欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 1967-1974.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.01967

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

利用RIL群体和自然群体检测与花生含油量相关的SSR标记

黄莉,赵新燕,张文华,樊志明,任小平,廖伯寿,姜慧芳*,陈玉宁   

  1. 中国农业科学院油料作物研究所 / 农业部油料作物生物学重点开放实验室,湖北武汉 430062
  • 收稿日期:2011-03-23 修回日期:2011-07-15 出版日期:2011-11-12 网络出版日期:2011-09-06
  • 通讯作者: 姜慧芳, E-mail:peanutlab@oilcrops.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2011CB109300), 农业部农作物种质资源保护项目(NB2010-2130135-28B), 国家花生产业技术体系建设(CARS-14-种质资源评价)资助。

Identification of SSR Markers Linked to Oil Content in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) through RIL Population and Natural Population

HUANG Li,ZHAO Xin-Yan,ZHANG Wen-Hua,FAN Zhi-Ming,REN Xiao-Ping,LIAO Bo-Shou,JIANG Hui-Fang*,CHEN Yu-Ning   

  1. Key Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology, Ministry of Agricultural / Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430062, China
  • Received:2011-03-23 Revised:2011-07-15 Published:2011-11-12 Published online:2011-09-06
  • Contact: 姜慧芳,E-mail:peanutlab@oilcrops.cn

摘要: 以远杂9102×中花5号杂交后代衍生的重组近交系F8代家系为材料,在含油量测试的基础上,选用10份低油材料(平均含油量52.91%)、12份高油材料(平均含油量58.85%)以及亲本进行SSR引物筛选,通过631对SSR引物扩增,筛选出来源于7对引物的13个有显著差异的片段可以有效区分低油材料和高油材料。以这7对差异引物在F8 RIL群体中扩增,对20份低油家系材料(含油量<55%)和45份高油家系材料(含油量>56%)进行统计分析,获得1个与花生含油量相关的分子标记2A5-250/240,其中,标记2A5-250为低油材料(含油量<55%)所拥有,相符率为95.0%,标记2A5-240为高油材料(含油量>56%)所拥有,相符率为88.9%。用SSR标记2A5-250/240检测11份高油(平均含油量为55.93%)栽培种花生和11份低油(平均含油量为48.41%)栽培种花生,结果表明,标记2A5-240与高油栽培种花生的符合率为63.6%,2A5-250与低油栽培种花生的符合率为90.9%。在19份高油(平均含油量为58.60%)野生花生中,10份野生花生能检测到标记2A5-240。综合分析RIL群体和自然群体的研究结果表明,标记2A5-250/240可用于花生含油量分子标记辅助选择。

关键词: 花生, 含油量, SSR, 分子辅助选择

Abstract: Oil content has been an important quality trait for peanut. However, the progress in genetic improvement of oil content is slow. This is mainly due to the complex genetic basis, the high cost in oil content testing, and difficulty in phenotypic selection because of environmental influence. Therefore, marker assisted selection (MAS) is necessary for oil content improvement in peanut breeding. In the present study, F8 RILs derived from a cross of Yuanza 9102×Zhonghua 5 were selected as materials. Ten RILs with extremely low oil content (about 52.91% on an average), twelve RILs with extremely high oil content (about 58.85% on an average) and the two parental lines were used to screen 631 simple sequence repeat (SSR) primers. Thirteen polymorphic bands of seven SSR primers were able to distinguish the extremely high and low oil content lines. Subsequently, the seven SSR primers were used to genotype the total RIL population. Based on the statistics of the SSR data from 20 lines with low oil content (less than 55%) and 45 lines with high oil content (more than 56%), we identified that a SSR marker, 2A5-250/240, was tightly linked to the oil content trait. The band 2A5-250 appeared almost in all low oil content lines with the match rate of 95.0%, while the band 2A5-240 appeared almost in all high oil content lines with the match rate of 88.9%. Detection of the marker 2A5-250/240 was conducted in 11 high oil (55.93% on an average) and 11 low oil (48.41% on an average) content peanut cultivars. The results showed that the match rates of the band 2A5-250 to low oil content materials and 2A5-240 to high oil content materials was 90.9% and 63.6%, respectively. In addition, the band 2A5-240 appeared in 10 of the 19 wild peanut (Arachis) lines with high oil content (about 58.60%). The results based on the analyses using RIL and natural populations demonstrated that the SSR marker 2A5-250/240 was useful for marker-assisted selection of oil content in peanut.

