作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 612-619.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00612
甘露1,2,李殿荣1,3,臧新4,付春华1,2,余龙江1,2,栗茂腾1,2,*
GAN Lu1,2,LI Dian-Rong1,3,ZANG Xin4,FU Chun-Hua1,2,YU Long-Jiang1,2,LI Mao-Teng12*
摘要:
| [1] Choe L H, Lee K H. A comparison of three commercially available isoelectricfocusing units for proteome analysis: The multiphor, the IPGphor and the protean IEF cell. Electrophoresis, 2000, 21: 993–1000 [2] Cutler P, Bell D J, Birrell H C, Connelly J C, Connor S C, Holmes E, Mitchell B C, Monté S Y, Neville B A, Pickford R, Polley S, Schneider K, Skehel J M. An integrated proteomic approach to studying glomerular nephrotoxicity. Electrophoresis, 1999, 20: 3647–3658 [3] Görg A, Obermaier C, Boguth G, Harder A, Scheibe B, Wildgruber R, Weiss W. The current state of two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis, 2000, 21: 1037–1053 [4] Liang Y(梁宇), Jing Y-X(荆玉祥), Shen S-H(沈世华). Advances in plant proteomics. Acta Phytoecol Sin (植物生态学报), 2004, 28(1): 114–125 (in Chinese with English abstract) [5] O'Farrell P H. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J Biol Chem, 1975, 250: 4007–4021 [6] Bjellqvist B, Ek K, Righetti P G, Gianazza E, Görg A, Westermeier R, Postel W. Isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients: Principle, methodology and some applications. J Biochem Biophys Methods, 1982, 6: 317–39 [7] Lei H-L(雷红灵), Fu M(付明), WU Y-Y(吴永尧). Study on two-dimension electrophoresis of seed proteins of Cardamine enshiensis. Hubei Agric Sci (湖北农业科学), 2008, 47(10): 1114–1116 (in Chinese with English abstract) [8] Gallardo K, Job C, Groot S P C, Puype M, Demol H, Vandekerckhove J, Job D. Proteomics of Arabidopsis seed Germination: A comparative study of wild-type and gibberellin-deficient seeds. Plant Physiol, 2002, 129: 823–837 [9] Jiang Y Q, Yang B, Harris N S, Deyholos M K. Comparative proteomic analysis of NaCl stress-responsive proteins in Arabidopsis roots. J Exp Bot, 2007, 58: 3591–3607 [10] Rutschow H, Ytterberg A J, Friso G, Nilsson R, van Wijk K J. Quantitative proteomics of a chloroplast SRP54 sorting mutant and its genetic interactions with CLPC1 in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol, 2008, 148: 156–175 [11] Parker T, Flowers T J, Moore A L, Harpham N V. An accurate and reproducible method for proteome profiling of the effects of salt stress in the rice leaf lamina. J Exp Bot, 2006, 57: 1109–1118 [12] Kim S T, Kim S G, Kang Y H, Wang Y, Kim J Y, Yi N, Kim J K, Rakwal R, Koh H J, Kang K Y. Proteomics analysis of rice lesion mimic mutant (sp/1) reveals tightly localized probenazole-induced protein (PBZ1) in cells undergoing programmed cell death. J Proteome Res, 2008, 7: 1750–1760 [13] Natarajan S, Xu C, Caperna T J, Garrett W M. Comparison of protein solubilization methods suitable for proteomic analysis of soybean seed proteins. Anal Biochem, 2005, 342: 214–220 [14] Amme S, Rutten T, Melzer M, Sonsmann G, Vissers J P, Cschlesier B, Mock H P. A proteome approach defines protective functions of tobacco leaf trichomes. Proteomics, 2005, 5: 2508–2518 [15] Chen S B, Gollop N, Heuer B. Proteomic analysis of salt-stressed tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) seedlings: Effect of genotype and exogenous application of glycinebetaine. J Exp Bot, 2009, 60: 2005–2019 [16] Huang Pu-H-Y(皇甫海燕), Guan C-Y(官春云), Guo B-S(郭宝顺), Zhang X-Y(张秀英). Progress in proteomics and plant proteomics research. Crop Res (作物研究), 2006, 5: 577–581 (in Chinese with English abstract) [17] Meza-Basso L, Alberdi M, Raynal M, Ferrero-Cadinanos M L, Delseny M. Changes in protein synthesis in rapeseed (Brassica napus) seedlings during a low temperature treatment. Plant Physiol, 1986, 82: 733–738 [18] Mihr C, Baumgartner M, Dieterich J H, Schmitz U K, Braun H P. Proteomic approach for investigation of cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) in Brassica. J Plant Physiol, 2001, 158: 787–794 [19] Hajduch M, Casteel J E, Hurrelmeyer K E, Song Z, Agrawal G K, Thelen J J. Proteomic analysis of seed filling in Brassica napus: Developmental characterization of metabolic isozymes using high-resolution two-dimensional gel electrophoresis1. Plant Physiol, 2006, 141: 32–46 [20] Agrawal G K, Hajduch M, Graham K, Thelen J J. In-depth