欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (08): 1193-1196.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国水稻品种的蛋白质含量及与米质的相关性研究

陈能;罗玉坤;谢黎虹;朱智伟;段彬伍;章林平   

  1. 农业部稻米及制品质量监督检验测试中心/中国水稻研究所,浙江杭州310006
  • 收稿日期:2005-09-08 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-08-12 网络出版日期:2006-08-12

Protein Content and Its Correlation with Other Quality Parameters of Rice in China

CHEN Neng,LUO Yu-Kun,XIE Li-Hong,ZHU Ri-Wei,DUAN Bin-Wu,ZHANG Lin-Ping   

  1. Rice Product Quality Supervision and Inspection Center, Ministry of Agriculture, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2005-09-08 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-08-12 Published online:2006-08-12

摘要:

研究了5 323份稻谷样品(籼稻谷3 805份、粳稻谷1 518份)的蛋白质含量的分布特点、类别比例及与稻米品质的关系。结果表明,我国当前生产上应用的水稻品种的蛋白质含量呈单峰曲线分布,虽覆盖6.0%~15.7%的宽广范围,但主要分布于8.0%~11.0%;籼稻与粳稻蛋白质含量的分布曲线有所差别。约73%的水稻品种具中等蛋白质含量,高、低蛋白的品种分别占14%和13%;其中高蛋白籼稻品种的比例是粳稻的6倍,而低蛋白籼稻品种仅为粳稻的1/3。蛋白质含量对稻米的垩白度、透明度及直链淀粉含量等品质指标有负面影响,因而高蛋白品种的优质率显著低于中等及低蛋白的品种。本文还对稻谷、谷壳、糙米和精米等不同形态样品的蛋白质含量作了比较,并进行了相关和回归分析。

关键词: 水稻品种, 蛋白质含量, 稻米品质

Abstract:

Rice protein is rich lysine, which is the first limiting essential amino acid. In an earlier study, the genetic properties of rice protein, the environmental conditions that affected the protein content, and the correlation between protein content and grain quality have been reported. The protein content of rice can be the result of interaction between environmental forces and genetic properties of the individual. From 1970–1990, several institutions, such as Chinese academy of agriculture science began a screening and identifying program to research the quality and protein content from the China’s germplasm collections. To our knowledge, there are few studies concerning the distribution, classification of all the rice varieties. In this paper, the distribution, classification and related quality of protein content of 5 323 varieties (times) rice in China were studied. Of these, 3 805 are indica varieties (times) and 1 518 are japonica varieties (times).
Results showed that there was a normal distribution for protein content of rice varieties in general. The protein content was 8%–11% for most rice varieties, although a broad range from 6.0%–15.7% was found in this study. There were some differences for indica and japonica rice on distribution curve of protein content. The protein content ranged from 6.3% to 15.7%,in indicas, and 6.0% to 13.6% in japonicas(Fig.1). Classifying the rice protein content into high (11%), middle (8%–11%) and low (8%) groups, 73% of rice varieties belonged to middle group, 14% to high, and 13% to low. Among them, the percent of varieties with high protein content for indica rice was 5 times more than that for japonica rice, but that with low protein content, for indica rice, was one third of that for japonica (Fig.2). Either indica or japonica rice, the rate of superior varieties with low or middle protein contents was significantly higher than that with high protein content, Due to the negative effect of protein content on chalkiness, translucency and amylose content of rice.
The protein contents among paddy rice, brown rice and hull were compared, and their correlation and regression analyses were also made in this study. Mean protein content is 9.55% for brown rice, 8.34% for paddy rice, and 3.18% for hull (Table 1), and the ratio of protein content in above three parts was 3.0:2.6:1. The protein content of paddy in indica rice often exceeded that in japonica, there was a same case for hull and brown- rice protein content. For indica rice, the protein content was negatively correlated to Gel consistence (GC) and amylose content with a significant coefficient r of -0.093 and -0.17, respectively, and positively related to translucency (grade) with a significant coefficient r of 0.154. For japonica rice, the protein content was negatively correlated to GC and amylose content with a significant coefficient r of -0.233 and -0.0258, respectively, and positively related to translucency (grade) with a significant coefficient r of 0.219. High-protein rice was usually preferred over poor translucency, hard GC and low amylose content.

