小麦磷饥饿前后根系蛋白质组差异表达谱建立及差异表达蛋白的鉴定

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00780

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (05): 780-790.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00780

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇下一篇

小麦磷饥饿前后根系蛋白质组差异表达谱建立及差异表达蛋白的鉴定

冯万军^1,2，李振兴^1,2，郭宝健^1,2，彭慧茹^1,2，姚颖垠^1,2，倪中福^1,2,*，孙其信^1,2,*

1 农业生物技术国家重点实验室 / 教育部杂种优势研究与利用重点实验室 / 北京市作物遗传改良重点实验室 / 农业部作物基因组与遗传改良重点实验室 / 中国农业大学, 北京 100193; 2 国家植物基因研究北京中心, 北京 100193

收稿日期:2011-09-05 修回日期:2011-12-19 出版日期:2012-05-12 网络出版日期:2012-03-05
通讯作者: 倪中福, E-mail: wheat3392@cau.edu.cn; 孙其信, E-mail: qxsun@cau.edu.cn
基金资助:
本研究由国家基础研究发展计划(973计划)前期项目(2007CB109000), 国家杰出青年科学基金(30925023), 国家自然科学基金项目(30671297)和国家高技术研究发展计划项目(863计划)资助。

Identification of Differential Expressed Proteins Responding to Phosphorus Starvation Based on Proteomic Analysis in Roots of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

FENG Wan-Jun^1,2,LI Zhen-Xing^1,2,GUO Bao-Jian^1,2,PENG Hui-Ru^1,2,YAO Ying-Yin^1,2,NI Zhong-Fu^1,2,*,SUN Qi-Xin^1,2,*

1 Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization (MOE) and State Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology, Key Laboratory of Crop Genomics and Genetic Improvement (MOA), Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; 2 National Plant Gene Research Centre (Beijing), Beijing 100193, China

Received:2011-09-05 Revised:2011-12-19 Published:2012-05-12 Published online:2012-03-05
Contact: 倪中福, E-mail: wheat3392@cau.edu.cn; 孙其信, E-mail: qxsun@cau.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以耐低磷的小麦基因型洛夫林10号为材料, 采用蛋白质双向电泳技术, 结合质谱鉴定, 分析了正常磷供应和无磷处理7天后根系中的蛋白质组表达谱差异, 以期为深入探讨小麦响应磷胁迫的分子机理提供蛋白水平上的数据和资料。研究发现, 在可重复检测到的1 144个蛋白点中, 有87个在磷胁迫处理前后发生了明显的表达改变，占总数的7.6%，包括磷胁迫前特异表达、磷胁迫后特异表达、磷胁迫后上调和磷胁迫后下调表达等4种差异表达模式。在87个差异蛋白点中，有39个通过质谱技术被成功鉴定，涉及到代谢、细胞生长和分裂、转录和翻译、抗病、信号转导、转座元件及未知功能蛋白等功能类别，说明小麦可能通过细胞的代谢状态和基因表达改变来适应磷胁迫，进而维持体内磷含量的平衡状态。最后，我们还对差异表达点与磷胁迫的关系进行了分析和讨论。

关键词: 磷营养, 蛋白质组表达谱, 根系, 小麦

Abstract: Growth inhibition caused by phosphorus (P) deficiency is a serious problem for crop production. Plants can respond defensively to this stress by modifying their metabolic pathways and root morphologies through changes of quantity of low-Pi responding genes. To better understand the adaptation mechanisms of wheat to Pi deficiency conditions, a comparative proteome analysis was conducted in this study using wheat root samples treated 7 days without (–P) and with phosphorus (+P). Among 1 144 protein spots reproducibly detected, eighty seven of which (7.6%) were differentially expressed, including those present in treatments of only in –P or +P, and up- or down-regulated in –P. Moreover, 39 of the differentially expressed proteins were revealed to be involved in various biological processes such as metabolism, cell growth and division, transcription and translation, disease and defense, signal transduction, acting as transposable elements and unclassified proteins. Taken together, our results showed that wheat responds to the Pi starvation stress through an array of changes in metabolic states of cells and genes expression, which results in the maintenance of a relative P homeostasis in plants.

Key words: Phosphorus nutrition, Proteomic analysis, Root, Triticum aestivum L.

冯万军，李振兴，郭宝健，彭慧茹，姚颖垠，倪中福，孙其信. 小麦磷饥饿前后根系蛋白质组差异表达谱建立及差异表达蛋白的鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(05): 780-790.

