欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (06): 1009-1017.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01009

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同抗性小麦根与菲利普孢囊线虫(Heterodera filipjevi)互作的表型特征

崔磊1,2，高秀2,4，王晓鸣2，简恒3，唐文华3，李洪连1,*，李洪杰2,*   

  1. 1 河南农业大学植物保护学院，河南郑州450002；2 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所 / 农作物基因资源与基因改良国家重大科学工程，北京100081；3 中国农业大学植物病理系，北京100193；4 河北科技师范学院生命科学学院，河北秦皇岛066004
  • 收稿日期:2011-12-13 修回日期:2012-02-22 出版日期:2012-06-12 网络出版日期:2012-03-29
  • 通讯作者: 李洪杰, E-mail: hongjie@caas.net.cn; 李洪连, E-mail: honglianli@sina.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(200903040), 国家自然科学基金项目(31171545和30971899), 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2009CB118300)和科技部中澳特别基金项目(2010DFA31380)的资助。

Characterization of Interaction between Wheat Roots with Different Resistance and Heterodera filipjevi

CUI Lei1,2,GAO Xiu2,4,WANG Xiao-Ming2,JIAN Heng3,TANG Wen-Hua3,LI Hong-Lian1,*,LI Hong-Jie2,*   

  1. 1 College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China; 2 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Beijing 100081, China; 3 Department of Plant Pathology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; 4 College of Life Science and Technology, Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
  • Received:2011-12-13 Revised:2012-02-22 Published:2012-06-12 Published online:2012-03-29
  • Contact: 李洪杰, E-mail: hongjie@caas.net.cn; 李洪连, E-mail: honglianli@sina.com

PDF

2278

被引次数

5

摘要： 菲利普孢囊线虫(Heterodera filipjevi)是最近在我国新发现的小麦病原线虫，在黄淮冬麦区对小麦生产构成威胁。2009—2011年2个生长季在河南省许昌市进行的田间病圃抗性鉴定中，小麦－黑麦6R(6D)染色体代换系(带有抗病基因CreR)对H. filipjevi Hfc-1致病型表现高抗反应型(HR)，小麦品种太空6号表现中抗反应型(MR)，其亲本品种豫麦49表现高感反应型(HS)。利用Pluronic F-127胶体为介质，研究了不同抗性小麦品种根尖对线虫的吸引性。结果显示，无论品种的抗性水平如何，其根尖单独存在时均能够吸引线虫的二龄幼虫；当3个品种(系)的根尖同时存在时，6R(6D)根尖吸引的二龄幼虫数量显著少于太空6号和豫麦49。采用酸性品红－次氯酸钠染色法观察线虫对根系的侵染，发现不论抗性水平高低，二龄幼虫都能侵入寄主根的组织，但至侵染后期，6R(6D)和太空6号根中的线虫数量显著少于豫麦49。这些结果表明，虽然线虫能够侵入抗病品种的根组织，但是大部分二龄幼虫却不能继续发育而形成孢囊。这为了解小麦对H. filipjevi的抗性机制提供了实验证据。

关键词: 小麦, 菲利普孢囊线虫, 抗病性, 侵染, 吸引, 小麦-线虫互作

Abstract: Heterodera filipjevi is a newly identified pathogenic species of cereal cyst nematode that invades wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in central China. A two-year field test (2009–2011) conducted in Xuchang County, Henan Province, China, where H. filipjevi has severely damaged wheat for several years, demonstrated that the wheat-rye (Secale cereale L.) chromosome substitution line 6R(6D) (carrying gene CreR for resistance to Heterodera spp.) was highly resistant (HR) to the nematode. The wheat cultivar Taikong 6 was moderately resistant (MR) and its parental cultivar Yumai 49 was highly susceptible (HS). Attraction of H. filipjevi juveniles to root tips of wheats differed in resistance to H. filipjevi was studied using Pluronic F-127 gel as a medium. Although root tips from wheat cultivars with different resistance were able to attract juveniles of nematode alone, the number of juveniles around the root tip from line 6R(6D) was obviously less than that from Taikong 6 (MR) and Yumai 49 (HS) when they were challenged together concurrently by H. filipjevi. The juveniles were capable to penetrate into wheat roots regardless of their resistance as revealed by acid fuschin-sodium hypochlorite staining of infected roots. However, significantly smaller number of nematodes in the roots of 6R(6D) and Taikong 6 were observed compared to those of Yumai 49 at later stage of wheat-H. filipjevi interaction. These findings demonstrate that some of the H. filipjevi juveniles are not able to continue to reproduce themselves although they can penetrate the roots of resistant wheat cultivars 6R(6D) and Taikong 6. The results from this study provide experimental evidence on mechanism of host resistance to H. filipjevi.

