欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (07): 1129-1134.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同小麦品种籽粒淀粉理化特性的差异及其相关

李春燕;封超年*;王亚雷;张容;郭文善;朱新开;彭永欣   

  1. 江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室/扬州大学小麦研究所,江苏扬州225009
  • 收稿日期:2006-07-10 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-07-12 网络出版日期:2007-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 封超年

Differences and Correlations of Starch Physicochemical Properties among Different Wheat Cultivars

LI Chun-Yan,FENG Chao-Nian*,WANG Ya-Lei,ZHANG Rong,GUO Wen-Shan,ZHU Xin-Kai,PENG Yong-Xin   

  1. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/ Wheat Research Institute, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2006-07-10 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-07-12 Published online:2007-07-12
  • Contact: FENG Chao-Nian

摘要:

选用非糯性强筋、中筋、弱筋小麦品种和糯性小麦品种(系),研究淀粉理化特性的差异。结果表明,糯性与非糯性小麦RVA图谱有着明显的差异。峰值黏度、低谷黏度、最终黏度、峰值时间、糊化温度等黏度特征值,糯小麦均显著低于非糯性品种,同一类型不同品种间RVA图谱差异主要是在峰值黏度之后的曲线变化;破损淀粉含量为强筋>中筋>弱筋>糯小麦。糯性与非糯性小麦品种面粉的X-衍射图谱均呈现A型特征,晶体结构差异主要表现在峰值的大小,结晶度变化范围为28.97%~36.97%。相关分析表明,直链淀粉含量、直/支比、破损淀粉含量对淀粉黏度特性有重要的影响,而结晶度对黏度特性影响不显著。

关键词: 小麦, 淀粉, 理化特性

Abstract:

Starch physicochemical properties include viscosity, crystallinity, gelatinization and thermal properties, which can directly or indirectly affect dough and final products qualities. Many researches showed that the correlation of starch granule size, amylose content and ratio of amylose content to amylopectin content with viscosity properties was significant. We studied starch viscosity property, damaged starch content and crystal property in different types (waxy or non-waxy) of wheat or wheat cultivars and their reciprocal relationship in Yangzhou University. Pasting properties of starch were measured by the Rapid Viscosity Analyser Super3 (Newport Co., Australia). Four different types of viscosity profiles were got. For strong-gluten wheat, final viscosity value was higher than peak viscosity value. For medium-gluten wheat, final viscosity value was slightly higher than peak value or almost the same. For weak-gluten wheat, final viscosity value was a little lower than peak value or almost the same. The pasting parameters of waxy wheat were lower than those of the others (non-waxy). There was significant difference in RVA profile among different cultivars with the same type (strong-gluten, mediate-gluten, weak gluten or waxy wheat), which induced the changes of pasting parameters after their reaching peak viscosity. During milling, some starch granules can be mechanically damaged. Different cultivars flour milled by Branbender mill had different damaged starch content, which were tested by SDmatic (Sweden). The order of damaged starch content of wheat flour was strong-gluten wheat>medium-gluten wheat>weak-gluten wheat>waxy wheat. X-ray diffraction of flour investigated with Diffractomes Bruker Axs D8 Advance (Germany) in different wheat cultivars showed their peaks at angle 15º, 20º, 23º, 17º, and 18º, which retained the typical A-type pattern. The order of intensities of X-ray diffraction peaks was 18º>17º>23º>15º>20º, which was the main difference among them. Degree of crystallinity ranged from 28.97%–36.97%. It might be concluded that amylose content, the ratio of amylose content to amylopectin content and damaged starch content have significant effects, while crystallinity has no significant effect on starch pasting properties.

Key words: Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Starch, Physicochemical properties

[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[9] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[10] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[11] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[12] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[13] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[14] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[15] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!