作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (09): 1562-1568.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01562
陈春侠**,陆明洋**,尚爱兰,王玉民,席章营*
CHEN Chun-Xia**,LU Ming-Yang**,SHANG Ai-Lan,WANG Yu-Min,XI Zhang-Ying*
摘要:
籽粒大小是影响玉米产量的关键因素。本研究基于59份玉米染色体单片段代换系(SSSL)纯合体,对玉米百粒重性状进行2年6个试验环境的表型鉴定,利用t测验和重叠群作图的方法对SSSL内代换片段上的百粒重效应进行了QTL分析。共检测出20个百粒重QTL,分布在玉米的8条染色体上,其中14个(70.0%)在2个以上试验环境中被重复检出,4个(20.0%)在4个以上试验环境中被重复检出,在全部6个试验环境中重复检出且基因加性效应值较大的玉米百粒重QTL是位于玉米第5染色体Bin5.05区SSR分子标记bnlg278和umc1680附近的q100kw-5-3。研究结果为玉米籽粒大小性状相关基因的进一步精细定位和克隆奠定了基础。
| [1]Peng B(彭勃), Wang Y(王阳), Li Y-X(李永祥), Liu C(刘成), Liu Z-Z(刘志斋), Wang D(王迪), Tan W-W(谭巍巍), Zhang Y(张岩), Sun B-C(孙宝成), Shi Y-S(石云素), Song Y-C(宋燕春), Wang T-Y(王天宇), Li Y(黎裕). QTL analysis for yield components and kernel-related traits in maize under different water regimes. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(11): 1832–1842 (in Chinese with English abstract)[2]Tang J-H(汤继华), Yan J-B(严建兵), Ma X-Q(马西青), Teng W-T(滕文涛), Meng Y-J(孟义江), Dai J-R(戴景瑞), Li J-S(李建生). Genetic dissection for grain yield and its components using an “Immortalized F2 Population” in maize. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(8): 1299–1303 (in Chinese with English abstract)[3]Zhao P(赵璞), Liu R-X(刘瑞响), Li C-P(李成璞), Xing X-R(邢向茹), Cao X-L(曹晓良), Tao Y-S(陶勇生), Zhang Z-X(张祖新). QTL mapping for grain yield associated traits using Ye478 introgression lines in maize. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2011, 44(17): 3508–3519 (in Chinese with English abstract)[4]Messmer R, Fracheboud Y, Banziger M, Vargas M, Stamp P, Ribaut J M. Drought stress and tropical maize: QTL-by-environment interactions and stability of QTLs across environments for yield components and secondary traits. Theor Appl Genet, 2009, 119: 913–930[5]Doebley J, Bacigalupo A, Stec A. Inheritance of kernel weight in two maize-teosinte hybrid populations: Implications for crop evolution. Heredity, 1994, 85: 191–195[6]Goldman I L, Rocheford T R, Dudley J W. Molecular markers associated with maize kernel oil concentration in an Illinois high protein × Illinois low protein cross. Crop Sci, 1994, 34: 908–915[7]Xi Z-Y(席章营), Wu J-Y(吴建宇). Prospect of the secondary populations in crop. J Agric Biotechnol (农业生物技术学报), 2006, 14 (1): 128–134 (in Chinese with English abstract)[8]Eshed Y, Zamir D. An introgression line population of Lyeopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield associated QTL. Genetics, 1995, 141: 1147–1162[9]He F-H(何凤华). Development of single segment substitution lines (SSSLs) and QTL analysis in rice(Oryza sativa L.). PhD Dissertation of South China Agricultural University, 2003 (in Chinese with English abstract) [10]Xi Z-Y(席章营). Identification and mapping of QTLs based on chromosome single segment substitution lines in rice (Oryza sativa L.). PhD Dissertation of South China Agricultural University (华南农业大学), 2004 (in Chinese with English abstract) [11]He F H, Xi Z Y, Zeng R Z, Talukdar A, Zhang G Q. Identification of QTLs for plant height and its components by using single segment substitution lines in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice Sci, 2005, 12: 151–156[12]Liu G F, Zhang Z M, Zhu H T, Zhao F M, Ding X H, Zeng R Z, Li W T, Zhang G Q. Detection of QTLs with additive effects and additive-by-environment interaction effects on panicle number in rice (Oryza sativa L.) with single segment substitution lines. Theor Appl Genet, 2008, 116: 923–931 [13]Wang B-T(王帮太), Zhang S-H(张书红), Xi Z-Y(席章营). QTL Mapping for ear length based on chromosome single segment substitution lines of 87-1 Zong3 in maize. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2012, 20(3):9–14 (in Chinese with English abstract) [14]Lu M Y, Li X H, Shang A L, Wang Y M, Xi Z Y. Characterization of a set of chromosome single-segment substitution lines derived from two sequenced elite maize inbred lines. Maydica, 2012, 56: 399–407[15]Liu G F, Zeng R Z, Zhu H T, Zhang Z M, Ding X H, Zhao F M, Li W T, Zhang G Q. Dynamic expression of nine QTLs for tiller number detected with single segment substitution lines in rice. Theor Appl Genet, 2009, 118: 443–453 [16]Zhang N, Brewer M T, van der Knaap E. Fine mapping of fw3.2 controlling fruit weight in tomato. Theor Appl Genet, 2012, 125: 273–284[17]Frary A, Nesbitt T C, Frary A, Grandillo S, van der Knaap E, Cong B, Liu J, Meller J, Elber R, Alpert KB, Tanksley S D. fw2.2: A quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science, 2000, 289: 85–88[18]Paterson A H, DeVerna J W, Lanini B, Tanksley S D. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using selected overlapping recombinant chromosomes, in an interspecies cross of tomato. Genetics, 1990, 124: 735–742[19]McCouch S R, Cho Y G, Yano M, Paul E, Blinstruub M, Morishima H, Kinosita T. Report on QTL nomenclature. Rice Genet Newsl, 1997, 14: 11–13[20]Guo J F, Su G Q, Zhang J P, Wang G Y. Genetic analysis and QTL mapping of maize yield and associate agronomic traits under semi-arid land condition. Afr J Biotechnol, 2008, 7:1829–1838[21]Lu G H, Tang J H, Yan J B, Ma X Q, Li J S, Chen S J, Ma J C, Liu Z X, Zhu L, Zhang Y R, Dai J R. Quantitative trait loci mapping of maize yield and its components under different water treatments at flowering time. J Integr Plant Biol, 2006, 48: 1233−1243[22]Yang J-P(杨俊品), Rong T-Z(荣廷昭), Xiang D-Q(向道权), Tang H-T(唐海涛), Huang L-J(黄烈健), Dai J-R(戴景瑞). QTL mapping of quantitative traits in maize. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(2): 188–196 (in Chinese with English abstract)[23]Veldboom L R, Lee M. Molecular-marker-facilitated studies of morphological traits in maize. II: Determination of QTLs for grain yield and yield components. Theor Appl Genet, 1994, 89: 451–458[24]Yan J-B(严建兵), Tang H(汤华), Huang Y-Q(黄益勤), Zheng Y-L(郑用琏), Chander S, Li J-S(李建生). QTL mapping major and epistatic analysis for yield and yield components using molecular markers. Chin Sci Bull (科学通报), 2006, 51(12):1413–1421 (in Chinese)[25]Li J Z, Zhang Z W, Li Y L, Wang Q L, Zhou Y G. QTL consistency and meta-analysis for grain yield components in three generations in maize. Theor Appl Genet, 2011, 122: 771–782[26]Melchinger A E, Utz H F, Schon C C. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using different testers and independent population samples in maize reveals low power of QTL detection and large bias in estimates of QTL effects. Genetics, 1998, 149: 383–403[27]Yan J B, Tang H, Huang Y Q, Zheng Y L, Li J S. Quantitative trait loci mapping and epistatic analysis for grain yield and yield components using molecular markers with an elite maize hybrid. Euphytica, 2006, 149: 121–131[28]Yang J-P(杨俊品), Rong T-Z(荣廷昭). Improvement of RFLP marker facilitated studies of QTLs in maize. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 1999, 7(1): 18–24 (in Chinese with English abstract)[29]Liu Z-H(刘宗华), Tang J-H(汤继华), Wei X-T(卫晓轶), Wang C-L(王春丽), Tian G-W(田国伟), Hu Y-M(胡彦民), Chen W-C(陈伟程). QTL mapping of ear traits under low and high nitrogen conditions in maize. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2007, 40(11): 2409–2417 (in Chinese with English abstract)[30]Yang G H, Li Y L, Wang Q L, Zhou Y G, Zhou Q, Shen B T, Zhang F F, Liang X J. Detection and integration of quantitative trait loci or grain yield components and oil content in two connected recombinant inbred line populations of high-oil maize. Mol Breed, 2012, 29: 313–333[31]Lan J-H(兰进好), Li X-H(李新海), Gao S-R(高树仁), Zhang B-S(张宝石), Zhang S-H(张世煌). QTL analysis of yield components in maize under different environments. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(10): 1253–1259 (in Chinese with English abstract) [32]Xiang D-Q(向道权), Cao H-H(曹海河), Cao Y-G(曹永国), Yang J-P(杨俊品), Huang J-J(黄烈健), Wang S-C(王守才), Dai J-R(戴景瑞). Construction of a yield genetic map and location of for component traits in maize by quantitative trait loci SSR markers. Acta Genet Sin (遗传学报), 2001, 28(8): 778–784 (in Chinese with English abstract)[33]Austin D F, Lee M. Detection of quantitative trait loci for grain yield and yield components in maize across generations in stress and nonstress environments. Crop Sci, 1998, 38: 1296–1308[34]Wang Y(王阳), Liu