Key words: wheat, Heterodera filipjevi, resistance, infestation, attraction, wheat-nematode interaction

[1]Rivoal R, Nicol J M. Past research on the cereal cyst nematode complex and future needs. In: Riley I T, Nicol J M, Dababat A A, eds. Cereal Cyst Nematodes: Status, Research and Outlook. Ankara, Turkey: CIMMYT Press, 2009. pp 3–10

[2]Ogbonnaya F C, Eastwood R F, Lagudah E. Identification and utilization of genes for cereal cyst nematode resistance (Heterodera avenae) resistance in wheat: the Australian experience. In: Riley I T, Nicol J M, Dababat A A, eds. Cereal Cyst Nematodes: Status, Research and Outlook. Ankara, Turkey: CIMMYT Press, 2009. pp 166–171

[3]Andres M F, Melillo M T, Delibes A, Romero M D, Bleve-Zacheo T. Changes in wheat root enzymes correlated with resistance to cereal cyst nematodes. New Phytol, 2001, 152: 343–354

[4]Seah S, Miller C, Sivasithamparam K, Lagudah E S. Root responses to cereal cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae) in hosts with different resistance genes. New Phytol, 2000, 146: 527–533

[5]Chen P-S(陈品三), Wang M-Z(王明祖), Peng D-L(彭德良). Preliminary report of identification on cereal cyst nematode of wheat in China. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1991, 24(5): 89–91 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6]Hajihasani A, Tanha Maafi Z, Nicol J M, Rezaee S. Effect of the cereal cyst nematode, Heterodera filipjevi, on wheat in microplot trials. Nematology, 2010, 12: 357–363

[7]Smiley R W. Occurrence, distribution and control of Heterodera avenae and H. filipjevi in western USA. In: Riley I T, Nicol J M, Dababat A A, eds. Cereal Cyst Nematodes: Status, Research and Outlook. Ankara, Turkey: CIMMYT Press, 2009. pp 35–40

[8]Peng D L, Ye W X, Peng H, Gu X C. First report of the cyst nematode (Heterodera filipjevi) on wheat in Henan province, China. Plant Dis, 2010, 94: 1262

[9]Li H L, Yuan H X, Sun J W, Fu B, Nian G L, Hou X S, Xing X P, Sun B J. First record of the cereal cyst nematode Heterodera filipjevi in China. Plant Dis, 2010, 94: 1505

[10]Yuan H-X(袁虹霞), Zhang F-X(张福霞), Zhang J-J(张佳佳), Hou X-S(侯兴松), Li H-J(李洪杰), Li H-L(李洪连). Resistance of CIMMYT wheat germplasm to Heterodera filipjevi Xuchang population from Henan province, China. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2011, 37(11): 1956–1966 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11]Li H J, Cui L, Li H L, Wang X M, Murray T D, Conner R L, Wang L J, Gao X, Sun Y, Sun S C, Tang W H. Effective resources in wheat and wheat-Thinopyrum derivatives for resistance to Heterodera filipjevi in China. Crop Sci, 2012, doi: 10.2135/cropsci2011.11.0591

[12]Taylor C, Shepherd K W, Langridge P. A molecular genetic map of the long arm of chromosome 6R of ray incorporating the cereal cyst nematode resistance gene, CreR. Theor Appl Genet, 1998, 97: 1000–1012

[13]Nian G-L(年高磊), Sun J-W(孙君伟), Hou X-S(侯兴松), Fu B(付博), Yuan H-X(袁虹霞), Xing X-P(邢小萍), Li H-L(李洪连). Identification of pathotypes of three populations of Heterodera filipjevi in Henan province. In: Liao J-L(廖金铃), Peng D-L(彭德良), Duan Y-X(段玉玺), eds. Nematology Research in China (中国线虫学研究). Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2010. Vol. 3. pp 120–133 (in Chinese)

