欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (05): 809-817.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00809

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同耐镉基因型水稻农艺和生理性状的比较研究

黄冬芬;奚岭林;杨立年;王志琴;杨建昌*   

  1. 扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室, 江苏扬州225009
  • 收稿日期:2007-07-24 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-05-12 网络出版日期:2008-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 杨建昌

Comparisons in Agronomic and Physiological Traits of Rice Genotypes Differing in Cadmium-Tolerance

HUANG Dong-Fen,XI Ling-Lin,YANG Li-Nian,WANG Zhi-Qin,YANG Jian-Chang*   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2007-07-24 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-05-12 Published online:2008-05-12
  • Contact: YANG Jian-Chang

摘要: 于2004和2005年在扬州大学试验农场进行了不同耐镉基因型水稻农艺和生理性状的比较研究。2个耐镉(Cd)基因型汕优63(杂交籼稻)和扬粳9538(粳稻)及2个Cd敏感基因型扬稻6号(籼稻)和武运粳7号(粳稻)种植于盆钵。于移栽前盆钵土中加入Cd, 浓度为150 mg kg-1(Cd处理), 以未加Cd为对照(CK)。Cd处理后, 耐Cd基因型籽粒产量较CK降低6.2%~8.9%, Cd敏感基因型产量较对照降低38.3%~47.1%。每盆穗数和每穗颖花数显著减少是减产的主要原因, 结实率和千粒重在Cd处理和CK间无显著差异。Cd处理显著抑制Cd敏感基因型的分蘖发生, 导致整个生育期干物质积累的显著下降, 但对物质运转率和收获指数无显著影响。在Cd胁迫下, 分蘖至拔节期Cd敏感基因型的根系活力、叶片光合速率、超氧化物歧化酶和过氧化氢酶活性明显低于耐Cd基因型, 叶片超氧自由基和过氧化氢含量、乙烯释放速率及根系伤流液中1-氨基环丙烷-1-羧酸浓度则显著高于耐Cd基因型。抽穗以后Cd对上述生理指标以及整个生育时期叶片脱落酸含量无显著影响。说明Cd对水稻生长发育的影响主要在生育前期(分蘖至拔节期), 此期分蘖发生多、根系活力和叶片抗氧化保护系统能力强及乙烯合成少是耐Cd基因型水稻的主要农艺和生理特征。

关键词: 水稻, 耐镉基因型, 活性氧系统, 根系活力, 乙烯

Abstract: Cadmium (Cd) is one of major contaminants in agricultural soil, threatening agricultural production and human health. To understand agronomic and physiological characteristics of rice genotypes differing in Cd-tolerance would have great significance in selecting or breeding a Cd-tolerant cultivar. In this study, two Cd-tolerant rice genotypes of Shanyou 63 (indica hybrid) and Yangjing 9538 (japonica) and two Cd-susceptible genotypes of Yangdao 6 (indica) and Wuyunjing 7 (japonica) were pot-grown at a farm of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province in 2004 and 2005. 150 mg kg-1 Cd was added into pot soil before seedling transplanting (Cd treatment), and no Cd addition was taken as control (CK). Under the Cd treatment, the grain yield was reduced by 6.2–8.9% for the Cd-tolerant genotypes and by 38.3–47.1% for the Cd-susceptible ones when compared with their respective CKs. The reduction in grain yield was mainly attributed to the reductions of panicles per pot and spikelets per panicle. The differences in seed-setting rate and 1 000-grain weight were not significant between the Cd treatment and CK. The Cd treatment markedly inhibited the tillering of the Cd-susceptible genotypes, resulting in the reduction in dry matter accumulation during the whole growth period. Cd little affected the translocation of non-structural carbohydrate from culms and sheaths and harvest index. For Cd-susceptible genotypes, the Cd treatment significantly reduced root oxidation activity and photosynthetic rate, activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase of leaves, and obviously increased contents of superoxidate radical and hydrogen peroxide and ethylene evolution rate of leaves, and the concentration of 1-aminocylopropane-1-carboxylic acid in root bleedings from the tillering to jointing stages, while the Cd treatment much less affected the above physiological traits for the Cd-tolerant genotypes. The differences in the above traits at heading and afterwards and abscisic acid content in leaves during the whole growth period were not significant between the Cd treatment and CK. The results indicate that the effects of Cd on rice growth and development are mainly during the early growth period (from tillering to jointing), and more tillers, stronger root activity and antioxidative defense system, and less ethylene synthesis in the plants during this period would be considered as agronomic and physiological traits of Cd-tolerant genotypes of rice.

Key words: Rice, Cadmium-tolerant genotype, Reactive oxygen species, Root activity, Ethylene

[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[7] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[8] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[9] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[10] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[11] 陈悦, 孙明哲, 贾博为, 冷月, 孙晓丽. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 781-790.
[12] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[13] 巫燕飞, 胡琴, 周棋, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 水稻延伸因子复合体家族基因鉴定及非生物胁迫诱导表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 644-655.
[14] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
[15] 王琰, 陈志雄, 姜大刚, 张灿奎, 查满荣. 增强叶片氮素输出对水稻分蘖和碳代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 739-746.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!