops Prod, 2019, 129: 142-155.
doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.11.056
[17] Ren X M, Zhang L Z, Dua M W, Jochem B E, Wopke W, Tian X L, Li Z H. Managing mepiquat chloride and plant density for optimal yield and quality of cotton. Field Crops Res, 2013, 149: 1-10.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.04.014
[18] Wilson D G, York A C, Edmisten K L. Narrow-row cotton response to mepiquat chloride. Cotton Sci, 2007, 11: 177-185.
[19] 何钟佩, 闵祥佳, 李丕明, 奚惠达. 植物生长延缓剂DPC对棉铃内源激素水平和棉铃发育影响的研究. 作物学报, 1990, 16: 252-258.
He Z P, Min X J, Li P M, Xi H D. Study on effects of DPC on endogenous hormone levels and the development of cotton bolls. Acta Agron Sin, 1990, 16: 252-258 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] Chen B L, Yang H K, Song W C, Liu C Y, Xu J, Zhao W Q, Zhou Z G. Effect of N fertilization rate on soil alkali-hydrolyzable N, subtending leaf N concentration, fiber yield, and quality of cotton. Crop J, 2016, 4: 323-330.
doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2016.03.006
[21] 陈建平, 顾双平, 刘伟仲. 氮肥与化控配合应用对棉花产量和品质的影响. 棉花学报, 1993, 5(2): 49-54.
Chen J P, Gu S P, Liu W Z. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer combined with chemical control on lint yield, fiber quality of cotton. Cotton Sci, 1993, 5(2): 49-54 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] 徐景丽. 氮素和缩节胺对小麦后直播棉产量及农艺性状的调节. 扬州大学硕士学位论文, 江苏扬州, 2021.
Xu J L. Regulation of Both Nitrogen and DPC on the Yield and Agronomic Triats for Direct Seeding Cotton after Wheat Harvest. MS Thesis of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, 2021 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 白文强. 灌水量、 施氮量和缩节胺用量对南疆棉花生长和水氮利用的影响. 西北农林科技大学硕士学位论文, 陕西杨凌, 2022.
Bai W Q. Effects of Irrigation Amount, Nitrogen Rate and Mepiquat Dose on Cotton Growth and Water-Nitrogen Utilization in Southern Xinjiang. MS Thesis of Northwest Agricultural & Forestry University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China, 2022 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] 张特, 王蜜蜂, 赵强. 滴施缩节胺与氮肥对棉花生长发育及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2022, 48: 396-409.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.14026
Zhang T, Wang M F, Zhao Q. Effects of DPC and nitrogen fertilizer through drip irrigation on growth and yield in cotton. Acta Agron Sin, 2022, 48: 396-409 (in Chinese with English abstract).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.14026
[25] 金桂红, 高璆, 金建松. 棉花优质高产看叶诊断栽培模式的研究II棉花生育展叶进程与优质高产的形成. 南京农业大学学报, 1988, 11(4): 11-16.
Jin G H, Gao Q, Jin J S. Cultural model of good quality and high yield by leaf diagnosis on cotton: II. Formation of yield in the leaf order process of cotton plants. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 1988, 11(4): 11-16 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26] 李亦扬, 李远, 赵子胥, 张鼎顺, 杜嘉宁, 吴淑娟, 孙思琦, 陈媛, 张祥, 陈德华, 刘震宇. 土壤增氮对棉铃对位叶Bt杀虫蛋白含量影响及氮代谢机制. 作物学报, 2023, 49: 2505-2516.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.24217
Li Y Y, Li Y, Zhao Z X, Zhang D S, Du J N, Wu S J, Sun S Q, Chen Y, Zhang X, Chen D H, Liu Z Y. Effects of increased nitrogen on Bt protein expression and nitrogen metabolism in the leaf subtending to cotton boll. Acta Agron Sin, 2023, 49: 2505-2516 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] Li N, Yao N, Li Y, Chen J Q, Liu D L, Asim B, Li L C, Wang T X, Chen X G. A meta-analysis of the possible impact of climate change on global cotton yield based on crop simulation approaches. Agric Sys, 2021, 193: 103221.
doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103221
[28] Devendra P C, John L S, Lavesta C H, Phillip R, George V, Alessandro E, Guy D. C, Lorena N L, Yafit C, Amrit P, Ved P, Joshua M L. Cultivar, irrigation management, and mepiquat chloride strategy: Effects on cotton growth, maturity, yield, and fiber quality. Field Crops Res, 2022, 286: 108633.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108633
[29] 张婷婷. 新疆棉花马克隆值的影响因素分析及其与可纺性关系研究. 东华大学硕士学位论文, 上海, 2018.
Zhang T T. The Analysis of Influencing Factors on Cotton Micronaire Value and Relationship between Spinnability and Micronaire. MS Thesis of Donghua University, Shanghai, China, 2018 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] Han W R, Liu S L, Lei Y P, Zhang Y J, Han Y C, Wang G P, Feng L, Li X F, Li Y B, Wang Z B. Climate warming accelerates cotton growth while cultivar shifts extend the growth period. Field Crops Res, 2023, 293: 108850.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108850
[1] 王吕, 吴玉红, 秦宇航, 淡亚彬, 陈浩, 郝兴顺, 田霄鸿. 紫云英稻秸秆协同还田与氮肥减量配施对水稻干物质积累、氮素转运及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 756-770.
