欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12): 2098-2103.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.02098

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

红麻光周期钝感材料的鉴定与遗传分析

张立武,黄枝秒,万雪贝,林荔辉,徐建堂,陶爱芬,方平平,祁建民*   

  1. 福建农林大学作物科学学院 / 作物遗传育种与综合利用教育部重点实验室，福建福州 350002
  • 收稿日期:2014-05-17 修回日期:2014-09-16 出版日期:2014-12-12 网络出版日期:2014-10-16
  • 通讯作者: 祁建民, E-mail: qijm863@163.com, Tel: 0591-87644898
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由福建农林大学青年教师基金(2012xjj01), 福建农林大学杰出青年科研基金(xjq201401), 国家麻类产业技术体系项目(CARS-19-E06), 农业部东南黄红麻实验观测站(农科教发2011), 农业部引进国际先进农业科学技术计划(948计划)(2013-Z70)资助。

Identification and Genetic Analysis of Photoperiod Insensitive Materials in Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus)

ZHANG Li-Wu,HUANG Zhi-Miao,WAN Xue-Bei,LIN Li-Hui,XU Jian-Tang,TAO Ai-Fen,FANG Ping-Ping,QI Jian-Min*   

  1. Key Laboratory for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Ministry of Education / College of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
  • Received:2014-05-17 Revised:2014-09-16 Published:2014-12-12 Published online:2014-10-16
  • Contact: 祁建民, E-mail: qijm863@163.com, Tel: 0591-87644898

RichHTML

PDF

880

被引次数

5

摘要：

开花期是影响红麻纤维产量和品质的关键因素之一。本文通过分期播种调查6份新引育的红麻品系的光周期反应，结果表明其光周期反应敏感度变化在36.0%~56.2%之间，其中赞引1号最低(36.0%)，福红952B最高(56.2%)。将赞引1号与福红952B杂交，在自然短日照条件下对其正反交F1分析表明，开花期性状受核基因控制，不存在细胞质效应，光周期敏感对光周期钝感为显性。在自然短日照条件下对该组合的4个群体(P1、P2、F1和F2)联合分析发现，赞引1号的光周期钝感特性受1对加性-显性主基因和加性-显性-上位性多基因模型(D-1)控制，主效基因的加性效应值为8.2 d，遗传率为80.2%。该研究有助于红麻光周期钝感种质改良及主效基因定位。

关键词: 红麻, 开花期, 光周期钝感, 遗传分析

Abstract:

Flowering stage is one of the key factors affecting fiber yield and quality in kenaf. In this study, photoperiod response sensitivity of six newly bred kenaf lines was identified via changing sowing time. The results showed that photoperiod response sensitivity of various lines ranged from 36.0% to 56.2%. Among them, Zanyin 1 was insensitive one to photoperiod response (36.0%) while Fuhong 952B was sensitive (56.2%) one. To uncover the genetic basis of flowering stage under the condition of natural short day, we further used the joint segregation analysis of four populations (P1, P2, F1, and F2) in a cross of Zanyin 1 ´ Fuhong 952B. The analysis of F1 and reciprocal F1 revealed that flowering stage was controlled by nuclear genes instead of cytoplasmic genes, and the photoperiod response sensitivity genotype was almost completely dominant. Flowering stage is best described by the D-1 genetic model, a case of one additive-dominance major gene as well as additive-dominance-epistasis polygenes. The additive effect of the major gene was 8.2 days. And heritability of the major gene was 80.2%. These findings will facilitate breeding strategies for the improvement of photoperiodic insensitive germplasm as well as the major gene mapping in kenaf.

