欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (02): 182-188.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

灌浆期短暂高温对小麦淀粉形成的影响

刘萍;郭文善;浦汉春;封超年;朱新开;彭永欣   

  1. 扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2005-01-11 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-02-12 网络出版日期:2006-02-12
  • 通讯作者: 郭文善

Effects of Transient High Temperature during Grain Filling Period on Starch Formation in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

LIU Ping; GUO Wen-Shan; PU Han-Chun; FENG Chao-Nian; ZHU Xin-Kai and PENG Yong-Xin   

  1. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology
  • Received:2005-01-11 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-02-12 Published online:2006-02-12
  • Contact: GUO Wen-Shan

摘要:

采用人工气候室控温,研究了灌浆期高温对弱、中筋两个小麦品种淀粉形成的影响。结果表明,温度从25℃升至30℃有利于籽粒总淀粉积累,当灌浆温度超过30℃时,温度升高,总淀粉含量下降,40℃时总淀粉含量最低。在相同温度条件下,小麦淀粉的形成以花后第25~27天高温胁迫影响最大,花后第33~35天高温胁迫影响最小。当温度超过25℃时,随温度的升高,剑叶可溶性糖、蔗糖含量和SPS酶活性呈下降趋势。40℃处理使SS、SBE酶活性最低,峰值在25~30℃之间。40℃高温胁迫下,弱筋小麦扬麦9号籽粒淀粉粒呈椭圆型,与蛋白质鞘结合较疏松,角质化程度低;中筋小麦扬麦12籽粒淀粉粒受到伤害,呈扁圆形,并出现裂纹,说明灌浆期短暂高温胁迫对扬麦12的影响大于对扬麦9号。

关键词: 小麦, 短暂高温, 灌浆期, 淀粉形成

Abstract:

Wheat grain quality is affected by the environment. Temperature is a major component in environmental variation and has a marked effect on grain filling in wheat. Short period of heat shock, such as over 30℃ for a few days, happens frequently during grain filling in China and many wheat-growing areas in the world, and has become an important factor limiting wheat quality. Starch is the major storage substance in grains of wheat, comprising 65%–70% of dry weight. Investigating the effects of transient high temperature during grain filling period on starch formation and its context is useful for understanding the mechanism of heat damage and improving wheat quality under high temperature stress.
Four temperature levels, i.e. daily average temperature 25℃, 30℃, 35℃ and 40℃, respectively, were set in a phytotron, and wheat plants during different grain filling stages, including the 15th–17th, 19th–21st, 25th-27th and 33rd-35th day after anthesis (DAA), were treated. The wheat cultivars tested were Yangmai 9 with weak-gluten and Yangmai 12 with medium-gluten. Results showed that grain starch content was highest in the treatment of 30℃ and was lowest in the treatment of 40℃ in two cultivars .Under the same temperature, the effects of heat shock during the 25th–27th DAA were greatest, while that during the 33rd–35th DAA were lowest (Table 1). For the treatments of the 25th–27th DAA, the higher the temperature, the lower the soluble sugar and sucrose contents and sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) activity in flag leaves. Sucrose synthase (SS), starch branching enzyme (SBE) activities were lowest in 40℃ treatment, and SS and SBE activities reached maximum in 25–30℃ treatments (Fig. 2–4). As for starch morphology, the granules in grains were in ellipsoid shape and combined loosely with protein sheath for 40℃ treatment of Yangmai 9 (PlateⅠ­3, 4), but were damaged and in flat ball shape with a crack for that of Yangmai 12 (PlateⅠ­7, 8). Starch granules of Yangmai 9 were slightly damaged for 30℃ treatment (PlateⅠ­1, 2). At the 1st day after 30℃ heat shock treatment, the cracked granules were observed for Yangmai 12, but disappeared at maturity (PlateⅠ­5, 6). While in 40℃ treatment, the crack could still be observed at maturity. It indicated that the heat damage at 30℃ for 3d could be considerably compensated other than at 40℃. It was probable that a kind of protective mechanism for enzymes existed in the endosperm, which had the critical temperature of 30℃. Resistance to high temperature varied with cultivars, and Yangmai 9 was stronger than Yangmai 12.

Key words: Wheat, Transient high temperature, Grain filling period, Starch formation

中图分类号: 

  • S512
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!