欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (02): 360-367.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00360

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

谷子CBL基因鉴定及其在干旱、高盐胁迫下的表达分析

赵晋锋1,**,余爱丽1,**,田岗1,杜艳伟1,郭二虎1,*,刁现民2,*   

  1. 1 山西省农科院谷子研究所,山西长治 046011;2 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所, 北京100081
  • 收稿日期:2012-06-18 修回日期:2012-10-09 出版日期:2013-02-12 网络出版日期:2012-12-11
  • 通讯作者: 郭二虎, E-mail: guoerhu2003@yahoo.com.cn; 刁现民, E-mail: xmdiao@yahoo.com.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(20114008)资助。

Identification of CBL Genes from Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica [L.] Beauv. ) and Its Expression under Drought and Salt Stresses

ZHAO Jin-Feng1,**,YU Ai-Li1,**,TIAN Gang1,DU Yan-Wei1,GUO Er-Hu1,*,DIAO Xian-Min2,*   

  1. 1 Millet Research Institute, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changzhi 046011, China; 2 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2012-06-18 Revised:2012-10-09 Published:2013-02-12 Published online:2012-12-11
  • Contact: 郭二虎, E-mail: guoerhu2003@yahoo.com.cn; 刁现民, E-mail: xmdiao@yahoo.com.cn

摘要:

CBL/CIPK信号网络系统在植物对逆境应答过程中起重要作用。本文利用生物信息学方法从谷子基因组中鉴定出7个候选CBL基因,命名为SiCBL1~SiCBL7。分析表明谷子CBL基因在蛋白质序列和结构上非常保守,所有预测SiCBL基因都含有7~8个内含子,而且其外显子序列同源性很高并且大部分外显子含有相同的碱基数目。预测SiCBL基因均含有4个EF-Hand功能域而且相邻EF-Hand功能域之间的氨基酸数目非常保守。进化和聚类分析结果表明, CBL基因在陆生植物早期的进化过程中就已经存在,所有CBL基因被分为4个亚组。7个候选SiCBL基因中, 4个基因(SiCBL1、SiCBL2、SiCBL3和SiCBL5)受干旱胁迫诱导表达,3个(SiCBL1、SiCBL3和SiCBL7)受高盐胁迫诱导表达。SiCBL3基因在干旱胁迫下被强烈诱导可能意味着其在干旱应答中起重要作用。本文报道的谷子CBL基因丰富和完善了植物CBL成员, 为进一步研究CBL/CIPK网络系统在抗逆作物谷子逆境响应中的功能、机制奠定了基础。

关键词: 谷子, CBL基因, 干旱, 盐

Abstract:

CBL/CIPK signal network system plays an important role in plant stress response. In this study, we identified seven candidate CBL genes designated as SiCBL1–7 from foxtail millet (Setaria italica [L.] Beauv.) genome using bioinformatics methods. The distributions of the predicted foxtail millet CBL genes were uneven in the nine chromosomes. Sequence analysis showed that the protein sequences and structure of foxtail millet CBL genes were very conservative. All the putative CBL genes contained 7–8 introns. Most exons of those SiCBL genes contained the same base number and shared highly similar sequence identity. All foxtail millet CBL genes consisted of four EF-Hand functional domains and the distance between the EF-hand motifs was conservative. Evolutionary analysis revealed that the CBL genes existed in the early evolutionary stage of terrestrial plants and all CBL genes were divided into four subgroups. The expression patterns of those SiCBL genes under drought and salt stresses, were displayed by RT-PCR and the results showed that four SiCBL genes (SiCBL1, SiCBL2, SiCBL3,and SiCBL5) were strongly induced by drought and three SiCBL genes (SiCBL1, SiCBL3,and SiCBL7) were induced by salt stress. SiCBL3 maybe takes an important role in foxtail millet under drought because of its constitutive high level expression. Foxtail millet CBL genes reported in this study would enrich CBL members in plant kingdom and lay a foundation for studying the function and mechanisms of the CBL/CIPK network system response to stresses.

