欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12): 2136-2148.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.02136

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

条带深松对不同密度玉米群体根系空间分布的调节效应

王新兵,侯海鹏,周宝元,孙雪芳,马玮*,赵明   

  1. 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所 / 农业部作物生理生态与栽培重点开放实验室,  北京100081
  • 收稿日期:2014-06-11 修回日期:2014-09-16 出版日期:2014-12-12 网络出版日期:2014-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 赵明, E-mail: zhaomingcau@163.net, Tel: 010-82108752; 马玮, E-mail: weiwei_8200@126.com, Tel: 010-82106042
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CRRS-02), 国家粮食丰产科技工程项目(2011BAD16B14)和中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资助。

Effect of Strip Subsoiling on Population Root Spatial Distribution of Maize under Different Planting Densities

WANG Xin-Bing,HOU Hai-Peng,ZHOU Bao-Yuan,SUN Xue-Fang,MA Wei*,ZHAO Ming*   

  1. Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Production, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2014-06-11 Revised:2014-09-16 Published:2014-12-12 Published online:2014-10-20
  • Contact: 赵明, E-mail: zhaomingcau@163.net, Tel: 010-82108752; 马玮, E-mail: weiwei_8200@126.com, Tel: 010-82106042

摘要:

为探究条带深松耕作(SS)对密植玉米群体根系空间分布与容纳量的调节效应,本试验设置3个种植密度(低密:4.50万株 hm-2、中密:6.75万株 hm-2、高密:9.00万株 hm-2),以土壤免耕(NT)为对照,利用小立方原位根土取样器,通过“3D monolith”根系空间取样方法,比较研究玉米个体与群体根系的空间分布对种植密度与土壤耕作方式的响应。结果表明,单株根长受种植密度影响显著,在0~50 cm土层中(每10 cm为一土层),高密种植的单株根长较低密种植减少110.31、43.18、15.73、10.49和17.45 m;在高密种植条件下,与土壤免耕比,条带深松耕作增加20~30 cm、30~40 cm、40~50 cm土层中的单株根长13.32%、19.80%、47.20%;单株根干重与单株根长的变化一致。种植密度对群体总根长的影响不显著,却显著影响群体根系的空间分布。与低密种植比,高密种植的植株中心根长密度在0~10 cm、10~20 cm土层中分别降低3.82 cm cm-3、0.62 cm cm-3,但植株之间的根长密度在0~10 cm、10~20 cm、20~30 cm、30~40 cm土层中分别增加1.13 cm cm-3、0.18 cm cm-3、0.06 cm cm-3、0.05 cm cm-3;在高密种植条件下对土壤进行条带深松耕作,与土壤免耕比,植株中心的根长密度在0~10 cm土层中降低16.10%,在10~20 cm、20~30 cm土层中却分别增加47.45%和13.37%,植株之间的根长密度在20~30 cm、30~40 cm、40~50 cm土层中分别增加50.26%、30.72%和106.15%;条带深松耕作显著提高密植玉米群体下层根系的容纳量。高密条件下条带深松耕作增加了群体根干重、深层根系量、植株间根系分布及根表面积,进而增加了地上部群体叶面积指数及地上部干重,最终促进产量显著提高。说明密植群体通过条带深松耕作改善了群体的根系空间分布,减弱了上层根系的拥挤,通过增加深层土壤根系量及植株之间根系量增加了群体根系容纳量,发挥了密植群体根系功能,实现了密植群体的高产。

关键词: 夏玉米, 种植密度, 条带深松, 群体根系, 空间分布, 根系容纳量

Abstract:

