欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2): 506-513.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.31040

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

小麦穗型相关生长素通路基因发掘及TaARF23-A与小穗数关联分析

谭丹(), 陈家婷, 郜钰, 张晓军, 李欣, 闫贵云, 李锐, 陈芳, 常利芳, 张树伟, 郭慧娟, 畅志坚, 乔麟轶*()   

  1. 山西农业大学农学院 / 作物遗传与分子改良山西省重点实验室 / 农业农村部有机旱作农业重点实验室(部省共建), 山西太原 030031
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-22 接受日期:2023-09-13 出版日期:2024-02-12 网络出版日期:2023-09-27
  • 通讯作者: *乔麟轶, E-mail: linyi.qiao@sxau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:E-mail: t17311990323@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(32201749);山西省重点研发计划项目(202102140601001)

Discovery of auxin pathway genes involving spike type and association analysis between TaARF23-A and spikelet number in wheat

TAN Dan(), CHEN Jia-Ting, GAO Yu, ZHANG Xiao-Jun, LI Xin, YAN Gui-Yun, LI Rui, CHEN Fang, CHANG Li-Fang, ZHANG Shu-Wei, GUO Hui-Juan, CHANG Zhi-Jian, QIAO Lin-Yi*()   

  1. College of Agriculture, Shanxi Agricultural University / Shanxi Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Molecular Improvement / Key Laboratory of Sustainable Dryland Agriculture (co-construction by Ministry and Province), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Taiyuan 030031, Shanxi, China
  • Received:2023-06-22 Accepted:2023-09-13 Published:2024-02-12 Published online:2023-09-27
  • Contact: *E-mail: linyi.qiao@sxau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(32201749);Shanxi Key Research and Development Program(202102140601001)

RichHTML

22

PDF

586

摘要：

生长素是调控作物穗部形态的主要内源激素之一。为了发掘小麦中与穗型相关的生长素通路基因, 本研究选择了纺锤穗型品系SY95-71和密穗品系CH7034, 对其幼穗内源生长素含量进行了检测, 结果显示SY95-71幼穗中的色胺含量显著高于CH7034。转录组测序结果表明, 在高置信区间(P<0.01)范围内, SY95-71幼穗中富集到4个特有的生长素相关条目, 并且色氨酸脱羧酶基因(负责将色氨酸转化为色胺)和生长素响应因子基因(Auxin Response Factors, ARFs)的转录水平均显著高于CH7034。对在SY95-71中高表达的2个ARF基因(TraesCS7A02G475700和TraesCS7A02G475600)作了进一步分析, 结果显示二者是位于7A染色体长臂上的一对串联重复基因, 根据小麦ARF家族成员编号, 将其分别命名为TaARF23-A1和TaARF23-A2。qRT-PCR结果证实SY95-71幼穗中TaARF23-A1和TaARF23-A2的表达量极显著高于CH7034。测序结果显示TaARF23-A的外显子序列在SY95-71和CH7034间具有2个SNP和1个InDel。根据InDel位点开发分子标记, 并将其与SY95-71和CH7034的RILs群体在6个大田环境下的穗部表型进行关联分析, 结果显示TaARF23-A与小穗数显著相关(P<0.0001), 其CH7034型等位变异比SY95-71型等位变异增加了1.67个小穗。本研究结果将为小穗发育机制解析提供参考, 也为小麦理想穗型改良提供了分子标记。

关键词: 小麦, 穗型, 生长素, TaARF23-A, 小穗数, 分子标记

Abstract:

