欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 517-525.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00517

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

甘蓝和白菜紫色酸性磷酸酶17基因家族的克隆和比较分析

卢坤1,2，张凯1,2,**，柴友荣1,2，陆俊杏1,2，唐章林1,2，李加纳1,2,*   

  1. 1西南大学农学与生物科技学院，重庆400716；2重庆市油菜工程技术研究中心，重庆400716
  • 收稿日期:2009-09-18 修回日期:2009-12-08 出版日期:2010-03-12 网络出版日期:2010-01-22
  • 通讯作者: 李加纳, E-mail: ljn1950@swu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家高技术研究发展计划（863计划）项目（2006AA10Z1E6和2008AA10Z147），引进国际先进农业科学技术计划（948计划）项目（2006-Q04）和中国博士后科学基金资助项目（20090460717）资助。

Cloning and Comparative Analysis of PURPLE ACID PHOSPHATASE 17 Gene Families in Brassica oleracea and Brassica rapa

LU Kun1,2,ZHANG Kai1,2,**,CHAI You-Rong1,2,LU Jun-Xing1,2,TANG Zhang-Lin1,2,*   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy and Life Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China; 2 Chongqing Rapeseed Technology Research Center, Chongqing 400716, China
  • Received:2009-09-18 Revised:2009-12-08 Published:2010-03-12 Published online:2010-01-22
  • Contact: LI Jia-Na, E-mail: ljn1950@swu.edu.cn

PDF

1940

被引次数

13

摘要：

从甘蓝和白菜中分别克隆到2个PAP17, 根据序列相似性, 将PAP17分为类型I (BoPAP17-1和BrPAP17-1)和类型II (BoPAP17-2和BrPAP17-2)。Southern杂交表明, 白菜和甘蓝中均只存在2个PAP17成员, 与克隆结果吻合。系统发育和分子进化分析表明, PAP17基因家族受纯化选择, 编码低分子量PAP蛋白。荧光定量PCR结果表明, PAP17在所检测的9个组织器官中均有表达, 尤以花和蕾中的表达量特别高, 种子中也有一定程度的表达, 表明其与体内储备态磷的动用有关, 尤其在花和蕾的发育阶段。磷饥饿诱导表达结果表明, 除BrPAP17-2在幼苗叶片中表达受抑制外, BrPAP17和BoPAP17在幼苗根部和叶片中均受磷饥饿诱导, 表达量先降后升, 诱导4 d或8 d后达到峰值; 恢复供磷4 d后, 表达量迅速降低至基础表达水平以下。与幼苗叶片相比, 白菜和甘蓝幼苗根部的PAP17磷饥饿诱导表达似乎更为强烈。这些结果表明PAP17在白菜和甘蓝根部可能参与了根外磷的活化与吸收及无机磷由根部向其他组织器官的转运。

关键词: 白菜, 甘蓝, 紫色酸性磷酸酶, 基因家族, 磷饥饿

Abstract:

Two PAP17 genes were cloned from parent species of Brassica napus, B. oleracea and B. rapa, respectively. According to sequence similarity, PAP17 genes could be divided into two types, type I (BoPAP17-1 and BrPAP17-1) and type II (BoPAP17-2 and BrPAP17-2). Southern hybridization resulted in two bands both in B. oleracea and B. rapa, this is accordance with former cloning results. Phytogenetic and molecular evolution analysis indicated that PAP17 genes in Brassica species underwent purifying selection, and their deduced proteins are typical low molecular weight PAP proteins. Expression patterns of BoPAP17 and BrPAP17 genes were assayed by fluorescent quantitative PCR. The results revealed that PAP17 genes expressed in all nine tested tissues and organs, with the extremely high expression in flower and bud, and certain expression in seeds at different stages, implying these PAP17 genes most likely mobilize phosphorus reserves in plants, particularly during flower and bud development stages. Under phosphate starvation conditions, expression of BrPAP17-2 in seedling leaf was restrained, while that of BrPAP17 and BoPAP17 in seedling root and leaf was induced, the expression levels declined in the first 24 hours, and then continuously increased with the maximal levels between four days and eight days after treatment. After four days of Pi-resupply, their expression declined below un-induced basal levels. In comparison with seedling leaf, it seems that BrPAP17 and BoPAP17 showed stronger phosphate starvation induced expression in seedling root. These results thus suggested that PAP17 genes in B. oleracea and B. rapa may be involved in external phosphorus assimilation and transferring inorganic phosphate from root to other tissues or organs.