FENG Wan-Jun,LI Zhen-Xing,GUO Bao-Jian,PENG Hui-Ru,YAO Ying-Yin,NI Zhong-Fu,SUN Qi-Xin. Identification of Differential Expressed Proteins Responding to Phosphorus Starvation Based on Proteomic Analysis in Roots of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38(05): 780-790.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00780

https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/Y2012/V38/I05/780

参考文献

[1]Vance C P, Uhde-Stone C, Allan D L. Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource. New Phytol, 2003, 157: 423-447

[2]Raghothama K G. Phosphate acquisition. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1999, 50: 665-693

[3]Bates T R, Lynch J P. Stimulation of root hair elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana by low phosphorus availability. Plant Cell Environ, 1996, 19: 529-538

[4]Gahoonia T S, Nielsen N E. Direct evidence on participation of root hairs in phosphorus (32P) uptake from soil. Plant Soil, 1998, 198: 147-152

[5]Mollier A, Pellerin S. Maize root system growth and development as influenced by phosphorus deficiency. J Exp Bot, 1999, 50: 487-497

[6]Williamson L C, Ribrioux S P C P, Fitter A H, Leyser H M O. Phosphate availability regulates root system architecture in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol, 2001, 126: 875-882

[7]Péret B, Clément M, Nussaume L, Desnos T. Root developmental adaptation to phosphate starvation: better safe than sorry. Trends Plant Sci, 2011, 16: 1360-1385

[8]Ueki K. Control of phosphatase release from cultured tobacco cells. Plant Cell Physiol, 1978, 19: 385-392

[9]Lipton D S, Blancher R W, Blevins D G. Citritions in excludes from P-sufficient and P-starved Medicago sativa L. seedling. Plant Physiol, 1987, 85: 315-317

[10]Rao I M, Terry N. Leaf phosphate status photosynthesis and carbon partitioning in sugar beet: II. Diurnal changes in sugar phosphates, adenylates, and nicotinamide nucleotides. Plant Physiol, 1989, 90: 820-826

[11]Hoffland E, Findenegg G R, Nelemans J A. Solubilization of rock phosphate by rape. Plant & Soil, 1989, 113: 155-165

[12]Duff S M G, Sarath G, Plaxton W C. The role of acid phosphatase in plant phosphorus metabolism. Physiol Planta, 1994, 90: 791-800

[13]Wasaki J, Yamamura T, Shinano T, Osaki M. Secreted acid phosphatase is expressed in cluster roots of lupin in response to phosphorus deficiency. Plant & Soil, 2003, 248: 129-136

[14]Muchhal U S, Raghothama K G. Transcriptional regulation of plant phosphate transporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1999, 96, 5868-5872

[15]Uta P, Scott K, Christophe R, Briggs S P. Rice phosphate transporters include an evolutionarily divergent gene specifically activated in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002, 99: 13324-13329

[16]Thibaud M C, Arrighi J F, Bayle V, Chiarenza S, Creff A, Bustos R, Paz-Ares J, Poirier Y, Nussaume L. Dissection of local and systemic transcriptional responses to phosphate starvation in Arabidopsis. Plant J, 2010, 64: 775-789

[17]Wu P, Wang X. Role of OsPHR2 on phosphorus homeostasis and root hairs development in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Signal Behav, 2008, 3: 674-675

[18]Devaiah B N, Karthikeyan A S, Raghothama K G. WRKY75 transcription factor is a modulator of phosphate acquisition and root development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol, 2007, 143: 1789-1801.

[19]Devaiah B N, Nagarajan V K, Raghothama K G. Phosphate homeostasis and root development in Arabidopsis are synchronized by the zinc finger transcription factor ZAT6. Plant Physiol, 2007, 145: 147-159

[20]Chen Z H, Nimmo G A, Jenkins G I, Nimmo H G. BHLH32 modulates several biochemical and morphological processes that respond to Pi starvation in Arabidopsis. Biochem J, 2007, 405: 191-198

[21]Bariola P A, Howard C J, Taylor C B, Verburg M T, Jaglan V D, Green P J. The Arabidopsis ribonuclease gene RNS1 is tightly controlled in response to phosphate limitation. Plant J, 1994, 6: 673-685

[22]Misson J, Raghothama K G, Jain A, Jouhet J, Block M A, Bligny R, Ortet P, Creff A, Somerville S, Rolland N, Doumas P, Nacry P, Herrerra-Estrella L, Nussaume L, Thibaud M C. A genome-wide transcriptional analysis using Arabidopsis thaliana Affymetrix gene chips determined plant responses to phosphate deprivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2005, 102: 11934-11939

