欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (08): 1507-1513.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01507

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同种植密度对甜高粱糖分积累及SS、SPS活性的影响

陈维维1,再吐尼古丽•库尔班2,涂振东2,叶凯2,*   

  1. 1 新疆农业大学食品学院，新疆乌鲁木齐 830052；2 新疆农业科学院生物质能源研究所，新疆乌鲁木齐 830091
  • 收稿日期:2012-12-04 修回日期:2013-04-15 出版日期:2013-08-12 网络出版日期:2013-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 叶凯，E-mail: yekai486@sohu.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金地区基金项目(31060036)和新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金项目(2010211B27)资助。

Effects of Different Planting Densities on Sugar Accumulation and Activities of Sucrose Synthase and Sucrose Phosphate Synthase of Sweet Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench

CHEN Wei-Wei1,Zaituniguli•KUERBAN2,TU Zhen-Dong2,YE Kai2,*   

  1. 1 College of food Sciences, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China; 2 Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
  • Received:2012-12-04 Revised:2013-04-15 Published:2013-08-12 Published online:2013-05-20
  • Contact: 叶凯，E-mail: yekai486@sohu.com

RichHTML

PDF

1121

被引次数

4

摘要：

对甜高粱2个品种XT-2、T601设置7个不同种植密度处理，分析了甜高粱不同生育阶段总糖含量、还原糖含量、蔗糖含量、SS和SPS活性的变化。2个品种的总糖含量随生长进程均升高，成熟期达最高值。其还原糖的变化趋势不一致，XT-2呈升高-平缓-降低的趋势，T601呈升高-降低的趋势。2个品种在整个生育期蔗糖含量均呈升高的趋势，成熟期达最高值。T601除密度处理B6 (6170株 hm–2)外其他处理SS活性均呈升高-降低-升高的趋势，XT-2无明显规律。XT-2除密度处理B2 (11 110株 hm–2)、B4 (7929株 hm–2)外其他处理SPS活性均呈升高-降低-升高的趋势，T601无明显规律。综上所述，甜高粱品种XT-2最适于糖分积累的密度为9250 株 hm–2，成熟期总糖含量达14.2% (鲜基)，T601的最适密度为11 110株 hm–2，成熟期总糖含量达14.31%(鲜基)，作为积累糖的原料，后者为最佳选择。完熟期SS活性下降、SPS活性上升有利于糖的积累，为最佳收获时期。

关键词: 甜高粱, 密度, 糖类, 蔗糖合成酶(SS), 蔗糖磷酸合成酶(SPS)

Abstract:

Two sweet sorghum varieties (XT-2 and T601) with seven different planting densities of treatments, were need to analyze the reducing sugar, total sugar content, sucrose content, activities of SS and SPS at different growing stages. The total sugar content in two varieties had the same, increasing tendency with the highest value at mature period.The reducing sugar content changed in a tendency of increasing maintaining decreasing in XT-2, and in a tendency of increasing, reducing in T601. The sucrose contents of the two varieties showed the same increasing tendency with the highest value at mature period. In addition to the density treatment B6 (6170 plants ha–1), SS activity showed a tendency of rising-decreasing-hiding in T601, and no obvious changing hale in XT-2. Except for density treatment B2 (11 110 plants ha–1), B4 (7929 plants ha–1), SPS activity showed a tendency of rising-reducing-rising in XT-2, and no obvious rule in T601.For XT-2, the optimal density was 9250 plants ha–1, the total sugar content was 14.2% (on a fresh matter basis), for T601 the optimal density was 11 110 plants ha–1, the total sugar content was 14.31% (on a fresh matter basis). The latter is the best choice for total sugar accumulation. Activity of SS is decline, SPS activity Declined and increased. SPS activity in the full ripening stage are favorable to sugar accumulation. In this care, it is the best time for harvest.

Key words: Sweet sorghum, Plant density, Saccharide, Sucrose synthase (SS), Sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS)

[1] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[2] 娄洪祥, 姬建利, 蒯婕, 汪波, 徐亮, 李真, 刘芳, 黄威, 刘暑艳, 尹羽丰, 王晶, 周广生. 种植密度对油菜正反交组合产量与倒伏相关性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1724-1740.
[3] 陈云, 刘昆, 张宏路, 李思宇, 张亚军, 韦佳利, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 机插密度和穗肥减量对优质食味水稻品种籽粒淀粉合成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1540-1550.
[4] 郑迎霞, 陈杜, 魏鹏程, 卢平, 杨锦越, 罗上轲, 叶开梅, 宋碧. 种植密度对贵州春玉米茎秆抗倒伏性能及籽粒产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 738-751.
[5] 董二伟, 王劲松, 武爱莲, 王媛, 王立革, 韩雄, 郭珺, 焦晓燕. 行距和密度对高粱籽粒灌浆、淀粉及氮磷钾累积特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2459-2470.
[6] 张金丹, 范虹, 杜进勇, 殷文, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强. 小麦玉米同步增密有利于优化种间关系而提高间作产量[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2481-2489.
[7] 任媛媛, 张莉, 郁耀闯, 张彦军, 张岁岐. 大豆种植密度对玉米/大豆间作系统产量形成的竞争效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(10): 1978-1987.
[8] 赵小红,白羿雄,王凯,姚有华,姚晓华,吴昆仑. 种植密度对2个青稞品种抗倒伏及秸秆饲用特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(4): 586-595.
[9] 金容,李钟,杨云,周芳,杜伦静,李小龙,孔凡磊,袁继超. 密度和株行距配置对川中丘区夏玉米群体光分布及雌雄穗分化的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(4): 614-630.
[10] 郑飞娜,初金鹏,张秀,费立伟,代兴龙,贺明荣. 播种方式与种植密度互作对大穗型小麦品种产量和氮素利用率的调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(3): 423-431.
[11] 王士红,杨中旭,史加亮,李海涛,宋宪亮,孙学振. 增密减氮对棉花干物质和氮素积累分配及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(3): 395-407.
[12] 刘俊华, 吴正锋, 沈浦, 于天一, 郑永美, 孙学武, 李林, 陈殿绪, 王才斌, 万书波. 氮肥与密度互作对单粒精播花生根系形态、植株性状及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(10): 1605-1616.
[13] 王素芳,薛惠云,张志勇,汤菊香. 棉花根系生长与叶片衰老的协调性[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(01): 93-101.
[14] 杜进勇,柴强,王一帆,范虹,胡发龙,殷文,李登业. 地上地下互作强度对小麦间作玉米光合特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1398-1406.
[15] 赵松超,李一凡,刘博远,赵铭钦. 晾制密度对雪茄烟叶膜脂过氧化作用及品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(7): 1090-1098.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2