C(刘成), Wang T-Y(王天宇), Shi Y-S(石云素), Song Y-C(宋燕春), Li Y(黎裕). QTL analysis of yield components in maize under diferent water regirues. J Plant Genet Resour (植物遗传资源学报), 2007, 8(2): 179–183 (in Chinese with English abstract)[35]Ma J-L(马金亮). Analysis of QTL for yield and related traits using founder inbred lines in maize. Master dissertation of Henan Agricultural University, 2010 (in Chinese with English abstract)[36]Yano M, Kojima S, Takahashi Y, Lin H X, Sasaki T. Genetic control of flowering time in rice, a short-day plant. Plant Physiol, 2001, 127: 1425–1429[37]Yano M, Harushima Y, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, Minobe Y, Sasaki T. Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling heading date in rice using a high-density linkage map. Theor Appl Genet, 1997, 95: 1025–1032[38]Lin S Y, Sasaki T, Yano M. Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling seed dormancy and heading date in rice, Oryza sativa L., using backcross inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet, 1998, 96: 997–1003[39]Yamamoto T, Lin H X, Sasaki T, Yano M. Identification of heading date quantitative trait locus Hd6 and characterization of its epistatic interactions with Hd2 in rice using advanced backcross progeny. Genetics, 2000, 154: 885–891[40]Lin H X, Ashikari M, Yamanouchi U, Sasaki T, Yano M. Identification and characterization of a quantitative trait locus Hd9, controlling heading date in rice. Breed Sci, 2002, 52: 35–41[41]LeCLere S, Schmelz E A, Chourey P S. Sugar levels regulate tryptophan-dependent auxin biosynthesis in developing maize kernels. Plant Physiol, 2010, 153: 306–318[42]Sheridan W F, Neuffer M G. Defective kernel mutants of maize II. Morphological and embryo culture studies. Genetics, 1980, 95:945–960[43]Sheridan W F, Neuffer M G. Genetic control of embryo and endosperm development in maize. In: Reddy G M, Coe E H, eds. Gene Structure and Function in Higher Plants. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing Company, 1986. pp 105–122[44]Scanlon M J, Stinard P S, James M G, Myers A M, Robertson D S. Genetic analysis of 63 mutations affecting maize kernel development isolated from mutator stocks. Genetics, 1994, 136: 281-294[45]Neuffer M G, Sheridan W, Bendbow E. Rescue of lethal defective kernel mutants by genetic manipulation. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter, 1978, 52:84-88[46]Neuffer M G, England D J. Induced mutations with confirmed locations. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter, 1995, 69:43-46[47]Lai J S, Li R Q, Xu X, Jin W W, Xu M L, Zhao H N, Xiang Z K, Song W B, Ying K, Zhang M, Jiao Y P, Ni P X, Zhang J G, Li D, Guo X S, Ye K X, Jian M, Wang B, Zheng H S, Liang H Q, Zhang X Q, Wang S C, Chen S J, Li J S, Fu Y, Springer N M, Yang H M, Wang J, Dai J R, Schnable P S, Wang J. Genome-wide patterns of genetic variation among elite maize inbred lines. Nat Genet, 2010, 42: 1027–1030 |
| [1] | 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901. |
| [2] | 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801. |
| [3] | 郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657. |
| [4] | 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308. |
| [5] | 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325. |
| [6] | 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590. |
| [7] | 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352. |
| [8] | 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500. |
| [9] | 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364. |
| [10] | 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180. |
| [11] | 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005. |
| [12] | 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021. |
| [13] | 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789. |
| [14] | 郭向阳, 涂亮, 王栋, 刘鹏飞, 王安贵, 易强, 任洪, 李刚, 祝云芳, 吴迅, 蒋喻林, 田丰, 陈泽辉. 热带Suwan种质在我国玉米种质改良中的创新与利用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 655-664. |
| [15] | 孟成, 王哲. 玉米ZmPFK基因家族全基因组鉴定及响应胁迫表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 764-779. |
|
||