欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11): 1964-1972.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01964

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

甘蓝型油菜苗期耐淹性状主基因+多基因遗传分析

金岩1,2,吕艳艳2,付三雄2,戚存扣2,*   

  1. 1 南京农业大学农学院, 江苏南京 210095; 2 江苏省农业科学院经济作物研究所, 江苏南京 210014
  • 收稿日期:2014-02-10 修回日期:2014-07-06 出版日期:2014-11-12 网络出版日期:2014-07-25
  • 通讯作者: 戚存扣, E-mail: qck9898@sina.com, Tel: 025-84390372, 025-84390367
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由引进国际先进农业科学技术计划(948计划)项目(2011-G23), 国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-13)和江苏省农业科技自主创新资金[CX(11)4009]资助。

Inheritance of Major Gene Plus Polygene of Water-logging Tolerance in Brassica napus L.

JIN Yan1,2,LÜ Yan-Yan2,FU San-Xiong2,QI Cun-Kou2,*   

  1. 1 College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; 2 Institute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
  • Received:2014-02-10 Revised:2014-07-06 Published:2014-11-12 Published online:2014-07-25
  • Contact: 戚存扣, E-mail: qck9898@sina.com, Tel: 025-84390372, 025-84390367

摘要:

长江中下游是中国油菜主产区,该地区油菜播栽期间雨水多,易产生湿害,造成产量下降。所以研究甘蓝型油菜苗期耐淹性的遗传规律,对选育耐淹性强油菜新品种,提高油菜产量意义重大。本文应用甘蓝型油菜品种WR-4 (耐淹)WR-5 (不耐淹)杂交后代衍生的6个世代(P1F1P2B1:2B2:2F2:3)群体为材料,全淹6 d后去水恢复生长,去水后第7天调查死苗率,以此为耐淹性指标,于201220136个世代群体家系进行耐淹性鉴定。应用植物数量性状主基因+多基因混合遗传模型多世代联合分析方法对耐淹性进行遗传分析。结果表明,2个年度该家系群体苗期耐淹性的最适遗传模型分别是E-0B-3,即2对加性-显性-上位性主基因+加性-显性-上位性多基因和2对加性主基因模型。由此可见,该家系群体甘蓝型油菜苗期耐淹性主要受2对主基因控制,主基因存在加性、显性和上位性效应。当有显性效应存在时(2012),主基因显性效应值|ha|=0.3475|hb|=0.0069大于主基因加性效应值|da|=|db|=0.0036B1:2B2:2F2:3群体的主基因遗传率(h2mg)2012年分别为36.25%61.40%61.84%,平均为53.16%2013年分别为8.30%30.48%43.13%;平均为27.30%2年平均,环境变异占表型变异的59.77%。上述结果表明,甘蓝型油菜苗期耐淹性受2对主基因型控制,但环境对耐淹性状的表型影响较大。F2:3家系群体苗期耐淹性遗传率较高,因此育种上可在早期世代对耐淹性状进行选择。

关键词: 甘蓝型油菜, 耐淹性, 主基因+多基因, 遗传分析

Abstract:

The middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River is a main producing region of canola (Brassica napus L.) in China. However, canola in this region is subjected to water-logging during planting period to reduce yield. It is of importance to study the inheritance of water-logging tolerance for canola. In this paper a family lines population of six generations of P1, F1, P2, B1:2, B2:2, F2:3 derived from the cross of WR-4 (resistant)×WR-5 (non-resistant) was used to analyse genetic segregation by applying major gene plus polygene mixed inheritance model. The seedling mortality was recorded on the 7th day after logging-removing for plant recovery following six days full-submergence treatment of the seedlings in 2012 and 2013. The results showed that the seedling mortality was respectively fitted the genetic model of E-0 and B-3 i.e. two pairs of additive- dominant-epistatic major gene plus additive-dominant-epistatic polygene model and two pairs of additive major genes model. This result confirms that water-logging tolerance of seedling in this cross is controlled mainly by two major genes which expressed in the mode of additive-dominant-epistatic effects. While dominant effects expressed (2012) it gave a higher value of |ha|=0.3475, |hb|=0.0069 than the additive effect of the major genes which was |da|=|db|=0.0036. In the populations of B1:2, B2:2, and F2:3, h2mg was 36.25%, 61.40%, and 61.84% respectively with an average of 53.16% in 2012, and 8.30%, 30.48%, and 43.13% respectively with an average of 27.30% in 2013. Variance from environment effects was 59.77% of the total phenotypic variance on an average in two years. A conclusion could be made that water-logging tolerance of seedling in B. napus is controlled by two major genes but heavily affected by environment. Since a higher value of h2mg was detected in F2:3 populations, selection in early generations might be an effective way for waterlogging tolerance breeding in B. napus.

Key words: Brassica napus L., Water-logging tolerance, Major gene plus polygene, Genetic model

[1]张冬晓. 我国油菜生产的发展与展望. 中国油料作物学报, 2001, 23: 80–82



Zhang D X, Developmental prospect of rapeseed production in China. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2001, 23: 80–82 (in Chinese)



[2]王汉中. 我国油菜产需形势分析及产业发展对策. 中国油料作物学报, 2007, 29: 101–105



Wang H Z. Strategy for rapeseed industry development based on the analysis of rapeseed production and demand in China. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2007,  29: 101–105 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]Leul M, Zhou W J. Alleviation of waterlogging damage in winter rape by application of uniconazole: effects on morphological characteristics, hormones and photosynthesis. Field Crops Res, 1998, 59: 121–127



[4]李真, 蒲圆圆, 高长斌, 周广生, 涂金星, 傅廷栋. 甘蓝型油菜DH群体苗期耐湿性的评价. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43: 286–292



Li Z, Pu Y Y, Gao C B, Zhou G S, Tu J X, Fu T D. Evaluation of waterlogging tolerance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) DH lines at seedling stage. Sci Agric Sin, 2010, 43: 286–292 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[5]Gutierrez B F H, Lavado R S, Porcelli C A. Note on the effects of winter and spring waterlogging on growth, chemical composition and yield of rapeseed. Field Crops Res, 1996, 47: 175–179



[6]Zhou W J, Lin X Q. Effects of waterlogging at different growth stages on physiological characteristics and seed yield of winter rape (Brassica napus L.). Field Crops Res, 1995, 44: 103–110



[7]胡官庆, 吴应元, 宋周元, 黄正勤. 油菜湿害表现及生理机制与预防. 安徽农业科学, 2000, 28(2): 171–171



Hu G Q, Wu Y Y, Song Z Y, Huang Z Q. Performance, physiological mechanisms and prevention of waterlogging in rapeseed. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2000, 28(2): 171–171 (in Chinese)



[8]戚存扣, 傅寿仲. 江苏油菜科学技术发展50年. 江苏农业学报, 2010, 26: 430–436



Qi C K, Fu S Z. Fifty years experience of development of cultivars and cultivation of oil-seed rape in Jiangsu Province. Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2010, 26: 430–436 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9]张洁夫, 戚存扣. 江苏油菜产业可持续发展的关键技术. 江苏农业学报, 2013, 29: 1236–1240



Zhang J F, Qi C K. Key technologies for sustainable development of rapeseed production in Jiangsu Province. Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2013, 29: 1236–1240 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]宋丰萍, 胡立勇, 周广生, 吴江生, 傅廷栋. 渍水时间对油菜生长及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2010, 36: 170–176



Song F P, Hu L Y, Zhou G S, Wu J S, Fu T D. Effects of waterlogging time on rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) growth and yield. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36: 170–176 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]李玲, 张春雷, 张树杰, 李光明. 渍水对冬油菜苗期生长及生理的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2011, 33: 247–252



Li L, Zhang C L, Zhang S J, Li G M. Effects of waterlogging on growth and physiological changes of winter rapeseed seedling (Brassica napus L.). Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2011, 33: 247–252 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[12]陈洁, 张学昆, 谌利, 晁国红, 李加纳. 甘蓝型油菜耐湿种质资源的快速筛选. 中国油料作物学报, 2006, 28: 138–143



Chen J, Zhang X K, Chen L, Chao G H, Li J N. Screening for waterlogging tolerance germplasm in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2006, 28: 138–143 (in Chinese)



[13]张学昆, 陈洁, 王汉中, 李加纳, 邹崇顺. 甘蓝型油菜耐湿性的遗传差异鉴定. 中国油料作物学报, 2007, 29: 204–208



Zhang X K, Chen J, Wang H Z, Li J N, Zou C S. Genetic difference of waterlogging tolerance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2007, 29: 204–208 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]李云, 付三雄, 戚存扣. 油菜苗期耐淹性快速筛选方法的建立及验证. 中国油料作物学报, 2012, 34: 256–261



Li Y, Fu S X, Qi C K. Screening method on waterlogging tolerance of rapeseed seedling through morphology and physiology verification. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2012, 34: 256–261 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]丛野, 程勇, 邹崇顺, 张学昆, 王汉中. 甘蓝型油菜发芽种子耐湿性的主基因+多基因遗传分析. 作物学报, 2009, 35: 1462–1467



Cong Y, Cheng Y, Zou C S, Zhang X K, Wang H Z. Genetic analysis of waterlogging tolerance for germinated seeds of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) with mixed model of major gene plus polygene. Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35: 1462–1467 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]盖钧镒, 章元明, 王建康. 植物数量性状遗传体系. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003. pp 6– 8, 224–265, 351–370



Gai J Y, Zhang Y M, Wang J K. Genetic System of Quantitative Traits in Plants. Beijing: Science Pres, 2003. pp 6– 8, 224–265, 351–370 (in Chinese)



[17]刘后利. 实用油菜栽培学. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 1987. pp 536–537



Liu H L. Practical Cultivation of Rapeseed. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 1987. pp 536–537 (in Chinese)