Key words: Kenaf, Flowering stage, Photoperiod insensitivity, Genetic analysis

[1]熊和平. 麻类作物育种学(第1版). 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2008. pp 208–296



Xiong H P. Breeding Sciences of Bast and Leaf Fiber Crops, 1st edn. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2008. pp 156–185 (in Chinese)



[2]唐守伟. 多种用途黄麻, 红麻产品开发现状及发展趋势. 中国麻作, 1993, (1): 38–41



Tang S W. Status and trends of development multiple-use products in jute and kenaf. Chin Fiber Crops, 1993, 15(1): 38–41 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]李德芳, 刘伟杰, 谭石林. 红麻对短光钝感材料的发掘及其研究. 作物学报, 1996, 22: 50–54



Li D F, Liu W J, Tan S L. Exploitation and investigation of photoperiod response insensitive materials in kenaf. Acta Agron Sin, 1996, 22: 50–54 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[4]邓丽卿. 红麻品种对光温反应的研究. 中国农业科学, 1987, 20(4), 56–62



Deng L Q. The characteristics of response to daylength and temperature of kenaf cultivars. Sci Agric Sin, 1987, 20(4), 56–62 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[5]彭定祥, 蔡明历. 光照时间对红麻不同熟期品种和光钝感材料发育影响研究. 中国麻作, 1998, 20(4): 9–12



Peng D X, Cai M L. Research on development of different maturity and photoperiod insensitive materials with daylength in kenaf. Chin Fiber Crops, 1998, 20(4): 9–12 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[6]徐建堂, 林荔辉, 祁建民, 张高阳, 方平平, 林培清, 池仁漫. 红麻光钝感突变体光周期反应与RAPD扩增片段差异分析. 中国麻业科学, 2012, 34(9): 260–264



Xu J T, Lin L H, Qi J M, Zhang G Y, Fang P P, Lin P Q, Chi R M. Photoperiod reaction traits of light-insensitive kenaf mutant and difference analysis of amplified fragments with RAPD marker. Plant Fiber Sci China, 2012, 34(9): 260–264 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[7]徐建堂, 祁建民, 林荔辉, 林培清, 陶爱芬, 方平平. 红麻光周期诱导下部分生理指标的变化. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 42(1): 10–13



Xu J T, Qi J M, Lin L H, Lin P Q, Tao A F, Fang P P. Partial physiological metabolism during photoperiodic induction in kenaf. J Fujian Agric For Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2013, 42(1): 10–13 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]Zhang L, Li A Q, Wang X F, Xu J T, Zhang G Q, Su J Qi J M, Guan C Y. Genetic diversity of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) evaluated by inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR). Biochem Genet, 2013, 51: 800–810



[9]韩天富, 盖钧镒, 邱家驯. 中国大豆不同生态类型代表品种开花前、开花后光周期反应的比较研究. 大豆科学, 1998, 17: 129–134



Han T F, Gai J Y, Qiu J S. A comparative study on pre- and post- flowering photoperiod response in various ecotypes of soybeans. Soybean Sci, 1998, 17(2): 129–134



[10]Gai J Y, Wang Y J, Wu X L, Chen S Y. A comparative study on segregation analysis and QTL mapping of quantitative traits in plants-with a case in soybean. Front Agric China, 2007, 1: 1–7



[11]章元明, 盖钧镒, 张孟臣. 利用P1, F1, P2和F2或F2:3世代联合的数量性状分离分析. 西南农业大学学报, 2000, 22: 6–9 (in Chinese with English abstract)



Zhang Y M, Gai J Y, Zhang M C. Jointly segregating analysis of P1, P2, F1 and F2 or F2:3 families. J Southwest Agric Univ, 2000, 22: 6–9



[12]Thornsberry J M, Goodman M M, Doebley J, Kresovich S, Nielsen D, Buckler E S. Dwarf8 polymorphisms associate with variation in flowering time. Nat Genet, 2001, 28: 286–289



[13]Xue W, Xing Y, Weng X, Zhao Y, Tang W, Wang L, Zhou H, Yu S, Xu C, Li X, Zhang Q. Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet, 2008, 40: 761–767



[14]Yamanaka N, Watanabe S, Toda K, Hayashi M, Fuchigami H, Takahashi R, Harada K. Fine mapping of the FT1 locus for soybean flowering time using a residual heterozygous line derived from a recombinant inbred line. Theor Appl Genet, 2005, 110: 634–639



[15]Osterberg M K, Shavorskaya O, Lascoux M, Lagercrantz U. Naturally occurring indel variation in the Brassica nigra COL1 gene is associated with variation in floweringtime. Genetics, 2002, 161: 299–306



