欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5): 1158-1171.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.34110

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

耐亚磷酸盐除草剂转基因油菜的创建和抗性评价

钟元(), 朱天宇, 戴成, 马朝芝*()   

  1. 华中农业大学作物遗传改良全国重点实验室 / 国家油菜工程技术研究中心 / 洪山实验室, 湖北武汉 430070
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-03 接受日期:2023-10-23 出版日期:2024-05-12 网络出版日期:2023-12-13
  • 通讯作者: 马朝芝, E-mail: yuanbeauty@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:E-mail: zy14745140090623@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(32072105)

Developing and resistance assessing of phosphite-tolerant herbicide transgenic Brassica napus L.

ZHONG Yuan(), ZHU Tian-Yu, DAI Cheng, MA Chao-Zhi*()   

  1. National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University / National Engineering Research Center of Rapeseed / Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
  • Received:2023-07-03 Accepted:2023-10-23 Published:2024-05-12 Published online:2023-12-13
  • Contact: E-mail: yuanbeauty@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(32072105)

RichHTML

6

PDF

234

摘要：

在油菜的生产过程中, 大量伴生的杂草严重影响了其产量和品质。由于近年来田间抗除草剂杂草数量的增加, 除草剂的选择正在迅速减少, 这影响了未来农业的可持续发展。植物可以通过正磷酸盐(Pi)转运蛋白吸收亚磷酸盐(Phi), 但Phi不能被代谢为作物的磷肥料, 导致植物生长受到抑制。此前, 从罗尔斯通菌属(Raltsonia sp. strain 4506)中分离出了ptxD (phosphite dehydrogenase)基因, 其139位的酪氨酸突变为谷氨酰胺(Y139Q)的突变蛋白ptxDQ催化Phi转化为Pi的活性显著提高。为了评价ptxDQ/Phi系统对甘蓝型油菜杂草的防治效果, 本研究获得了带有密码子优化的ptxD (Y139Q, ptxDQ)基因的转基因甘蓝型油菜。在以Phi为单一磷元素的条件下, ptxDQ转基因油菜可以正常生长, 体内Pi含量显著提高, 且Pi饥饿响应基因(PT21和PT24等)的表达水平被显著抑制, 说明ptxDQ在油菜体内可以促使Phi转化为Pi。此外, ptxDQ转基因油菜具有比野生型油菜和单子叶杂草(狗尾草)更强的生长竞争优势。综上所述, ptxDQ/Phi是一种有效的油菜磷利用和杂草控制系统, 既可以抑制杂草的生长, 又可以为作物提供充足的Pi营养, 从而提高了农业的可持续性。

关键词: 甘蓝型油菜, 除草剂, 亚磷酸盐, ptxDQ

Abstract:

During the production of Brassica napus, the yield and quality of the crop are seriously affected by a large number of accompanying weeds. Herbicide control options are rapidly diminishing due to the recent increase in the number of herbicide-resistant weeds in fields, which affects the sustainable development of agriculture in the future. Plants can take up phosphite (Phi) via orthophosphate (Pi) transporters, but the Phi cannot be metabolized and used as a phosphorus fertilizer for crops, resulting in plant growth inhibition. Previously, a ptxD gene isolated from Ralstonia sp. 4506, and the mutant protein ptxDQ at position 139, which had tyrosine mutation to glutamine (Y139Q), significantly improved the conversion activity of Phi to Pi. To evaluate the efficacy of ptxDQ/Phi-based weed control system in Brassica napus, we generated transgenic B. napus plants with a codon-optimized ptxD (Y139Q, ptxDQ) gene. Ectopic expression of ptxDQ confered the ability to convert Phi to Pi, resulting in improving plant growth in the presence of Phi. Pi-starvation-induced genes (e.g. PT21 and PT24) were suppressed in the ptxDQ transgenic lines by supplying Phi, indicating that ptxDQ can transform Phi into Pi in rapeseed. In addition, ptxDQ transgenic Brassica napus had a greater competitive growth advantage over wild-type Brassica napus and monocotyledonous weeds (Setaria glauca). In conclusion, the ptxDQ/Phi system provided an effective alternative for suppressing the weed growth while providing adequate Pi nutrition to the crops, which in turn improved the sustainability of agriculture.