Key words: Foxtail millet, Calcineurin B-Like proteins gene, Drought, Salt

[1]Wang W X, Vinocur B, Altman A. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperature: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta, 2003, 218: 1–14



[2]Zhi H(智慧), Niu Z-G(牛振刚), Jia G-Q(贾冠清), Chai Y(柴杨), Li W(李伟), Wang Y-F(王永芳), Li H-Q(李海权), Lu P(陆平), Bai S-L(白素兰), Diao X-M(刁现民). Variation and correlation analysis of hay forage quality traits of foxtail millet [Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.]. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2012, 38: 800−807 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]Devos K M, Wang Z M, Beales J, Sasaki T, Gale M D. Comparative genetic maps of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) and rice (Oryza sativa). Theor Appl Genet, 1998, 96: 63–68



[4]Jayaraman A, Puranik S, Rai N K, Vidapu S, Sahu P P, Lata C, Prasad M. cDNA-AFLP analysis reveals differential gene expression in response to salt stress in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.). Mol Biotechnol, 2008, 40: 241–251



[5]Zhang G Y, Liu X, Quan Z W, Cheng S F, Xu X, Pan S K, Xie M, Zeng P, Yue Z, Wang W L, Tao Y, Bian C, Han C L, Xia Q J, Peng X H, Cao R, Yang X H, Zhan D L, Hu J C, Zhang Y X, Li H N, Li H, Li N, Wang J Y, Wang C C, Wang R Y, Guo T, Cai Y J, Liu C Z, Xiang H T, Shi Q X, Huang P, Chen Q C, Li Y R, Wang J, Zhao Z H, Wang J. Genome sequence of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) provides insights into grass evolution and biofuel potential. Nat Biotechnol, 2012, 30: 549–554



[6]Bennetzen J L, Schmutz J, Wang H, Percifield R, Hawkins J, Pontaroli A C, Estep M, Feng L, Vaughn J N, Grimwood J, Jenkins J, Barry K, Lindquist E, Hellsten U, Deshpande S, Wang X W, Wu X M, Mitros T, Triplett J, Yang X H, Ye C Y, Mauro-Herrera M, Wang L, Li P H, Sharma M, Sharma R, Ronald P C, Panaud O, Kellogg E A, Brutnell T P, Doust A N, Tuskan G A, Rokhsar D, Devos K M. Reference genome sequence of the model plant setaria. Nat Biotechnol, 2012, 30: 555–561



[7]Luan S, Kudla J, Rodriguez-Concepcion M, Yalovsky S, Gruissem W. Calmodulins and calcineurin B-like proteins: calcium sensors for specific signal response coupling in plants. Plant Cell, 2002, 14(suppl): S389–S400



[8]Kudla J, Batistic O. Integration and channeling of calcium signaling through the CBL calcium sensor/CIPK protein kinase network. Planta, 2004, 219: 915–924



[9]Batisti? O, Kudla J. Plant calcineurin B-like proteins and their interacting protein kinases. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2009, 1793: 985–992



[10]Mahajan S, Tuteja N. Cold, salinity and drought stresses: an overview. Arch Biochem Biophy, 2005, 444: 139–158



[11]Liu J P, Ishitani M, Halfter U, Kim C S, Zhu J K. The Arabidopsis thaliana SOS2 gene encodes a protein kinase that is required for salt tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2000, 97: 3730–3734



[12]Zhu J K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2002, 53: 247–273



[13]Martinez A J, Jiang X, Garciadeblas B, Mendoza I, Zhu J K, Pardo J M,Quintero F J. Conservation of the salt overly sensitive pathway in rice. Plant Physiol, 2007, 143: 1001–1012



[14]Xu J, Li H D, Chen L Q, Wang Y, Liu L L, He L, Wu W H. A protein kinase, interacting with two calcineurin B-like proteins, regulates K+ transporter AKT1 in Arabidopsis. Cell, 2006, 125: 1347–1360



[15]Albrecht V, Weinl S, Blazevic D, D’Angelo C, Batistic O, Kolukisaoglu U, Bock R, Schulz B, Harter K, Kudla J. The calcium sensor CBL1 integrates plant responses to abiotic stresses. Plant J, 2003, 36:457–470