Key words: Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), Oil content, SSR, Marker assisted selection

[1]Liao B-S(廖伯寿), Lei Y(雷永), Wang S-Y(王圣玉), Li D(李栋), Huang J-Q(黄家权), Jiang H-F(姜慧芳), Ren X-P(任小平). Genetic diversity of peanut RILs and enhancement for high oil genotypes. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(6): 999-1004 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[2]Zhang L-H(张礼红), Tan X-H(谭兴和), Wang F(王锋), Deng J-H(邓洁红), Pan X-H(潘小红). Review on arachis in foreign. Food Sci Technol (食品科技), 2007, (6): 13-16 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[3]Jiang H-F(姜慧芳), Ren X-P(任小平). Genetic diversity of peanut resource on morphological characters and seed chemical components in China. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2006, 28(4): 421-426 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[4]Tai Y P, Clyde T Y. Genetic studies of peanut proteins and oils. J Am Oil Chem Soc, 1975, 52(9): 377-385

[5]Yu S-L(禹山林), Yang Q-L(杨庆利), Pan L-J(潘丽娟), Bo W-N(薄文娜). Genetic analysis for oil content of peanut seeds. J Plant Genet Resour (植物遗传资源学报), 2009, 10(3): 453-456 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6]Chen S-L(陈四龙), Li Y-R(李玉荣), Cheng Z-S(程增书), Liao B-S(廖伯寿), Lei Y(雷永), Liu J-S(刘吉生). Heterosis and genetic analysis of oil content in peanut using mixed model of major gene and polygene. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2009, 42(9): 3048-3057 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]Wang J-Y(王金彦), Yang Q-L(杨庆利), Yu S-L(禹山林). Development and application of SSR markers in peanut. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2009, 31(3): 401-406 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8]Zhang S F, Ma C Z, Zhu J C, Wang J P, Wen Y C, Fu T D. Genetic analysis of oil content in Brassica napus L. using mixed model of majorgene and polygene. Acta Genet Sin, 2006, 33: 171-180

[9]Zhao J, Becker H C, Zhang D, Zhang Y, Ecke W. Oil content in a European × Chinese rapeseed population: QTL with additive andepistatic effects and their genotype-environment interactions. Crop Sci, 2005, 45: 51-59

[10]Delourme R, Falentin C, Huteau V, Clouet V, Horvais R, Gandon B, Specel S, Hanneton L, Dheu J E, Deschamps M, Margale E, Vincourt P, Renard M. Genetic control of oil content in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2006, 113: 1331-1345

[11]Mahmood T, Rahman M H, Stringam G R, Yeh F, Good A G. Identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) for oil and protein contents and their relationships with other seed quality traits in Brassica juncea. Theor Appl Genet, 2006, 113:1211-1220

[12]Mansur L M, Orf J, Lark K G. Determ in ing the linkage of quantitative trait loci to RFLP maker using extreme phenotype of recombinant inbreds of soybean(Glycine max L. Merr.). Theor Appl Genet, 1993, 86: 914-918

[13]Wu X-L(吴晓雷), Wang Y-J(王永军), He C-Y(贺超英), Chen S-Y(陈受宜), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒), Wang X-C(王学臣). QTLs mapping of some agronomic traits of doybean. Acta Genet Sin (遗传学报), 2001, 28(10): 947-955 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14]Hong Y-B(洪彦彬), Lin K-Y(林坤耀), Zhou G-Y(周桂元), Li S-X(李少雄), Li Y(李艳), Liang X-Q(梁炫强). Genetic linkage analysis of SSR markers and the gene for dark purple testa color in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2007, 29(1): 35-38 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15]Wang H(王辉), Shi Y-M(石延茂), Ren Y(任艳), Li S-L(李双铃), Jiao K(焦坤), Yuan M(袁美), Li H-J(李华军). Development of SSR markers for root-knot nematode resistance in peanut. J Peanut Sci (花生学报), 2008, 37(2): 14-17 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16]Hong Y-B(洪彦彬), Li S-X(李少雄), Liu H-Y(刘海燕), Zhou G-Y(周桂元), Chen X-P(陈小平), Wen S-J(温世杰), Liang X-Q(梁炫强). Correlation analysis of SSR markers and host resistance to Aspergillus flavus infection in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Mol Plant Breed (分子植物育种), 2009, 7(2): 360-364 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17]Varshney R K, Bertioli D J, Moretzsohn M C, Vadez V, Krishnamurthy L, Aruna R, Nigam S N, Moss B J, Seetha K, Ravi K, He G, Knapp S J, Hoisington D A. The first SSR-based genetic linkage map for cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2009, 118: 729-739

[18]Khedikar Y P, Gowda M V C, Sarvamangala C, Patgar K V, Upadhyaya H D, Varshney R K. A QTL study on late leaf spot and rust revealed one major QTL for molecular breeding for rust resisitance in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2010, 121: 971-984

[19]Xia Y-L(夏友霖), Liao B-S(廖伯寿), Li J-N(李加纳), Lei Y(雷永), Jiang H-F(姜慧芳), Cui F-H(崔富华), Zeng X-P(曾孝平). Identification of AFLP markers linked to resistance to late leaf spot in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2007, 29(3): 318-321 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[20]Hou H-M(侯慧敏), Liao B-S(廖伯寿), Lei Y(雷永), Ren X-P(任小平), Wang S-Y(王圣玉), Li D(李栋), Jiang H-F(姜慧芳), Huang J-Q(黄家权), Chen B-Y(陈本银). Identification of AFLP markers for resistance to peanut rust. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2007, 29(2): 89-92 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[21]Lei Y(雷永), Liao B-S(廖伯寿), Wang S-Y(王圣玉), Li D(李栋), Jiang H-F(姜慧芳). Identification of AFLP markers for resistance to seed infection by Aspergillus flavus in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(10): 1349-1353 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[22]Liao B-S(廖伯寿), Lei Y(雷永), Li D(李栋), Wang S-Y(王圣玉), Huang J-Q(黄家权), Ren X-P(任小平), Jiang H-F(姜慧芳), Yan L-Y(晏立英). Novel high oil germplasm with resistance to Aspergillus flavus and bacterial wilt developed from recombinant inbred lines. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(8): 1296-1301 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[23]Hopkins M S, Casa A M, Wang T, Mitchell S E, Dean R E, Kochert G D, Kresovich S. Discovery and characterization of polymorphic simple sequence repeats (SSR) in peanut. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 1243-1247

[24]Palmieri D A, Hoshino A A, Bravo J P, Lopes C R, Gimenes M A. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from the forage species Arachis Pintoi (Genus Arachis). Mol Ecol Notes, 2002, 2: 551-553

[25]He G, Meng R, Newman M, Gao G, Pittman R N, Prakash C S. Microsatellites as DNA markers in cultivated peanut (A. hypogaea L.). BMC Plant Biol, 2003, 3: 3

[26]Ferguson M E, Burow M D, Schulze S R, Bramel P J, Paterson A H, Kresovich S, Mitchell S. Microsatellite identification and characterization in peanut (A. hypogaea L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 108: 1064-1070

[27]Moretzsohn M C, Hopkins M S, Mitchell S E, Kresovich S, Valls J F, Ferreira M E. Genetic diversity of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and its wild relatives based on the analysis of hypervariable regions of the genome. BMC Plant Biol, 2004, 4: 11

[28]Moretzsohn M C, Leoi L, Proite K, Guimaras P M, Leal-Bertioli S C M, Gimenes M A, Martins W S, Valls J F M, Grattapaglia D, Bertioli D J. A microsatellite-based, gene-rich linkage map for the AA genome of Arachis (Fabaceae). Theor Appl Genet, 2005, 111: 1060-1071

[29]Palmieri D A, Bechara M D, Curi R A, Gimenes M A, Lopes C R. Novel polymorphic microsatellite markers in section Caulorrhizae (Arachis, Fabaceae). Mol Ecol Notes, 2005, 5: 77-79

