欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (12): 2077-2084.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.02077

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

芝麻EST-SSR标记的开发和初步研究

魏利斌1;张海洋2,*;郑永战2;郭旺珍1,*;张天真1   

  1. 1南京农业大学作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室,江苏南京210095; 2河南省农作物新品种重点实验室,河南郑州450002
  • 收稿日期:2008-05-04 修回日期:2008-07-15 出版日期:2008-12-12 网络出版日期:2008-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 郭旺珍
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(30471104);国家重大基础研究前期研究专项(2003CCAO0700);教育部111工程项目(B08025)

Development and Utilization of EST-derived Microsatellites in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)

WEI Li-Bin1,ZHANG Hai-Yang2*,ZHENG Yong-Zhan2,GUO Wang-Zhen1*,ZHANG Tian-Zhen1   

  1. 1 National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement, Cotton Research Institute, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu; 2 Henan Key Laboratory of Crop Improvement, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan, China
  • Received:2008-05-04 Revised:2008-07-15 Published:2008-12-12 Published online:2008-10-10
  • Contact: GUO Wang-Zhen

摘要:

为了加速分子标记在芝麻研究中的应用,利用网上现有的芝麻EST(expressed sequence tags)数据信息,开展了芝麻EST-SSR功能性标记的开发和利用研究。 在所有的3 328条芝麻EST序列中共确认得到1 785条非冗余EST序列。其中,在含有微卫星重复的148条序列中共检测有155个EST-SSR。非冗余EST序列总长为774.266 kb,平均每4.99 kb含有一个EST-SSR。EST-SSR的分布频率和特征分析表明,以AG/TC为重复基元(motif)的SSR出现最多,占总SSR的37.42%。利用这些序列,设计开发了50对EST-SSR引物,并分别选用36个芝麻、2个棉花、2个大豆和2个油葵进行多态性和通用性研究。其中44对引物在供试芝麻材料中扩增出条带,共产生108个位点,平均每对引物产生2.45个位点,多态信息含量(polymorphism information content, PIC)平均值为0.390。根据遗传相似性系数进行聚类,有26个芝麻材料聚类在两个大的亚类(III和IV)中,聚类结果表明芝麻的基因型与地理来源之间没有必然的联系。此外,分别有2对、3对和4对引物可以在棉花、大豆和油葵中进行通用性扩增。本研究证实这种全新开发的芝麻EST-SSR标记在芝麻遗传多样性分析、遗传图谱构建以及比较基因组等研究方面有广阔的利用前景。

关键词: 芝麻, 表达序列标签 (EST), 简单重复序列(SSR), 多态信息含量(PIC), 遗传多样性

Abstract:

The deficiencies of markers in Sesamum indicum L. that can be used at home and aboard seriously restrict its studies in molecular field. To accelerate the application of molecular markers in sesame, EST-SSR markers development and utilization using publicly available sesame EST data were performed. A total of 1 785 non-redundant EST sets were assembled among the 3 328 identified sesame EST. 148 microsatellites sequences containing 155 EST-SSR were detected from these EST. The total length of the non-redundant EST sequences was 774.266 kb, on average one EST-SSR each 4.99 kb. The distribution characteristics of the EST-SSR markers was analyzed. Among the SSR, dinucleotide AG/TC was the most abundant (occurring 58 times), with frequency of 37.42%. According to these EST sequences containing SSR, 50 primer pairs were designed and tested on 36 sesame accessions, 2 cotton accessions, 2 soybean accessions and 2 oil sunflower accessions to detect polymorphisms and transferability. With 44 EST-SSR, 108 loci were successfully amplified in sesame, with an average of 2.45 loci per primer pair. Of the 44 amplified primer pairs, 27(61.4%) primer pairs revealed polymorphisms in the 36 sesame accessions. The PIC (polymorphism information content) ranged from 0.105 to 0.844, with an average of 0.390. Based on genetic similarity coefficient, the UPGMA dendrogram grouped 26 of 36 accessions in to two sub-clusters (III and IV), but it revealed no association between genotypes and geographical sources. In addition, 2, 3 and 4 SSR markers could be transferred to the PCR of cotton, soybean and oil sunflower respectively. This study effectively proved that EST-SSR from sesame is valuable for genetic analysis, linkage mapping and transferability study among oil plants.