[16]周瑞阳, 张新, 张加强, 甘正华, 韦汉西. 红麻细胞质雄性不育系的选育及杂种优势利用取得突破. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41: 314



Zhou R Y, Zhang X, Zhang J Q, Gan Z H, Wei H X. Abreakthrough in kenaf cytoplasmic male sterile lines breeding and heterosis utilization. Sci Agric Sin, 2008, 41: 314 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]Long Y, Shi J, Qiu D, Li R, Zhang C, Wang J, Hou J, Zhao J, Shi L, Park B S, Choi S, Lim Y, Meng J. Flowering time Quantitative Trait Loci analysis of oilseed Brassica in multiple environments and genomewide alignment with Arabidopsis. Genetics, 2007, 177: 2433–2444
[1] 王好让, 张勇, 于春淼, 董全中, 李微微, 胡凯凤, 张明明, 薛红, 杨梦平, 宋继玲, 王磊, 杨兴勇, 邱丽娟. 大豆突变体ygl2黄绿叶基因的精细定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 791-800.
[2] 刘磊, 詹为民, 丁武思, 刘通, 崔连花, 姜良良, 张艳培, 杨建平. 玉米矮化突变体gad39的遗传分析与分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 886-895.
[3] 江建华, 张武汉, 党小景, 荣慧, 叶琴, 胡长敏, 张瑛, 何强, 王德正. 水稻核不育系柱头性状的主基因+多基因遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1215-1227.
[4] 李增强, 丁鑫超, 卢海, 胡亚丽, 岳娇, 黄震, 莫良玉, 陈立, 陈涛, 陈鹏. 铅胁迫下红麻生理特性及DNA甲基化分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6): 1031-1042.
[5] 周步进, 李刚, 金刚, 周瑞阳, 刘冬梅, 汤丹峰, 廖小芳, 刘一丁, 赵艳红, 王颐宁. 利用红麻HcPDIL5-2a非全长基因创制雄性不育新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6): 1043-1053.
[6] 李辉, 李德芳, 邓勇, 潘根, 陈安国, 赵立宁, 唐慧娟. 红麻非生物逆境胁迫响应基因HCWRKY71表达分析及转化拟南芥[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6): 1090-1099.
[7] 吴然然, 林云, 陈景斌, 薛晨晨, 袁星星, 闫强, 高营, 李灵慧, 张勤雪, 陈新. 绿豆雄性不育突变体msm2015-1的遗传学与细胞学分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 860-868.
[8] 蒋成功, 石慧敏, 王红武, 李坤, 黄长玲, 刘志芳, 吴宇锦, 李树强, 胡小娇, 马庆. 玉米籽粒突变体smk7的表型分析和基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 285-293.
[9] 卢海, 李增强, 唐美琼, 罗登杰, 曹珊, 岳娇, 胡亚丽, 黄震, 陈涛, 陈鹏. 红麻DNA甲基化响应镉胁迫及甲基化差异基因的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2324-2334.
[10] 张雪翠,钟超,段灿星,孙素丽,朱振东. 大豆品种郑97196抗疫霉病基因RpsZheng精细定位[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(7): 997-1005.
[11] 李辉, 李德芳, 邓勇, 潘根, 陈安国, 赵立宁, 唐慧娟. 红麻海藻糖生物合成关键酶基因HcTPPJ的克隆及响应逆境的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(12): 1914-1922.
[12] 田士可, 秦心儿, 张文亮, 董雪, 代明球, 岳兵. 玉米雄性不育突变体mi-ms-3的遗传分析及分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(12): 1991-1996.
[13] 莫祎,孙志忠,丁佳,余东,孙学武,盛夏冰,谭炎宁,袁贵龙,袁定阳,段美娟. 水稻白条纹叶突变体wsl1的遗传分析及基因精细定位[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(7): 1050-1058.
[14] 崔月,陆建农,施玉珍,殷学贵,张启好. 蓖麻株高性状主基因+多基因遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(7): 1111-1118.
[15] 李云富,王静贤,杜艳芳,邹华文,张祖新. 玉米开花期相关的Indeterminate domain (IDD)蛋白家族基因的鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(4): 499-507.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2