欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 2183-2191.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.02183

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

超高产夏玉米花粒期不同部位叶片衰老与抗氧化酶特性

王永军1,2,3,杨今胜2,袁翠平3,柳京国2,李登海2,*,董树亭1,*   

  1. 1作物生物学国家重点实验室 / 山东农业大学农学院, 山东泰安 271018；2山东登海种业股份有限公司 / 山东省玉米育种与栽培技术重点实验室, 山东莱州 261448；3吉林省农业科学院 / 玉米国家工程实验室, 吉林长春 130033
  • 收稿日期:2013-03-04 修回日期:2013-06-09 出版日期:2013-12-12 网络出版日期:2013-10-01
  • 通讯作者: 董树亭, 李登海, E-mail: stdong@sdau.edu.cn, Tel: 0538-8245838 / 0535-2788917
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(30900878和31201159)，国家科技支撑计划项目(2013BAD07B02和2011BAD16B10)和山东省泰山学者专项(ts200648033)资助。

Characteristics of Senescence and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities in Leaves at Different Plant Parts of Summer Maize with the Super-high Yielding Potential after Anthesis

WANG Yong-Jun1,2,3,YANG Jin-Sheng2,YUAN Cui-Ping3,LIU Jing-Guo2,LI Deng-Hai2,*,DONG Shu-Ting1,*   

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology / College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China; 2 Shandong Denghai Seed-Breeding Co. Ltd. / Key Laboratory of Maize Breeding and Culture of Shandong Province, Laizhou 261448, China; 3 Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences / National Engineering Laboratory for Maize, Changchun 130033, China
  • Received:2013-03-04 Revised:2013-06-09 Published:2013-12-12 Published online:2013-10-01

RichHTML

PDF

2118

被引次数

26

摘要：

为探讨超高产玉米叶源衰老特征, 揭示其抗氧化关键酶及膜脂过氧化特性, 为玉米衰老调控和高产栽培提供依据, 本研究在大田条件下, 以我国创高产纪录的夏玉米为例, 从单株水平上对高产纪录试验(EHYR)和普通生产田(MCFF)玉米叶片衰老及抗氧化酶特性比较表明, EHYR产量达19 349 kg hm-2, 是MCFF的2.28倍。MCFF和EHYR叶片分别在开花后30 d和50 d进入速衰期, MCFF叶片衰老比EHYR提前20 d；速衰期EHYR叶面积降幅比MCFF低5.7%。EHYR在籽粒灌浆后期, 中上部叶片净光合速率较高, 可溶性蛋白含量明显高于MCFF, 而MDA含量则维持较低水平。在叶片衰老过程中, 自开花后20 d开始, EHYR上部和中部叶片SOD活性较高, 下部叶片则以SOD、POD和CAT三者活性较高；MCFF仅中部叶片POD和CAT活性较高。EHYR叶片衰老程度与CAT活性极显著负相关, MCFF叶片衰老与SOD和POD活性显著负相关, 且二者叶片衰老进程中SOD、POD、CAT的直接作用大于间接作用。与MCFF相比, EHYR叶片除具较高SOD和POD活性外, 在籽粒灌浆后期同时保持较高CAT活性和可溶性蛋白含量是降低膜脂过氧化程度, 延缓叶片衰老的重要原因。开花后20 d是EHYR与MCFF叶片衰老出现差异的生理临界点, 因而在此时期之前调控更有利于延缓衰老。

关键词: 夏玉米, 超高产, 开花后, 叶片衰老, 抗氧化酶

Abstract:

Grain yield improvement of maize (Zea mays L.) has been evidently associated with delayed leaf senescence during the grain-filling period after anthesis. The object of this study was to explore senescence characteristics and antioxidant enzyme activities after flowering in different position leaves of summer maize with high yield record for providing references of regulating the leaf senescence and achieving the higher yield in China. A field experiment planted Denghai 661, a new hybrid with high-yielding potential, was carried out to compare the experiment of maize with high yield record (EHYR) and the maize grown in conventional farmers’ field (MCFF) in individual level from 2005 to 2007. And the parameters related to the leaf senescence, such as leaf area (LA), LA reduction, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), soluble protein content, activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT), and malondialdehyde (MDA) content, were determined in this research. The grain yield of EHYR was 2.18 times greater than that of MCFF, reaching 19 349 kg ha-1. The rapid senescence time of EHYR leaves and MCFF leaves were found at 30 and 50 days after anthesis, respectively. Therefore, the leaf senescence of EHYR was 20 days earlier than that of MCFF. At the rapid senescence stage, the leaf area reduction of EHYR was 5.7% lower than that of MCFF. During the later period of leaf senescence, the net photosynthetic rate was higher in top and middle leaves than in bottom leaves. Furthermore, the soluble protein content in leaves of EHYR was higher than that of MCFF, but the MDA content was on the contrary. At 20 days after anthesis, the SOD activities in top and middle leaves of EHYR were higher than those of MCFF, while the SOD, POD, and CAT activities in bottom leaves of EHYR were higher than those of MCFF. On the contrary, the POD and CAT activities in middle leaves of MCFF were higher than those of EHYR. Results of both correlation analysis and path analysis indicated that the leaf reduction was negatively correlated with the CAT activity significantly in EHYR, also with the SOD and POD activities significantly in MCFF, and the direct effects were higher than the indirect effects of SOD, POD, and CAT in both EHYR and MCFF. Compared with MCFF treatment, besides higher SOD and POD activities, EHYR had higher CAT activities and soluble protein content resulting in declined lipid peroxidation during grain-filling period, which caused delayed leaf senescence and leaf senescence degree. There were obvious differences at 20 days post-anthesis in maize leaf senescence physiologically. Between EHYR and MCFF suggesting that the 20–30 days after anthesis is a critical period, and all the related agronomy measures should be recommended to be taken before this phase in maize production.

Key words: Summer maize, Super-high yielding potential, After anthesis, Leaf senescence, Antioxidant enzyme

[1]Gardner F P, Pearce R B, Mitchell R L. Physiology of Crop Plant. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1985. pp 3–30



[2]Li S-K(李少昆), Wang C-T(王崇桃). Potential and Ways to High Yield in Maize (玉米高产潜力途径). Beijing: Science Press, 2010. pp 217–354 (in Chinese)



[3]Tollenaar M, Daynard T B. Leaf senescence in short season maize hybrids. Can J Plant Sci, 1978, 58: 869–874



[4]Valentinuz O R, Tollenaar M. Vertical profile of leaf senescence during the grain-filling period in older and newer maize hybrids. Crop Sci, 2004, 44: 827–834



[5]Rajcana I, Dwyerb L M, Tollenaara M. Note on relationship between leaf soluble carbohydrate and chlorophyll concentrations in maize during leaf senescence. Field Crops Res, 1999, 63: 13–17



[6]Feller U K, Soong T S, Hageman R H. Leaf proteolytic activities and senescence during grain development of field-grown corn (Zea mays L.). Plant Physiol, 1977, 59: 290–294



[7]Gan S, Amasino R M. Inhibition of leaf senescence by autoregulated production of cytokinin. Science, 1995, 270: 1986–1988



[8]Guo Y, Gan S. Leaf senescence: signals, execution, and regulation. Curr Top Dev Biol, 2005, 71: 83–112



[9]Lim P O, Kim H J, Nam H G. Leaf senescence. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2007, 58: 115–136



[10]Pastori G M, IHppi V S. Antioxidative protection in a drought-resistant maize strain during leaf senescence. Physiol Plant, 1993, S7: 227–231



[11]Hodges D M, Andrews C J, Johnson D A, Hamilton R I. Antioxidant enzyme responses to chilling stress in differentially sensitive inbred maize lines. J Exp Bot, 1997, 48(310): 1105–1113



[12]Colomb B, Kiniry J R, Debaeke P. Effect of soil phosphorus on leaf development and senescence dynamics of field-grown maize. Agron J, 2000, 92: 428–435



[13]Borrás L, Maddonni G A, Otegui M E. Leaf senescence in maize hybrids: plant population, row spacing and kernel set effects. Field Crops Res, 2003, 82: 13–26



