欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (01): 107-112.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同施氮量对套作大豆根系形态与生理特性的影响

张含彬;任万军;杨文钰*;伍晓燕;王竹;杨继芝   

  1. 四川农业大学农学院,四川雅安 625014
  • 收稿日期:2005-12-20 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-01-12 网络出版日期:2007-01-12

Effects of Different Nitrogen Levels on Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Relay-Planting Soybean Root

ZHANG Han-Bin,REN Wan-Jun,YANG Wen-Yu*,WU Xiao-Yan,WANG Zhu,YANG Ji-Zhi   

  1. College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625014, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2005-12-20 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-01-12 Published online:2007-01-12

摘要:

在小麦/玉米/大豆套作模式中,利用挖掘法研究了施氮量在不同生育时期对套作大豆(贡选1号)一些根系形态与生理特性的影响。结果表明,在V3~R5时期,根干重、根瘤数、一级侧根长、伤流量均以低氮(纯氮45、90 kg hm-2)处理最优;在R7时期,高氮(纯氮180、225 kg hm-2)处理能够延缓大豆根系衰老,根干重、伤流量与施氮量呈正相关。根冠比与施氮量在V3~R5时期呈二次曲线关系,在生育末期呈直线递增关系。伤流量冠比(y)与三节期后天数(x)呈极显著负指数函数关系y=ae-bx。伤流液氮素内含物中NO3-高于NH4+,并随着施氮量增加而增加。在套作大豆整个生育时期中根系活力呈单峰曲线,低氮处理的套作大豆根系活力明显增强,高氮处理促使根系活力的峰值推迟至R3出现,并在生育末期(R7)保持高水平(>116.00 μg g-1 FW h-1)。

关键词: 套作大豆, 施氮量, 形态与生理特性

Abstract:

Relay-planting soybean pattern is dominant in southern China. However, studies on relay-planting soybean are so defective that it may influence the development of soybean. Soybean accumulates vast protein by itself; and grows well with adequate nitrogen fertilizer. Most of studies have been concentrated on the effects of nitrogen on the aerial parts, but less on the roots. The present experiment was carried out to study the effects of different nitrogen levels (0, 45, 90, 135, 180, 225 N kg ha-1) on morphological and physiological characteristics in the relay-planting soybean roots by root-excavating method. The results showed that the optimal treatments on the dry root weight, root nodule number, length of first lateral root and bleeding sap were the low nitrogen levels (45 and 90 N kg ha-1) at the growth stages of V3–R5. Length of first lateral root, dry root weight and bleeding sap all were positive correlated with the application amount of nitrogen at the growth stage of R7. The relation between the root-top ratio and nitrogen levels was a quadratic curve at growth stages of V3–R5, but root-top ratio had a linear relationship with the nitrogen levels at the very late growth stage. The relation between bleeding sap-top ratio (y=Bleeding sap/dry matters) and days (x) after V3 (11th, Aug, 2005) was a negative exponential correlation (y=1.0357e-0.03823x). The content of NO3--N in bleeding sap was more than that of NH4+-N; it was also raised with the increasing of nitrogen amount. Root activity had a peak during the whole growth stage of relay-planting soybean. The activity of soybean roots was enhanced by low nitrogen levels (45 and 90 N kg ha-1). High nitrogen levels(180 and 225 N kg ha-1) postponed the appearance of the peak value of root activity at the growth stage R3 and maintained a high level(>116.00 μg g-1 FW h-1) at the very late growth stage(R7). However, whether high nitrogen levels are propitious to increasing the yield of relay-planting soybean is not clear. The relationship between characteristics of roots and the aerial parts should be studied in the future.

Key words: Relay-planting soybean, Nitrogen levels, Morphological and Physiological Characteristics

[1] 彭西红, 陈平, 杜青, 杨雪丽, 任俊波, 郑本川, 罗凯, 谢琛, 雷鹿, 雍太文, 杨文钰. 减量施氮对带状套作大豆土壤通气环境及结瘤固氮的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1199-1209.
[2] 李鑫格, 高杨, 刘小军, 田永超, 朱艳, 曹卫星, 曹强. 播期播量及施氮量对冬小麦生长及光谱指标的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 975-987.
[3] 袁嘉琦, 刘艳阳, 许轲, 李国辉, 陈天晔, 周虎毅, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 张洪程. 氮密处理提高迟播栽粳稻资源利用和产量[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
[4] 谢呈辉, 马海曌, 许宏伟, 徐郗阳, 阮国兵, 郭峥岩, 宁永培, 冯永忠, 杨改河, 任广鑫. 施氮量对宁夏引黄灌区麦后复种糜子生长、产量及氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 463-477.
[5] 杨志远, 舒川海, 张荣萍, 杨国涛, 王明田, 秦俭, 孙永健, 马均, 李娜. 不同株型杂交籼稻对氮肥的耐受性差异比较[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1593-1602.
[6] 时晓娟, 韩焕勇, 王方永, 郝先哲, 高宏云, 罗宏海. DPC+化学封顶对不同施氮量下棉花叶片光合生理特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(9): 1416-1429.
[7] 王士红,杨中旭,史加亮,李海涛,宋宪亮,孙学振. 增密减氮对棉花干物质和氮素积累分配及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(3): 395-407.
[8] 宁芳,张元红,温鹏飞,王瑞,王倩,董朝阳,贾广灿,李军. 不同降水状况下旱地玉米生长与产量对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(5): 777-791.
[9] 陈诗豪,李正阳,陈佳露,张元卿,魏育明,郑有良,蒲至恩. 品种与栽培条件对小麦籽粒生物活性物质含量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(11): 1756-1763.
[10] 白伟,张立祯,逄焕成,孙占祥,牛世伟,蔡倩,安景文. 秸秆还田配施氮肥对东北春玉米光合性能和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(12): 1845-1855.
[11] 陈佳娜,曹放波,谢小兵,单双吕,高伟,李志斌,黄敏,邹应斌*. 机插条件下低氮密植栽培对“早晚兼用”双季稻产量和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(08): 1176-1187.
[12] 邹芳刚,张国伟,王友华,赵文青,周治国. 施氮量对滨海改良盐土棉花钾累积利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(01): 80-88.
[13] 孙敏,高志强*,赵维峰,任爱霞,邓妍,苗果园. 休闲期深松配施氮肥对旱地土壤水分及小麦籽粒蛋白质积累的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(07): 1286-1295.
[14] 王小春,杨文钰,邓小燕,张群,雍太文,刘卫国,杨峰,毛树明. 玉/豆和玉/薯模式下玉米氮素吸收利用差异及氮肥调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(03): 519-530.
[15] 李廷亮,谢英荷,洪坚平,冯倩,孙丞鸿,王志伟. 施氮量对晋南旱地冬小麦光合特性、产量及氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(04): 704-711.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!