欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (05): 809-817.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00809

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同耐镉基因型水稻农艺和生理性状的比较研究

黄冬芬;奚岭林;杨立年;王志琴;杨建昌*   

  1. 扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室, 江苏扬州225009
  • 收稿日期:2007-07-24 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-05-12 网络出版日期:2008-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 杨建昌

Comparisons in Agronomic and Physiological Traits of Rice Genotypes Differing in Cadmium-Tolerance

HUANG Dong-Fen,XI Ling-Lin,YANG Li-Nian,WANG Zhi-Qin,YANG Jian-Chang*   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2007-07-24 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-05-12 Published online:2008-05-12
  • Contact: YANG Jian-Chang

摘要: 于2004和2005年在扬州大学试验农场进行了不同耐镉基因型水稻农艺和生理性状的比较研究。2个耐镉(Cd)基因型汕优63(杂交籼稻)和扬粳9538(粳稻)及2个Cd敏感基因型扬稻6号(籼稻)和武运粳7号(粳稻)种植于盆钵。于移栽前盆钵土中加入Cd, 浓度为150 mg kg-1(Cd处理), 以未加Cd为对照(CK)。Cd处理后, 耐Cd基因型籽粒产量较CK降低6.2%~8.9%, Cd敏感基因型产量较对照降低38.3%~47.1%。每盆穗数和每穗颖花数显著减少是减产的主要原因, 结实率和千粒重在Cd处理和CK间无显著差异。Cd处理显著抑制Cd敏感基因型的分蘖发生, 导致整个生育期干物质积累的显著下降, 但对物质运转率和收获指数无显著影响。在Cd胁迫下, 分蘖至拔节期Cd敏感基因型的根系活力、叶片光合速率、超氧化物歧化酶和过氧化氢酶活性明显低于耐Cd基因型, 叶片超氧自由基和过氧化氢含量、乙烯释放速率及根系伤流液中1-氨基环丙烷-1-羧酸浓度则显著高于耐Cd基因型。抽穗以后Cd对上述生理指标以及整个生育时期叶片脱落酸含量无显著影响。说明Cd对水稻生长发育的影响主要在生育前期(分蘖至拔节期), 此期分蘖发生多、根系活力和叶片抗氧化保护系统能力强及乙烯合成少是耐Cd基因型水稻的主要农艺和生理特征。

关键词: 水稻, 耐镉基因型, 活性氧系统, 根系活力, 乙烯

Abstract: Cadmium (Cd) is one of major contaminants in agricultural soil, threatening agricultural production and human health. To understand agronomic and physiological characteristics of rice genotypes differing in Cd-tolerance would have great significance in selecting or breeding a Cd-tolerant cultivar. In this study, two Cd-tolerant rice genotypes of Shanyou 63 (indica hybrid) and Yangjing 9538 (japonica) and two Cd-susceptible genotypes of Yangdao 6 (indica) and Wuyunjing 7 (japonica) were pot-grown at a farm of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province in 2004 and 2005. 150 mg kg-1 Cd was added into pot soil before seedling transplanting (Cd treatment), and no Cd addition was taken as control (CK). Under the Cd treatment, the grain yield was reduced by 6.2–8.9% for the Cd-tolerant genotypes and by 38.3–47.1% for the Cd-susceptible ones when compared with their respective CKs. The reduction in grain yield was mainly attributed to the reductions of panicles per pot and spikelets per panicle. The differences in seed-setting rate and 1 000-grain weight were not significant between the Cd treatment and CK. The Cd treatment markedly inhibited the tillering of the Cd-susceptible genotypes, resulting in the reduction in dry matter accumulation during the whole growth period. Cd little affected the translocation of non-structural carbohydrate from culms and sheaths and harvest index. For Cd-susceptible genotypes, the Cd treatment significantly reduced root oxidation activity and photosynthetic rate, activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase of leaves, and obviously increased contents of superoxidate radical and hydrogen peroxide and ethylene evolution rate of leaves, and the concentration of 1-aminocylopropane-1-carboxylic acid in root bleedings from the tillering to jointing stages, while the Cd treatment much less affected the above physiological traits for the Cd-tolerant genotypes. The differences in the above traits at heading and afterwards and abscisic acid content in leaves during the whole growth period were not significant between the Cd treatment and CK. The results indicate that the effects of Cd on rice growth and development are mainly during the early growth period (from tillering to jointing), and more tillers, stronger root activity and antioxidative defense system, and less ethylene synthesis in the plants during this period would be considered as agronomic and physiological traits of Cd-tolerant genotypes of rice.

Key words: Rice, Cadmium-tolerant genotype, Reactive oxygen species, Root activity, Ethylene

[1] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[2] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[3] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[4] 杨影, 郝豫皖, 张学宁, 方佳璐, 马月华, 杨伟龙, 孙文清, 王新超, 王玉春, 黄建燕. 乙烯响应因子CsERF9调控茶树炭疽病抗性的分子机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1103-1115.
[5] 陈伟, 卫万娟, 赵其兵, 常东伟, 余凌波, 翟鹏飞, 冯志明, 陈宗祥, 任仰涛, 杨鹏, 刘海浪, 李珍富, 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 左示敏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9编辑Hd6基因创制优质早熟水稻新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.
[6] 石少阶, 刘凯, 陈姿夷, 王卉颖, 李三和, 周雷, 游艾青. 水稻矮化多分蘖基因DMT1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034.
[7] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[8] 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[9] 王婵, 吴莹莹, 李文奇, 李霞, 王芳权, 周彤, 杨杰. 基于HRM技术开发水稻抗条纹叶枯病基因STV11功能标记[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2547-2556.
[10] 陈惠莹, 何嘉欣, 朱斌, 黄士轩, 周星佑, 伍君权, 杨美艳. 水稻黄单胞菌噬菌体vB_XaS_HDB2的全基因组分析和生物学特性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2087-2099.
[11] 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[12] 雷松翰, 范骏扬, 车艳奕, 代永东, 郑雨萌, 田维江, 桑贤春, 王晓雯. 水稻内卷叶突变体acl3的鉴定及调控基因的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1467-1479.
[13] 李福媛, 杨奕, 马继琼, 许明辉, 林良斌, 孙一丁. 水稻OsPUB4基因克隆、激素诱导表达分析与互作蛋白筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1690-1700.
[14] 王梦宁, 谢可冉, 高逖, 王飞, 任孝俭, 熊栋梁, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 崔克辉. 水稻幼穗分化期至抽穗期高温对籽粒形态和充实的影响及其与粒重的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1347-1362.
[15] 盛倩男, 方娅婷, 赵剑, 杜思垚, 胡行珍, 余秋华, 朱俊, 任涛, 鲁剑巍. 不同养分管理措施对稻田和旱地油菜产量的影响及其对冻害的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1286-1298.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!