Auxin is one of the major endogenous hormones that regulate the spike morphology in crops. In order to explore the auxin pathway genes involving spike type in wheat, the line SY95-71 with spindle spike and line CH7034 with compacted spike were selected to detect the endogenous auxin content in their young spikes. The results showed that the tryptophan content in SY95-71’s young spikes was significantly higher than that in CH7034. RNA-seq results showed that four specific auxin-related GO items were enriched in SY95-71 young spikes within the high confidence interval (P<0.01), and the relative expression levels of Tryptophan Decarboxylase genes (responsible for transforming tryptophan into tryptamine) and Auxin Response Factor genes (ARFs) in SY95-71 were significantly higher than those in CH7034. Further analysis of two highly expressed ARF genes (TraesCS7A02G475600 and TraesCS7A02G475700) in SY95-71 revealed that they were a pair of tandem repeat genes located on the long arm of chromosome 7A and named TaARF23-A1 and TaARF23-A2 based on the IDs of ARF family member in wheat, respectively. The qRT-PCR results confirmed that the relative expression levels of TaARF23-A1 and TaARF23-A2 in SY95-71 young spikes were significantly higher than those in CH7034. The sequencing results showed that the exon of TaARF23-A had two SNPs and one InDel site between SY95-71 and CH7034. A molecular marker was developed based on the InDel site and then used to associated with the spike phenotypes of the recombinant inbred lines population derived by the cross of SY95-71 and CH7034 in six field environments. The results showed that TaARF23-A was significant correlation with spikelet number (P<0.0001), and its CH7034 allele increased by 1.67 spikelets compared with the SY95-71 allele. The results of this study provide the reference for the understanding of the development mechanism of spikelet and molecular marker for the improvement of ideal spike type in wheat.

Key words: wheat, spike type, auxin, TaARF23-A, spikelet, molecular marker

表1

TaARF23相关引物"

引物名称
Primer name		 正向引物
Forward sequence (5′-3′)		 反向引物
Reverse sequence (5′-3′)		 退火温度
Tm (℃)		 扩增长度
Size (bp)
A1-q CGAAGCTTGGAGGTATGTATC GTGCTAATGCACATGGCTTG 58 177
A2-q GCGAAGCTTGGAGGTCGTT GTGCTAATGCACATGGCTTG 58 169
P1 GCCAATCAAGCAAGGATGTC CTGGTGGACAGCAGTGATC 58 951
P2 CGAGGAAGCTTCAGTTACAC TTCTCTGGACAGGTGATACC 58 927
InDel GCAGGAAGAAATCAATGAAGCAG GTAGTAGGTCACTTGGAATTGC 58 82/70

图1

小麦品系SY95-71和CH7034的穗型"

图2

生长素合成通路中5个化合物在SY95-71和CH7034幼穗间的含量比较 TRP: 色氨酸; TRA: 色胺; IAM: 吲哚乙酰胺; IAN: 吲哚已腈; IAA: 吲哚乙酸; **表示P < 0.01。"

图3

SY95-71和CH7034幼穗中生长素通路相关的GO富集 BP: 生物进程类; MF: 分子功能类。特有条目的编号加粗表示。*表示P < 0.05, **表示P < 0.01。"

图4

SY95-71幼穗中生长素通路相关DEGs 差异极显著(| log2 (FPKMSY/FPKMCH) | > 4)的DEGs用三角形标注。"

图5

TaARF23-A分析 a: TaARF23-A1和 TaARF23-A2序列分析以及引物位置。CS: 中国春。b~c: TaARF23-A1和 TaARF23-A2在SY95-71和CH7034幼穗中的相对表达量; ***表示P < 0.001, ****表示P < 0.0001。d: 引物P1和P2在CH7034 (CH)和SY95-71 (SY)中扩增产物的测序结果。e: TaARF23-A的InDel标记; M: DNA ladder指示带; 箭头指示多态性条带。"

图6

RILs群体中InDel标记型与6个环境下穗部表型的相关性分析 S: SY型条带; C: CH型条带; 14C: 2014年成都; 15C: 2015年成都; 16Y1: 2016年运城试验点1; 16Y2: 2016年运城试验点2; 15L: 2015年临汾; 16L: 2016年临汾; BLUP: 6个环境下的数据平均值; *表示P < 0.05, **表示P < 0.01, ****表示P < 0.0001。"