Key words: Brassica napus, herbicide, phosphite, ptxDQ

表1

本研究中使用的引物"

引物名称
Primer name		 引物序列
Primer sequences (5°-3°)		 Tm (℃) 产物扩增大小
Product length (bp)
Y139Q-M-Sal I-F TCCATCGATAGTACTGTCGACATGAAGCCTAAAGTTGTTTTGACTC 66 1050
Y139Q-M-Kpn I-R GCTCACCCCGGGAGCGGTACCAGCAGCTTTAACACCTGGG 75
ptxDQ-F ATGAAGCCTAAAGTTGTTTTGACTCAT 56 1009
ptxDQ-R AGCAGCTTTAACACCTGGGT 57
ptxDQ-DNA-F GTTTTGACTCATTGGGTTCATCCAGA 59 993
ptxDQ-DNA-R AGCAGCTTTAACACCTGGGT 58
ptxDQ-qRT-F CGATTCTGCTTTCCTTGAAGAGTG 59 216
ptxDQ-qRT-R CCAGATCTGATTTGTCTATCTCCCTC 59
BnACT7-RT-F CTATCCTCCGTCTCGATCTCGC 61.8 173
BnACT7-RT-R CTTAGCCGTCTCCAGCTCTTGC 63.2
RT-PCR PT21 F ATCGGCCGCAACAGGTAAGG 61.5 181
RT-PCR PT21 R AGGGACAAGGAAGGTGAAGAG 59.4
RT-PCR PT1;4-F GTACCGGCGGAGATCTTCCCAGC 65.4 324
RT-PCR PT1;4-R CTACACAATGGGGACCGTTC 61.2
RT-PCR PT24 F CCTGAAACTGCTCGTTACACC 58.8 109
RT-PCR PT24 R CCTCTGCTCTTTCCTCCATCTC 58.6
RT-PCR PHR F ACTGAGGCTCTGCGACTTCA 60.2 360
RT-PCR PHR R TCTTGTTCGGATTTGGATGGTGAAT 59.5

图1

含有密码子优化ptxDQ的转基因甘蓝型油菜的产生 (a) 甘蓝型油菜Westar在Pi和不同Phi浓度处理7 d后的生长情况。标尺为2 cm。(b) 生长7 d后下胚轴长度的统计情况。(c) 生长7 d后根长的统计情况。(d) 生长7 d后鲜重的统计情况。(e) 植物转化载体p1300-ptxDQ示意图。(f)和(g)以120 μg mL-1 Hygromycin B和0.5 mmol L-1Pi +1.5 mmol L-1Phi为筛选剂进行转化。标尺为2 cm。(h) 油菜再生苗RNA水平的PCR鉴定。(i) 油菜再生苗ptxDQ基因相对表达量分析。数字编号为不同的油菜再生苗单株, M为marker, BnaACT7为油菜内参基因。使用t检验进行显著性检验, *、**、***分别表示在0.05、0.01、0.001概率水平差异显著。"

附图1

不同生态型油菜在Pi和Phi下的水培试验 (a)和(b) 处理2周后不同油菜的生长状况。Pi浓度为1 mmol L-1, Phi浓度为4 mmol L-1。标尺为2 cm。(c) 处理2周后不同油菜根长的统计。(d) 处理2周后不同油菜鲜重的统计。使用t检验进行显著性检验: 当P ≤ 0.05时, 如果用不同的小写字母标注, 则条形图代表的值存在显著差异。"

附图2

ptxDQ蛋白序列分析 PtxDR4506、PtxDR4506 (Y139Q)和PtxDWM88氨基酸序列比对。相同的残基用黑色表示, 相似的残基用灰色表示。"