[23]Morcuende R, Bari R, Gibon Y, Zheng W M, Pant B D, Bläsing O, Usadel B, Czechowski T, Udvardi M K, Stitt M, Scheible W R. Genome-wide reprogramming of metabolism and regulatory networks of Arabidopsis in response to phosphorus. Plant Cell Environ, 2007, 30: 85-112

[24]Wasaki J, Yonetan R, Kuroda S. Tanscriptomic analysis of metabolic changes by phosphorus stress in rice plant roots. Plant Cell Environ, 2003, 26: 1515-1523

[25]Uhde-Stone C, Gilbert G, Johnson J MF, Litjens R, Zinn K E, Temple S J, Vance C P, Allan D L. Acclimation of white lupin to phosphorus deficiency involves enhanced expression of genes related to organic acid metabolism. Plant & Soil, 2003, 248: 99-116

[26]Wasaki J, Shinano T, Onishi K, Yonetani R, Yazaki J, Fujii F, Shimbo K, Ishikawa M, Shimatani Z, Nagata Y, Hashimoto A, Ohta T, Sato Y, Miyamoto C, Honda S, Kojima K, Sasaki T, Kishimoto N, Kikuchi S, Osaki M. Transcriptomic analysis indicates putative metabolic changes caused by manipulation of phosphorus availability in rice leaves. J Exp Bot, 2006, 57: 2049-2059

[27]Chacón-López A, Ibarra-Laclette E, Sánchez-Calderón L, Gutiérrez-Alanís D, Herrera-Estrella L. Global expression pattern comparison between low phosphorus insensitive 4 and WT Arabidopsis reveals an important role of reactive oxygen species and jasmonic acid in the root tip response to phosphate starvation. Plant Signal Behav, 2011, 6: 382-392

[28]Li K P, Xu C Z, Zhang K W, Yang A F, Zhang J R. Proteomic analysis of roots growth and metabolic changes under phosphorus deficit in maize (Zea mays L.) plants. Proteomics, 2007, 7: 1501-1512

[29]Fukuda T, Saito A, Wasaki J, Shinano T, Osaki M. Metabolic alterations proposed by proteome in rice roots grown under low P and high Al concentration under low pH. Plant Sci, 2007, 172: 1157-1165

[30]Gill B S, Appels R, Botha-Oberholster A M, Buell C R, Bennetzen J L, Chalhoub B, Chumley F, Dvorak J, Iwanaga M, Keller B, Li W L, McCombie W R, Ogihara Y, Quetier F, Sasaki T. A workshop report on wheat genome sequencing: international genome research on wheat consortium. Genetics, 2004, 68: 1087-1096

[31]Davies T G, Su J Y, Xu Q, Li Z S, Li J, Gordon-Weeks R. Expression analysis of putative high-affinity phosphate transporters in Chinese winter wheats. Plant Cell Environ, 2002, 25: 1325-1339

[32]Su J Y, Xiao Y M, Li M, Liu Q Y, Li B, Tong Y P, Jia J Z, Li Z S. Mapping QTLs for phosphorus-deficiency tolerance at wheat seedling stage. Plant & Soil, 2006, 281: 25-36

[33]Tesfaye M, Liu J, Allan D L, Vance C P. Genomic and genetic control of phosphate stress in legumes. Plant Physiol, 2007, 144: 594-603

[34]Gu J-T(谷俊涛), Bao J-X(鲍金香), Wang X-Y(王效颖), Guo C-J(郭程瑾), Li X-J(李小娟), Lu W-J(路文静), Xiao K(肖凯). Investigation based on cDNA-AFLP approach for differential expressed genes responding to deficient-Pi in wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35: 1597-1605 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[35]Li Z X, Ni Z F,Peng H R, Liu Z Y, Nie X L, Xu S B, Liu G, Sun Q X. Molecular mapping of QTLs for root response to phosphorus deficiency at seedling stage in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Prog Nat Sci, 2007, 17: 1177-1184

[36]Ueda I, Wada T. Determination of inorganic phosphate by the molybdovanadate method in the presence of ATP and some interfering organic bases. Anal Biochem, 1970, 37: 169-174

[37]Donnelly B E, Madden R D, Ayoubi P, Porter D R, Dillwith J W. The wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) leaf proteome. Proteomics, 2005, 5: 1624-1633

[38]Porubleva L, Velden K V, Kothari S, Oliver D J, Chitnis P R. The proteome of maize leaves: use of gene sequences and expressed sequence tag data for identification of proteins with peptide mass fingerprints. Electrophoresis, 2001, 22: 1724-1738