Key words: Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.), EST, SSR, PIC, Genetic diversity

[1]Bhat K V, Babrekar P P, Lakhanpaul S. Study of genetic di-versity in Indian and exotic sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) germplasm using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Euphytica, 1999, 110: 21-33
[2]Ercan A G, Taskin M, Turgut K. Analysis of genetic diversity in Turkish sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) populations using RAPD markers. Genet Res Crop Evol, 2004, 51: 599-607
[3]Kim D H, Zur G, Danin-Poleg Y, Lee S, Shim K, Kang C, Kashi Y. Genetic relationships of sesame germplasm collec-tion as revealed by inter-simple sequence repeats. Plant Breed, 2002, 121: 259-262
[4]Hernan E L, Petr K. Genetic relationship and diversity in a sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) germplasm collection using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). BMC Genet, 2006, 7: 10
[5]Dixit A A, Jin M H, Chung J W, Yu J W, Chung H K, Ma K H, Park Y J, Cho E G. Development of polymorphic microsatel-lite markers in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Mol Ecol Notes, 2005, 5: 736-738
[6]Yu J K, LaRota M, Kantety R V, Sorrells M E. EST derived SSR markers for comparative mapping in wheat and rice. Mol Gen Genet, 2004, 271: 742-751
[7]Varshney R K, Sigmund R, Borner A, Korzun V, Stein N, Sorrells M E, Langridge P, Graner A. Interspecific transfer-ability and comparative mapping of barley EST-SSR markers in wheat, rye and rice. Plant Sci, 2005, 168: 195-202
[8]Wang C-B(王长彪), Guo W-Z(郭旺珍), Cai C-P(蔡彩平), Zhang T-Z(张天真). Characterization, development and ex-ploitation of EST-derived microsatellites in Gossypium rai-mondii Ulbrich. Chin Sci Bull (科学通报), 2006, 51(3): 316-320(in Chinese)
[9]Jia X P, Shi Y S, Song Y C. Development of EST-SSR in foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Genet Resour Crop Evol, 2007, 54: 233-236
[10]Paterson A H, Brubaker C, Wendel J F. A rapid method for extraction of cotton (Gossypium spp.) genomic DNA suitable for RFLP or PCR analysis. Plant Mol Biol, 1999, 11: 122-127
[11]Zhang J (张军), Wu Y-T(武耀廷), Guo W-Z(郭旺珍), Zhang T-Z(张天真). Fast screening of microsatellite markers in cot-ton with PAGE/silver staining. Acta Gossypii Sin (棉花学报), 2000, 12(5): 267-269 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]Park Y H, Alabady M S, Ulloa M. Genetic mapping of new cotton fiber loci using EST-derived microsatellites in an in-terspecific recombinant inbred (RIL) cotton population. Mol Genet Genom, 2005, 274: 428-441
[13]Rohlf F J. NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version 2.1, User Guide. New York: Exeter Software, 2000
[14]Sokal R R, Michener C D. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ Kansas Sci Bull, 1958, 28: 1409-1438
[15]Sneath P H, Sokal R R. Numerical Taxonomy: The Principal and Practice of Numerical Classification. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1973
[16]Weber J L. Informativeness of human (dC-dA)n·(dG-dT)n polymorphisms. Genomics, 1990, 7: 524-530
[17]Cardle L, Ramsay L, Milbourne D. Computational and ex-perimental characterization of physically clustered simple sequence repeats in plants. Genetics, 2000, 156: 847-854
[18]Morgante M, Hanafey M, Powell W. Microsatellites are pref-erentially associated with nonrepetitive DNA in plant ge-nomes. Nat Genet, 2002, 30: 194-200
[19]Gao L F, Tang J F, Li H W. Analysis of microsatellites in major crops assessed by computational and experimental ap-proaches. Mol Breed, 2003, 12: 245-261
[20]Xin Y(忻雅), Cui H-R(崔海瑞), Zhang M-L(张明龙), Lim Y-P(林容杓), Choi S-R(崔水莲). Development of EST (ex-pressed sequence tags) marker in Chinese cabbage and its transferability to rapeseed. Hereditas (遗传), 2005, 27(3): 410-416 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]Kantety R V, Rota M L, Matthews D E. Data mining for simple sequence repeats in expressed sequence tags from barley, maize, rice, sorghum and wheat. Plant Mol Biol, 2002, 48: 501-510
[22]Sook J, Abbott A, Jesudurai C. Frequency, type, distribution and annotation of simple sequence repeats in Rosaceae EST. Funct Integr Genom, 2005, 5: 136-143