[16]Cheong Y H, Kim K N, Pandey G K, Gupta R, Grant J J, Luan S. CBL1, a calcium sensor that differentially regulates salt, drought, and cold responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2003, 15: 1833–1845



[17]Pandey G K, Cheong Y H, Kim K N, Grant J J, Li L, Hung W, D’Angelo C, Weinl S, Kudla J, Luan S. The calcium sensor calcineurin B-like 9 modulates abscisic acid sensitivity and biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2004, 16: 1912–1924



[18]Wang M Y, Gu D, Liu T S, Wang Z Q, Guo X Y, HOU W, Bai Y F, Chen X P, Wang G Y. Overexpression of a putative maize calcineurin B-like protein in Arabidopsis confers salt tolerance. Plant Mol Biol, 2007, 65: 733–746



[19]Mahajan S, Sopory S K, Tuteja N. Cloning and characterization of CBL-CIPK signaling components from a legume (Pisum sativum). FEBS J, 2006, 273: 907–925



[20]Zhang H C, Yin W L, Xia X L. Calcineurin B-like family in populus: comparative genome analysis and expression pattern under cold, drought and salt stress treatment. Plant Growth Regul, 2008, 56: 129–140



[21]Gao P, Zhao P M, Wang J, Wang H Y, Du X M, Wang G L, Xia G X. Co-expression and preferential interaction between two calcineurin B-like proteins and a CBL-interacting protein kinase from cotton. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2008, 46: 935–940



[22]Hwang Y H, Bethke P C, Cheong Y H, Chang H S, Zhu T, Jones R L. A gibberellin-regulated calcineurin B in rice localizes to the tonoplast and is implicated in vacuole function. Plant Physiol, 2005,138: 1347–1358



[23]Zhao J-F(赵晋锋), Yu A-L(余爱丽), Wang G-H(王高鸿), Tian G(田岗), Wang H-Y(王寒玉), Du Y-W(杜艳伟), Chang H-X(常海霞). Progress of CBL/CIPK signal system in response to stresses in plant. J Agricl Sci Technol (中国农业科技导报), 2011, 13: 32–38 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[24]Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. A novel cis-acting element in an Arabidopsis gene is involved in responsiveness to drought, low-temperature, or high-salt stress. Plant Cell, 1994, 6: 251–264



[25]Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software Version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol, 2007, 24: 1596–1599



[26]Sambrook J, Russell D. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd Edn. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2001. pp 581–585



[27]Diao X-M(刁现民). Adance in Foxtial Millet biotechnology and its future directions. J Hebei Agric Sci (河北农业科学), 2005, 9: 61–68 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[28]Tian B-H(田伯红), Wang S-Y(王素英), Li Y-J(李雅静), Wang J-G(王建广), Zhang L-X(张立新), Liang F-Q(梁凤芹), Zhai Y-Z(翟玉柱), Liu J-R(刘金荣). Response to sodium chloride stress at germination and seedling and identification of salinity tolerant genotypes in foxtail millet landraces originated from China. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34: 2218−2222 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[29]Guo X-Y(郭喜英). Phylogenetic and Expression Analysis of CBL Gene Family in Plants and Functional Analysis of CBL Genes in Zea mays. MS Disseratation of China Agricultural University Press, 2007. pp 19−20 (in Chinese)



[30]Lewit-Bentley A, Rety S. EF-hand calcium-binding proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 2000, 10: 637–643



[31]Kolukisaoglu U, Weinl S, Blazevic D, Bastistic O, Kudla J. Calcium sensors and their interacting protein kinases: Genomics of the Arabidopsis and rice CBL-CIPK signaling networks. Plant Physiol, 2004, 134: 43–58



[32]Song R, Llaca V, Messing J. Mosaic organization of orthologous sequences in grass genomes. Genome Res, 2002, 13: 1549–1555



[33]Langham R J, Walsh J, Dunn M, Ko C, Goff S A, Freeling M. Genomic duplication, fractionation and the origin of regulatory novelty. Genetics, 2004, 166: 935–945