[39]Bevan M, Bancroft I, Bent E, Love K, Goodman H, Dean C, Bergkamp R, Dirkse W, Van Staveren M, Stiekema W, Drost L, Ridley P, Hudson S A, Patel K, Murphy G, Piffanelli P, Wedler H, Wedler E, Wambutt R, Weitzenegger T, Pohl T M, Terryn N, Gielen J, Villarroel R, Chalwatzis N. Analysis of 1.9 Mb of contiguous sequence from chromosome 4 of the Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature, 1998, 391: 485-488

[40]Hammond J P, Bennett M J, Bowen H C, Broadley M R, Eastwood D C, May S T, Rahn C, Swarup R, Woolaway K E, White P J. Changes in gene expression in Arabidopsis shoots during phosphate starvation and the potential for developing smart plants. Plant Physiol, 2003, 132: 578-596

[41]Peters J M. Proteasomes: protein degradation machines of the cell. Trends Biochem Sci, 1994, 19: 377-382

[42]Osborne C K, Schiff R, Fuqua S A, Shou J. Estrogen receptor: current understanding of its activation and modulation. Clin Cancer Res, 2001, 7: 4338-4342

[43]Shamovsky I, Nudler E. New insights into the mechanism of heat shock response activation. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2008, 65: 855-861

[44]Benizri E, Ginouvès A, Berra E. The magic of the hypoxia-signaling cascade. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2008, 65: 1133-1149

[45]Sánchez-Calderón L, López-Bucio J, Chacón-López A, Gutiérrez-Ortega A, Hernández-Abreu E, Herrera-Estrella L. Characterization of low phosphorus insensitive mutants reveals a crosstalk between low P-induced determinate root development and the activation of genes involved in the adaptation of Arabidopsis to P deficiency. Plant Physiol, 2006, 140: 879-889

[46]Franco-Zorrilla J M, González E, Bustos R, Linhares F, Leyva A, Paz-Ares J. The transcriptional control of plant responses to phosphate limitation. J Exp Bot, 2004, 55: 285-293

[47]Ciereszko I, Kleczkowski L A. Effects of phosphate deficiency and sugars on expression of rab18 in Arabidopsis: hexokinase-dependent and okadaic acid-sensitive transduction of the sugar signal. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2002, 13: 43-49

[48]Jeschke W D, Peuke A D, Pate J S, Hartung W. Transport, synthesis and catabolism of abscisic acid (ABA) in intact plants of castor bean (Ricinus communis L.) under phosphate deficiency and moderate salinity. J Exp Bot, 1997, 48: 1737-1747

[49]Radin J. Stomatal responses to water stress and to abscisic acid in phosphorus-deficient cotton plants. Plant Physiol, 1984, 76: 392-394

[50]Li K P, Xu C Z, Li Z X, Zhang K W, Yang A F, Zhang J R. Comparative proteome analyses of phosphorus responses in maize (Zea mays L.) roots of wild-type and a low-P-tolerant mutant reveal root characteristics associated with phosphorus efficiency. Plant J, 2008, 55: 927-939

[51]Bao Y Q, Kost B, Chua N H. Reduced expression of ?-tubulin genes in Arabidopsis thaliana specifically affects root growth and morphology, root hair development and root gravitropism. Plant J, 2001, 28: 145-157

[52]Kumar A, Bennetzen J L. Plant retrotransposon. Annu Rev Genet, 1999, 33: 479-532

[53]Mhiri C, Morel J B, Vernhettes S, Casacuberta J M, Lucas H, Grandbastien M A. The promoter of the tobacco Tnt1 retrotransposon is induced by wounding and by abiotic stress. Plant Mol Biol, 1997, 33: 257-266

[54]Grandbastien M A. Activation of plant retrotransposons under stress conditions. Trends Plant Sci, 1998, 3: 181-187

[55]Fedoroff N. Transposons and genome evolution in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2000, 97: 7002-7007

[56]Kashkush K, Feldman M, Levy A A. Transcriptional activation of retrotransposons alters the expression of adjacent genes in wheat. Nature Genet, 2003, 33: 102-106

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

小麦磷饥饿前后根系蛋白质组差异表达谱建立及差异表达蛋白的鉴定

Identification of Differential Expressed Proteins Responding to Phosphorus Starvation Based on Proteomic Analysis in Roots of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

PDF

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

关于本刊

在线期刊

作者中心

相关单位

联系我们

[1]	翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2]	习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3]	毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4]	胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5]	陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6]	高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7]	张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8]	王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9]	何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10]	张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11]	郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[12]	乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[13]	侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[14]	尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[15]	李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.