[14]Erley G S, Begum N, Worku M, Bänziger M, Horst W J. Leaf senescence induced by nitrogen deficiency as indicator of genotypic differences in nitrogen efficiency in tropical maize. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci, 2007, 170: 106–114



[15]Hu T, Yuan L, Wang J, Kang S, Li F. Antioxidation responses of maize roots and leaves to partial root-zone irrigation. Agr Water Manage, 2010, 98: 164–171



[16]Zhang R-H(张仁和), Zheng Y-J(郑友军), Ma G-S(马国胜), Zhang X-H(张兴华), Lu H-D(路海东), Shi J-T(史俊通), Xue J-Q(薛吉全). Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic traits and protective enzyme activity in maize seeding. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2011, 31(5): 1303–1311 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]Stoddart J L, Thomas H. Leaf senescence. In: Boulter D, Parthier B, eds. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1982. pp 592–636



[18]Betania F Q, Yoo-Sun N. Molecular aspects of leaf senescence. Trends Plant Sci, 2000, 5: 278–282



[19]Buchanan-Wollaston V. The molecular biology of leaf senescence. J Exp Bot, 1997, 48: 181–1991



[20]Dong S-T(董树亭). Eco-Physiology and Formation of Yield and Quality in Maize (玉米生态生理与产量品质形成). Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006. pp 3–43, 49–113, 347–416 (in Chinese)



[21]Fageria N K, Baligar V C, Clark R B. Physiology of Crop Production. New York, London, Oxford: Food Products Press, 2005. pp 72–82



[22]Bradford M M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein using the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem, 1976, 72: 248–254



[23]Giannopolitis C N, Ries S K. Superoxide dismutases: I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol, 1977, 59: 309–314



[24]Hernandez J A, Jimenez A, Mullineaux P, Sevilla F. Tolerance of pea (Pisum sativum L.) to long-term salt stress is associated with induction of antioxidant defenses. Plant Cell Environ, 2000, 23: 853–862



[25]Samantary S. Biochemical responses of Cr-tolerant and Cr-sensitive mung bean cultivars grown on varying levels of chromium. Chemosphere, 2002, 47: 1065–1072



[26]Heath R L, Packer L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplast: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acids peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys, 1968, 125: 189–198



[27]Wang Q-C(王庆成), Liu K-C(刘开昌). Theory and practices of high-yielding maize cultivation in Shandong. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2004, 12(suppl-2): 60–62 (in Chinese) 



[28]He P(何萍), Jin J-Y(金继运). Effect of N and K nutrition on changes of endogenous hormone and metabolism of active oxygen during leaf senescence in spring maize. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 1999, 5(4): 289–296 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[29]Crafts-Brandner S J, Poneleit C G. Effect of ear removal on CO2 exchange and activities of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase of maize hybrids and inbred lines. Plant Physiol, 1987, 84: 261–265



[30]Wang Y-J(王永军). Study on Population Quality and Individual Physiology Function of Super High-Yielding Maize (Zea mays L.). PhD Dissertation of Shandong Agricultural University, 2008 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[31]Huang Z-X(黄振喜), Wang Y-J(王永军), Wang K-J(王空军), Li D-H(李登海), Zhao M(赵明), Liu J-G(柳京国), Dong S-T(董树亭), Wang H-J(王洪军), Wang J-H(王军海), Yang J-S(杨今胜). Photosynthetic traits of over-15000 kg ha-1 summer maize hybrids during grain filling. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2007, 40(9): 1898–1906 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[32]Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutases. Annu Rev Biochem, 1975, 44: 147–159



[33]Islam M R, Hu Y, Mao S, Jia P, Enejid A E, Xue X. Effects of water-saving superabsorbent polymer on antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in corn (Zea mays L.) under drought stress. J Sci Food Agric, 2011, 91: 813–819