附图3

潮霉素B和Phi对愈伤组织再生的影响 (a) 以120 μg mL-1 Hygromycin B和1 mmol L-1 Phi为筛选剂进行转化。标尺为2 cm。(b) 油菜再生苗DNA水平的PCR分析。数字编号为不同的油菜再生苗单株, M为marker。(c) 转基因油菜L10株系的根、茎、叶的RT-PCR分析。BnaACT7为油菜内参基因。"

表2

同一载体(pCMBIA1300-PtxDQ)不同筛选剂的转化情况统计"

筛选抗性
Resistance		 实验重复Replicate 外植体数
Number of explants		 愈伤数Number of calluses 外植体转化效率
Callus conversion rate (%)		 再生苗数
Number of green seedlings		 绿苗比例
Green seedling rate (%)		 阳性转基因
株系比例
Transformation
efficiency (%)
Pi+ Phi 1 403 364 90.32 7 1.73 0
2 313 255 81.47 2 0.64 0
3 235 194 82.55 2 0.85 0
平均值Average 317 271 84.78 3.6 1.07 0
Hyg B 1 342 100 29.24 11 3.22 100
2 216 106 49.07 9 4.17 100
3 257 108 42.02 10 3.89 100
平均值Average 272 105 40.11 10 3.76 100

图2

沙培水培法研究Phi对野生型和ptxDQ转基因甘蓝型油菜植株生长的影响 (a)~(c)野生型植株和2个ptxDQ转基因系(L5和L10, T1代)在沙培养(沙 : 蛭石=1:1)中分别生长14 d (a)、56 d (b)和76 d (c), 分别用无P、Pi或Phi营养液处理。(a)~(c)中比例尺分别为3 cm、7 cm、7 cm。(d) 柱状图为不含P、Pi或Phi营养液灌溉2周后野生型植株和2个ptxDQ转基因品系的SPAD值。(e)柱状图为不加P、Pi或Phi营养液灌溉2周后野生型植株和2个ptxDQ转基因品系的Pi含量。使用t检验进行显著性检验: 当P ≤ 0.05时, 如果用不同的小写字母标注, 则条形图代表的值存在显著差异。"

图3

油菜中磷饥饿响应基因的相对表达量分析 (a) PHR的相对表达量; (b) PT1:4的相对表达量; (c) PT21的相对表达量; (d) PT24的相对表达量。使用t检验进行显著性检验: 当P ≤ 0.05时, 如果用不同的小写字母标记, 则条形图代表的值存在显著差异。"

图4

ptxDQ/Phi可抑制田间杂草生长 (a)和(b) Westar、狗尾草和转基因植株在Pi和Phi处理3周后的生长发育情况, Pi浓度为1 mmol L-1, Phi浓度为8 mmol L-1。(a) 标尺为5 cm; (b) 标尺为2 cm。(c) 柱状图为(a)所示43株狗尾草的鲜重。使用t检验进行显著性检验: ***, P < 0.0001。(d) Westar和转基因植株在Pi和Phi处理3周后的鲜重、株高、根长的情况。(e) T1代转基因株系中的ptxDQ特异性条带的PCR分析。1~5, 表示L10的不同转基因植株。使用t检验进行显著性检验: 当P ≤ 0.05时, 如果用不同的小写字母标记, 则条形图代表的值存在显著差异。"