Key words: Rice varieties, Protein content, Rice quality

中图分类号: 

  • S511
[1] 朱金娟, 王慧萍, 杨国栋, 王宇诚, 杨晨, 王斌, Agustiani Nurwulan, 涂军明, 毕俊国, 崔克辉, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 水分管理和品种类型对再生稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 295-315.
[2] 李子翔, 黄绒, 王志超, 李鸿雁, 谭俊行, 程宇, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 聚-γ-谷氨酸对直播稻抗倒伏性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1654-1664.
[3] 熊强强, 孙长辉, 顾雯霏, 陆彦尧, 周年兵, 郭保卫, 刘国栋, 魏海燕, 朱金燕, 张洪程. 基于生育期、产量和品质对70份粳糯品种(系)的综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 728-743.
[4] 毕俊鸽, 曾占奎, 李琼, 洪壮壮, 颜群翔, 赵越, 王春平. 两个RIL群体中小麦籽粒品质相关性状QTL定位及KASP标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1669-1683.
[5] 陈志凯, 周仙莉, 张红岩, 滕长才, 侯万伟. 320份蚕豆蛋白质含量的SSR关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(11): 2775-2786.
[6] 唐承翰, 陈惠哲, 叶天承, 张玉屏, 向镜, 张义凯, 王志刚, 王亚梁. 机插种植均匀度对水稻产量构建及品质形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(10): 2625-2636.
[7] 刘亭萱, 谷勇哲, 张之昊, 王俊, 孙君明, 邱丽娟. 基于高密度遗传图谱定位大豆蛋白质含量相关的QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1532-1541.
[8] 杨硕, 武阳春, 刘鑫磊, 唐晓飞, 薛永国, 曹旦, 王婉, 刘亭萱, 祁航, 栾晓燕, 邱丽娟. 大豆蛋白含量主效位点qPRO-20-1的精细定位[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(2): 310-320.
[9] 陶钰, 姚宇, 王坤庭, 邢志鹏, 翟海涛, 冯源, 刘秋员, 胡雅杰, 郭保卫, 魏海燕, 张洪程. 穗肥氮素用量与结实期遮光复合作用对常规粳稻品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(7): 1730-1745.
[10] 胡雅杰, 余恩唯, 丛舒敏, 李娈, 薛建涛, 夏陈钰, 郭保卫, 邢志鹏. 结实期动态温度对软米粳稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(12): 3155-3165.
[11] 冯向前, 殷敏, 王孟佳, 马横宇, 刘元辉, 褚光, 徐春梅, 章秀福, 王丹英, 张运波, 陈松. 播期对长江下游不同类型晚稻品种产量的影响及其与水稻全育期温光资源配置间关系[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(10): 2597-2613.
[12] 刘秋员, 周磊, 田晋钰, 程爽, 陶钰, 邢志鹏, 刘国栋, 魏海燕, 张洪程. 长江中下游地区常规中熟粳稻产量、品质及氮素吸收性状的相互关系分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 904-914.
[13] 韩展誉,管弦悦,赵倩,吴春艳,黄福灯,潘刚,程方民. 灌浆温度和氮肥及其互作效应对稻米贮藏蛋白组分的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(7): 1087-1098.
[14] 苏达,吴良泉,Søren K. Rasmussen,周庐建,潘刚,程方民. 磷营养对水稻籽粒锌生物有效性的影响及其与植酸等磷酸肌醇谱含量的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(02): 228-237.
[15] 唐健,唐闯,郭保卫,张诚信,张振振,王科,张洪程,陈恒,孙明珠. 氮肥施用量对机插优质晚稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(01): 117-130.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!