欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (12): 1935-1942.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

小麦籽粒蛋白质含量高光谱预测模型研究

冯伟;姚霞;田永超;朱艳;刘小军;曹卫星*   

  1. 南京农业大学江苏省信息农业高技术研究重点实验室/农业部作物生长调控重点开放实验室,江苏南京210095
  • 收稿日期:2007-04-03 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-12-12 网络出版日期:2007-12-12
  • 通讯作者: 曹卫星

Predicting Grain Protein Content with Canopy Hyperspectral Remote Sensing in Wheat

FENG Wei,YAO Xia,TIAN Yong-Chao,ZHU Yan,LIU Xiao-Jun,CAO Wei-Xing*   

  1. Hi-Tech Key Laboratory of Information Agriculture of Jiangsu Province/Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2007-04-03 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-12-12 Published online:2007-12-12
  • Contact: CAO Wei-Xing

摘要: 为定量分析小麦籽粒蛋白质含量、叶片氮素营养指标、冠层高光谱参数的相互关系,确立能够准确预测小麦籽粒蛋白质含量的敏感光谱参数和定量模型,2003—2006年在连续3个生长季不同小麦品种和不同施氮水平的4个大田试验条件下,于小麦不同生育期采集田间冠层高光谱数据并测定植株氮素含量和籽粒蛋白质含量。试验1以低蛋白质含量的宁麦9号和高蛋白质含量的豫麦34为材料,试验2以低、中、高蛋白质含量的宁麦9号、扬麦12和豫麦34为材料,试验3以低蛋白质含量的宁麦9号、中蛋白质含量的扬麦10号和淮麦20以及高蛋白质含量的徐州26为材料,试验4以低蛋白质含量的宁麦9号和中蛋白质含量的扬麦10号为材料。结果显示,不同品种小麦的籽粒蛋白质含量随施氮水平的提高而增加,可以通过开花期叶片氮含量和氮积累量进行可靠的估测。而不同试验条件下的叶片氮含量和氮积累量可以基于统一的光谱参数进行定量反演,其中基于REPle和mND705的叶片氮含量监测模型及基于SDr/SDb和FD742的叶片氮积累量监测模型,具有可靠的预测性和适用性。根据特征光谱参数—叶片氮素营养—籽粒蛋白质含量这一技术路径,以叶片氮素营养为交接点将两部分模型链接,建立了基于开花期高光谱参数的小麦籽粒蛋白质含量预测模型,经独立资料检验表明,以参数mND705、REPle、SDr/SDb和FD742为变量建立成熟期籽粒蛋白质含量预报模型均给出较好的检验结果。因此,利用开花期关键特征光谱指数可以直接评价小麦成熟期籽粒蛋白质含量状况,其中基于mND705参数的预测模型更为准确可靠。

关键词: 小麦, 氮素营养, 籽粒蛋白质含量, 高光谱遥感, 预测模型

Abstract: Grain protein content is an important index indicating wheat quality status, and non-destructive and quick assessments of grain protein content are necessary for cultural regulation and quality classification in wheat production. The objectives of this study were to determine the relationships of grain protein content to ground-based canopy hyper-spectral reflectance and spectral parameters, and to derive regression equations for predicting grain protein content in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with canopy hyper-spectral remote sensing, by four field experiments with different wheat cultivars and nitrogen levels across three growing seasons, and by time-course measurements on canopy hyperspectral reflectance, plant dry weight, nitrogen content and grain protein content during the experiment periods in 2003–2006. In experiment one and four two cultivars of Ningmai 9 and Yumai 34 was used as low and high protein types respectively. In experiment two, Yangmai 12 was added as medium protein type cultivar. In experiment three, the high protein type cultivar altered for Xuzhou 26, and medium type cultivar for Yangmai 10 and Huaimai 20. The results showed that the grain protein content at maturity in wheat increased with nitrogen rate promotion, and could be well estimated by plant nitrogen nutrition status such as leaf N content and leaf N accumulation at anthesis. The regression analyses between vegetation indices developed and leaf N nutrition indices such as leaf N content and leaf N accumulation indicated that several key spectral parameters could be accurately used to estimate the changes in leaf N status across different growth stages, nitrogen levels and growing seasons, e.g., REPle and mND705 could be used to leaf nitrogen content, and SDr/SDb and FD742 to leaf nitrogen accumulation. The total predicting models on grain protein content at maturity were constructed based on canopy hyper-spectral parameters at anthesis by linking the above two models with leaf N nutrition as intersection in wheat. Testing of the predicting models with independent datasets indicated that the spectral indices of REPle, mND705, SDr/SDb, and FD742 could be used to accurately estimate grain protein contents in wheat. It can be concluded that the grain protein content at maturity in wheat could be predicted directly by key vegetation indices at anthesis, with more reliable estimation from mND705.

Key words: Wheat, Nitrogen nutrition, Grain protein content, Hyper-spectral remote sensing, Prediction model

[1] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[5] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[6] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[7] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 蒋嘉卉, 江炳志, 刘冠明, 王章英, 唐朝臣. 紫肉甘薯品质性状的近红外光谱预测模型构建与优化[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1088-1102.
[12] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[13] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[14] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[15] 李赢, 石晓旭, 刘海翠, 石吕, 薛亚光, 魏亚凤. 裸大麦籽粒β-葡聚糖含量近红外预测模型的建立[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 735-745.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!