[30]Chen B-Y(陈本银), Jiang H-F(姜慧芳), Liao B-S(廖伯寿), Ren X-P(任小平). Phylogenetic relationship among the species in genus Arachis through SSR. J Plant Genet Resour (植物遗传资源学报), 2007, 8(2): 140-144 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[31]Burow M D, Simpson C E, Starr J L, Paterson A H. Transmission genetics of chromatin from a synthetic amphidiploid to cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.): broadening the gene pool of a monophyletic polyploid species. Genetics, 2001, 159: 823-837

[32]Kantety R V, La Rota M, Matthews D E. Data mining for simple sequence repeats in expressed sequence tags from barley, maize, rice, sorghum and wheat. Plant Mol Biol, 2002, 48: 501-510

[33]Upadhyaya H D, Nigam S N. Detection of epistasis for protein and oil contents and oil quality parameters in peanut. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 115-118

[34]Wynne J C, Coffelt T A. Genetics of Arachis hypogaea L. In: Pattee H E, Young C T, eds. Peanut Science and Technology. Yoakum, TX: American Peanut Research and Education Society, 1982. pp 50-94

[35]Liu E-S(刘恩生). Diallel analysis for yield protein and oil content of peanut. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin (华北农学报), 1987, 2(3): 18-26 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[2] 陆一楚, 李振影, 买春海, 赵晓蕊, 王利祥. 夜间复合体关键基因AhLUX1正向调控花生结瘤的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1658-1668.
[3] 谷春苗, 王润风, 黄璐, 刘浩, 鲁清, 李海芬, 李少雄, 何双呈, 洪彦彬, 陈小平, 谭斌, 余倩霞. 花生WOX基因家族的全基因组分析及不定芽再生候选基因的鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1326-1340.
[4] 张颖星, 宋裕祯, 王跃, 曹越, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. EMS诱导糜子优异性状突变体的筛选及表型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1388-1400.
[5] 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 长江下游冬油菜区应对气候变化的育种和栽培策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1153-1165.
[6] 田春艳, 陆鑫, 吴才文, 徐超华, 刘家勇, 边芯, 桃联安. 基于荧光SSR的甘蔗创新种质遗传多样性分析及育种潜力评估[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1057-1072.
[7] 于天一, 王春晓, 肖丽, 钟召迪, 王宣仓, 赵勇, 路亚, 吴月, 吴正锋. 不同结瘤特性花生品种氮素累积、产量及品质特性对氮肥用量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 881-894.
[8] 张胜忠, 李国卫, 戈立江, 王菲菲, 胡晓辉, 苗华荣, 李燕, 钟文, 陈静. 花生机械脱壳损伤相关农艺指标筛选与QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 644-652.
[9] 王菲菲, 张胜忠, 杨贵华, 苗华荣, 胡晓辉, 张则林, 刘莎莎, 乔利仙, 单世华, 陈静. 331份花生种质苗期耐盐性综合评价和强耐盐种质鉴选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 279-294.
[10] 金欣欣, 宋亚辉, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 王瑾. 高产高油高油酸花生品种的生长发育及干物质生产特征[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 191-201.
[11] 迟晓元, 刘庆, 张君, 赵旭红, 李美, 于天一, 潘丽娟, 许静, 姜骁, 殷祥贞, 马俊卿, 陈娜. 不同花生品种(系)耐盐碱性田间鉴定及各性状指标相关性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 85-98.
[12] 孙辰硕, 张月, 田泽锴, 晏立英, 康彦平, 陈玉宁, 王欣, 淮东欣, 王前前, 姜慧芳, 罗怀勇, 黄莉, 廖伯寿, 王志慧, 雷永. 花生种质果柄强度的遗传分化与主要影响因子分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 118-130.
[13] 万书波, 张佳蕾, 高华鑫, 王才斌. 中国花生高产栽培研究进展与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1703-1711.
[14] 郭腾达, 崔梦杰, 陈琳杰, 韩锁义, 郭敬坤, 吴晨迪, 付留洋, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 张新友. 花生磷脂酰肌醇转运蛋白基因AhSFH的克隆及其响应黄曲霉菌侵染的表达特征分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1489-1500.
[15] 李文佳, 廖泳俊, 黄璐, 鲁清, 李少雄, 陈小平, 金晶炜, 王润风. 花生开花时间的全基因组关联分析及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1400-1408.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!