[1] 李利霞, 陈碧云, 闫贵欣, 高桂珍, 许鲲, 谢婷, 张付贵, 伍晓明. 中国油菜种质资源研究利用策略与进展. 植物遗传资源学报, 2020, 21: 1-19.
doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20200109005
Li L X, Chen B Y, Yan G X, Gao G Z, Xu K, Xie T, Zhang F G, Wu X M. Proposed strategies and current progress of research and utilization of oilseed rape germplasm in China. J Plant Genet Resour, 2020, 21: 1-19 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2] 敖礼林, 余增钢, 饶卫华. 油菜田杂草综合高效防控技术. 科学种养, 2019, (1): 39-40.
Ao L L, Yu Z G, Rao W H. Comprehensive and efficient prevention and control technology of weeds in rapeseed fields. Sci Breed, 2019, (1): 39-40 (in Chinese).
[3] de F Sousa M G, da Silva A C, Dos Santos Araújo R, Rigotto R M. Evaluation of the atmospheric contamination level for the use of herbicide glyphosate in the northeast region of Brazil. Environ Monit Assess, 2019, 191: 604.
doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7764-x pmid: 31485762
[4] Heap I, Duke S O. Overview of glyphosate-resistant weeds worldwide. Pest Manag Sci, 2018, 74: 1040-1049.
doi: 10.1002/ps.4760 pmid: 29024306
[5] Husken A, Dietz-Pfeilstetter A. Pollen-mediated intraspecific gene flow from herbicide resistant oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Transgenic Res, 2007, 16: 557-569.
doi: 10.1007/s11248-007-9078-y
[6] Squire G R, Hawes C, Begg G S, Young M W. Cumulative impact of GM herbicide-tolerant cropping on arable plants assessed through species-based and functional taxonomies. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2009, 16: 85-94.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-008-0072-6
[7] Schachtman D P, Reid R J, Ayling S M. Phosphorus uptake by plants:from soil to cell. Plant Physiol, 1998, 116: 447-453.
doi: 10.1104/pp.116.2.447 pmid: 9490752
[8] Sun S, Wang L, Mao H, Shao L, Li X, Xiao J, Ou-Yang Y, Zhang Q. A G-protein pathway determines grain size in rice. Nat Commun, 2018, 9: 851.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03141-y pmid: 29487318
[9] Wang Y, Chen Y F, Wu W H. Potassium and phosphorus transport and signaling in plants. J Integr Plant Biol, 2021, 63: 34-52.
doi: 10.1111/jipb.13053
[10] Bozzo G G, Singh V K, Plaxton W C. Phosphate or phosphite addition promotes the proteolytic turnover of phosphate- starvation inducible tomato purple acid phosphatase isozymes. FEBS Lett, 2004, 573: 51-54.
doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.07.051 pmid: 15327974
[11] Eshraghi L, Anderson J P, Aryamanesh N, McComb J A, Shearer B, Hardy G S. Suppression of the auxin response pathway enhances susceptibility to Phytophthora cinnamomi while phosphite- mediated resistance stimulates the auxin signalling pathway. BMC Plant Biol, 2014, 14: 68.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-68 pmid: 24649892
[12] Kariman K, Barker S J, Jost R, Finnegan P M, Tibbett M. Sensitivity of jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) to phosphate, phosphite, and arsenate pulses as influenced by fungal symbiotic associations. Mycorrhiza, 2016, 26: 401-415.
doi: 10.1007/s00572-015-0674-z pmid: 26810895
[13] Burra D D, Berkowitz O, Hedley P E, Morris J, Resjo S, Levander F, Liljeroth E, Andreasson E, Alexandersson E. Phosphite- Induced changes of the transcriptome and secretome in Solanum tuberosum leading to resistance against Phytophthora infestans. BMC Plant Biol, 2014, 14: 254.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-014-0254-y
