欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (06): 1069-1076.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.01069

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

高大气CO2浓度下氮素对小麦叶片光合能量分配的调节

张绪成1,2,于显枫1,王红丽3,马一凡1   

  1. 1 甘肃省农业科学院 / 农业部西北作物抗旱栽培与耕作重点开放实验室，甘肃兰州 730070；2中国农业大学资源环境学院，北京 100193；3 甘肃农业大学农学院, 甘肃兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2010-11-16 修回日期:2011-03-28 出版日期:2011-06-12 网络出版日期:2011-04-12
  • 通讯作者: E-mail: gszhangxuch@163.com, Tel: 0931-7612800
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(30800668)资助。

Regulation of Nitrogen Level on Photosynthetic Energy Partitioning in Wheat Leaves under Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Concentration

ZHANG Xu-Cheng1,2,YU Xian-Feng1,WANG Hong-Li3,MA Yi-Fan1   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Northwest Crop Drought-Resistant Farming of Ministry of Agriculture / Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou 730070, China; 2 College of Resources and Environment, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; 3College of Agronomy, Gansu agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
  • Received:2010-11-16 Revised:2011-03-28 Published:2011-06-12 Published online:2011-04-12
  • Contact: E-mail: gszhangxuch@163.com, Tel: 0931-7612800

PDF

1908

被引次数

8

摘要： 探讨了施氮量对高大气CO2浓度下小麦功能叶光合能量传递与分配的影响，进而明确氮素对小麦叶片光合作用适应性下调的能量分配调节作用。采用开顶式气室盆栽法，通过测定小麦拔节期和抽穗期不同大气CO2浓度和施氮水平下的叶氮浓度、光合速率–胞间CO2浓度(Pn–Ci)响应曲线和荧光动力学参数，测算光合电子传递速率和分配去向。与在正常CO2浓度(400 μmol mol-1)条件下相比，在高大气CO2浓度(760 μmol mol-1)下，小麦叶氮浓度显著下降，N200处理(200 mg kg-1)叶片抽穗期叶氮浓度的下降幅度较拔节期高335.7%。N200处理较N0处理(0 mg kg-1)提高小麦叶片光适应下PSII反应中心最大量子产额(Fv′/Fm′)、光化学效率(ΦPSII)和开放比例(qP)，降低非光化学猝灭系数(NPQ)。高大气CO2浓度下，小麦叶片光化学反应的非环式光合电子传递速率(Jc)和Rubisco羧化速率(Vc)显著升高，而光呼吸的非环式光合电子传递速率(Jo)和Rubisco氧化速率(Vo)明显降低；施氮使Jc、Jo、Vc和Vo值均呈上升趋势，而且Jc和Vc达到显著差异。高大气CO2浓度下Jo/Jc和Vo/Vc显著降低，施氮后小麦拔节期叶片Jo/Jc和Vo/Vc降低，但抽穗期Jo/Jc升高而Vo/Vc无明显变化。叶氮浓度与小麦叶片Jc、Jo和Vo均呈显著线性正相关，而且高大气CO2浓度下小麦叶片Jc、Jo和Vo对氮浓度的敏感性降低。高大气CO2浓度下，小麦叶片PSII反应中心开放比例增加，非光化学耗能降低，更多的光合电子进入光化学过程；施氮后使小麦叶氮浓度增加，提高光合能力，改变了能量分配，这是高氮条件下光合作用适应性下调被缓解的一个关键因素。