For exploring the regulation effect of strip subsoiling (SS) on spatial distribution and amount of maize population root system, a field experiment was conducted with three planting densities (LD: 45 000 plants ha-1, MD: 67 500 plants ha-1, 90 000 plants ha-1) and two soil tillage practices (SS: strip subsoiling tillage, NT: no tillage). The spatial distribution of maize individual and population roots and its response to planting density and soil tillage were studied using small cubic root soil sampler through the 3D monolith” root space sampling method. The result indicated that individual root length was significantly affected by planting density. In 0–50 cm soil layers (each layer was 10 cm), individual roots length was decreased by 110.31, 43.18, 15.73, 10.49, and 17.45 m under high planting density compared with under low planting density. Under the condition of high planting density, strip subsoiling increased individual roots length by 13.32%, 19.80%, 47.20% in 20–30 cm, 30–40 cm, 40–50 cm soil layers compared with no tillage. The effects of planting density were not significant on population total root length, while significant on spatial distribution of population root system. The root length density around single plant centre was decreased by 3.82 cm cm-3, 0.62 cm cm-3 in 0–10 cm, 10–20 cm soil layers, while root length density between two plants was increased by 1.13 cm cm-3, 0.18 cm cm-3, 0.06 cm cm-3, 0.05 cm cm-3 in 0–10 cm, 10–20 cm, 20–30 cm, 30–40 cm soil layers under high planting density compared with under low planting density. Under the condition of high planting density, compared with no tillage, strip subsoiling decreased root length density around single plant centre by 16.10% in 0–10 cm soil layer, while increased it by 47.45%, 13.37% in 10–20 cm, 20–30 cm soil layers. Meanwhile, strip subsoiling increased root length density between two plants by 50.26%, 30.72%, 106.15% in 20–30 cm, 30–40 cm, 40–50 cm soil layers respectively. The significant change of spatial distribution of population root system increased the index of root surface area and root dry matter in high planting density and strip subsoiling tillage treatment. The increments in leaf area and shoot dry matter resulted in an increment of maize final yield. The results of this study suggest that the distribution of root between two plants is improved with the increment of planting density. The treatment of high planting density and strip subsoiling regulates the spatial distribution of population root system by increasing the root quantity in deep soil layer and between two plants, and weakening the crowding of roots in up soil layer, which promotes the increment of maize yield.

Key words: Summer maize, Planting density, Strip subsoiling, Population root, Spatial distribution, Root accommodation

[1]Tokatlidis I S, Koutroubas S D. A review of maize hybrids’ dependence on high plant populations and its implications for crop yield stability. Field Crops Res, 2004, 12: 103–114



[2]陈传永, 侯玉虹, 孙锐, 朱平, 董志强, 赵明. 密植对不同玉米品种产量性能的影响及其耐密性分析. 作物学报, 2010, 36: 1153–1160



Chen C Y, Hou Y H, Sun R, Zhu P, Dong Z Q, Zhao M. Effects of planting density on yield performance and density tolerance analysis for maize hybrids. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36: 1153–1160 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[3]郭庆法, 王庆成, 汪黎明. 中国玉米栽培学. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 2004. pp 63-82, 350



Guo Q F, Wang Q C, Wang L M. Chinese Maize Cultivation. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 2004. pp 63–82, 350 (in Chinese)



[4]段民孝. 从农大108和郑单958中得到的玉米育种启示. 玉米科学, 2005, 13(4): 49–52



Duan M X. Some advice on corn breeding obtained from the elite varieties of Nongda 108 and Zhengdan 958. J Maize Sci, 2005, 13(4): 49–52 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[5]Casper B B, Jackson R B. Plant competition underground. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 1997, 28: 545–570



[6]Borras L, Westgate M E, Astin J P, Echarte L. Coupling time to silking with plant growth rate in maize. Field Crops Res, 2007, 102: 73–85



[7]Fitter A H. Characteristics and functions of root systems. In: Waisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U, eds. Plant Roots: the Hidden Half, 3rd edn. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc, 2002. pp 15–32



[8]杨罗锦, 陶洪斌, 王璞. 种植密度对不同株型玉米生长及根系形态特征的影响. 应用与环境生物学报, 2012, 18: 1009–1013



Yang L J, Tao H B, Wang P. Effect of planting density on plant growth and root morphology of maize. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2012, 18: 1009–1013 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9]李宗新, 陈源泉, 王庆成, 刘开昌, 高旺盛, 隋鹏. 高产栽培条件下种植密度对不同类型玉米品种根系时空分布动态的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38: 1286–1294