[14] Achary V M M, Ram B, Manna M, Datta D, Bhatt A, Reddy M K, Agrawal P K. Phosphite: a novel P fertilizer for weed management and pathogen control. Plant Biotechnol J, 2017, 15: 1493-1508.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.12803 pmid: 28776914
[15] Danova-Alt R, Dijkema C, DE Waard P, Kock M. Transport and compartmentation of phosphite in higher plant cells: kinetic and 31P nuclear magnetic resonance studies. Plant Cell Environ, 2008, 31: 1510-1521.
doi: 10.1111/pce.2008.31.issue-10
[16] Thao H T B, Yamakawa T, Myint A K, Sarr P S. Effects of phosphite, a reduced form of phosphate, on the growth and phosphorus nutrition of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2008, 54: 761-768.
doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0765.2008.00290.x
[17] Dormatey R, Sun C, Ali K, Fiaz S, Xu D R, Calderon-Urrea A, Bi Z Z, Zhang J L, Bai J P. ptxD/Phi as alternative selectable marker system for genetic transformation for bio-safety concerns: a review. PeerJ, 2021, 9: e11809.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.11809
[18] Loera-Quezada M M, Leyva-Gonzalez M A, Lopez-Arredondo D, Herrera-Estrella L. Phosphite cannot be used as a phosphorus source but is non-toxic for microalgae. Plant Sci, 2015, 231: 124-130.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.11.015 pmid: 25575997
[19] Pandeya D, Lopez-Arredondo D L, Janga M R, Campbell L M, Estrella-Hernandez P, Bagavathiannan M V, Herrera-Estrella L, Rathore K S. Selective fertilization with phosphite allows unhindered growth of cotton plants expressing the ptxD gene while suppressing weeds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2018, 115: E6946-E6955.
[20] Costas A M, White A K, Metcalf W W. Purification and characterization of a novel phosphorus-oxidizing enzyme from Pseudomonas stutzeri WM88. J Biol Chem, 2001, 276: 17429-17436.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M011764200 pmid: 11278981
[21] Changko S, Rajakumar P D, Young R E B, Purton S. The phosphite oxidoreductase gene, ptxD as a bio-contained chloroplast marker and crop-protection tool for algal biotechnology using Chlamydomonas. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2020, 104: 675-686.
doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-10258-7
[22] Lopez-Arredondo D L, Herrera-Estrella L. Engineering phosphorus metabolism in plants to produce a dual fertilization and weed control system. Nat Biotechnol, 2012, 30: 889-893.
doi: 10.1038/nbt.2346
[23] Nahampun H N, Lopez-Arredondo D, Xu X, Herrera-Estrella L, Wang K. Assessment of ptxD gene as an alternative selectable marker for Agrobacterium-mediated maize transformation. Plant Cell Rep, 2016, 35: 1121-1132.
doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-1942-x
[24] Manna M, Achary M M, Islam T, Agrawal P K, Reddy M K. The development of a phosphite-mediated fertilization and weed control system for rice. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 24941.
doi: 10.1038/srep24941 pmid: 27109389
[25] Lopez-Arredondo D L, Herrera-Estrella L. A novel dominant selectable system for the selection of transgenic plants under in vitro and greenhouse conditions based on phosphite metabolism. Plant Biotechnol J, 2013, 11: 516-525.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.2013.11.issue-4
[26] Pandeya D, Campbell L M, Nunes E, Lopez-Arredondo D L, Janga M R, Herrera-Estrella L, Rathore K S. ptxD gene in combination with phosphite serves as a highly effective selection system to generate transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Mol Biol, 2017, 95: 567-577.
doi: 10.1007/s11103-017-0670-0