investigation of the soybean seed-filling proteome and comparison with a parallel study of rapeseed. Plant Physiol, 2008, 148: 504–518 [21] Sheoran I S, Pedersen E J, Ross A R, Sawhney V K. Dynamics of protein expression during pollen germination in canola (Brassica napus). Planta, 2009, 230: 779–793 [22] Desclos M, Dubousset L, Etienne P, Caherec F L, Satoh H, Bonnefoy J, Ourry A, Avice J C. A proteomic profiling approach to reveal a novel role of Brassica napus drought 22 kD/water-soluble chlorophyll-binding protein in young leaves during nitrogen remobilization induced by stressful conditions. Plant Physiol, 2008, 147: 1830–1844 [23] Damerval C, Vienne D D, Zivy M, Thiellement H. Technical improvement in two-dimensional electrophoresis increase the level of genetic variation detected in wheat-seedling protein. Electrophoresis, 1986, 7: 53–54 [24] Gu R-S(谷瑞升), Liu Q-L(刘群录), Chen X-M(陈雪梅), Jiang X-N(蒋湘宁). An improved method of 2D electrophoresis for protein analysis of woody plants. J Beijing For Univ (北京林业大学学报–10 (in Chinese with English abstract)), 1999, 21(5): 7 [25] Candiano G, Bruschi M, Musante L, Santucci L, Ghiggeri G M, Carnemolla B, Orecchia P, Zardi L, Righetti P G. Blue silver: A very sensitive colloidal Coomassie G-250 staining for proteome analysis. Electrophoresis,2004, 25: 1327–1333 [26] Li X H, Wu X F, Yue W F, Liu J M, Li G L, Miao Y G. Proteomic analysis of the silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) hemolymph during developmental stage. J Proteome Res, 2006, 5: 2809–2814 [27] Ruan S-L(阮松林), Ma H-S(马华升), Wang S-H (王世恒), Xin Y(忻雅), Qian L-H(钱丽华), Tong J-X(童建新), Zhao H-P(赵杭苹), Wang J(王杰). Adevances in plant proteomics I: Key techniques of proteome. Hereditas (遗传), 2006, 28(11): 1472–1486 (in Chinese with English abstract) [28] Garfin D. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis: An overview. Trends Anal Chem, 2003, 22: 263–272 [29] Wu M-C(吴满成), Hu H-T(胡海涛), Yu Y-J(余有见), Sun N(孙娜), Yang L(杨玲). Extraction and improvement of two-dimensional electrophoresis analysis of proteins form berries of Elaeagnus umbellate Thunb. Plant Physiol Commun (植物生理学通讯), 2009, 45: 695–698 (in Chinese) |
| [1] | 马毅娜, 吴晓明玉, 李藕琪, 王圆, 陈丽, 张盈川, 赵伦, 文静, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-miR1040-EIF3A模块调控油菜开花时间的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 349-362. |
| [2] | 王彬, 蒙姜宇, 邱浩良, 贺亚军, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnaDUF579基因家族的鉴定与表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2100-2110. |
| [3] | 夏琦, 郭滢, 王坤美, 王思忆, 巨建业, 彭雅雯, 刘忠松, 夏石头. 甘蓝型油菜种子和种皮中水杨酸含量与原花色素积累的关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1189-1197. |
| [4] | 王晓琳, 刘忠松, 康雷, 杨柳. 甘蓝型油菜角果长度和每角粒数基因定位以及角果皮转录组动态分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 888-899. |
| [5] | 张琴, 戴成, 马朝芝. 生长素响应报告基因转化甘蓝型油菜及各组织GUS动态信号分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 667-675. |
| [6] | 孙程明, 周晓婴, 陈锋, 张维, 王晓东, 彭琦, 郭月, 高建芹, 胡茂龙, 付三雄, 张洁夫. 长链非编码RNA (lncRNA)在甘蓝型油菜分枝角度调控中的功能分析与预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 559-567. |
| [7] | 庄玥茗, 宋毅, 陈航航, 陆志峰, 廖世鹏, 李小坤, 丛日环, 任涛, 鲁剑巍. 氮肥用量对油菜籽粒内生微生物及籽粒品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3357-3368. |
| [8] | 黄绒, 周渠晨, 陈楚铭, 罗倩, 易东, 杜常欢, 黄祥宇, 盛锋, 杜雪竹. 过表达BnNRT2.3-like对油菜氮素吸收利用及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3184-3197. |
| [9] | 巨建业, 杨柳, 陈浩, 康雷, 夏石头, 刘忠松. 单细胞核转录组分析揭示油菜种皮分化过程和种子颜色差异原因[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2860-2874. |
| [10] | 林洋, 史晓蕾, 陈强, 刘兵强, 杨庆, 于慧娟, 闫龙, 武小霞, 杨春燕. 大豆蛋白质脂肪及脂肪酸组分相关QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2899-2910. |
| [11] | 张雯, 李玉, 王创, 石磊, 丁广大. 甘蓝型油菜磷转运蛋白BnaPT48的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2983-2995. |
| [12] | 胡志康, 舒雨, 王会, 杨莹莹, 廖俊宇, 刘佳, 成洪涛, 郭晨, 张园园, 刘胜毅, 胡琼, 梅德圣, 李超. 甘蓝型油菜苗期耐碱性种质综合鉴定与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2681-2692. |
| [13] | 王晨, 贺丹, 姚敏, 邱萍, 何昕, 熊兴华, 康雷, 刘忠松, 钱论文. 基于转录组分析鉴定甘蓝型油菜开花候选基因以及BnaCOR27功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2693-2704. |
| [14] | 徐林珊, 郜耿东, 王宇, 王家星, 杨吉招, 武亚瑞, 张宵寒, 常影, 李真, 谢雄泽, 龚德平, 王晶, 葛贤宏. 甘蓝型油菜漆酶基因家族成员表达模式及与茎秆抗折力的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 134-148. |
| [15] | 李嘉欣, 黄莹, 吴潞梅, 赵伦, 易斌, 马朝芝, 涂金星, 沈金雄, 傅廷栋, 文静. 甘蓝型油菜BnaSLY1基因进化分析及功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 44-57. |
|
||