[2] 柯会锋, 苏红梅, 孙正文, 谷淇深, 杨君, 王国宁, 徐东永, 王洪这, 吴立强, 张艳, 张桂寅, 马峙英, 王省芬. 棉花现代品种资源产量与纤维品质性状鉴定及分子标记评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 280-293.
[3] 肖胜华, 陆妍, 李安子, 覃耀斌, 廖铭静, 闭兆福, 卓柑锋, 朱永红, 朱龙付. 棉花AP2/ERF转录因子GhTINY2负调控植株抗盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 126-137.
[4] 上官小霞, 杨琴莉, 李换丽. 基于CRISPR/Cas9的棉花GhbHLH71基因编辑突变体的分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 138-148.
[5] 谭志新, 谢留伟, 李洪戈, 李芳军, 田晓莉, 李召虎. 基于AHP-隶属函数法的棉花子叶期耐低钾能力鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 199-208.
[6] 孙尚文, 束红梅, 杨长琴, 张国伟, 王晓婧, 孟亚利, 王友华, 刘瑞显. 低温下环丙酸酰胺调控棉花内源激素促进噻苯隆脱叶的机制[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 187-198.
[7] 刘韬奋, 罗单, 张启鹏, 孙圆圆, 李培松, 田景山, 张旺锋, 向导, 张亚黎, 杨明凤, 勾玲. 乙烯利催熟对机采棉铃重和纤维品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 209-218.
[8] 郭家鑫, 叶扬, 郭慧娟, 闵伟. 盐碱胁迫对棉花叶片蛋白质组的影响及差异性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 219-236.
[9] 宋毅, 李静, 谷贺贺, 陆志峰, 廖世鹏, 李小坤, 丛日环, 任涛, 鲁剑巍. 氮肥用量对冬油菜籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7): 2002-2011.
[10] 徐冉, 陈松, 徐春梅, 刘元辉, 章秀福, 王丹英, 褚光. 施氮量对籼粳杂交稻甬优1540产量和氮肥利用效率的影响及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1630-1642.
[11] 许乃银, 王扬, 王丹涛, 宁贺佳, 杨晓妮, 乔银桃. 棉花纤维质量指数的构建与WGT双标图分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1262-1271.
[12] 吴世雨, 陈匡稷, 吕尊富, 徐锡明, 庞林江, 陆国权. 施氮量对甘薯块根膨大过程中淀粉含量及特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(4): 1090-1101.
[13] 孟璐, 杜明伟, 黎芳, 齐海坤, 路正营, 徐东永, 李存东, 张明才, 田晓莉, 李召虎. 冀中地区高密种植条件下棉花药前群体大小和成熟度与化学脱叶催熟效果的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(4): 1028-1038.
[14] 雷建峰, 李月, 代培红, 赵燚, 尤扬子, 贾建国, 赵帅, 曲延英, 刘晓东. 棉花中不同植物病毒介导的VIGE体系的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(4): 978-987.
[15] 郭宏, 于霁雯, 裴文锋, 关永虎, 李航, 李长喜, 刘金伟, 王伟, 王宝全, 梅拥军. 南疆陆地棉杂种F2的遗传分析及遗传主效聚类[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(3): 608-621.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李绍清, 李阳生, 吴福顺, 廖江林, 李达模. 水稻孕穗期在淹涝胁迫下施肥的优化选择及其作用机理[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(01): 115 -120 .
[2] 王兰珍;米国华;陈范骏;张福锁. 不同产量结构小麦品种对缺磷反应的分析[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(06): 867 -870 .
[3] 杨建昌;张亚洁;张建华;王志琴;朱庆森. 水分胁迫下水稻剑叶中多胺含量的变化及其与抗旱性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(11): 1069 -1075 .
[4] 袁美;杨光圣;傅廷栋;严红艳. 甘蓝型油菜生态型细胞质雄性不育两用系的研究Ⅲ. 8-8112AB的温度敏感性及其遗传[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(03): 330 -335 .
[5] 王永胜;王景;段静雅;王金发;刘良式. 水稻极度分蘖突变体的分离和遗传学初步研究[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(02): 235 -239 .
[6] 王丽燕;赵可夫. 玉米幼苗对盐胁迫的生理响应[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(02): 264 -268 .
[7] 田孟良;黄玉碧;谭功燮;刘永建;荣廷昭. 西南糯玉米地方品种waxy基因序列多态性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(05): 729 -736 .
[8] 胡希远;李建平;宋喜芳. 空间统计分析在作物育种品系选择中的效果[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 412 -417 .
[9] 王艳;邱立明;谢文娟;黄薇;叶锋;张富春;马纪. 昆虫抗冻蛋白基因转化烟草的抗寒性[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 397 -402 .
[10] 郑希;吴建国;楼向阳;徐海明;石春海. 不同环境条件下稻米组氨酸和精氨酸的胚乳和母体植株QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 369 -375 .
京ICP备15008789号-2