[27] Liu T T, Yuan L L, Deng S R, Zhang X X, Cai H M, Ding G D, Xu F S, Shi L, Wu G B, Wang C. Improved the activity of phosphite dehydrogenase and its application in plant biotechnology. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2021, 9: 764188.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.764188
[28] Dai C, Li Y, Li L, Du Z, Lin S, Tian X, Li S, Yang B, Yao W, Wang J, Guo L, Lu S. An efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method using hypocotyl as explants for Brassica napus. Mol Breed, 2020, 40: 96.
doi: 10.1007/s11032-020-01174-0
[29] Carswell C, Grant B R, Theodorou M E, Harris J, Niere J O, Plaxton W C. The fungicide phosphonate disrupts the phosphate-starvation response in Brassica nigra seedlings. Plant Physiol, 1996, 110: 105-110.
pmid: 12226174
[30] Varadarajan D K, Karthikeyan A S, Matilda P D, Raghothama K G. Phosphite, an analog of phosphate, suppresses the coordinated expression of genes under phosphate starvation. Plant Physiol, 2002, 129: 1232-1240.
doi: 10.1104/pp.010835 pmid: 12114577
[31] Ren F, Guo Q Q, Chang L L, Chen L, Zhao C Z, Zhong H, Li X B. Brassica napus PHR1 gene encoding a MYB-like protein functions in response to phosphate starvation. PLoS One, 2012, 7: e44005.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044005
[32] Ren F, Zhao C Z, Liu C S, Huang K L, Guo Q Q, Chang L L, Xiong H, Li X B. A Brassica napus PHT1 phosphate transporter, BnPht1;4, promotes phosphate uptake and affects roots architecture of transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol, 2014, 86: 595-607.
doi: 10.1007/s11103-014-0249-y
[33] Li Y, Wang X, Zhang H, Wang S, Ye X, Shi L, Xu F, Ding G. Molecular identification of the phosphate transporter family 1 (PHT1) genes and their expression profiles in response to phosphorus deprivation and other abiotic stresses in Brassica napus. LoS One, 2019, 14: e220374.
[34] Buddenhagen C E, James T K, Ngow Z, Hackell D L, Rolston M P, Chynoweth R J, Gunnarsson M, Li F, Harrington K C, Ghanizadeh H. Resistance to post-emergent herbicides is becoming common for grass weeds on New Zealand wheat and barley farms. PLoS One, 2021, 16: e0258685.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258685
[35] Green J M, Siehl D L. History and outlook for glyphosate- resistant crops. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol, 2021, 255: 67-91.
[36] Holmes K H, Lindquist J L, Rebarber R, Werle R, Yerka M, Tenhumberg B. Modeling the evolution of herbicide resistance in weed species with a complex life cycle. Ecol Appl, 2022, 32: e02473.
doi: 10.1002/eap.v32.1
[37] Zabalza A, Orcaray L, Fernandez-Escalada M, Zulet-Gonzalez A, Royuela M. The pattern of shikimate pathway and phenylpropanoids after inhibition by glyphosate or quinate feeding in pea roots. Pestic Biochem Physiol, 2017, 141: 96-102.
doi: S0048-3575(16)30218-8 pmid: 28911748
[38] Wakelin A, Preston C. A target-site mutation is present in a glyphosate-resistant Lolium rigidum population. Weed Res, 2006, 46: 432-440.
doi: 10.1111/wre.2006.46.issue-5
[39] Yu Q, Cairns A, Powles S. Glyphosate, paraquat and ACCase multiple herbicide resistance evolved in a Lolium rigidum biotype. Planta, 2007, 225: 499-513.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-006-0364-3
[40] Baerson S R, Rodriguez D J, Tran M, Feng Y, Biest N A, Dill G M. Glyphosate-resistant goosegrass. Identification of a mutation in the target enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase. Plant Physiol, 2002, 129: 1265-1275.
doi: 10.1104/pp.001560 pmid: 12114580