关键词: 大气CO2浓度增高, 施氮量, 光合电子传递速率, 光能分配, 小麦

Abstract: The objective of this study was to understand the regulatory mechanism of nitrogen (N) application on photosynthetic acclimation under elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration. The ambient atmospheric CO2 concentration was 400 μmol mol−1, and the elevated CO2 concentration was 760 μmol mol−1, which was simulated with Top Open Chambers. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar Ningchun 4 was grown in pots under both CO2 concentrations and treated with low (0 mg pure N per kilogram soil, N0) and high (200 mg pure N per kilogram soil, N200) N application levels. The photosynthetic electron transport rate was estimated using the response curve between photosynthetic rate (Pn) and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. The leaf nitrogen concentrations were also measured at jointing and heading stages. Compared to that under the ambient CO2 concentration, the leaf nitrogen concentration of wheat was decreased significantly under the elevated CO2 concentration, and the percentage of decrease in N200 treatment was 335.7% higher at heading than jointing stage. The values of maximal quantum yield under irradiance (Fv′/Fm′), actual PSII efficiency under irradiance (ΦPSII), photochemical fluorescence quenching (qP) were higher in N200 treatment than in N0 treatment; however, the value of non-photochemical fluorescence quenching (NPQ) was higher in N0 treatment than in N200 treatment. Under elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration, the electronic transport rate of photochemistry (Jc) and Rubisco carboxylation rates (Vc) were increased significantly, but the electronic transport rate of photorespiration (Jo) and Rubisco oxygenation rate (Vo) were decreased significantly. N application tended to promote the values of Jc, Jo, Vc, and Vo, especially for Jc and Vc, which had significant increase compared to those in N0 treatment. When the atmospheric CO2 concentration elevated from 400 μmol mol−1 to 760 μmol mol−1, the rations of Jo/Jc and Vo/Vc decreased significantly. Under the elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration, N application decreased Jo/Jc and Vo/Vc significantly at jointing stage, but increased Jo/Jc at heading stage and remained Vo/Vc with no significant difference. The leaf nitrogen concentration was positively correlated with Jc (P < 0.01), Jo, (P < 0.05) and Vo (P < 0.05), and the sensitivities of Jc, Jo, and Vo in response to leaf N concentration were decreased under elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration. The opening ratio of PSII reaction center was increased under elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration, and the non-photochemical energy dissipation was decreased simultaneously, resulting in more photosynthetic electron transported to photochemical process in wheat leaf. N application had a positively effect on photosynthetic function and changed its energy partitioning through increasing leaf N concentration. This might be one of the key reasons for photosynthesis acclimation of C3 plant to N sufficient application under elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration.

Key words: Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration, Nitrogen application rate, Photosynthetic electron transport rate, Photosynthetic energy partition, Wheat