图7

TaARF23-A的预测靶基因 a: TaARF23-A正向调控TaIAA; b:TaARF23-A负向调控TaSAUR; TaSAUR转录数据由|log2(FPKMSY/FPKMCH)|≤1筛选获得; 启动子区的竖线表示ARF蛋白的结合元件AuxRE。"

[1] Luo X M, Yang Y M, Lin X L, Xiao J. Deciphering spike architecture formation towards yield improvement in wheat. J Genet Genomics, 2023, 50: 835-845.
doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2023.02.015
[2] Zhang D, Yuan Z. Molecular control of grass inflorescence development. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2014, 65: 553-578.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040104 pmid: 24471834
[3] Qi P F, Jiang Y F, Guo Z R, Chen Q, Ouellet T, Zong L J, Wei Z Z, Wang Y, Zhang Y Z, Xu B J, Kong L, Deng M, Wang J R, Chen G Y, Jiang Q T, Lan X J, Li W, Wei Y M, Zheng Y L. Transcriptional reference map of hormone responses in wheat spikes. BMC Genomics, 2019, 20: 390.
doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5726-x
[4] Di D W, Zhang C G, Luo P, An C W, Guo G Q. The biosynthesis of auxin: how many paths truly lead to IAA? Plant Growth Regul, 2016, 78: 275-285.
doi: 10.1007/s10725-015-0103-5
[5] Youssef H M, Eggert K, Koppolu R, Alqudah A M, Poursarebani N, Fazeli A, Sakuma S, Tagiri A, Rutten T, Govind G, Lundqvist U, Graner A, Komatsuda T, Sreenivasulu N, Schnurbusch T. VRS2 regulates hormone-mediated inflorescence patterning in barley. Nat Genet, 2017, 49: 157-161.
doi: 10.1038/ng.3717 pmid: 27841879
[6] Youssef H M, Hansson M. Crosstalk among hormones in barley spike contributes to the yield. Plant Cell Rep, 2019, 38: 1013-1016.
doi: 10.1007/s00299-019-02430-0 pmid: 31139893
[7] Zwirek M, Waugh R, McKim S M. Interaction between row-type genes in barley controls meristem determinacy and reveals novel routes to improved grain. New Phytol, 2019, 221: 1950-1965.
doi: 10.1111/nph.15548 pmid: 30339269
[8] Li Y P, Fu X, Zhao M, Zhang W, Li B, An D, Li J, Zhang A, Liu R, Liu X G. A genome-wide view of transcriptome dynamics during early spike development in bread wheat. Sci Rep, 2018, 8: 15338.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33718-y pmid: 30337587
[9] Zhu Y, Wagner D. Plant inflorescence architecture: the formation, activity, and fate of axillary meristems. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2020, 12: a034652.
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a034652
[10] Shi X, Cui F, Han X, He Y, Zhao L, Zhang N, Zhang H, Zhu H, Liu Z, Ma B, Zheng S, Zhang W, Liu J, Fan X, Si Y, Tian S, Niu J, Wu H, Liu X, Chen Z, Meng D, Wang X, Song L, Sun L, Han J, Zhao H, Ji J, Wang Z, He X, Li R, Chi X, Liang C, Niu B, Xiao J, Li J, Ling H Q. Comparative genomic and transcriptomic analyses uncover the molecular basis of high nitrogen-use efficiency in the wheat cultivar Kenong 9204. Mol Plant, 2022, 15: 1440-1456.
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2022.07.008
[11] Zadoks J C, Chang T T, Konzak C F. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res, 1974, 14: 415-421.
doi: 10.1111/wre.1974.14.issue-6
[12] 杨足君, 舒焕麟, 李光蓉. 利用种子储藏蛋白电泳分析小麦材料SY95-71及其亲本的遗传变异. 四川农业大学学报, 2000, 18(1): 7-10.
Yang Z J, Shu H L, Li G R. Genetic variations of seed storage protein in wheat line SY95-71 and its parents. J Sichuan Agric Univ, 2000, 18(1): 7-10 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 张潇文, 李世姣, 张晓军, 李欣, 杨足君, 张树伟, 陈芳, 常利芳, 郭慧娟, 畅志坚, 乔麟轶. 小麦品系CH7034中耐盐QTL定位. 作物学报, 2022, 48: 2654-2662.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.11074