[41] Sammons R D, Gaines T A. Glyphosate resistance: state of knowledge. Pest Manag Sci, 2014, 70: 1367-1377.
pmid: 25180399
[42] Gaines T A, Zhang W, Wang D, Bukun B, Chisholm S T, Shaner D L, Nissen S J, Patzoldt W L, Tranel P J, Culpepper A S, Grey T L, Webster T M, Vencill W K, Sammons R D, Jiang J, Preston C, Leach J E, Westra P. Gene amplification confers glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107: 1029-1034.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906649107 pmid: 20018685
[43] Robertson I D, Dean L M, Rudebusch G E, Sottos N R, White S R, Moore J S. Alkyl phosphite inhibitors for frontal ring-opening metathesis polymerization greatly increase pot life. ACS Macro Lett, 2017, 6: 609-612.
doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.7b00270
[44] Mehta D, Ghahremani M, Perez-Fernandez M, Tan M, Schlapfer P, Plaxton W C, Uhrig R G. Phosphate and phosphite have a differential impact on the proteome and phosphoproteome of Arabidopsis suspension cell cultures. Plant J, 021, 105: 924-941.
doi: 10.1111/tpj.v105.4
[45] Rima F B, da Silva Y, Teixeira M P R, Maia A J, Assis K G O, da Silva R, de Souza Junior V S, da Silva Y, Lopes J W B, Barbosa R S, Singh V P. Phosphorus in soils and fluvial sediments from a Cerrado biome watershed under agricultural expansion. Environ Monit Assess, 2022, 194: 388.
doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-09983-w pmid: 35445983
[46] Baammi S, Daoud R, El Allali A. Assessing the effect of a series of mutations on the dynamic behavior of phosphite dehydrogenase using molecular docking, molecular dynamics and quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics simulations. J Biomol Struct Dyn, 2023, 41: 4154-4166.
doi: 10.1080/07391102.2022.2064912
[47] Gonzalez-Morales S I, Pacheco-Gutierrez N B, Ramirez- Rodriguez C A, Brito-Bello A A, Estrella-Hernandez P, Herrera-Estrella L, Lopez-Arredondo D L. Metabolic engineering of phosphite metabolism in Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942 as an effective measure to control biological contaminants in outdoor raceway ponds. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2020, 13: 119.
doi: 10.1186/s13068-020-01759-z
[48] Sandoval-Vargas J M, Jimenez-Clemente L A, Macedo-Osorio K S, Oliver-Salvador M C, Fernandez-Linares L C, Duran-Figueroa N V, Badillo-Corona J A. Use of the ptxD gene as a portable selectable marker for chloroplast transformation in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Mol Biotechnol, 2019, 61: 461-468.
doi: 10.1007/s12033-019-00177-3 pmid: 30997667
[49] Yuan H, Wang Y, Liu Y, Zhang M, Zou Z. A novel dominant selection system for plant transgenics based on phosphite metabolism catalyzed by bacterial alkaline phosphatase. PLoS One, 2021, 16: e0259600.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259600
[50] Chavana J, Singh S, Vazquez A, Christoffersen B, Racelis A, Kariyat R R. Local adaptation to continuous mowing makes the noxious weed Solanum elaeagnifolium a superweed candidate by improving fitness and defense traits. Sci Rep, 2021, 11: 6634.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85789-z pmid: 33758235
[51] Garcia M J, Palma-Bautista C, Rojano-Delgado A M, Bracamonte E, Portugal J, Alcantara-de la Cruz R, De Prado R. The triple amino acid substitution TAP-IVS in the EPSPS gene confers high glyphosate resistance to the superweed Amaranthus hybridus. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20: 2396.
doi: 10.3390/ijms20102396