Key words: Brassica rapa, brassica oleracea, Purple acid phosphatase, Gene family, Phosphate starvation


[1]         Duff S M G, Sarath G, Plaxton W C. The role of acid phosphatases in plant phosphorus metabolism. Physiol Plant, 1994, 90: 791–800


[2]         Li D, Zhu H, Liu K, Liu X, Leggewie G, Udvardi M, Wang D. Purple acid phosphatases of Arabidopsis thaliana-comparative analysis and differential regulation by phosphate deprivation. J Biol Chem, 2002, 277: 27772–27781


[3]         Lu K(卢坤). Screening of Phosphorus-Efficient Brassica napus Genotype, and Cloning, Expression and Molecular Evolution of Brassica PAP12 and PAP17 Gene Families. PhD dissertation of Southwest University, 2008 (in Chinese with English abstract)


[4]         Bozzo G G, Dunn E L, Plaxton W C. Differential synthesis of phosphate-starvation inducible purple acid phosphatase isozymes in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) suspension cells and seedlings. Plant Cell Environ, 2006, 29: 303–313


[5]         del Pozo J C, Allona I, Rubio V, Leyva A, de la Pena A, Aragoncillo C, Paz-Ares J. A type 5 acid phosphatase gene from Arabidopsis thaliana is induced by phosphate starvation and by some other types of phosphate mobilising/oxidative stress conditions. Plant J, 1999, 19: 579–589


[6]         Kuang R, Chan K H, Yeung E, Lim B L. Molecular and biochemical characterization of AtPAP15, a purple acid phosphatase with phytase activity, in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol, 2009, 151: 199–209


[7]         Lu K, Chai Y R, Zhang K, Wang R, Chen L, Lei B, Lu J, Xu X F, Li J N. Cloning and characterization of phosphorus starvation inducible Brassica napus PURPLE ACID PHOSPHATASE 12 gene family, and imprinting of a recently evolved MITE-minisatellite twin structure. Theor Appl Genet, 2008, 117: 963–975


[8]         Lu K, Li J N, Zhong W R, Zhang K, Fu F Y, Chai Y R. Isolation, characterization and phosphate-starvation inducible expression of potential Brassica napus PURPLE ACID PHOSPHATASE 17 (BnPAP17) gene family. Bot Stud, 2008, 49: 199–213


[9]         Wang X, Wang Y, Tian J, Lim B L, Yan X, Liao H. Overexpressing AtPAP15 enhances phosphorus efficiency in soybean. Plant Physiol, 2009, 151: 233–240


[10]      Xiao K, Harrison M, Wang Z Y. Cloning and characterization of a novel purple acid phosphatase gene (MtPAP1) from Medicago truncatula Barrel Medic. J Integr Plant Biol, 2006, 48: 204–211


[11]      Saghai-Maroof M A, Soliman K M, Jorgensen R A, Allard R W. Ribosomal DNA spacer length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1984, 81: 8014–8018


[12]      Comeron J M. K-Estimator: Calculation of the number of nucleotide substitutions per site and the confidence intervals. Bioinformatics, 1999, 15: 763–764


[13]      Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol, 2007, 24: 1596


[14]      Kozak M. Effects of intercistronic length on the efficiency of reinitiation by eucaryotic ribosomes. Mol Cell Biol, 1987, 7: 3438–3445


