欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 1796-1801.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

春播小麦醇溶蛋白组成及其对品质性状的影响

张平平1,2;陈东升3;张勇2;夏先春2;何中虎2,4,*

  

  1. 1华中农业大学植物科技学院,湖北武汉430007; 2中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/国家农作物基因资源与基因改良重大科学工程/国家小麦改良中心,北京100081;3宁夏省农林科学院作物研究所,宁夏永宁750105;4 CIMMYT中国办事处,北京100081
  • 收稿日期:2006-02-13 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-12-12 网络出版日期:2006-12-12
  • 通讯作者: 何中虎

Gliadin Composition and Their Effects on Quality Properties in Spring Wheat

ZHANG Ping-Ping12,CHEN Dong-Sheng3,ZHANG Yong2,XIA Xian-Chun2,HE Zhong-Hu24*   

  1. 1 College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei; 2 Institute of Crop Sciences/The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement/ National Wheat Improvement Center, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081; 3Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Yinchuan 750002, Ningxia; 4 CIMMYT China Office, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2006-02-13 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-12-12 Published online:2006-12-12
  • Contact: HE Zhong-Hu

摘要:

对来源于中国、CIMMYT和澳大利亚的33份春性小麦品种进行2年4种环境的田间试验,利用反相高效液相色谱(RP-HPLC)对醇溶蛋白组分进行了量化分析。结果表明,醇溶蛋白总量及ω、α/β和γ(γ1、γ2、γ3)各组分含量及比例在基因型间和环境间存在显著差异。α/β型含量最高(43.12%~50.87%),γ型次之(32.71%~43.14%),ω型含量较低(11.89%~21.58%)。1BL/1RS易位显著改变小麦醇溶蛋白组分含量和比例,易位系的ω型醇溶蛋白含量显著高于非易位系,为17.44%~21.58%,而γ型醇溶蛋白显著低于非易位系,α/β型醇溶蛋白在易位和非易位系中的含量差异不显著。不论在1BL/1RS易位系或非易位系中,醇溶蛋白总量及ω、α/β和γ型醇溶蛋白含量都与面粉蛋白质含量显著正相关,与其他大部分面粉品质性状相关不显著,说明谷蛋白组分可能对加工品质更重要。在易位系中,ω、γ1和γ型醇溶蛋白总量与沉降值呈显著正相关,醇溶蛋白总量、γ2和γ型醇溶蛋白与形成时间显著正相关,ω和γ型醇溶蛋白含量与延伸性呈显著负相关。

关键词: 春小麦, 反相高效液相色谱, 醇溶蛋白, 加工品质

Abstract:

Gliadin composition affects processing quality in bread wheat. CIMMYT and Australian germplasms have made a great contribution to improving yield and quality for Chinese spring wheat, so thirty-three spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes originated from CIMMYT, Australia and China were grown under four environments in 2003 and 2004. The flour sample was separated and quantified by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography method in order to understand the composition of gliadin and the effects on quality properties in spring wheat. The results showed that significant variation in total gliadin and gliadin subgroups were observed among genotypes and environments. Within the subgroups, the α/β-type gliadins were generally presented the greatest amount (43.12%–50.87%), the γ-type gliadins content were the middle (32.71%–43.14%), and the ω-type gliadins content at lower levels (11.89%–21.58%). 1BL/1RS translocation affects the composition and the content of gliadin. High proportion of ω-type gliadins (17.44%–21.58%) was presented in 1B/1R translocation, however, no significant difference was observed on the amount of α/β-type gliadins between the 1B/1R translocation and the non-translocation genotypes. The amounts of total gliadin and the gliadin subgroups were significantly correlated with the protein content in flour of both the translocation and non-translocation lines, while weakly correlated with sedimentation volume, development time, stability time, extensibility and maximum resistance. It is likely that glutenin might play more important role in determining processing quality. In the translocation lines, ω, γ1 and γ-type gliadins had significantly positive correlation with sedimentation volume. Total gliadin, γ2 and γ-type gliadins had significantly positive correlation with dough development time, while ω and γ-gliadins had significantly negative correlation with dough extensibility.

Key words: Spring wheat, Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, Gliadin, Processing quality

中图分类号: 

  • S512
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1Pod-D1Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 谢玮欣, 毛守发, 韦金贵, 侯思宇, 樊志龙, 殷文, 胡发龙, 南运有, 柴强. 干旱灌区绿肥还田对减量灌水春小麦水分利用的调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 514-526.
[3] 王曜阔, 王文政, 张敏, 刘希伟, 杨敏, 李昊昱, 张灵鑫, 闫彦菲, 蔡瑞国. 水氮运筹对冬小麦籽粒GMP合成和面粉加工品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2176-2189.
[4] 王天译, 杨绣娟, 赵佳佳, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 李晓华, 郝水源, 郑军. 山西小麦醇溶蛋白多样性及其对面粉品质效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1784-1800.
[5] 吕国锋, 范金平, 吴素兰, 张晓, 赵仁慧, 李曼, 王玲, 高德荣, 别同德, 刘健. 早熟小麦品种扬麦37主要目标性状的遗传构成分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1538-1547.
[6] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 侯慧芝, 薛云贵, 郭宏娟, 王硕, 赵绮志, 张绪成, 谢军红. 干旱条件下深施肥对春小麦旗叶生态化学计量特征及其光合碳同化的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 2078-2090.
[7] 张康, 聂志刚, 王钧, 李广. 温度升高下APSIM模型春小麦籽粒生长参数敏感性分析及优化[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 464-477.
[8] 毛守发, 韦金贵, 柴强, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 殷文, 王琦明. 绿洲灌区绿肥还田对减量灌水小麦产量的补偿机制[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(11): 2818-2830.
[9] 董志强, 吕丽华, 姚艳荣, 张经廷, 张丽华, 姚海坡, 申海平, 贾秀领. 水氮互作下强筋小麦师栾02-1产量和品质[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7): 1942-1953.
[10] 宁宁, 莫娇, 胡冰, 李大双, 娄洪祥, 王春云, 白晨阳, 蒯婕, 汪波, 王晶, 徐正华, 李晓华, 贾才华, 周广生. 长江流域不同生态区油菜籽关键品质比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(12): 3315-3327.
[11] 王海琪, 王荣荣, 蒋桂英, 尹豪杰, 晏世杰, 车子强. 施氮量对滴灌春小麦叶片光合生理性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(1): 211-224.
[12] 侯慧芝, 张绪成, 方彦杰, 于显枫, 王红丽, 马一凡, 张国平, 雷康宁. 全膜微垄沟播对寒旱区春小麦苗期土壤水热环境及光合作用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(9): 1398-1407.
[13] 马明生, 郭贤仕, 柳燕兰. 全生物降解地膜覆盖对旱地土壤水分状况及春小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(12): 1933-1944.
[14] 王旭虹,李鸣晓,张群,金峰,马秀芳,姜树坤,徐正进,陈温福. 籼型血缘对籼粳稻杂交后代产量和加工及外观品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(4): 538-545.
[15] 赵财,王巧梅,郭瑶,殷文,樊志龙,胡发龙,于爱忠,柴强. 水氮耦合对地膜玉米免耕轮作小麦干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(11): 1694-1703.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!