作物学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (01): 154-159.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00154
张兴华,高杰,杜伟莉,张仁和*,薛吉全
ZHANG Xing-Hua,GAO Jie,DU Wei-Li,ZHANG Ren-He*,XUE Ji-Quan
摘要:
维持较高的光合作用对于作物适应干旱逆境意义重大,光合电子传递和气孔行为是作物光合机构的重要组成部分,而玉米上有关它们之间的组合响应干旱胁迫研究报道较少。本文将2个主推玉米品种陕单609和郑单958生长在自然光和4个干旱胁迫下的干旱棚内,对其叶片的光系统II (PSII)的电子传递功能和气孔导度进行了研究。结果显示,中度和重度干旱胁迫下2个品种叶片净光合速率(Pn)和气孔导度(Gs)显著下降,而伴随着胞间CO2浓度(Ci)上升,显示光合速率下降是非气孔因素所致。JIP-test分析发现干旱胁迫下2个品种OJIP曲线中出现了K-band,说明光系统II (PSII)放氧复合体(OEC)受到抑制和PSII供体侧与受体侧电子传递不平衡;同时干旱胁迫下反映从PSII供体侧到PSI末端受体电子流的荧光参数显著改变,损伤了光系统II和I之间光合电子传递链,限制CO2同化。品种间光合特性对干旱胁迫的响应存在差异,重度干旱对郑单958叶片光合机构的影响比对品种陕单609大。以上结果表明,中度和重度干旱下玉米品种叶片Pn下降归属于光化学活性的衰退;陕单609光合机构的耐旱性强于郑单958。
| [1]张仁和, 杜伟莉, 郭东伟, 张爱瑛, 胡富亮, 李凤艳, 薛吉全. 陕西省不同年代玉米品种产量和氮效率性状的变化. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 915–923Zhang R H, Du W L, Guo D W, Zhang A Y, Hu F L, Li F Y, Xue J Q. Changes of grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of maize hybrids released in different eras in Shaanxi Province. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 915–923 (in Chinese with English abstract).[2]李少昆, 王崇桃. 玉米生产技术创新与扩散. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010. pp 1–32Li S K, Wang C T. Innovation and Diffusion of Corn Production Technology. Beijing: Science Press, 2010. pp 1–32 (in Chinese)[3]Yordanov I, Velikova T, Tsonev T. Plant response to drought, acclimation and stress tolerance. Photosynthetica, 2000, 38: 171–186[4]Eberhard S, Finazzi G, Wollman A. The dynamics of photosynthesis. Annu Rev Genet, 2008, 42: 463–515[5]Pinheiro C, Chaves M M. Photosynthesis and drought: can we make metabolic connections from available data? J Exp Bot, 2011, 62: 869–882[6]Pena-Rojas K, Aranda X, Fleck I. Stomatal limitation to CO2 assimilation and down-regulation of photosynthesis in Quercus ilex resprouts in response to slowly imposed drought. Tree Physiol, 2004, 24: 813–822[7]Bu L D, Zhang R H, Chang Y, Xue J Q, Han M M. Responses of water stress to photosynthetic characteristics of the maize leaf in the seeding. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30: 1184–1192 [8]Nielsen D C, Vigil M F, Benjamin J G. The variable response of dryland corn yield to soil water content at planting. Agric Water Manage, 2009, 96: 330–336[9]Efeoglu B, Ekmekci Y, Cicek N. Physiological responses of three maize cultivars to drought stress and recovery. South Afr J Bot, 2009, 75: 34–42[10]Parry M A J, Andralojc P J, Khan S, Lea P J, Keys A J. Rubisco activity: effects of drought stress. Ann Bot, 2002,89: 833–839[11]Galmés J, Ribas-Carbó M, Medrano H, Flexas J. Rubisco activity in Mediterranean species is regulated by the chloroplastic CO2 concentration under water stress. Environ Exp Bot, 2011, 62: 653–665[12]Massacci A, Nabiev S M, Pietrosanti L, Nematov S K, Chernikova T N, Thor K, Leipner J. Response of the photosynthetic apparatus of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) to the onset of drought stress under field conditions studied by gas-exchange analysis and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2008, 46: 189–195[13]Demmig-Adams B, Adams W W, Baker D H, Logan B A, Bowling D R, Verhoreven A S. Using chlorophyll fluorescence to assess the fraction of absorbed light allocated to thermal dissipation of excess excitation. Physiol Plant, 1996, 98: 253–264[14]Chaves M M, Maroco J P, Pereira J S. Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant. Funct Plant Biol, 2003, 30: 239–264[15]Strasser R J, Srivastava A, Govindjee. Polyphasic chlorophyll a fluorescence transient in plants and cyanobacteria. Photochem Photobiol, 1995, 61: 32–42[16]Strasser R J. Donor side capacity of photosystem II probed by chlorophyll a fluorescence transients. Photosynth Res, 1997, 52: 147–155[17]Baker N R, Rosenqvist E. Application of chlorophyll fluorescence can improve crop production strategies: an examination of future possibilities. J Exp Bot, 2004, 55: 1607–1621[18]张子山, 李耕, 高辉远, 刘鹏, 杨程, 孟祥龙, 孟庆伟. 玉米持绿与早衰品种叶片衰老过程中光化学活性的变化. 作物学报, 2013, 39: 93–100Zhang Z S, Li G, Gao H Y, Liu P, Yang C, Meng X L, Meng Q F. Characterization of photosynthetic performance during senescence in stay-green and quick-leaf-senescence Zea mays L. inbred lines. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39: 93–100 (in Chinese with English abstract)[19]Oukarroum A, Schansker G, Strasser R J. Drought stress effects on photosystem I content and photosystem II thermotolerance analyzed using Chl a fluorescence kinetics in barley varieties differing in their drought tolerance. Physiol Plant, 2009, 137: 188–19[20]Miyashita K, Tanakamaru S, Maitani T, Kimura K. Recovery responses of photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance in kidney bean following drought stress. Environ Exp Bot, 2005, 53: 205–214[21]Gomes G, Luz C D, Santos R D, Batitucci P, Silva D M, Falqueto A R. Drought tolerance of passion fruit plants assessed by the OJIP chlorophyll a fluorescence transient. Sci Hortic, 2012, 142: 49–56[22]Campos H, Trejo C, Valdiva P, Nava G, Martinez C, Ortega C. Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations of bell pepper plants under water stress and re-watering: Delayed restoration of growth and photosynthesis during recovery. Environ Exp Bot, 2014, 98: 56–64[23]Zhang Z S, Li P, Gao H Y, Zhang L T, Yang C, Liu P. Characterization of photosynthetic performance during senescence in stay-green and quick-leaf-senescence Zea mays L. inbred lines. PLoS One, 2012, 8: 1–8[24]胡富亮, 郭德林, 高杰, 路海东, 张仁和, 薛吉全. 种植密度对春玉米干物质、氮素积累与转运及产量的影响. 西北农业学报, 2013, 20: 60–66Hu F L, Guo D L, Gao J, Lu H D, Zhang R H, Xue J Q. Effects of planting densities on dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and grain yield in spring maize. Acta Agric Boreali-Occident Sin, 2013, 20: 60–66 (in Chinese with English abstract)[25]Schansker G, Tóth S Z, Strasser R J. Methylviologen and dibromothymoquinone treatments of pea leaves reveal the role of photosystem I in the Chl a fluorescence rise OJIP. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2005, 1706: 250–261[26]Strasser R J, Tsimilli-Michael M, Qiang S, Goltsev V. Simultaneous in vivo recording of prompt and delayed fluorescence and 820-nm reflection changes during drying and after rehydration of the resurrection plant Haberlea rhodopensis. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2010, 1797: 1313–1326[27]Farquhar G D, Sharkey T D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol, 1982, 33: 317–345[28]Lawlor D W, Tezara W. Causes of decreased photosynthetic rate and metabolic capacity in water-deficient leaf cells: a critical evaluation of mechanisms and integration of processes. Ann Bot, 2009, 103: 561–579[29]Mehta P, Allakverdiev S I, Jajoo A. Characterization of photosystem II heterogeneity in response to high salt stress in wheat leaves. Photosynth Res, 2010, 52: 147–155[30]Oukarroum A, El Madidi S, Schansker G, Strasser R J. Probing the responses of barley cultivars (Hordeum vulgare L.) by chlorophyll a fluorescence OLKJIP under drought stress and re-watering. Environ Exp Bot, 2007, 60: 438–446 |
| [1] | 任依涵, 赵曼利, 代晶, 李银水, 顾炽明, 杨璐, 杜雪竹, 胡文诗, 秦璐. 油菜叶片功能氮动态变化对光合速率及光合氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1459-1471. |
| [2] | 杨飚, 杜帅康, 张继旺, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 马铃薯III类POD基因家族的全基因组鉴定及其表达谱分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 405-420. |
| [3] | 王雅致, 杨飚, 季香林, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 二倍体马铃薯抗旱资源鉴定及抗旱基因初步筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 72-84. |
| [4] | 孔娜, 刘涛, 刘文婷, 陈刚, 文利超, 邓智超, 郭梅, 李伟, 郭永峰. 烟草NtCEP7基因克隆及其编码小肽在苗期抗旱中的作用分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 249-261. |
| [5] | 刘海波, 张蕾, 王立琦, 石晓丽, 周文莹, 崔国贤, 佘玮. 苎麻BnGCL1基因响应干旱胁迫的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 14-27. |
| [6] | 胡城祯, 高维东, 孔斌雪, 王建飞, 车卓, 杨德龙, 陈涛. 小麦TaAPC11基因家族鉴定及TaAPC11-5B参与干旱胁迫的生物学功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 148-164. |
| [7] | 何鹏旭, 姚立蓉, 陈远玲, 闫妍, 张宏, 汪军成, 李葆春, 杨轲, 司二静, 孟亚雄, 马小乐, 王化俊. 大麦干旱胁迫萌发生理及分子机理的差异性与相关性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2412-2432. |
| [8] | 陆雯佳, 汪军成, 姚立蓉, 张宏, 司二静, 杨轲, 孟亚雄, 李葆春, 马小乐, 王化俊. 大麦PRX基因家族全基因组鉴定及其干旱胁迫下的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1198-1214. |
| [9] | 王林, 陈晓雨, 张文梦龙, 汪思琦, 程冰云, 程靖秋, 潘锐, 张文英. 大麦HvMYB2分子特性及响应干旱胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 873-887. |
| [10] | 霍如雪, 葛祥菡, 石嘉, 李雪蕊, 戴圣杰, 刘振宁, 李宗芸. 甘薯组氨酸激酶蛋白IbHK5响应干旱和盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 650-666. |
| [11] | 马群, 王志昊, 闫磊, 李瑜娇, 王佳琪, 李钊, 刘巍, 艾鑫, 马迁驰, 王晓光, 钟超, 任婧瑶, 刘喜波, 赵姝丽, 张鹤, 赵新华, 蒋春姬, 王婧, 于海秋. 高油酸和普通花生萌发期抗旱筛选评价体系的建立[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3266-3280. |
| [12] | 魏琦, 何冠华, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 唐怀君, 刘成, 王天宇, 黎裕, 路运才, 李春辉. 基于抗旱玉米自交系SL001的抗旱优异基因资源挖掘[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3171-3183. |
| [13] | 刘永惠, 沈一, 沈悦, 梁满, 沙琴, 张旭尧, 陈志德. 花生干旱诱导型启动子AhMYB44-11-Pro的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2157-2166. |
| [14] | 李闻娟, 王利民, 齐燕妮, 赵玮, 谢亚萍, 党照, 赵丽蓉, 李雯, 徐晨梦, 王琰, 张建平. 亚麻LuWRI1a在旱盐胁迫响应中的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1750-1761. |
| [15] | 乔志新, 张杰道, 王雨, 郭启芳, 刘燕静, 陈蕊, 胡文浩, 孙爱清. 干旱胁迫下冬小麦不同品种萌发特性差异的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1568-1583. |
|
||