Zhang X W, Li S J, Zhang X J, Li X, Yang Z J, Zhang S W, Chen F, Chang L F, Guo H J, Chang Z J, Qiao L Y. QTL mapping for salt tolerance in wheat line CH7034. Acta Agron Sin, 2022, 48: 2654-2662 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] Qiao L Y, Zhang W P, Li X Y, Zhang L, Zhang X J, Li X, Guo H J, Ren Y K, Zheng J, Chang Z J. Characterization and expression patterns of auxin response factors in wheat. Front Plant Sci, 2018, 9: 1395.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01395 pmid: 30283490
[15] Israeli A, Reed J W, Ori N. Genetic dissection of the auxin response network. Nat Plants, 2020, 6: 1082-1090.
doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0739-7 pmid: 32807951
[16] Bargmann B O, Vanneste S, Krouk G, Nawy T, Efroni I, Shani E, Choe G, Friml J, Bergmann D C, Estelle M, Birnbaum K D. A map of cell type-specific auxin responses. Mol Syst Biol, 2013, 9: 688.
doi: 10.1038/msb.2013.40 pmid: 24022006
[17] Du M, Bou Daher F, Liu Y, Steward A, Tillmann M, Zhang X, Wong J H, Ren H, Cohen J D, Li C, Gray W M. Biphasic control of cell expansion by auxin coordinates etiolated seedling development. Sci Adv, 2022, 8: eabj1570.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj1570
[18] Hayashi K I, Arai K, Aoi Y, Tanaka Y, Hira H, Guo R, Hu Y, Ge C, Zhao Y, Kasahara H, Fukui K. The main oxidative inactivation pathway of the plant hormone auxin. Nat Commun, 2021, 12: 6752.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27020-1
[19] Xiong L, Huang Y, Liu Z, Li C, Yu H, Shahid M Q, Lin Y, Qiao X, Xiao J, Gray J E, Jin J. Small EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR-LIKE2 peptides regulate awn development in rice. Plant Physiol, 2022, 190: 516-531.
doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac278 pmid: 35689635
[20] Ochagavia H, Prieto P, Savin R, Griffiths S, Slafer G. Dynamics of leaf and spikelet primordia initiation in wheat as affected by Ppd-1a alleles under field conditions. J Exp Bot, 2018, 69: 2621-2631.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery104
[21] Chen Z, Cheng X, Chai L, Wang Z, Du D, Wang Z, Bian R, Zhao A, Xin M, Guo W, Hu Z, Peng H, Yao Y, Sun Q, Ni Z. Pleiotropic QTL influencing spikelet number and heading date in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2020, 133: 1825-1838.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-020-03556-6
[22] Dobrovolskaya O, Pont C, Sibout R, Martinek P, Badaeva E, Murat F, Chosson A, Watanabe N, Prat E, Gautier N, Gautier V, Poncet C, Orlov Y L, Krasnikov A A, Bergès H, Salina E, Laikova L, Salse J. FRIZZY PANICLE drives supernumerary spikelets in bread wheat. Plant Physiol, 2015, 167: 189-199
doi: 10.1104/pp.114.250043 pmid: 25398545
[23] 丁浦洋, 周界光, 赵聪豪, 唐华苹, 牟杨, 唐力为, 邓梅, 魏育明, 兰秀锦, 马建. 小麦小穗数调控基因WAPO1的单倍型、遗传效应、地理分布及育种利用分析. 作物学报, 2022, 48: 2196-2209.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.11078
Ding P Y, Zhou J G, Zhao C H, Tang H P, Mu Y, Tang L W, Deng M, Wei Y M, Lan X J, Ma J. Dissection of haplotypes, geographical distribution and breeding utilization of WAPO1 associated with spike development in wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2022, 48: 2196-2209 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] Chen Z, Ke W, He F, Chai L, Cheng X, Xu H, Wang X, Du D, Zhao Y, Chen X, Xing J, Xin M, Guo W, Hu Z, Su Z, Liu J, Peng H, Yao Y, Sun Q, Ni Z. A single nucleotide deletion in the third exon of FT-D1 increases the spikelet number and delays heading date in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Biotechnol J, 2022, 20: 920-933.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.v20.5