[52] Scarrow R. Glyphosate resistance: of superweeds and survivors. Nat Plants, 2017, 3: 17078.
doi: 10.1038/nplants.2017.78 pmid: 28504704
[1] 曹松, 姚敏, 任睿, 贾元, 向星汝, 李文, 何昕, 刘忠松, 官春云, 钱论文, 熊兴华. 转录组结合区域关联分析挖掘油菜含油量积累的候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(5): 1136-1146.
[2] 周香玉, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波, 张学昆. 甘蓝型油菜苗期响应渍害胁迫的生理调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 1015-1029.
[3] 李阳阳, 吴丹, 许军红, 陈倬永, 徐昕媛, 徐金盼, 唐钟林, 张娅茹, 朱丽, 严卓立, 周清元, 李加纳, 刘列钊, 唐章林. 基于QTL和转录组测序鉴定甘蓝型油菜耐旱候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 820-835.
[4] 杨闯, 王玲, 全成滔, 余良倩, 戴成, 郭亮, 傅廷栋, 马朝芝. 甘蓝型油菜盐胁迫响应基因表达谱分析及共表达网络的构建[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 237-250.
[5] 唐玉凤, 姚敏, 何昕, 官梅, 刘忠松, 官春云, 钱论文. 甘蓝型油菜SGR基因家族的全基因组鉴定与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7): 1829-1842.
[6] 袁大双, 张晓莉, 朱冬鸣, 杨友鸿, 姚梦楠, 梁颖. BnMAPK2 对甘蓝型油菜耐旱性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1518-1531.
[7] 杨一丹, 何督, 刘静, 张岩, 陈飞志, 巫燕飞, 杜雪竹. 寄主诱导的基因沉默干扰核盘菌致病基因OAH在甘蓝型油菜抗菌核病中的应用[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1542-1550.
[8] 杨太桦, 杨福权, 郜耿东, 殷帅, 金庆东, 徐林珊, 蒯婕, 汪波, 徐正华, 葛贤宏, 王晶, 周广生. 初步探究LncRNA在甘蓝型油菜生态型分化中的作用[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1197-1210.
[9] 张盈川, 吴晓明玉, 陶保龙, 陈丽, 鲁海琴, 赵伦, 文静, 易斌, 涂金星, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-miR43-FBXL调控模块参与甘蓝型油菜铝胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1211-1221.
[10] 柏成成, 姚小尧, 王雨璐, 王赛玉, 李金莹, 蒋有为, 靳舒荣, 陈春杰, 刘渔, 魏星玥, 徐新福, 李加纳, 倪郁. 甘蓝型油菜长链烷烃合成相关基因的克隆及其与BnCER1-2的互作[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(4): 1016-1027.
[11] 陈慧, 肖清, 汪华栋, 文静, 马朝芝, 涂金星, 沈金雄, 傅廷栋, 易斌. 甘蓝型油菜SUMO蛋白家族成员鉴定及Bna.SUMO1.C08基因的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(4): 917-925.
[12] 陈晓汉, 王丽琴, 汪华栋, 肖清, 陶保龙, 赵伦, 文静, 易斌, 涂金星, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. BnABCI8影响甘蓝型油菜叶绿体发育[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(4): 893-905.
[13] 王珍, 张晓莉, 刘淼, 姚梦楠, 孟晓静, 曲存民, 卢坤, 李加纳, 梁颖. 甘蓝型油菜BnMAPK1超量表达及中油821的转录差异表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(3): 856-868.
[14] 张文宣, 梁晓梅, 戴成, 文静, 易斌, 涂金星, 沈金雄, 傅廷栋, 马朝芝. 利用CRISPR/Cas9技术突变BnaMPK6基因降低甘蓝型油菜的耐盐性[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(2): 321-331.
[15] 李继军, 陈雅慧, 王艺瑾, 周志华, 郭子越, 张建, 涂金星, 姚璇, 郭亮. 甘蓝型油菜种质资源田间耐渍性评价和耐渍种质资源筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(12): 3162-3175.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李绍清, 李阳生, 吴福顺, 廖江林, 李达模. 水稻孕穗期在淹涝胁迫下施肥的优化选择及其作用机理[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(01): 115 -120 .
[2] 王兰珍;米国华;陈范骏;张福锁. 不同产量结构小麦品种对缺磷反应的分析[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(06): 867 -870 .
[3] 杨建昌;张亚洁;张建华;王志琴;朱庆森. 水分胁迫下水稻剑叶中多胺含量的变化及其与抗旱性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(11): 1069 -1075 .
[4] 袁美;杨光圣;傅廷栋;严红艳. 甘蓝型油菜生态型细胞质雄性不育两用系的研究Ⅲ. 8-8112AB的温度敏感性及其遗传[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(03): 330 -335 .
[5] 王永胜;王景;段静雅;王金发;刘良式. 水稻极度分蘖突变体的分离和遗传学初步研究[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(02): 235 -239 .
[6] 王丽燕;赵可夫. 玉米幼苗对盐胁迫的生理响应[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(02): 264 -268 .
[7] 田孟良;黄玉碧;谭功燮;刘永建;荣廷昭. 西南糯玉米地方品种waxy基因序列多态性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(05): 729 -736 .
[8] 胡希远;李建平;宋喜芳. 空间统计分析在作物育种品系选择中的效果[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 412 -417 .
[9] 王艳;邱立明;谢文娟;黄薇;叶锋;张富春;马纪. 昆虫抗冻蛋白基因转化烟草的抗寒性[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 397 -402 .
[10] 郑希;吴建国;楼向阳;徐海明;石春海. 不同环境条件下稻米组氨酸和精氨酸的胚乳和母体植株QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 369 -375 .
京ICP备15008789号-2