不同轮回选择方法对玉米窄基群体的改良效果

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01895

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用轮回选择进行群体改良，是玉米种质扩增与改良的有效方法，能为选育优良自交系提供基本素材，进而提高选育自交系及杂交种的效率。本研究以玉米窄基群体P4C0及其经过不同轮回选择方法改良的10个群体为材料，通过多点田间表型鉴定和配合力测定，研究不同轮回选择方法对玉米窄基群体的改良效果，利用SSR分子标记分析不同轮回选择方法对群体遗传多样性的影响。结果表明，几种轮回选择方法都能有效改良群体的主要性状及其一般配合力(GCA)。以时间计算，控制双亲混合选择(MS)对群体P4C0主要性状及其GCA改良效果优于半同胞-S2:3(HS-S2:3)轮回选择，但在株高和穗位高的改良上，HS-S2:3选择效果较好。以轮次计算，开放改良对群体P4HSC1主要性状及其GCA的改良效果优于MS，但开放改良后，群体株高和穗位高有较大幅度的增加。不同轮回选择方法对群体遗传多样性和遗传结构的影响不尽一致。P4C0经过5轮MS后，在群体改良的低代，群体遗传多样性得到了较好的保持，而多代的改良导致群体遗传多样性下降；P4C0经过1轮HS-S2:3选择后，遗传多样性比P4C0有较大幅度的下降。P4HSC1经过1轮开放改良后，遗传多样性有较大幅度的增加。P4HSC1经过3轮MS改良后，群体遗传多样性呈增大的趋势，但每轮增加的幅度均较小。

关键词: 玉米, 群体, 轮回选择, 性状, 配合力, 遗传多样性

Abstract:

The narrow basis of maize germplasm is the main factor blocked the development of maize breeding in China. The population improvement via recurrent selection is one of effective methods for the improvement and expansion of maize germplasm. In this study, three kinds of recurrent selection methods were carried out to improve the narrow base maize population P4C0: a) five cycles of biparental mass selection (MS); b) one cycle of half-sib and S2:3 family combining selection (HS-S2:3) followed by three cycles of MS; and c) one cycle of open improvement (OI) by crossing two inbred lines to the population. In different ecological environments, the phenotypes of the developed populations were analyzed and the combining abilities were tested according to an incomplete diallel model to study the effects of the different methods. The effects of the different methods on genetic diversity of the populations were also analyzed by using 51 pairs of SSR markers. It was found that the effects of different methods on the main traits, general combing ability (GCA) and the genetic diversity were different. The effects of MS on yield, yield components and their GCAs were greater than these of HS-S2:3. In addition, MS was more effective on maintaining the genetic diversity of the population. The HS-S2:3 were more beneficial to maintain plant height and ear height of the population. The OI was more effective on the improvement of yield, yield components and their GCAs than MS. Genetic diversity was maintained in the first two cycles of MS on P4C0 then decreased slightly from the 3rd cycle. Genetic diversity decreased after one cycle of HS-S2:3 and increased after 3 cycles of MS or 1 cycle of OI.

Key words: Maize, Population, Recurrent selection, Traits, Combining ability, Genetic diversity

李芦江,兰海,潘光堂,杨克诚. 不同轮回选择方法对玉米窄基群体的改良效果[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(11): 1895-1904.

LI Lu-Jiang,LAN Hai,PAN Guang-Tang,YANG Ke-Cheng. Effect of Different Recurrent Selection Methods on a Narrow Base Maize Population[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(11): 1895-1904.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01895

https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/Y2014/V40/I11/1895

参考文献

[1]哈洛威 A R. 玉米轮回选择的理论与实践. 北京: 农业出版社, 1989. pp 47–120

Hallauer A R. Theory and Practice for Recurrent Selection in Maize Population. Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1989. pp 47–120 (in Chinese)

[2]张德贵, 李新海, 李明顺, 谢传晓, 郝转芳, 白丽, 张世煌, 潘光堂. 四个热带亚热带玉米群体开花期性状对混合选择的直接选择响应. 作物学报, 2010, 36: 28–35

Zhang D G, Li X H, Li M S, Xie C X, Hao Z F, Bai L, Zhang S H, Pan G T. Direct selection response for flowering traits in four tropical and subtropical maize populations by mass selection. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36: 28–35 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[3]Lamkey K R, Dudley J W. Mass selection and inbreeding depression in three autotetraploid maize synthetics. Crop Sci, 1984, 24: 802–806

[4]Weyhrich R A, Lamkey K R, Hallauer A R. Response of seven methods of recurrent selection in the BS11 maize population. Crop Sci, 1998, 38: 308–321

[5]Leon T N, Coors J G. Twenty-four cycles of mass selection for prolificacy in the Golden Glow maize population. Crop Sci, 2002, 42: 325–333

[6]彭泽斌, 刘新芝, 孙福来. 中综3号玉米群体格子混合选择效果分析. 作物学报, 2000, 26: 618–622

Peng Z B, Liu X Z, Sun F L. Effects of grid mass selection in ZZ3 maize population. Acta Agron Sin, 2000, 26: 618–622 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]魏昕, 荣廷昭, 潘光堂. 墨白964群体5轮混合选择遗传变异的分子生物学研究. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39(2): 237–245

Wei X, Rong T Z, Pan G T. The genetic diversiy variation revealed by ssr markers in the tropical maize population Pob32 after 5 cycles of mass selection. Sci Agric Sin, 2006, 39(2): 237–245 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8]谢振江, 张锦芬, Lazar K. 中国和南斯拉夫异地育种对南斯拉夫玉米群体改良的效果. 南京农业大学学报, 2001, 24 (3): 6–10