Li Z X, Chen Y Q, Wang Q C, Liu K C, Gao W S, Sui P. Influence of planting density on root spatio-temporal distribution of different types of maize under high-yielding cultivation conditions. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38: 1286–1294 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]王敬锋, 刘鹏, 赵秉强, 董树亭, 张吉旺, 赵明, 杨吉顺, 李耕. 不同基因型玉米根系特性与氮素吸收利用的差异. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44: 699–707



Wang J F, Liu P, Zhao B Q, Dong S T, Zhang J W, Zhao M, Yang J S, Li G. Comparison of root characteristics and nitrogen uptake and use efficiency in different corn genotypes. Sci Agric Sin, 2011, 44: 699–707 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]Rubio G, Walk T, Ge Z Y, Yan X, Liao H, Lynch J P. Root gravitropism and below-ground competition among neighboring plants: a modelling approach. Ann Bot, 2001, 88: 929–940



[12]韩宾, 孔凡磊, 张海林, 陈阜. 耕作方式转变对小麦/玉米两熟农田土壤固碳能力的影响. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21: 91–98



Han B, Kun F L, Zhang H L, Chen F. Effects of tillage conversion on carbon sequestration capability of farmland soil doubled cropped with wheat and corn. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2010, 21: 91–98 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[13]春亮, 陈范骏, 张福锁, 米国华. 不同氮效率玉米杂交种的根系生长、氮素吸收与产量形成. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2005, 11: 615–619



Chun L, Chen F J, Zhang F S, Mi G H. Root growth, nitrogen uptake and yield formation of hybrid maize with different N efficiency. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2005, 11: 615–619 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]Smith D M, Jackson N A, Roberts J M, Ong C K. Root distributions in Grevillea robusta-maize agroforestry system in semi-arid Kenya. Plant Soil, 1999, 211: 191–205



[15]Radersma S, Ong C K. Spatial distribution of root length density and soil water of linear agroforestry systems in sub-humid Kenya: Implications for agroforestry models. For Ecol Manag, 2004, 188: 77–89



[16]Xue Q, Zhu Z, Musick J T, Stewart B A, Dusek D A. Root growth and water uptake in winter wheat under deficit irrigation. Plant Soil, 2003, 257: 151–161



[17]米国华, 陈范骏, 吴秋平, 赖宁薇, 袁力行, 张福锁. 玉米高效吸收氮素的理想根构型. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2010, 53: 1369–1373



Mi G H, Chen F J, Wu Q P, Lai N W, Yuan L X, Zhang F S. Ideotype root architecture for efficient nitrogen acquisition by maize in intensive cropping systems. Sci China, Life Sci, 2010, 53: 1369–1373



[18]Sasal M C, Andriulo A E, Taboada M A. Soil porosity characteristics and water movement under zero tillage in silty soils in Argentinian Pampas. Soil Till Res, 2006, 87: 9–18



[19]Xu D, Mermoud A. Topsoil properties as affected by tillage practices in North China. Soil Till Res, 2001, 60: 11–19



[20]Motavalli P P, Stevens W E, Hartwig G. Remediation of subsoil compaction and compaction effects on corn N availability by deep tillage and application of poultry manure in a sandy-textured soil. Soil Till Res, 2003, 71: 121–131



[21]Ji B, Zhao Y, Mu X, Liu K, Li C H. Effects of tillage on soil physical properties and root growth of maize in loam and clay in central China. Plant Soil Environ, 2013, 59(7): 295–302



[22]王群, 李潮海, 李全忠, 薛帅. 紧实胁迫对不同类型土壤玉米根系时空分布及活力的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44: 2039–2050



Wang Q, Li C H, Li Q Z, Xue S. Effect of soil compaction on spatio-temporal distribution and activities in maize under different soil types. Acta Ecol Sin, 2011, 44: 2039–2050 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[23]赵明. 作物产量性能与高产技术. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2013. pp 304–308



Zhao M. The Crop Yield Performance and High Yield Technology. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2013. pp 304–308 (in Chinese)



[24]Böhm W. Methods of Studying Root Systems. Ecological Studies 33. Springer, Berlin, 1979. p 188



[25]慕自新, 张岁岐, 郝文芳, 梁爱华, 梁宗锁. 玉米根系形态性状和空间分布对水分利用效率的调控. 生态学报, 2005, 25: 2895–2900



Mu Z X, Zhang S Q, Hao W F, Liang A H, Liang Z S. The effect of root morphological traits and spatial distribution on WUE in maize. Acta Ecol Sin, 2005, 25: 2895–2900 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[26]Eapen D, Barroso M, Ponce G. Hydro tropism: root growth responses to water. Trends Plant Sci, 2005, 10: 44–50



[27]Rajaniemi T K, Allison V J, Goldberg D E. Root competition can cause a decline in diversity with increased productivity. J Ecol, 2003, 91: 407–416



[28]宋海星, 李生秀. 玉米生长空间对根系吸收特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2003, 36: 899–904



Song H X, Li S X. Effects of root growth space of on maize its absorbing characteristics. Sci Agric Sin, 2003, 36: 899–904 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[29]王空军, 郑洪建, 刘开昌, 张吉旺, 董树亭, 胡昌浩. 我国玉米品种更替过程中根系时空分布特性的演变. 植物生态学报, 2001, 25: 472–475



Wang K J, Zheng H J, Liu K C, Zhang J W, Dong S T, Hu C H. Evolution of maize root distribution in space-time during maize varieties replacing in China. Acta Phytoecol Sin, 2001, 25: 472–475 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[30]李少昆, 刘景德, 张旺峰, 魏邦军, 杨刚, 赵海. 不同密度玉米根系在大田土壤中的分布、重量的调节及与地上部分的关系. 玉米科学, 1993, 1(3): 43–49



Li S K, Liu J D, Zhang W F, Wei B J, Yang G, Zhao H. Roots distribution, weight regulation and their relation with shoot growth of maize under different plant density in field. Maize Sci, 1993, 1(3): 43–49 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[31]王崇桃, 李少昆. 玉米生产限制因素评估与技术优先序. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43: 1136–1146



Wang C T, Li S K. Assessment of limiting factors and techniques prioritization for maize production in China. Sci Agric Sin, 2010, 43: 1136–1146 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[32]李宁, 翟志席, 李建民, 吴沛波, 段留生, 李召虎. 密度对不同株型的玉米农艺、根系性状及产量的影响. 玉米科学, 2008, 16(5): 98–102



Li N, Zhai Z X, Li J M, Wu P B, Duan L S, Li Z H. Effects of planting density on agricultural characters, root system characters and yield of different maize plant types. Maize Sci, 2008, 16(5): 98–102 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[33]梁金凤, 齐庆振, 贾小红, 宫少俊, 黄元仿. 不同耕作方式对土壤性质与玉米生长的影响研究. 生态环境学报, 2010, 19: 945–950



Liang J F, Qi Q Z, Jia X H, Gong S J, Huang Y F. Effects of different tillage managements on soil properties and corn growth. Ecol Environ Sci, 2010, 19: 945–950 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[34]Ehlers W, Hamblin A P, Tennant D, Vanderploeg R R. Root system parameters determining water uptake of field crops. Irrig Sci, 1991, 12: 115–124



[35]Amato M, Ritchie J T. Spatial distribution of roots and water uptake of maize (Zea mays L.) as affected by soil structure. Crop Sci, 2002, 42: 773–780



[36]Doussan C, Pierret A, Garrigues E, Pages L. Water uptake by plant roots: II-modelling of water transfer in the soil root-system with explicit account of flow within the root system-comparison with experiments. Plant Soil, 2006, 283: 99–117



[37]赵江, 张怡明, 牛兴奎, 刘鑫, 李少昆, 张凤路. 不同密度条件玉米根系性状在不同土层中的分布研究. 华北农学报, 2011, 26(增刊): 99–103



Zhang J, Zhang Y M, Niu X K, Liu X, Li S K, Zhang F L. Studies on the distribution of maize root characteristics at different soil layers and densities. Acta Agric Boreal-Sin, 2011, 26(suppl): 99–103 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[38]Jiang W S, Wang K J, Wu Q P, Dong S T, Liu P, Zhang J W. Effects of narrow plant spacing on root distribution and physiological nitrogen use efficiency in summer maize. Crop J, 2013, 1: 77–83



