欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (02): 273-277.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

5个玉米人工合成群体主要性状育种潜势分析

张建辉; 杨克诚; 荣廷昭; 潘光堂   

  1. 四川农业大学玉米研究所,四川雅安625014
  • 收稿日期:2004-10-22 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-02-12 网络出版日期:2006-02-12
  • 通讯作者: 杨克诚

Breeding Potentiality of Major Traits for Five Synthesized Corn Populations

ZHANG Jian-Hui; YANG Ke-Cheng; RONG Ting-Zhao and PAN Guang-Tang   

  1. Maize Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625014, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2004-10-22 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-02-12 Published online:2006-02-12
  • Contact: YANG Ke-Cheng

摘要:

对5个玉米人工合成群体主要性状表现、杂种优势以及配合力进行了研究。结果表明,群体内个体间均存在较丰富的遗传变异,群体间主要性状及其配合力差异更为明显,其中群体GP-5和GP-3植株穗位高低适中,主要产量性状及其GCA表现较好,优良个体出现频率较高,比对照高产的组合出现次数较多,具有较大改良利用潜势;群体GP-4虽主要产量性状均值偏低,GCA正向效应值偏小,但植株较矮,穗位较低,比对照高产的组合出现次数较多,通过GCA改良和SCA选择有一定利用前景;群体GP-1和GP-2植株穗位偏高,主要产量性状的GCA均为负值,育种潜力不大。

关键词: 玉米群体, 遗传变异, 配合力

Abstract:

Lack of germplasm resources is one of the major factors restricting corn breeding in China. In order to broaden the genetic basis of corn breeding, many maize breeders have done researches with different populations. In the present study, 45 combinations derived from crosses of 5 synthesized corn populations and 9 testers were used with incomplete diallel cross design, to evaluate the major characteristics and combining ability of the 5 populations. The results showed that variances in the 5 populations were significant in all the observed traits except pollening stage, silking stage, green leaves at dough stage, kernels/row, percentage of kernel to cob and kernel depth (Table 1). Table 2 showed that plant height and ear height were higher in GP-1 and GP-2; kernels/row, ear weight, kernel weight/ear and yield per plant were higher in GP-3 and GP-5; plant height and ear height were lower in GP-4. Within the 5 synthesized corn populations, comparatively greater genetic variation was detected for plant height and ear height in GP-4, for ear length in GP-1, for rows/ear, ear weight, kernel weight/ear and yield per plant in GP-2, and for 100-kernel weight in GP-5. There was a smaller genetic variation in GP-3. Normal distribution was observed in yield per plant within the five populations. The frequencies of plants with an average yield per plant higher than 160g, that of control, in the five populations were different, which in GP-1, GP-2, GP-3, GP-4 and GP-5 were 28%, 26%, 31%, 14% and 26%, respectively.
Analysis of combing ability for the traits with significant variations over two seasons showed that all the major traits of GP-5 and GP-3 were higher in GCA, while only ear length, plant height or ear height were detected to be prominence in the other 3 populations (Table 5). There was a big difference in numbers of combinations with significant SCA effects on these traits. GP-1 was involved in combinations with both maximum positive and maximum negative SCA effects in ear length. Most combinations of GP-2 and GP-5 showed maximum positive and maximum negative SCA effects in the other three traits (Table 6). Among the 11 combinations superior to the reference in yield per plant (Table 7), when ES40, R08 and 48-2 were used as one of the parents, the possibility to get hybrids of high yield per plant was great in GP-5, and then in GP-4 and GP-3.
It is concluded that GP-3 and GP-5 possess an appropriate plant height and ear height, with higher yield traits, better general combing ability, greater frequencies of elite individual, and high-yielding combination, compared with the reference cultivar. They exhibit a better potentiality. GP-4 is lower in mean values of the major yield traits and lower in positive GCA effect, but possess a lower plant height and ear height, a higher high-yielding combination frequency than the reference cultivar. It also shows a good potentiality for breeding when improvement is made for GCA and SCA. GP-1 and GP-2 show higher plant height and ear height, a negative GCA in major traits and a lower high-yielding combination frequency compared with the reference cultivar, so they are of less breeding potentiality.

Key words: Corn population, Genetic variation, Combining ability

中图分类号: 

  • S513
[1] 李京琳, 李佳林, 李新鹏, 安保光, 曾翔, 吴永忠, 黄培劲, 龙湍. 水稻ptc1隐性核不育系的创制及其配合力分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2173-2183.
[2] 向丽媛,徐凯,苏静,吴超,袁雄,郑兴飞,刁英,胡中立,李兰芝. 基于通路分析剖析水稻农艺性状配合力和杂种优势[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1319-1326.
[3] 简大为, 周阳, 刘宏伟, 杨丽, 买春艳, 于立强, 韩新年, 张宏军, 李洪杰. 利用功能标记揭示新疆小麦改良品种与地方品种的遗传变异[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(05): 657-671.
[4] 张征,张雪丽,莫博程,代志军,胡中立,李兰芝,郑兴飞. 籼型杂交水稻农艺性状的配合力研究[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(10): 1448-1457.
[5] 王博新,王亚辉,陈朋飞,刘徐冬雨,冯志前,郝引川,张仁和,张兴华,薛吉全*. 源于陕A群、陕B群玉米自交系在不同密度条件下配合力分析[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(09): 1328-1336.
[6] 李国君,马艺文,徐丹阳,吴永波,宋洁,王楠,郝转芳,赵娟. 玉米SNAC基因的遗传变异及耐旱性调控[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(08): 1128-1138.
[7] 谢辉,党小景,刘二宝,曾思远,洪德林. 江淮稻区杂交粳稻骨干亲本产量性状配合力的SSR标记位点鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(03): 330-343.
[8] 李芦江,兰海,潘光堂,杨克诚. 不同轮回选择方法对玉米窄基群体的改良效果[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(11): 1895-1904.
[9] 崔超,高聚林*,于晓芳*,苏治军,王志刚,孙继颖,胡树平,王海燕,高英波,高鑫. 18个玉米自交系氮效率性状的配合力分析[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(05): 838-849.
[10] 王建军,雍洪军,张晓聪,李明顺,张德贵,白丽,高志强,张世煌,李新海. 12个外来玉米群体与我国主要种质配合力效应和杂种优势分析[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(12): 2170-2177.
[11] 库丽霞, 孟庆雷, 侯本军, 李家富, 刘海静, 陈彦惠. 轮回选择对豫综5号玉米群体产量性状配合力的改良效果[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(02): 215-222.
[12] 陈洪梅, 汪燕芬, 姚文华, 罗黎明, 李佳莉, 徐春霞, 番兴明, 郭华春. 导入热带种质的温带玉米自交系的利用潜力[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(10): 1785-1793.
[13] 唐建卫, 殷贵鸿, 王丽娜, 韩玉林, 黄峰, 于海飞, 杨光宇, 李新平. 小麦湿面筋含量和面筋指数遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(09): 1701-1706.
[14] 黄殿成, 梁奎, 孙程, 江建华, 石明亮, 戴剑, 谢辉, 赵凯铭, 阮方松, 马文霞, 洪德林. 杂交粳稻亲本米质性状优异配合力的标记基因型鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(03): 405-414.
[15] 梁奎,黄殿成,赵凯铭,阮方松,谢辉,马文霞,洪德林. 杂交粳稻亲本产量性状优异配合力的标记基因型筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(08): 1270-1279.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!