[23]Li H-S(李华盛), Fan S-L(范术丽), Shen F-F(沈法富). Screening of microsatellite markers from cotton EST. Acta Gossypii Sin (棉花学报), 2005, 17(4): 211-216(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]Lewin B, Genes V. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994
[25]Chabane K, Ablett G A, Cordeiro G M. EST versus genomic derived microsatellite markers for genotyping wild and culti-vated barley. Genet Resour Crop Evol, 2005, 52: 903-909
[26]Cho Y G, Ishii T, Temnykh S, Chen X, Lipovich L, McCouch S R, Park W D, Ayres N, Cartinhour S. Diversity of microsa-tellites derived from genomic libraries and GenBank se-quences in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2000, 100: 713-722
[27]Scott K D, Eggler P, Seaton G, Rossetto M, Ablett E M, Lee L S, Henry R J. Analysis of SSR derived from grape EST. Theor Appl Genet, 2000, 100: 723-726
[28]Cordeiro G M, Casu R, McIntyre C L, Manners J M, Henry R J. Microsatellite markers from sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) EST cross transferable to erianthus and sorghum. Plant Sci, 2001, 160: 1115-1123
[29]Saha M C, Rouf Mian M A, Eujayl I, John C Z, Wang L J, May G D. Tall fescue EST-SSR markers with transferability across several grass species. Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 109: 783-791
[30]Gupta P K, Rustgi S, Sharma S, Singh R, Kumar N, Balyan H S. Transferable EST-SSR markers for the study of polymor-phism and genetic diversity in bread wheat. Mol Gen Genet, 2003, 270: 315-323
[31]Ellegren H. Microsatellites: Simple sequences with complex evolution. Nat Rev Genet, 2004, 5: 435-445
[32]Sharopova N, McMullen M D, Schultz L, Schroeder S, San-chez-Villeda H, Gardiner J, Bergstrom D, Houchins K, Melia-Hancock S, Musket T, Duru N, Polacoo M. Develop-ment and mapping of SSR markers for maize. Plant Mol Biol, 2002, 48: 463-481
[33]Temnykh S, DeClerck G, Lukashova A, Lipovich L, Cartin-hour S, McCouch S. Computational and experimental analysis of microsatellites in rice (Oryza sativa L.): Frequency, length variation, transposon associations, and genetic marker poten-tial. Genome Res, 2001, 11: 1441-1452
[34]Yi G, Lee J M, Lee S, Choi D, Kim B D. Exploitation of pepper EST-SSR and an SSR-based linkage map. Theor Appl Genet, 2006, 114: 113-130
[1] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[2] 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 王若若, 王磊, 张立异. 397份高粱种质资源在贵州表型多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
[3] 田春艳, 陆鑫, 吴才文, 徐超华, 刘家勇, 边芯, 桃联安. 基于荧光SSR的甘蔗创新种质遗传多样性分析及育种潜力评估[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1057-1072.
[4] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
[5] 梅飘, 刘丁丁, 叶圆圆, 张晨禹, 丁诗琦, 李亚奇, 王培鑫, 梅菊芬, 马春雷. 基于茶树液相功能芯片的白化茶树资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2358-2370.
[6] 王天译, 杨绣娟, 赵佳佳, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 李晓华, 郝水源, 郑军. 山西小麦醇溶蛋白多样性及其对面粉品质效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1784-1800.
[7] 王浩辰, 王克晶, 韩娟, 李向华. 东南沿海短绒野大豆两种代表性生境自然种群的空间遗传结构特征:种群内取样策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2875-2885.
[8] 张红岩, 敏玉霞, 滕长才, 彭小星, 陈志凯, 周仙莉, 娄树宝, 刘玉皎. 利用130K液相芯片分析中国蚕豆种质资源遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 1989-2000.
[9] 李长喜, 董占鹏, 关永虎, 刘金伟, 李航, 梅拥军. 南疆陆地棉农艺性状与皮棉产量性状的遗传贡献及决策系数分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1486-1502.
[10] 柯会锋, 苏红梅, 孙正文, 谷淇深, 杨君, 王国宁, 徐东永, 王洪这, 吴立强, 张艳, 张桂寅, 马峙英, 王省芬. 棉花现代品种资源产量与纤维品质性状鉴定及分子标记评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 280-293.
[11] 苏一钧, 赵路宽, 唐芬, 戴习彬, 孙亚伟, 周志林, 刘亚菊, 曹清河. 378份甘薯引进种遗传多样性及群体结构分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2582-2593.
[12] 王倩, 张立媛, 许月, 李海, 刘少雄, 薛亚鹏, 陆平, 王瑞云, 刘敏轩. 黍稷高基元EST-SSR标记开发及200份核心种质资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2308-2318.
[13] 卢茂昂, 彭小爱, 张玲, 汪建来, 何贤芳, 朱玉磊. 基于55K SNP芯片揭示小麦育种亲本遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1708-1714.
[14] 李赢, 刘海翠, 石吕, 石晓旭, 韩笑, 刘建, 魏亚凤. 江苏裸大麦种质资源遗传多样性和群体结构分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(10): 2687-2697.
[15] 姚祝芳, 张雄坚, 杨义伶, 黄立飞, 陈新亮, 姚肖健, 罗忠霞, 陈景益, 王章英, 房伯平. 177份甘薯地方资源表型性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(9): 2228-2241.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!