欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (01): 113-119.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

苗期干旱胁迫对不同抗旱花生品种生理特性、产量和品质的影响

严美玲;李向东*;林英杰;王丽丽;周录英   

  1. 山东农业大学农学院/山东省作物生物学重点实验室,山东泰安271018
  • 收稿日期:2005-11-25 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-01-12 网络出版日期:2007-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 李向东

Effects of Drought during Seedling Stage on Physiological Traits, Yield and Quality of Different Peanut Cultivars

YAN Mei-Ling,LI Xiang-Dong*,LIN Ying-Jie,WANG Li-Li,ZHOU Lu-Ying   

  1. The Key Laboratory of Crop Biology of Shandong/ College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
  • Received:2005-11-25 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-01-12 Published online:2007-01-12
  • Contact: LI Xiang-Dong

摘要:

在人工控水条件下,研究了两个不同抗旱花生品种苗期干旱下的生理特性及其产量和品质。结果表明,随着干旱程度的增加,两品种叶片光合速率(Pn)逐渐下降,丙二醛(MDA)含量增加;解除干旱后,叶内MDA含量降低,Pn很快恢复到或超过对照水平,农大818的恢复能力强于鲁花11。适当干旱处理,可增加叶片中超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化物酶(POD)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)的活性,提高叶片可溶性蛋白质(Pr)含量,鲁花11以中轻度干旱(灌水60~80 mm),而农大818以中度干旱(灌水40~60 mm)时酶活性最强、Pr含量最高,同一干旱处理、特别重度干旱(灌水20 mm)处理的酶活性,农大818明显高于鲁花11;解除干旱后,两品种叶中SOD、POD、CAT活性和Pr含量显著降低,但农大818的酶活性仍高于鲁花11。随着苗期干旱程度的增加,花生荚果和籽仁产量降低,但农大818的降幅小于鲁花11;若苗期灌水量低于60~80 mm则影响产量。花生苗期中、轻度干旱胁迫可增加籽仁蛋白质含量,而对脂肪含量的影响不大;重度干旱明显降低籽仁脂肪含量、脂肪中油酸组分和O/L比值,增加亚油酸组分,但对蛋白质的影响较小。鲁花11以60~80 mm水分处理及农大818以40~60 mm水分处理时籽仁品质最佳。

关键词: 花生, 苗期干旱, 生理特性, 产量品质

Abstract:

Peanut is one of the ideal crops in dry farming. Drought is the main limit factor of peanut to increase yield and improve quality. Seedling stage is constantly hit by drought for summer peanut. In order to understand the suitable watering amount at peanut seedling stage, provide theoretical basis and technique for dry farming peanut producing the experiment was conducted with drought light-resistant peanut cv. Luhua 11 and drought resistant peanut cv. Nongda 818 from 2003 to 2004 in the experimental station of Shandong Agricultural University. Five treatments with watering 20 mm(serious drought stress), 40 mm(middle drought stress), 60 mm(slight-middle drought stress), 80 mm(slight drought stress) and 100 mm(CK) were made at 10 days after seedling(27 June) with three replicates in a randomized block design. The drought stress stopped at full-bloom stage(20 July) and then all treatments were irrigated 100 mm water at full-bloom stage, pod setting stage and pod filling stage separately. The results showed that the photosynthesis rate(Pn) decreased, and malondialdeyde (MDA) content increased remarkably with the drought degree raising. After rewatering, the MDA content decreased and Pn returned to the level of check rapidly, the recovery ability of Nongda 818 was bigger than that of Luhua 11. Suitable drought treatment could enhance the activities of superoxide dismutase(SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT), and increase the soluble protein content. The highest activities of SOD, POD, CAT and soluble protein content presented at the slight-middle drought treatment(watering 60–80 mm ) for Luhua 11, but at the middle drought treatment(watering 40–60 mm ) for Nongda 818. At the same drought treatment, especially at serious drought treatment(watering 20 mm), the activities of SOD, POD, CAT of Nongda 818 were obviously higher than that of Luhua 11. After rewatering, the activities of SOD, POD, CAT and soluble protein content reduced significantly, but the activities of SOD, POD, CAT of Nongda 818 were still higher than that of Luhua 11. With the drought degree raising, pod and kernel yields substantially decreased and the yield losses of Nongda 818 were less than that of Luhua 11. The irrigating amount at peanut seedling stage is no less than 60–80 mm to avoid the yield loss. Middle and slight drought stress at seedling stage could increase the protein content of peanut kernel, and have a little effect on fat content. Serious drought stress at seedling stage remarkably decreased oleic content and the ratio of oleic/linoleic(O/L), increased linoleic content of peanut kernel, and have a little effect on protein content. The optimal irrigating amount at seedling stage for the best kernel quality of Luhua 11 is 60–80 mm and that of Nongda 818 is 40–60 mm.

