欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (04): 675-683.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00675

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

花铃期干旱胁迫下氮素水平对棉花光合作用与叶绿素荧光特性的影响

刘瑞显;王友华;陈兵林;郭文琦;周治国*   

  1. 南京农业大学/农业部作物生长调控重点开放试验室, 江苏南京210095
  • 收稿日期:2007-06-18 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-04-12 网络出版日期:2008-04-12
  • 通讯作者: 周治国

Effects of Nitrogen Levels on Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics under Drought Stress in Cotton Flowering and Boll- Forming Stage

LIU Rui-Xian,WANG You-Hua,CHEN Bing-Lin,GUO Wen-Qi,ZHOU Zhi-Guo*   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China

  • Received:2007-06-18 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-04-12 Published online:2008-04-12
  • Contact: ZHOU Zhi-Guo

PDF

1713

被引次数

157

摘要：

于2004—2005在江苏南京农业大学卫岗试验站进行盆栽试验, 设置干旱与对照2个土壤水分处理, 每个处理再设置3个氮素水平, 研究了花铃期干旱胁迫下氮素水平对棉花叶片光合作用与叶绿素荧光参数的影响, 以期为棉花花铃期干旱时的合理氮肥运筹提供理论依据。结果表明, 与对照相比, 干旱处理显著降低了棉株凌晨叶水势、土壤相对含水量、净光合速率(Pn)、气孔导度(Gs)与胞间CO2浓度(Ci), 但提高了叶绿素a(Chl a)、叶绿素b(Chl b)、总叶绿素(Chl a+b)及类胡萝卜素(Car)的含量。干旱处理下, Pn、Gs、Ci、Chl a、Chl b、Chl a+b及Car均以240 kg hm-2氮素水平最高。干旱胁迫下叶绿素初始荧光(Fo)明显升高, 且随氮素水平的提高而增大; 而最大光化学效率(Fv/Fm)、光系统II(PS II)量子产量(ΦPS II)、电子传递速率(ETR)与光化学猝灭系数(qP)均显著降低, 干旱胁迫亦增大了非光化学猝灭系数(NPQ)。干旱胁迫下Fv/Fm、ΦPS II、ETR与qP均以240 kg hm-2氮素水平最高。干旱胁迫显著降低叶片蒸腾速率(Tr), 导致叶温升高, 增施氮肥进一步增大了叶温。干旱胁迫降低了棉株各器官干物质重, 而施氮则增大水分胁迫指数。综合分析认为, 过量施氮或施氮不足均不利于提高棉花叶片光合性能。两年试验结果表明, 在本试验设置的3个氮素水平中, 花铃期干旱胁迫下以240 kg hm-2纯氮, 且基施50%, 初花期追施50%较适宜。

关键词: 棉花, 干旱胁迫, 氮素水平, 光合特性, 叶绿素荧光参数, 产量

Abstract: The flowering and boll-forming stage is the key yield determinant period of upland cotton. Short-duration water stress occurring during this stage significantly reduced cotton development and final productivity. Nitrogen application plays an important role in alleviating the adverse effects of dry soil on plant development. In order to explore effects of nitrogen on cotton photosynthesis under drought stress. The photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of cotton with different nitrogen application were examined under developing gradually drought stress during flowering and boll-forming stage. Leaf water potential, soil relative water content, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) were reduced, but the pigment contents of cotton leaf were increased under soil drought stress. The reduced degree of Pn was increased with increasing nitrogen levels. Under drought stress, Pn, Gs, Ci, Chl a content, Chl b content, Chl a+b content. and Car content in 240 kg N ha-1 treatment was the highest among the three nitrogen levels. Drought stress caused a significant decline in the maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm), the quantum yield of electron transport (ΦPS II), the electron transport rate (ETR) and the photochemical quenching co-efficient (qP). These changes were accompanied by an increase in both the minimal fluorescence (Fo) and the non-photochemical quenching co-efficient (NPQ). Fv/Fm, ΦPS II, ETR, and qP were higher at 240 kg N ha-1 level than at 0 and 480 kg N ha-1 levels. The transpiration (Tr) of cotton was reduced and the temperature of leaf was enhanced under drought. The dry matter of cotton decreased under drought. Nitrogen application increased dry matter weight and augmented the water stress indexes. All results suggest that 240 kg N ha-1 is the optimal nitrogen application rate under drought, deficient (0 kg N ha-1) and excessive (480 kg N ha-1) nitrogen application are of disadvantage to photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics.

Key words: Cotton, Drought, Nitrogen levels, Photosynthesis, Chlorophyll fluorescence, Yield

[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[7] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[8] 周静远, 孔祥强, 张艳军, 李雪源, 张冬梅, 董合忠. 基于种子萌发出苗过程中弯钩建成和下胚轴生长的棉花出苗壮苗机制与技术[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1051-1058.
[9] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[10] 孙思敏, 韩贝, 陈林, 孙伟男, 张献龙, 杨细燕. 棉花苗期根系分型及根系性状的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1081-1090.
[11] 王霞, 尹晓雨, 于晓明, 刘晓丹. 干旱锻炼对B73自交后代当代干旱胁迫记忆基因表达及其启动子区DNA甲基化的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1191-1198.
[12] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[13] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[14] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[15] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2