[1]Bernacchi C J, Calfapietra C, Davey P A, Scarascia-Mugnozza G E, Raines C A, Long S P, Wittig V E. Photosynthesis and stomatal conductance responses of poplars to free-air CO2 enrichment (PopFACE) during the first growth cycle and immediately following coppice. New Phytol, 2003, 159: 609–621
[2]Christian K. Plant CO2 responses: an issue of definition, time and resource supply. New Phytol, 2006, 172: 393–411
[3]Paul M J, Pellny T K. Carbon metabolite feedback regulation of leaf photosynthesis and development. J Exp Bot, 2003, 54: 539–547
[4]Karpinski S, Reynolds H, Kapinska B, Wingsle G, Creissen G, Mullineaux P. Systemic signaling and acclimation in response to excess exciation energy in Arabdopsis. Science, 1999, 284: 654–657
[5]Ainsworth E A, Long S P. What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytol, 2005, 165: 351–372
[6]Daepp M, Nsberger J, Locher A. Nitrogen fertilization and developmental stage alter the response of Lolium perenne to elevated CO2. New Phytol, 2001, 150: 347–358
[7]Liao Y(廖轶), Chen G-Y(陈根云), Zhang D-Y(张道允), Xiao Y-Z(肖元珍), Zhu J-G,(朱建国), Xu D-Q(许大全). Non-stomatal acclimation of leaf photosynthesis to free-Air CO2 enrichment (FACE) in winter wheat. J Palnt Physiol Mol Biol (植物生理与分子生物学学报), 2003, 29(6): 479–486 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]Li F-S(李伏生), Kang S-Z(康绍忠), Zhang F-C(张富仓). Effects of CO2 enrichment, nitrogen and water on photosynthesis, evapotranspiration and water use efficiency of spring wheat. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2003, 14(3): 387–393 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]Bloom A J, Smart D R, Nguyen D T, Searles P S. Nitrogen assimilation and growth of wheat under elevated carbon dioxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002, 99: 1730–1735
[10]Wallsgrove R M, Keys A J, Lea P J, Miflin B J. Photosynthesis photorespiration and nitrogen metabolism. Plant Cell Environ, 1983, 6: 301–309
[11]Hiromi N, Amane M, Tadahiko M. The effect of elevated partia1 pressures of CO2 on the relationship between photosynthetic capacity and N content in rice leaves. Plant Physiol, 1997, 115: 191–198
[12]Chen G-P(陈改苹), Zhu J-G(朱建国), Pang J(庞静), Cheng L(程磊), Xie Z-B(谢祖彬), Zeng Q(曾青). Effects of free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) on some traits and C/N ratio of rice root at the heading stage. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2006, 20(1): 53–57 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]Kruse J, Hetzger I, Mai C, Polle A, Rennenberg H. Elevated CO2 affects N-metabolism of young poplar plants (Populus tremula × P. alba) differently at deficient and sufficient N-supply. New Phytol, 2003, 157: 65–81
[14]Reich P B, Hobbie S E, Lee T, Ellsworth D S, West J B, Tilman D, Knops J M H, Naeem S, Trost J. Nitrogen limitation constrains sustainability of ecosystem response to CO2. Nature, 2006, 440: 708–922
[15]Sawada S, Kuninaka M, Watanabe K. The mechanism to suppress photosynthesis through end product inhibition in single rooted soybean leaves during acclimation to CO2 enrichment. Plant Cell Environ, 2001, 42: 1093–1102
[16]Teng N J, Wang J, Chen T, Wu X Q, Wang Y H, Lin J X. Elevated CO2 induces physiological, biochemical and structural changes in leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol, 2006, 172: 92–103
[17]Maroco J P, Breia E, Faria T, Pereira S, Chaves M M. Effects of long-term exposure to elevated CO2 and N fertilization on the development of photosynthetic capacity and biomass accumulation in Quercus suber L. Plant Cell Environ, 2002, 25: 105–113
[18]Yusuke O, Tadaki H and Kouki H. Effect of elevated CO2 levels on leaf starch, nitrogen and photosynthesis of plants growing at three natural CO2 springs in Japan. Ecol Res, 2007, 22: 475–484
[19]Krall J P, Edward G E. Relationship between photosystem II activity and CO2 fixation in leaves. Plant Physiol, 1992, 86: 180–187
[20]Epron D, Godard D, Cornic G, Genty B. Limitation of net CO2 assimilation rate by internal resistance to CO2 transfer in the leaves of two tree species (Fagus sylvatica L. and Castanea sativa Mill). Plant Cell Environ, 1995, 18: 43–51
[21]Farquhar G D, von Caemmerer S, Berry J A. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta, 1980, 149: 78–90
[22]Di Marco, Iannell M A, loreto F. Relationship between photosynthetic and photorespiration in field-grown wheat leaves. Photosynthetica, 1994, 30: 45–51
[23]Demmig-Adams B, Adams III W W, Barker D H, Logan B A, Verhoeven A S, Bowling D R. Using chlorophyll fluorescence to assess the fraction of absorbed light allocated to thermal dissipation of excess excitation. Plant Physiol, 1996, 98: 253–264
[24]Luo Y Q, Su B, Currie W S, Dukes J S, Finzi A, Hartwig U, Hungate B, McMurtrie R E, Oren R, Parton W J, Pataki D E, Shaw M R, Zak D R, Field C B. Progressive nitrogen limitation of ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. BioScience, 2004, 54: 731–739
[25]Ainsworth E A, Rogers A. The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising
[CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ, 2007, 30: 258–270
[26]Shangguan Z P, Shao M A, Dyckmans J. Effects of nitrogen nutrition and water deficit on net photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence in winter wheat. J Plant Physiol, 2000, 156: 46–51
[27]Ines C, Terezinha F F. Effect of nitrogen supply on growth and photosynthesis of sunflower plants grown in the greenhouse. Plant Sci, 2004, 166: 1379–1385
[28]Liberloo M, Tulva I, Raïm O, Kull O, Ceulemans R. Photosynthetic stimulation under long-term CO2 enrichment and fertilization is sustained across a closed Populus canopy profile (EUROFACE). New Phytol, 2007, 173: 537–549
[29]Xu K(徐凯), Guo Y-P(郭延平), Zhang S-L(张上隆), Dai W-S(戴文圣), Fu Q-G(符庆功). Photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO2 in strawberry leaves grown at different levels of nitrogen nutrition. J Plant Physiol Mol Biol (植物生理与分子生物学学报), 2006, 32(4): 473–480 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]Li H-D(李海东), Gao H-Y(高辉远). Effects of different nitrogen application rate on allocation of photosynthetic electron flux in Rumex K-1 leaves. J Palnt Physiol Mol Biol (植物生理与分子生物学学报), 2007, 33(5): 417–424 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]Rogers A, Gibon Y, Stitt M, Morgan P B, Bernacchi C J, Ort D R, Long S P. Increased C availability at elevated carbon dioxide concentration improves N assimilation in a legume. Plant Cell Environ, 2006, 29: 1651–1658
[32]Long S P, Ainsworth E A, Rogers A, Ort D R. Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: plants FACE the future. Ann Rev Plant Biol, 2004, 55: 591–628
[33]Evans J R. Nitrogen and photosynthesis in the flag leaf of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Physiol, 1983, 72: 297–302
[34]Feng Y L, Fu G L, Zheng Y L. Specific leaf area relates to the differences in leaf construction cost, photosynthesis, nitrogen allocation, and use efficiencies between invasive and noninvasive alien congeners. Planta, 2008, 228: 383–390
[35]Yun F(云菲), Liu G-S(刘国顺), Shi H-Z(史宏志), Song J(宋晶). Effects of light and nitrogen interaction on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics in flue-cured tobacco. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2010, 43(5): 932–941 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2