Xie Z J, Zhang J F, Lazar K. The effect of Yugoslavia maize population improvement through different locational breeding between China and Yugoslavia. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2001, 24 (3): 6–10 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9]Holthaus J F, Lamkey K R. Population means and genetic variances in selected and unselected Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic maize populations . Crop Sci, 1995, 35: 1581–1589

[10]Weyhrich R A, Lamkey K R, Hallauer A R. Response of seven methods of recurrent selection in the BS11 maize population. Crop Sci, 1998, 38: 308–321

[11]刘仁东. 玉米开放的S1或S2轮回选择系统与优良自交系种质的循环利用. 作物杂志, 1994, (1): 12–14

Liu R D. The open S1 or S2 recurrent selection system and cyclic utilization of superior inbred lines in maize. Crops, 1994, (1): 12–14 (in Chinese)

[12]彭泽斌, 张世煌. 玉米群体改良的问题与对策. 中国农业科学, 2000, 33(增刊): 16–20

Peng Z B, Zhang S H. Problems and strategies in maize population improvement. Sci Agric Sin, 2000, 33(Suppl): 16–20 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13]张建辉, 荣廷昭, 潘光堂, 杨克诚. 5个玉米人工合成群体主要性状育种潜势分析. 作物学报, 2006, 32: 273–277

Zhang J H, Rong T Z, Pan G T, Yang K C. Breeding potentiality of major traits for five corn synthesized corn populations. Acta Agron Sin, 2006, 32: 273–277 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14]孔繁玲. 植物数量遗传学. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2006. pp 282–284

Kong F L. Quantitative Genetic in Plant. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2006. pp 282–284 (in Chinese)

[15]唐启义, 冯明光. DPS数据处理系统—试验设计、统计分析及模型优化. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006. pp 171–174

Tang Q Y, Feng M G. DPS Data Processing System Experiment Design, Statistical Analysis and Modeling. Beijing: Science Press, 2006. pp 171–174 (in Chinese)

[16]Kotchoni S O, Gachomo E W. A rapid and hazardous reagent free protocol for genomic DNA extraction suitable for genetic studies in plants. Mol Biol Rep, 2009, 36: 1633–1636

[17]王凤格, 赵久然, 郭景轮, 佘华姊, 刘龙渊. 一种改进的玉米的SSR标记PAGE/快速银染检测新方法. 农业生物技术学报, 2004, 12: 606–607

Wang F G. Zhao J R, Guo J L, Shen H Z, Liu L Y. An improved PAGE rapid silver stain method used in maize SSR markers. J Agric Biol, 2004, 12(5): 606–607 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18]Rolf J F. NTSYS—pc2 Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System (CP). Version 2.0. New York: Exeter Software, 1998. pp 6–30

[19]Peakall R, Smouse P E. GENALEX 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes, 2006, 6: 288–295

[20]Francis C Y, Yang R C, Boyle T. POPGENE VERSION 1.31—Microsoft Window-Based Freeware for Population Genetic Analysis Quick User Guide. Alberta: University of Alberta, 1999. pp 2–29

[21]Hallauer A R, Miranda J B. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. New York: Iowa State University Press, 1981. pp 111–124

[22]赖仲铭, 杨克诚. 全姊妹轮回选择与混合选择对玉米群体改良效果的初步研究. 作物学报, 1983, 9: 7–16

Lai Z M, Yang K C. Study on the improvement effect of full-sib recurrent selection and mass selection on maize population. Acta Agron Sin, 1983, 9: 7–16 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[23]Thanda D, Kevin V P. Divergent selection for resistance to maize weevil in six maize populations. Crop Sci, 2003, 43: 2043–2049

[24]Wardyn B M, Edwards J W, Lamkey K R. Inbred-progeny selection is predicted to be inferior to half-sib selection for three maize populations. Crop Sci, 2009, 49: 443–450

[25]库丽霞, 孟庆雷, 侯本军, 李家富, 刘海静, 陈彦惠. 轮回选择对豫综5号玉米群体产量性状配合力的改良效果. 作物学报, 2012, 38: 215–222

Ku L X, Meng Q L, Hou B J, Li J F, Liu H J, Chen Y H. Improvement efficiency of recurrent selection for the combining ability of yield trait in maize population Yuzong 5. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38: 215–222 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[26]黄素华, 滕文涛, 王玉娟, 戴景瑞. 利用SSR标记分析玉米轮回选择群体的遗传多样性. 遗传学报, 2004, 31: 73–80

Huang S H, Teng W T, Wang Y J, Dai J R. Genetic diversity analysis of m aize recurrent selection populations by SSR marker. Acta Gen Sin, 2004, 31: 73–80 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[27]Hinze L L, Kresovich S, Nason J D, Lamkey K R. Population genetic diversity in a maize reciprocal recurrent selection program. Crop Sci, 2005, 45: 2435–2442

相关文章 15

[1]	刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2]	马小倩, 秦娜, 代书桃, 秦家范, 李小艳, 王淑婷, 刘忠玲, 李君霞. 175份谷子种质在2种环境下的表型变异分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1757-1773.
[3]	梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[4]	杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[5]	韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[6]	孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[7]	张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[8]	张颖星, 宋裕祯, 王跃, 曹越, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. EMS诱导糜子优异性状突变体的筛选及表型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1388-1400.
[9]	张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[10]	杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[11]	蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[12]	田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[13]	徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 王若若, 王磊, 张立异. 397份高粱种质资源在贵州表型多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
[14]	蒋嘉卉, 江炳志, 刘冠明, 王章英, 唐朝臣. 紫肉甘薯品质性状的近红外光谱预测模型构建与优化[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1088-1102.
[15]	杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed