欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (01): 154-159.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00154

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

干旱胁迫对玉米品种苗期叶片光合特性的影响

张兴华,高杰,杜伟莉,张仁和*,薛吉全   

  1. 西北农林科技大学农学院,陕西杨凌 712100
  • 收稿日期:2014-05-21 修回日期:2014-09-30 出版日期:2015-01-12 网络出版日期:2014-11-11
  • 通讯作者: 张仁和,E-mail: zhangrenhe1975@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由陕西省科技资源统筹专项(2011KTZB02-01-02), 陕西省科技计划农业攻关项目(2014K01-02-03)和西北农林科技大学创新专项(QN2011086)资助。

Effects of Drought Stress on Photosynthetic Characteristics of Maize Hybrids to at Seedling Stage

ZHANG Xing-Hua,GAO Jie,DU Wei-Li,ZHANG Ren-He*,XUE Ji-Quan   

  1. College of Agronomy, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, China
  • Received:2014-05-21 Revised:2014-09-30 Published:2015-01-12 Published online:2014-11-11
  • Contact: 张仁和,E-mail: zhangrenhe1975@163.com

摘要:

维持较高的光合作用对于作物适应干旱逆境意义重大,光合电子传递和气孔行为是作物光合机构的重要组成部分,而玉米上有关它们之间的组合响应干旱胁迫研究报道较少。本文将2个主推玉米品种陕单609和郑单958生长在自然光和4个干旱胁迫下的干旱棚内,对其叶片的光系统II (PSII)的电子传递功能和气孔导度进行了研究。结果显示,中度和重度干旱胁迫下2个品种叶片净光合速率(Pn)和气孔导度(Gs)显著下降,而伴随着胞间CO2浓度(Ci)上升,显示光合速率下降是非气孔因素所致。JIP-test分析发现干旱胁迫下2个品种OJIP曲线中出现了K-band,说明光系统II (PSII)放氧复合体(OEC)受到抑制和PSII供体侧与受体侧电子传递不平衡;同时干旱胁迫下反映从PSII供体侧到PSI末端受体电子流的荧光参数显著改变,损伤了光系统II和I之间光合电子传递链,限制CO2同化。品种间光合特性对干旱胁迫的响应存在差异,重度干旱对郑单958叶片光合机构的影响比对品种陕单609大。以上结果表明,中度和重度干旱下玉米品种叶片Pn下降归属于光化学活性的衰退;陕单609光合机构的耐旱性强于郑单958。

关键词: 玉米品种, 干旱胁迫, 光合速率, OJIP荧光

Abstract:

Maintaining active photosynthesis is very important for crops to adapt drought stress. The electron transport chain and stomatal conductance are important in photosynthesis. Limited data are available on their combined responses to drought stress in maize. In this paper, the effects of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics in maize hybrids Shaandan 609 and Zhengdan 958 at seedling stage were investigated. The results showed that the CO2 assimilation (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs) and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) decreased during drought stress, showing the decreased photosynthesis due to stomatal factor. During moderate and severe drought stress, down-regulation in net CO2 fixation (Pn) was primarily mediated through non-stomatal limitation. The OJIP transients and other associated biophysical parameters elucidated the events of photoacclimatory changes in photosystem II (PSII) with progressive increase of drought stress, and the K-bands appeared in the stage of extreme drought severity indicating the imbalance between the electrons at the acceptor and donor sides of PSII, which suggested the oxygen-evolving complex (OEC) and electron transport were inhibited. In conclusion, the moderate and severedrought stress mainly damages the electron transfer from the plastoquinone (PQ) pool to the PSI terminal acceptors; this, along with constraints to both stomatal and non-stomatal components of photosynthesis, limits carbon assimilation. There are differences in cultivars with the response of PSII activity to drought stress.

Key words: Maize, Drought stress, Photosynthetic characteristics, OJIP

[1]张仁和, 杜伟莉, 郭东伟, 张爱瑛, 胡富亮, 李凤艳, 薛吉全. 陕西省不同年代玉米品种产量和氮效率性状的变化. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 915–923

Zhang R H, Du W L, Guo D W, Zhang A Y, Hu F L, Li F Y, Xue J Q. Changes of grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of maize hybrids released in different eras in Shaanxi Province. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 915–923 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[2]李少昆, 王崇桃. 玉米生产技术创新与扩散. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010. pp 1–32

Li S K, Wang C T. Innovation and Diffusion of Corn Production Technology. Beijing: Science Press, 2010. pp 1–32 (in Chinese)

[3]Yordanov I, Velikova T, Tsonev T. Plant response to drought, acclimation and stress tolerance. Photosynthetica, 2000, 38: 171–186

[4]Eberhard S, Finazzi G, Wollman A. The dynamics of photosynthesis. Annu Rev Genet, 2008, 42: 463–515

[5]Pinheiro C, Chaves M M. Photosynthesis and drought: can we make metabolic connections from available data? J Exp Bot, 2011, 62: 869–882

[6]Pena-Rojas K, Aranda X, Fleck I. Stomatal limitation to CO2 assimilation and down-regulation of photosynthesis in Quercus ilex resprouts in response to slowly imposed drought. Tree Physiol, 2004, 24: 813–822

[7]Bu L D, Zhang R H, Chang Y, Xue J Q, Han M M. Responses of water stress to photosynthetic characteristics of the maize leaf in the seeding. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30: 1184–1192

[8]Nielsen D C, Vigil M F, Benjamin J G. The variable response of dryland corn yield to soil water content at planting. Agric Water Manage, 2009, 96: 330–336

[9]Efeoglu B, Ekmekci Y, Cicek N. Physiological responses of three maize cultivars to drought stress and recovery. South Afr J Bot, 2009, 75: 34–42

[10]Parry M A J, Andralojc P J, Khan S, Lea P J, Keys A J. Rubisco activity: effects of drought stress. Ann Bot, 2002,89: 833–839

[11]Galmés J, Ribas-Carbó M, Medrano H, Flexas J. Rubisco activity in Mediterranean species is regulated by the chloroplastic CO2 concentration under water stress. Environ Exp Bot, 2011, 62: 653–665

[12]Massacci A, Nabiev S M, Pietrosanti L, Nematov S K, Chernikova T N, Thor K, Leipner J. Response of the photosynthetic apparatus of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) to the onset of drought stress under field conditions studied by gas-exchange analysis and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2008, 46: 189–195

[13]Demmig-Adams B, Adams W W, Baker D H, Logan B A, Bowling D R, Verhoreven A S. Using chlorophyll fluorescence to assess the fraction of absorbed light allocated to thermal dissipation of excess excitation. Physiol Plant, 1996, 98: 253–264

[14]Chaves M M, Maroco J P, Pereira J S. Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant. Funct Plant Biol, 2003, 30: 239–264

[15]Strasser R J, Srivastava A, Govindjee. Polyphasic chlorophyll a fluorescence transient in plants and cyanobacteria. Photochem Photobiol, 1995, 61: 32–42

[16]Strasser R J. Donor side capacity of photosystem II probed by chlorophyll a fluorescence transients. Photosynth Res, 1997, 52: 147–155

[17]Baker N R, Rosenqvist E. Application of chlorophyll fluorescence can improve crop production strategies: an examination of future possibilities. J Exp Bot, 2004, 55: 1607–1621

[18]张子山, 李耕, 高辉远, 刘鹏, 杨程, 孟祥龙, 孟庆伟. 玉米持绿与早衰品种叶片衰老过程中光化学活性的变化. 作物学报, 2013, 39: 93–100

Zhang Z S, Li G, Gao H Y, Liu P, Yang C, Meng X L, Meng Q F. Characterization of photosynthetic performance during senescence in stay-green and quick-leaf-senescence Zea mays L. inbred lines. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39: 93–100 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]Oukarroum A, Schansker G, Strasser R J. Drought stress effects on photosystem I content and photosystem II thermotolerance analyzed using Chl a fluorescence kinetics in barley varieties differing in their drought tolerance. Physiol Plant, 2009, 137: 188–19

[20]Miyashita K, Tanakamaru S, Maitani T, Kimura K. Recovery responses of photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance in kidney bean following drought stress. Environ Exp Bot, 2005, 53: 205–214

[21]Gomes G, Luz C D, Santos R D, Batitucci P, Silva D M, Falqueto A R. Drought tolerance of passion fruit plants assessed by the OJIP chlorophyll a fluorescence transient. Sci Hortic, 2012, 142: 49–56

[22]Campos H, Trejo C, Valdiva P, Nava G, Martinez C, Ortega C. Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations of bell pepper plants under water stress and re-watering: Delayed restoration of growth and photosynthesis during recovery. Environ Exp Bot, 2014, 98: 56–64

[23]Zhang Z S, Li P, Gao H Y, Zhang L T, Yang C, Liu P. Characterization of photosynthetic performance during senescence in stay-green and quick-leaf-senescence Zea mays L. inbred lines. PLoS One, 2012, 8: 1–8

[24]胡富亮, 郭德林, 高杰, 路海东, 张仁和, 薛吉全. 种植密度对春玉米干物质、氮素积累与转运及产量的影响. 西北农业学报, 2013, 20: 60–66

Hu F L, Guo D L, Gao J, Lu H D, Zhang R H, Xue J Q. Effects of planting densities on dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and grain yield in spring maize. Acta Agric Boreali-Occident Sin, 2013, 20: 60–66 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[25]Schansker G, Tóth S Z, Strasser R J. Methylviologen and dibromothymoquinone treatments of pea leaves reveal the role of photosystem I in the Chl a fluorescence rise OJIP. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2005, 1706: 250–261

[26]Strasser R J, Tsimilli-Michael M, Qiang S, Goltsev V. Simultaneous in vivo recording of prompt and delayed fluorescence and 820-nm reflection changes during drying and after rehydration of the resurrection plant Haberlea rhodopensis. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2010, 1797: 1313–1326

[27]Farquhar G D, Sharkey T D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol, 1982, 33: 317–345

[28]Lawlor D W, Tezara W. Causes of decreased photosynthetic rate and metabolic capacity in water-deficient leaf cells: a critical evaluation of mechanisms and integration of processes. Ann Bot, 2009, 103: 561–579

[29]Mehta P, Allakverdiev S I, Jajoo A. Characterization of photosystem II heterogeneity in response to high salt stress in wheat leaves. Photosynth Res, 2010, 52: 147–155

[30]Oukarroum A, El Madidi S, Schansker G, Strasser R J. Probing the responses of barley cultivars (Hordeum vulgare L.) by chlorophyll a fluorescence OLKJIP under drought stress and re-watering. Environ Exp Bot, 2007, 60: 438–446

[1] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[2] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[3] 王霞, 尹晓雨, 于晓明, 刘晓丹. 干旱锻炼对B73自交后代当代干旱胁迫记忆基因表达及其启动子区DNA甲基化的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1191-1198.
[4] 丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
[5] 张明聪, 何松榆, 秦彬, 王孟雪, 金喜军, 任春元, 吴耀坤, 张玉先. 外源褪黑素对干旱胁迫下春大豆品种绥农26形态、光合生理及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1791-1805.
[6] 李洁, 付惠, 姚晓华, 吴昆仑. 不同耐旱性青稞叶片差异蛋白分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1248-1258.
[7] 高震, 梁效贵, 张莉, 赵雪, 杜雄, 崔彦宏, 周顺利. 不同时期灌溉对华北平原春玉米穗粒数的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1324-1331.
[8] 李鹏程, 毕真真, 孙超, 秦天元, 梁文君, 王一好, 许德蓉, 刘玉汇, 张俊莲, 白江平. DNA甲基化参与调控马铃薯响应干旱胁迫的关键基因挖掘[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 599-612.
[9] 秦天元, 刘玉汇, 孙超, 毕真真, 李安一, 许德蓉, 王一好, 张俊莲, 白江平. 马铃薯StIgt基因家族的鉴定及其对干旱胁迫的响应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 780-786.
[10] 周练, 刘朝显, 熊雨涵, 周京, 蔡一林. 质膜内在蛋白ZmPIP1;1参与玉米耐旱性和光合作用的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 472-480.
[11] 刘亚文, 张红燕, 曹丹, 李兰芝. 基于多平台基因表达数据的水稻干旱和盐胁迫相关基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2423-2439.
[12] 秦天元, 孙超, 毕真真, 梁文君, 李鹏程, 张俊莲, 白江平. 基于WGCNA的马铃薯根系抗旱相关共表达模块鉴定和核心基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(7): 1033-1051.
[13] 张海燕, 汪宝卿, 冯向阳, 李广亮, 解备涛, 董顺旭, 段文学, 张立明. 不同时期干旱胁迫对甘薯生长和渗透调节能力的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(11): 1760-1770.
[14] 李旭凯,李任建,张宝俊. 利用WGCNA鉴定非生物胁迫相关基因共表达网络[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1349-1364.
[15] 袁溢,朱双,方婷婷,蒋金金,王幼平. 人工合成甘蓝型油菜抗旱性及DNA甲基化水平分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(5): 693-704.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!