[34]Ge T-D(葛体达), Sui F-G(隋方功), Bai L-P(白莉萍), Lü Y-Y(吕银燕), Zhou G-S(周广胜). Effects of water stress on the protective enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in roots and leaves of summer maize. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2005, 38 (5): 922–928 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[35]Shao G-Q(邵国庆), Li Z-J(李增嘉), Ning T-Y(宁堂原), Jiang B-J(蒋保娟), Jiao N-Y(焦念元). Effects of irrigation and urea types on ear leaf senescence after anthesis, yield and economic benefit of maize. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2009, 42(10): 3459–3466 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[36]Nie L-X(聂乐兴), Jiang X-Y(姜兴印), Wu S-H(吴淑华), Zhang J-W(张吉旺), Liu P(刘鹏). Effects of DA-6 on leaf photosynthetic carboxylase and protective enzyme activities and grain yield of high-yielding summer maize. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2010, 21(10): 2558–2564 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[37]Wang K-J(王空军), Hu C-H(胡昌浩), Dong S-T(董树亭), Liu K-C(刘开昌), Sun Q-Q(孙庆泉). Changes of the protective enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation after anthesis among maize varieties planted in different years. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1999, 25(6): 700–706 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[2] 刘吉昌, 李思烨, 李雪婷, 王洪章, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 任昊. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型夏玉米品种根系生长及养分吸收效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 565-577.
[3] 林子晴, 钟醒宇, 刘樊, 任子澳, 马瑞, 邓秀峰, 王东伟, 刘少鹏, 陈康, 张明才, 李召虎, 周于毅, 段留生. 山东北部沿海平原区小麦-玉米周年两吨粮超高产技术创建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 631-643.
[4] 孔娜, 刘涛, 刘文婷, 陈刚, 文利超, 邓智超, 郭梅, 李伟, 郭永峰. 烟草NtCEP7基因克隆及其编码小肽在苗期抗旱中的作用分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 249-261.
[5] 刘海波, 张蕾, 王立琦, 石晓丽, 周文莹, 崔国贤, 佘玮. 苎麻BnGCL1基因响应干旱胁迫的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 14-27.
[6] 张清怡, 肖义涛, 李秋霞, 张钰石, 张明才, 李召虎. 渗透胁迫下不同玉米品种幼苗ABA合成及生理生化响应差异[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 221-232.
[7] 郭保卫, 王旺, 王开, 王岩, 曾鑫, 景秀, 王晶, 倪新华, 许轲, 张洪程. 长江中下游两类型糯稻高产群体动态特征及超高产形成规律[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2433-2453.
[8] 孟凡琦, 房孟颖, 罗艺, 卢霖, 董学瑞, 王亚菲, 郭丽娜, 闫鹏, 董志强, 张凤路. 乙烯利-甜菜碱-水杨酸合剂对夏玉米耐热性和产量的调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1299-1311.
[9] 李培华, 李杰, 孟祥宇, 孙玉晨, 冯永佳, 李云丽, 刁邓超, 赵雯, 吴玮, 韩德俊, 张嵩午, 郑炜君. 高温胁迫下冷型小麦的抗逆性评估及其生理响应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1118-1130.
[10] 宋利, 刘广周, 张华, 卢庭启, 卿春燕, 杨云山, 郭晓霞, 胡单, 李少昆, 侯鹏. 密植滴灌水肥一体化对西南夏玉米产量及土壤细菌群落的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 992-1004.
[11] 阳新月, 肖人滈, 张林茜, 唐铭均, 孙光燕, 杜康, 吕长文, 唐道彬, 王季春. 不同生育期涝渍对甘薯抗逆生理特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 744-754.
[12] 辛雨宁, 任昊, 王洪章, 梁明磊, 于涛, 刘鹏. 喷施6-苄氨基腺嘌呤(6-BA)对授粉后高温胁迫下夏玉米籽粒灌浆及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 418-431.
[13] 王丽萍, 李盼, 赵连豪, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 范虹, 何蔚, 柴强, 殷文. 西北绿洲灌区玉米叶片衰老特征对不同地膜覆盖利用方式的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 233-246.
[14] 孙照华, 任昊, 王洪章, 王子强, 姚海燕, 辛爱美, 赵斌, 张吉旺, 任佰朝, 刘鹏. 叶面喷施硅制剂对滨海盐碱地夏玉米叶片光合性能及籽粒产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2383-2395.
[15] 周香玉, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波, 张学昆. 甘蓝型油菜苗期响应渍害胁迫的生理调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 1015-1029.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2