欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (05): 676-682.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

甘蓝型油菜产量及相关性状的QTL分析

易斌;陈伟;马朝芝;傅廷栋;涂金星   

  1. 华中农业大学,作物遗传改良国家重点实验室/国家油菜改良武汉分中心,湖北武汉430070
  • 收稿日期:2005-03-23 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-05-12 网络出版日期:2006-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 涂金星

Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci for Yield and Yield Components in Brassica napus L.

YI Bin; CHEN Wei; MA Chao-Zhi; FU Ting-Dong and TU Jin-Xing   

  1. National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement/National Rapeseed Genetic Improvement Center,Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
  • Received:2005-03-23 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-05-12 Published online:2006-05-12
  • Contact: TU Jin-Xing

摘要:

高产是甘蓝型油菜育种的重要目标之一,产量是多基因控制的数量性状。本文通过QTL作图分析了产量及其相关性状的数量性状位点,以甘蓝型油菜中油821和保604 F1代小孢子培养获得的DH系为作图群体,构建了由20个连锁群组成的,包括251个分子标记( 2个RFLP标记,72个RAPD标记,91个SSR标记,86个SRAP标记)的遗传连锁图(10个标记没有分配到连锁群中)。图谱的平均图距为6.96 cM,共覆盖油菜基因组1 746.5 cM。在此图谱基础上采取复合区间作图法,检测到与油菜产量及其相关性状有关的QTL共17个。其中控制株高的3个分别位于第4、第9和第10连锁群上,对性状的解释率为9.42%~17.58%;与分枝部位有关的4个分别位于第4、第6和第7连锁群上,其中Bp1 和Bp2 均位于第4连锁群,对性状的解释率为8.13%~15.20%;与主花序有效长有关的3个分别位于第4、第10和第16连锁群上,对性状的解释率为7.49%~23.36%;与一次有效分枝有关的2个分别位于第1、第4连锁群上,对性状的解释率为15.29%~19.58%;与角果总数和千粒重有关的分别位于第4连锁群和第9连锁群上,贡献率分别为17.42%和7.64%;与单株产量有关的3个分别位于第3、第4和第15连锁群,共解释26.60%的表型变异。部分性状的QTL在连锁群上成簇分布,对性状贡献率很大,表现主效QTLs的特点,相应的性状之间也呈显著相关,这表明一因多效或者相关的QTLs之间紧密连锁是性状相关的遗传基础。本研究中与主效QTLs连锁的标记可用于油菜产量性状的分子标记辅助选择。

关键词: 油菜, 双单倍体群体, 分子标记遗传图谱, 产量, 数量性状位点(QTL)

Abstract:

Although seed yield is one of the most important objectives in Brassica napus breeding program, it is poorly understood because of the multigenic and nongenetic influence. Recent advances in molecular marker techniques provide the possibilities to trace gene behavior at individual gene loci, which greatly helps to understand the complex genetics of quantitative traits of seed yield. The objective of our investigation was to acquire the information on the association between molecular markers and seed yield in Brassica napus and on the inheritance of these agronomic traits and to facilitate the selection in breeding programs. A double hapolid (DH) population derived from a cross between the rapeseed cultivars Zhongyou 821 and Bao 604 was used to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for seed yield and yield components. Eighty-two double hapolid lines as well as two parent lines were evaluated in field environments in Wuhan, with two replications, for 7 agronomic traits, including plant height (PH), branch position (BP), length of main raceme (LMR), No. of primary branches (NPB), No. of pod per plant (NPP), 1000-seed weight (SW) and yield per plant (YPP). It was shown that all the seven agronomic traits had continuous phenotypic distributions and were suitable for QTL analysis (Table 2). A total of 261 molecular markers consisting of 2 RFLPs, 72 RAPDs, 91 SSRs and 86 SRAPs were employed to 82 DH lines and to construct the genetic linkage map, two hundred and fifty-one markers were assembled into 20 linkage groups (LG1–LG20), no linkage was found between the remaining 10 markers and any of the established linkage groups (Fig.1). The total map length was 1 746.5 cM with an average distance of 6.96 cM between adjacent markers. By employing complex interval mapping, a total of 17 putative QTLs were identified to be significant for the seven traits, of which 3 were for yield, 14 for yield components (Table 4). The phenotypic variation was explained by individual QTL ranged from 9.42%–17.58% for three QTLs of plant height, 8.13%–15.20% for four QTLs of branch position, 7.49%–23.36% for three QTLs of length of main raceme, 15.29%–19.58% for two QTLs of No. of primary branches, 17.42% for one QTL of No. of pod per plant, 7.64% for one QTL of 1000-seed weight and 8.11–9.78 for three QTLs of yield per plant. Some QTLs were mapped at the same or similar position in LG4, there were significant correlations between the corresponding traits. It suggested that the pleiotropism or tight linkage of QTLs for different traits might be the important genetic base for trait correlations. The molecular marker linked closely with main QTLs of yield and yield components in this paper could be used for MAS in rapeseed breeding program.

Key words: Brassica napus, DH (doubled haploid), Molecular linkage map, Yield, QTL (quantitative trait loci)

中图分类号: 

  • S565
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[4] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[5] 任依涵, 赵曼利, 代晶, 李银水, 顾炽明, 杨璐, 杜雪竹, 胡文诗, 秦璐. 油菜叶片功能氮动态变化对光合速率及光合氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1459-1471.
[6] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[7] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[8] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[9] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[12] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[13] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[14] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[15] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!