Key words: Peanut, Drought at seedling stage, Physiological traits, Yield and quality

[1] 郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[2] 陆一楚, 李振影, 买春海, 赵晓蕊, 王利祥. 夜间复合体关键基因AhLUX1正向调控花生结瘤的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1658-1668.
[3] 谷春苗, 王润风, 黄璐, 刘浩, 鲁清, 李海芬, 李少雄, 何双呈, 洪彦彬, 陈小平, 谭斌, 余倩霞. 花生WOX基因家族的全基因组分析及不定芽再生候选基因的鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1326-1340.
[4] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[5] 于天一, 王春晓, 肖丽, 钟召迪, 王宣仓, 赵勇, 路亚, 吴月, 吴正锋. 不同结瘤特性花生品种氮素累积、产量及品质特性对氮肥用量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 881-894.
[6] 张胜忠, 李国卫, 戈立江, 王菲菲, 胡晓辉, 苗华荣, 李燕, 钟文, 陈静. 花生机械脱壳损伤相关农艺指标筛选与QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 644-652.
[7] 王菲菲, 张胜忠, 杨贵华, 苗华荣, 胡晓辉, 张则林, 刘莎莎, 乔利仙, 单世华, 陈静. 331份花生种质苗期耐盐性综合评价和强耐盐种质鉴选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 279-294.
[8] 金欣欣, 宋亚辉, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 王瑾. 高产高油高油酸花生品种的生长发育及干物质生产特征[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 191-201.
[9] 迟晓元, 刘庆, 张君, 赵旭红, 李美, 于天一, 潘丽娟, 许静, 姜骁, 殷祥贞, 马俊卿, 陈娜. 不同花生品种(系)耐盐碱性田间鉴定及各性状指标相关性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 85-98.
[10] 孙辰硕, 张月, 田泽锴, 晏立英, 康彦平, 陈玉宁, 王欣, 淮东欣, 王前前, 姜慧芳, 罗怀勇, 黄莉, 廖伯寿, 王志慧, 雷永. 花生种质果柄强度的遗传分化与主要影响因子分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 118-130.
[11] 万书波, 张佳蕾, 高华鑫, 王才斌. 中国花生高产栽培研究进展与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1703-1711.
[12] 郭腾达, 崔梦杰, 陈琳杰, 韩锁义, 郭敬坤, 吴晨迪, 付留洋, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 张新友. 花生磷脂酰肌醇转运蛋白基因AhSFH的克隆及其响应黄曲霉菌侵染的表达特征分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1489-1500.
[13] 李文佳, 廖泳俊, 黄璐, 鲁清, 李少雄, 陈小平, 金晶炜, 王润风. 花生开花时间的全基因组关联分析及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1400-1408.
[14] 林伟津, 郭泽佳, 刘浩, 李海芬, 王润风, 黄璐, 余倩霞, 陈小平, 洪彦彬, 李少雄, 鲁清. 花生荚果产量相关性状QTL定位与候选基因分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 969-981.
[15] 迟晓元, 毕竞男, 赵健鑫, 陈娜, 潘丽娟, 姜骁, 殷祥贞, 赵旭红, 马俊卿, 许静. 花生荚果力学特性评鉴及早熟种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 943-957.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!