[39]Zhang L Z, Li B G, Yan G T, Wopke W, Spiertz J H J, Zhang S P. Genotype and planting density effects on rooting traits and yield in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J Integr Plant Biol, 2006, 48: 1287–1293



[40]朱献玳, 陈学留, 刘益同, 王忠孝, 张建华. 玉米根系的生长及其在土壤中的分布. 莱阳农学院学报, 1991, 8(l): 15–19



Zhu X D, Chen X L, Liu Y T, Wang Z X, Zhang J H. Root growth and distribution in soil of maize. J Laiyang Agric Coll, 1991, 8(l): 15–19 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[41]鄂玉江, 戴俊英, 顾慰连. 玉米根系的生长规律及其与产量关系的研究: I. 玉米根系生长和吸收能力与地上部分的关系. 作物学报, 1988, 14: 149–154



E Y J, Dai J Y, Gu W L. Studies on the relationship between root growth and yield in maize: I. Relationships between the growth and absorption ability of the roots and the growth and development of the above ground parts of maize. Acta Agron Sin, 1988, 14: 149–154 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[42]陈晓远, 高志红, 罗远培. 植物根冠关系. 植物生理学通讯, 2005, 41: 555–562



Chen X Y, Gao Z H, Luo Y P. Relationship between root and shoot of plants. Plant Physiol Commun, 2005, 41: 555–562 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[1] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[2] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[3] 张倩, 韩本高, 张博, 盛开, 李岚涛, 王宜伦. 控失尿素减施及不同配比对夏玉米产量及氮肥效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 180-192.
[4] 娄洪祥, 姬建利, 蒯婕, 汪波, 徐亮, 李真, 刘芳, 黄威, 刘暑艳, 尹羽丰, 王晶, 周广生. 种植密度对油菜正反交组合产量与倒伏相关性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1724-1740.
[5] 李静, 王洪章, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝. 夏玉米不同栽培模式花后叶片光合性能的差异[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1351-1359.
[6] 郑迎霞, 陈杜, 魏鹏程, 卢平, 杨锦越, 罗上轲, 叶开梅, 宋碧. 种植密度对贵州春玉米茎秆抗倒伏性能及籽粒产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 738-751.
[7] 张金丹, 范虹, 杜进勇, 殷文, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强. 小麦玉米同步增密有利于优化种间关系而提高间作产量[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2481-2489.
[8] 周宝元, 葛均筑, 孙雪芳, 韩玉玲, 马玮, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 黄淮海麦玉两熟区周年光温资源优化配置研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(10): 1843-1853.
[9] 赵小红,白羿雄,王凯,姚有华,姚晓华,吴昆仑. 种植密度对2个青稞品种抗倒伏及秸秆饲用特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(4): 586-595.
[10] 郑飞娜,初金鹏,张秀,费立伟,代兴龙,贺明荣. 播种方式与种植密度互作对大穗型小麦品种产量和氮素利用率的调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(3): 423-431.
[11] 王士红,杨中旭,史加亮,李海涛,宋宪亮,孙学振. 增密减氮对棉花干物质和氮素积累分配及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(3): 395-407.
[12] 马正波, 董学瑞, 唐会会, 闫鹏, 卢霖, 王庆燕, 房孟颖, 王琦, 董志强. 四甲基戊二酸对夏玉米光合生产特征的调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(10): 1617-1627.
[13] 陈晓影,刘鹏,程乙,董树亭,张吉旺,赵斌,任佰朝,韩坤. 基于磷肥施用深度的夏玉米根层调控提高土壤氮素吸收利用[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(02): 238-248.
[14] 万泽花,任佰朝,赵斌,刘鹏,张吉旺. 不同熟期夏玉米品种籽粒灌浆脱水特性和激素含量变化[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1446-1453.
[15] 周宝元,马玮,孙雪芳,丁在松,李从锋,赵明. 冬小麦-夏玉米高产模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征研究[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(4): 589-600.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!