[14]Wang C, Lower S, Williamson V M. Application of Pluronic gel to the study of root-knot nematode behaviour. Nematology, 2009, 11: 453–464

[15]Byrd D W, Kirkpatrick T, Barker K R. An improved technique for clearing and staining plant tissues for the detection for clearing and staining plant tissues for the detection of nematode. J Nematol, 1983, 15: 142–143

[16]Heun M, Friebe B. Introgression of powdery mildew resistance from rye into wheat. Phytopathology, 1989, 80: 242–245

[17]Li H-J(李洪杰), Wang X-M(王晓鸣), Song F-J(宋凤景), Wu C-P(伍翠平), Wu X-F(武小菲), Zhang N(张宁), Zhou Y(周阳), Zhang X-Y(张学勇). Response to powdery mildew and detection of resistance genes in wheat cultivars from China. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2011, 37(39): 943–954 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18]Friebe B, Jiang J, Raupp W J, McIntosh R A, Gill B S. Characterization of wheat-alien translocations conferring resistance to diseases and pests: current status. Euphytica, 1996, 91: 59–87

[19]Ho J Y, Weide R, Ma H M, van Wordrangen M F, Lambert K N, Kooenneef M, Zabel P, Williamson V M. The root-knot nematode resistance gene (Mi) in tomato: construction of a molecular linkage map and identification of dominant cDNA markers in resistant genotypes. Plant J, 1992, 2: 971–982

[20]Prot J C. Migration of plant parasitic nematodes towards plant roots. Rev Nématol, 1980, 3: 305–318

[21]Pline M, Dusenbery D B. Responses of plant-parasitic nematode Meloidogyne incognita to carbon dioxide determined by video camera-computer tracking. J Chem Ecol, 1987, 13: 873–888

[22]Robinson A F. Optimal release rates for attracting Meloidogyne incognita, Rotylenchulus reniformis, and other nematodes to carbon dioxide in sand. J Nematol, 1995, 27: 42–50

[23]Wang C, Bruening G, Williamson V M. Determination of preferred pH for root-knot nematode aggregation using Pluronic F-127 gel. J Chem Ecol, 2009, 35: 1242–1251

[24]Grymaszewska G, Golinowski W. Structure of syncytia induced by Heterodera avenae Woll. in roots of susceptible and resistant wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Phytopathol, 1991, 133: 307–319

[25]Wu X-J(吴绪金), Yuan H-X(袁虹霞), Zhang J-F(张军锋), Xing X-P(邢小萍), Sun B-J(孙炳剑), Li H-L(李洪连). A preliminary study on the resistance mechanism of wheat cultivars to cereal cyst nematode. Henan Agric Sci (河南农业科学), 2009, (1): 73–77 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[26]Spiegel Y, Burrows P M, Bar-Eyal M. A chemo attractant in onion root exudates recognized by Ditylenchus dipsact in laboratory bioassay. Phytopathology, 2003, 93: 127–132

[27]Wuyts N, Maung Z T Z, Swennen R, De Waele D. Banana rhizodeposition: Characterization of root border cell production and effects on chemotaxis and motility of the parasitic nematode Radopholus similis. Plant Soil, 2006, 28: 217–228

[28]Barichello J M, Morishita M, Kozo T, Nangai T. Absorption of insulin from Pluronic F-127 gels following subcutaneous administration in rats. Int J Pharmaceutics, 1999, 184: 189–198

[29]Morishita M, Barichello J M, Takayama K, Chiba Y, Tokiwa S, Nagai T. Pluronic F-127 gels incorporating highly purified unsaturated fatty acids for buccal delivery of insulin. Int J Pharmaceutics, 2001, 212: 289–293

[30]Kabanov A V, Batrakova E V, Alakhov V Y. Pluronic block copolymers for overcoming drug resistance in cancer. Adv Drug Delivery Rev, 2002, 54: 759–779

[31]Robinson A F. Movement of five nematode species through sand subjected to natural temperature gradient fluctuations. J Nematol, 1995, 26: 46–58

[32]Ko M P, van Gundy S D. An alternative gelling agent for culture and studies of nematodes, bacteria, fungi and plant tissues. J Nematol, 1988, 20: 478–485
[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2