欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (04): 531-538.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

棉纤维加厚发育生理特性的基因型差异及对纤维比强度的影响

张文静;胡宏标;陈兵林;束红梅;王友华;周治国*   

  1. 南京农业大学/农业部作物生长调控重点开放实验室,江苏南京 210095
  • 收稿日期:2006-06-28 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-04-12 网络出版日期:2007-04-12
  • 通讯作者: 周治国

Genotypic Differences in Some Physiological Characteristics during Cotton Fiber Thickening and Its Relationship with Fiber Strength

ZHANG Wen-Jing,HU Hong-Biao,CHEN Bing-Lin,SHU Hong-Mei,WANG You-Hua,ZHOU ZHi-Guo*   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2006-06-28 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-04-12 Published online:2007-04-12
  • Contact: ZHOU ZHi-Guo

摘要:

选择3类棉纤维比强度差异明显的品种,于2004—2005年在江苏南京(长江流域下游棉区)研究棉纤维加厚发育过程中主要生理特性的基因型差异及对纤维比强度的影响,为探索改善棉纤维比强度的生理调控途径提供理论依据。结果表明,高纤维比强度基因型(科棉1号)棉纤维中可溶性糖转化多,进入纤维次生壁加厚发育期的β-1,3-葡聚糖含量峰值高,纤维素合成关键酶(蔗糖合成酶和β-1,3-葡聚糖酶)活性增强快、峰值高,纤维素累积速率平缓且快速累积期长;而较低纤维比强度基因型(苏棉15和德夏棉1号)的棉纤维加厚发育生理特征与此相反;中等棉纤维比强度基因型(美棉33B)则介于上述两者之间。与纤维素生物合成相关的物质和关键酶活性变化的基因型差异是造成纤维素累积速率及纤维比强度差异的主要生理原因之一。此外,β-1,3-葡聚糖含量的剧增可作为棉纤维进入次生壁加厚发育阶段的一个重要特征。

关键词: 棉花, 基因型, 纤维加厚发育, 生理特性, 纤维比强度

Abstract:

The secondary wall thickening stage is a key period to cotton fiber strength development and many complex physiological and biochemical processes are involved in it. To investigate the relationship between the genotypic differences in some physiological characteristics during cotton fiber thickening and the fiber strength, we carried out the 2-year experiments in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province (cotton belts in lower basin of the Yangtze River) in 2004–2005 by using three genotypes with significant difference in fiber strength as materials. Flowers were labeled at anthesis and sampling was conducted every seven days from 10 DPA (day post-anthesis) on. The results showed that the genotype Ⅰ with high strength fiber (Kemian 1 was representative cultivar) had more soluble sugar transformed, higher peak of β-1,3-glucan content at the onset of fiber secondary wall thickening. Sucrose synthetase and β-1,3-glucanase, plays very important roles in fiber development, always kept in higher activities in Kemian 1 than in other tested cultivars during the fiber secondary wall thickening. All these resulted in longer term and more tempered cellulose accumulation and higher strength fiber formation. On the contrary, the genotype Ⅱ with lower strength fiber (Dexiamian 1 and Sumian 15 were representative cultivars) had less soluble sugar transformed, lower peak of β-1,3-glucan content at the onset of fiber secondary wall thickening, slower increasing trend of the key enzymes activities and a more quickly descended trend afterward, leading to a shorter term and rapid cellulose accumulation and lower strength fiber. Dexiamian 1, an early cultivar, reached the peak values of β-1,3-glucan content and key enzymes activities earlier than other cultivars for about a week. And the starting time of cellulose rapid accumulation was also earlier than other tested cultivars. The characters of the genotype Ⅲ with medium strength fiber (NuCOTN 33B) were intermediate. From above results, we suggest that the differences of the dynamics of soluble sugar and β-1,3-glucan contents and sucrose synthetase and β-1,3-glucanase might be one of the physiological reasons for the differences in the cellulose accumulation and fiber strength formation. Further, the occurrence of β-1,3-glucan content peak may be proposed as a sign of the onset of secondary wall thickening in the fiber cell.

Key words: Cotton, Genotype, Cotton fiber thickening development, Physiological characters, Fiber strength

[1] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[2] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[3] 张曦, 王广恩, 李邵琦, 刘祎, 李俊兰, 钱玉源. 基于转录组测序解析陆海杂交姊妹系马克隆值差异的形成机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1442-1458.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[6] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
[7] 周琦翔, 朱艳, 汪楚博, 朱柏林, 李俊博, 宋利兵. 基于DSSAT模型模拟气候变化对新疆棉花物候期及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 590-602.
[8] 郭栋财, 吕涛, 蔡永生, 买吾鲁达·艾合买提, 全家, 曲延英, 郑凯. 棉花纤维品质相关性状QTL元分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1445-1466.
[9] 王亚雯, 戚正阳, 尤佳琦, 聂新辉, 曹娟, 杨细燕, 涂礼莉, 张献龙, 王茂军. 棉花60K功能位点基因芯片的制备及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1178-1188.
[10] 管圣, 廖澳, 王立琦, 李茜, 卢建宁, 荣晶, 崔国贤, 杨瑞芳, 佘玮. 6-BA调控增强苎麻抗旱性的生理机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 823-834.
[11] 朱灿灿, 李君霞, 景雅, 付森杰, 秦娜, 王春义, 代书桃, 魏昕, 张程炀. 不同耐荫性谷子对遮阴的生理响应及转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3211-3223.
[12] 丁俊沣, 许映飞, 张祥, 陈媛, 陈德华. 生长调节剂吲哚丁酸对移栽棉苗成活及生长发育的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3331-3341.
[13] 哈丽哈什·依巴提, 张炎, 李青军, 徐新朋, 何萍. 基于产量反应和农学效率的棉花智能化推荐施肥方法研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 3052-3064.
[14] 胡亮亮, 周洪妹, 王晓磊, 王素华, 李彩菊, 魏云山, 王丽侠, 程须珍, 陈红霖. 小豆产量相关性状的基因型与环境互作效应及稳定性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2581-2594.
[15] 李亚玮, 徐盈盈, 左春阳, 刘若男, 梁亚军, 孔杰, 张献龙, 闵玲. 棉花减数分裂进程鉴定体系构建及其对高温胁迫的响应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2570-2580.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!