[25] Zhang X Y, Jia H Y, Li T, Wu J Z, Nagarajan R, Lei L, Powers C, Kan C C, Hua W, Liu Z Y, Chen C, Carver B F, Yan L L. TaCol-B5 modifies spike architecture and enhances grain yield in wheat. Science, 2022, 376: 180-183.
doi: 10.1126/science.abm0717
[26] 张宏娟, 李玉莹, 苗丽丽, 王景一, 李超男, 杨德龙, 毛新国, 景蕊莲. 小麦转录因子基因TaNAC67参与调控穗长和每穗小穗数. 作物学报, 2019, 45: 1615-1627.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.91009
Zhang H J, Li Y Y, Miao L L, Wang J Y, Li C N, Yang D L, Mao X G, Jing R L. Transcription factor gene TaNAC67 involved in regulation spike length and spikelet number per spike in common wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2019, 45: 1615-1627 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] Li Y, Xiao J, Wu J, Duan J, Liu Y, Ye X, Zhang X, Guo X, Gu Y, Zhang L, Jia J, Kong X. A tandem segmental duplication (TSD) in green revolution gene Rht-D1b region underlies plant height variation. New Phytol, 2012, 196: 282-291.
doi: 10.1111/nph.2012.196.issue-1
[28] Wang M, Yuan J, Qin L, Shi W, Xia G, Liu S. TaCYP81D5, one member in a wheat cytochrome P450 gene cluster, confers salinity tolerance via reactive oxygen species scavenging. Plant Biotechnol J, 2020, 18: 791-804.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.v18.3
[29] Jia M, Li Y, Wang Z, Tao S, Sun G, Kong X, Wang K, Ye X, Liu S, Geng S, Mao L, Li A. TaIAA21 represses TaARF25-mediated expression of TaERFs required for grain size and weight development in wheat. Plant J, 2021, 108: 1754-1767.
doi: 10.1111/tpj.v108.6
[30] Yin H, Li M, Lyu M, Hepworth S R, Li D, Ma C, Li J, Wang S M. SAUR15 promotes lateral and adventitious root development via activating H+-ATPases and auxin biosynthesis. Plant Physiol, 2020, 184: 837-851.
doi: 10.1104/pp.19.01250 pmid: 33890042
[31] Guilfoyle T J, Hagen G. Auxin response factors. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2007, 10: 453-460.
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.08.014 pmid: 17900969
[32] Hu J, Li X, Sun T P. Four class A AUXIN RESPONSE FACTORs promote tomato fruit growth despite suppressing fruit set. Nat Plants, 2023, 9: 706-719.
doi: 10.1038/s41477-023-01396-y pmid: 37037878
[1] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 彭佳泺, 李颖, 李丹丹, 杨军宁, 郭学峰, 张文姣, 俞晓雪, 周亚荣, 王振玉, 王彩香, 马雄风, 宿俊吉. 陆地棉I类LBD家族成员鉴定及GhLBD6调控开花期的功能和单倍型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1682-1697.
[5] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[6] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[7] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[8] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[9] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[10] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[11] 张曦, 王广恩, 李邵琦, 刘祎, 李俊兰, 钱玉源. 基于转录组测序解析陆海杂交姊妹系马克隆值差异的形成机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1442-1458.
[12] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[13] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[14] 石少阶, 刘凯, 陈姿夷, 王卉颖, 李三和, 周雷, 游艾青. 水稻矮化多分蘖基因DMT1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034.
[15] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2