[18]Burgos M S, Messmer M M, Stamp P, Schmid J E. Flooding tolerance of spelt (Triticum spelta L.) compared to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): a physiological and genetic approach. Euphytica, 2001, 122: 287–295



[19]薛远超, 李加纳, 刘列钊, 徐新福. 甘蓝型油菜EMS诱变材料的耐湿性鉴定与筛选. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 37(4): 76–80



Xue Y C, Li J N, Liu L K, Xu X F. Identification and screening of waterlogging tolerance of EMS mutagenesis lines in (Brassica napus L.). J Southwest Chin Nor Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2012, 37(4): 76–80 (in Chinese)



[20]时明芝, 周保松. 植物涝害和耐涝机理研究进展. 安徽农业科学, 2006, 34(2): 209–210



Shi M Z, Zhou B S. Research advance in physiological damage of flood and water-logging resistance. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2006, 34(2): 209–210 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[21]钟雪花, 杨万年, 吕应堂. 淹水胁迫下对烟草、油菜某些生理指标的比较研究. 武汉植物学研究, 2002, 20: 395–398



[22]Zhong X H, Yang W N, Lü Y T. Comparative research on some physiological characteristics of tobacco and rape under flooding stress. J Wuhan Bot Res, 2002, 20: 395–398 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[23]吕艳艳, 金岩, 付三雄, 戚存扣. 不同耐淹油菜品种的耐淹性生理差异. 植物生理学报, 2013, 49: 959–967



Lü Y Y, Jin Y, Fu S X, Qi C K. Physiological differences of different waterlogging resistant Brassica napus L. under waterlogging stress. Plant Physiol J, 2013, 49: 959–967 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 马毅娜, 吴晓明玉, 李藕琪, 王圆, 陈丽, 张盈川, 赵伦, 文静, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-miR1040-EIF3A模块调控油菜开花时间的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 349-362.
[2] 王彬, 蒙姜宇, 邱浩良, 贺亚军, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnaDUF579基因家族的鉴定与表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2100-2110.
[3] 杨思杰, 杜启迪, 柴守玺, 熊宏春, 谢永盾, 赵林姝, 古佳玉, 郭会君, 刘录祥. 小麦小旗叶突变性状基因定位与遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1548-1557.
[4] 夏琦, 郭滢, 王坤美, 王思忆, 巨建业, 彭雅雯, 刘忠松, 夏石头. 甘蓝型油菜种子和种皮中水杨酸含量与原花色素积累的关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1189-1197.
[5] 王晓琳, 刘忠松, 康雷, 杨柳. 甘蓝型油菜角果长度和每角粒数基因定位以及角果皮转录组动态分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 888-899.
[6] 张琴, 戴成, 马朝芝. 生长素响应报告基因转化甘蓝型油菜及各组织GUS动态信号分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 667-675.
[7] 孙程明, 周晓婴, 陈锋, 张维, 王晓东, 彭琦, 郭月, 高建芹, 胡茂龙, 付三雄, 张洁夫. 长链非编码RNA (lncRNA)在甘蓝型油菜分枝角度调控中的功能分析与预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 559-567.
[8] 黄绒, 周渠晨, 陈楚铭, 罗倩, 易东, 杜常欢, 黄祥宇, 盛锋, 杜雪竹. 过表达BnNRT2.3-like对油菜氮素吸收利用及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3184-3197.
[9] 巨建业, 杨柳, 陈浩, 康雷, 夏石头, 刘忠松. 单细胞核转录组分析揭示油菜种皮分化过程和种子颜色差异原因[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2860-2874.
[10] 张雯, 李玉, 王创, 石磊, 丁广大. 甘蓝型油菜磷转运蛋白BnaPT48的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2983-2995.
[11] 胡志康, 舒雨, 王会, 杨莹莹, 廖俊宇, 刘佳, 成洪涛, 郭晨, 张园园, 刘胜毅, 胡琼, 梅德圣, 李超. 甘蓝型油菜苗期耐碱性种质综合鉴定与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2681-2692.
[12] 王晨, 贺丹, 姚敏, 邱萍, 何昕, 熊兴华, 康雷, 刘忠松, 钱论文. 基于转录组分析鉴定甘蓝型油菜开花候选基因以及BnaCOR27功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2693-2704.
[13] 马骏, 陈锋, 殷贵鸿, 胡海燕, 魏学宁, 解超杰, 孔令让. 小麦抗茎基腐病遗传育种研究的现状与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2559-2569.
[14] 徐林珊, 郜耿东, 王宇, 王家星, 杨吉招, 武亚瑞, 张宵寒, 常影, 李真, 谢雄泽, 龚德平, 王晶, 葛贤宏. 甘蓝型油菜漆酶基因家族成员表达模式及与茎秆抗折力的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 134-148.
[15] 李嘉欣, 黄莹, 吴潞梅, 赵伦, 易斌, 马朝芝, 涂金星, 沈金雄, 傅廷栋, 文静. 甘蓝型油菜BnaSLY1基因进化分析及功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 44-57.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!