[15]      Kowalski S P, Lan T H, Feldmann K A, Paterson A H. Comparative mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica oleracea chromosomes reveals islands of conserved organization. Genetics, 1994, 138: 499–510


[16]      Schmidt R, Acarkan A, Boivin K. Comparative structural genomics in the Brassicaceae family. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2001, 39: 253–262


[17]      Yang Y W, Lai K N, Tai P Y, Ma D P, Li W H. Molecular phylogenetic studies of Brassica, Rorippa, Arabidopsis and allied genera based on the Internal transcribed spacer region of 18S–25S rDNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol, 1999, 13: 455–462


[18]      Parkin I A P, Sharpe A G, Lydiate D J. Patterns of genome duplication within the Brassica napus genome. Genome, 2003, 46: 291–303
Zhu H, Qian W, Lu X, Li D, Liu X, Liu K, Wang D. Expression patterns of purple acid phosphatase genes in Arabidopsis organs and functional analysis of AtPAP23 predominantly transcribed in flower. Plant Mol Biol, 2005, 59: 581–594
[1] 左同鸿, 张贺翠, 曾静, 朱利泉. 甘蓝自交不亲和相关基因BoPUB3L的克隆与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1698-1710.
[2] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[3] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[4] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[5] 宋裕祯, Bheel Chander Kumar, 王跃, 张颖星, 郭娟, Khound Rituraj, Santra Dipak Kumar, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. 糜子AP2亚家族全基因组鉴定及PmAP2-1和PmAP2-9耐盐功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1127-1139.
[6] 牛丽, 王勇胜, 王长杰, 张宏, 孟亚雄, 李葆春, 杨轲, 马小乐, 姚立蓉, 司二静, 王化俊, 汪军成. 大麦NAC基因家族鉴定分析及HvNAC38的耐盐功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 688-707.
[7] 王楚锐, 李开祥, 赵志, 肖麓, 唐国永, 赵志刚, 徐亮, 杜德志, 柳海东. 甘蓝型春油菜早花基因BnCRY2功能位点KASP标记的开发及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 708-721.
[8] 杨宗桃, 杨婷, 王禹童, 艾静, 李燕烨, 刘家勇, 邓军, 赵勇, 张跃彬. 甘蔗CLC基因家族鉴定与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 722-734.
[9] 孟成, 王哲. 玉米ZmPFK基因家族全基因组鉴定及响应胁迫表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 764-779.
[10] 马毅娜, 吴晓明玉, 李藕琪, 王圆, 陈丽, 张盈川, 赵伦, 文静, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-miR1040-EIF3A模块调控油菜开花时间的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 349-362.
[11] 胡城祯, 高维东, 孔斌雪, 王建飞, 车卓, 杨德龙, 陈涛. 小麦TaAPC11基因家族鉴定及TaAPC11-5B参与干旱胁迫的生物学功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 148-164.
[12] 王彬, 蒙姜宇, 邱浩良, 贺亚军, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnaDUF579基因家族的鉴定与表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2100-2110.
[13] 夏琦, 郭滢, 王坤美, 王思忆, 巨建业, 彭雅雯, 刘忠松, 夏石头. 甘蓝型油菜种子和种皮中水杨酸含量与原花色素积累的关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1189-1197.
[14] 陆雯佳, 汪军成, 姚立蓉, 张宏, 司二静, 杨轲, 孟亚雄, 李葆春, 马小乐, 王化俊. 大麦PRX基因家族全基因组鉴定及其干旱胁迫下的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1198-1214.
[15] 周恩强, 缪亚梅, 周瑶, 姚梦楠, 赵娜, 王永强, 朱宇翔, 薛冬, 李宗迪, 石宇欣, 李波, 汪凯华, 顾春燕, 王学军, 魏利斌. 基于种子发育转录组的豌豆bZIP基因家族分析及种子发育候选基因的鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 914-931.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2