[34]Brunner S, Keller B, Feuillet C. A large rearrangement involving genes and low-copy DNA interrupts the microcollinearity between rice and barley at the Rph7 locus. Genetics, 2003, 164: 673–683



[35]Ilic K, SanMiguel P J, Bennetzen J L. A complex history of rearrangement in an orthologous region of the maize, sorghum, and rice genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003, 100: 12265–12270



[36]Ramakrishna W, Emberton J, SanMiguel P, Ogden M, Llaca V, Messing J, Bennetzen J L. Comparative sequence analysis of the sorghum Rph region and the maize Rp1 resistance gene complex. Plant Physiol, 2002b, 130: 1728–1738



[37]Lai J, Ma J, Swigonova Z, Ramakrishna W, Linton E, Llaca V, Tanyolac B, Park Y J, Jeong O Y, Bennetzen J L, Messing J. Gene loss and movement in the maize genome. Genome Res, 2004, 14: 1924–1931



[38]Swigonova Z, Lai J, Ma J, Ramakrishna W, Llaca V, Bennetzen J L, Messing J. Close split of maize and sorghum genome progenitors. Genome Res, 2004, 14: 1916–1923



[39]Zhang J-W(张俊文), Wei J-H(魏建华), Wang H-Z(王宏芝), Wang Y-Z(王彦珍), Ma R-C(马荣才), Li R-F(李瑞芬). The role and mechanism of CBL/CIPK signaling system response to stress in Plant. Prog Nat Sci (自然科学进展), 2008, 18: 841–846 (in Chinese)

[1] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[2] 马小倩, 秦娜, 代书桃, 秦家范, 李小艳, 王淑婷, 刘忠玲, 李君霞. 175份谷子种质在2种环境下的表型变异分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1757-1773.
[3] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[4] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[5] 宋裕祯, Bheel Chander Kumar, 王跃, 张颖星, 郭娟, Khound Rituraj, Santra Dipak Kumar, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. 糜子AP2亚家族全基因组鉴定及PmAP2-1和PmAP2-9耐盐功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1127-1139.
[6] 牛丽, 王勇胜, 王长杰, 张宏, 孟亚雄, 李葆春, 杨轲, 马小乐, 姚立蓉, 司二静, 王化俊, 汪军成. 大麦NAC基因家族鉴定分析及HvNAC38的耐盐功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 688-707.
[7] 汪玲, 胡好, 宋家凤, 程洁蓝, 陈颖, 郑婷婷, 吕钊彦, 朱晓彪, 侯华兰. 马铃薯UDP-糖基转移酶基因StUGT52的克隆及功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 665-676.
[8] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[9] 刘吉昌, 李思烨, 李雪婷, 王洪章, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 任昊. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型夏玉米品种根系生长及养分吸收效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 565-577.
[10] 李诗晴, 王茜, 王素华, 张耀文, 王丽侠. 绿豆种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定及相关基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 376-388.
[11] 黄丽霞, 张卫卫, 甄一越, 王秋宝, 田洪岭, 李国栋, 刘龙龙, 张丽君. 盐胁迫下苦荞萌发期耐盐碱性评价及种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 459-479.
[12] 张晴, 杨昱, 郭茜, 岳霈尧, 殷丛丛, 牛景萍, 赵晋忠, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmARA6a的克隆及响应盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 480-493.
[13] 杨飚, 杜帅康, 张继旺, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 马铃薯III类POD基因家族的全基因组鉴定及其表达谱分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 405-420.
[14] 亓青松, 牛翔雨, 刘冰可, 康禄, 王琛, 封德顺. 小偃麦辐射诱变种质芽期和苗期耐盐鉴定、筛选及耐盐指标评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 389-404.
[15] 王菲菲, 张胜忠, 杨贵华, 苗华荣, 胡晓辉, 张则林, 刘莎莎, 乔利仙, 单世华, 陈静. 331份花生种质苗期耐盐性综合评价和强耐盐种质鉴选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 279-294.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!