欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (06): 938-945.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00938

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

多效唑处理对直播油菜机械收获相关性状及产量的影响

杨阳1,蒯婕1,吴莲蓉1,刘婷婷1,孙盈盈1,左青松2,周广生1,*,吴江生1   

  1. 1华中农业大学植物科学技术学院,湖北武汉 430070;2扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室,江苏扬州 225009
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-14 修回日期:2015-04-02 出版日期:2015-06-12 网络出版日期:2015-04-17
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家科技支撑计划项目(2013BAD20B06, 2014BAD11B03), 国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(NYCYTC-00510), 国家公益性(农业)科研专项经费项目(201203096)和教育部高校自主科技创新基金(2013PY001)资助。

Effects of Paclobutrazol on Yield and Mechanical Harvest Characteristics of Winter Rapeseed with Direct Seeding Treatment

YANG Yang1,KUAI Jie1,WU Lian-Rong1,LIU Ting-Ting1,SUN Yin-Yin1,ZUO Qing-Tong2,ZHOU Guang-Sheng1,*,WU Jiang-Sheng1   

  1. 1 College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; 2 Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
  • Received:2015-01-14 Revised:2015-04-02 Published:2015-06-12 Published online:2015-04-17

摘要:

以阳光2009与沣油520为材料,于封行期及蕾薹初期喷施不同浓度多效唑,测定倒伏、角果抗裂性及产量相关指标,研究多效唑对油菜产量和机械收获相关性状的影响,为高产及机械收获条件下油菜的多效唑调控提供技术支撑及理论依据。结果表明,不同时期多效唑处理均显著提高2个油菜品种的抗倒性、抗裂角性及产量,蕾薹初期喷施300 mg L–1多效唑后油菜抗倒与抗裂角指数增量大,封行期喷施150 mg L–1多效唑则后产量的增量大。多效唑处理降低每角果粒数,但增加油菜品种的单株角果数及千粒重,故而增加产量;且可通过增加油菜根颈粗、鲜重根冠比及抗折力降低株高和倒伏指数,提高油菜抗根倒与抗茎倒能力;通过增加角果含水量、延缓角果成熟度、增加角果皮干重提高油菜角果抗裂性。本研究认为封行期喷施150 mg L–1的多效唑是最佳喷施时期与喷施浓度,既可显著增强易倒伏而减产油菜田块的抗倒与抗裂角能力,最大幅度地提高产量,又可满足油菜机械化生产模式所需的高产、抗倒及抗裂角要求。

关键词: 油菜, 多效唑, 产量, 倒伏指数, 抗裂角指数, 机械收获

Abstract:

The aim of this research was to study the effects and mechanism of paclobutrazol (PP333) treatments on rapeseed yield and mechanical harvesting. PP333 was foliage sprayed with different concentrations at two stages (the closing of crop and the start of flower bud), on two varieties of rapeseed Yangguang 2009 and Fengyou 520. Our results demonstrated that PP333 treatment significantly increased the rapeseed lodging resistance, silique shattering resistance and yield. PP333 of 300 mg L–1 at the bud beginning more significantly enhanced lodging resistance and silique shattering resistance, whereas 150 mg L–1 PP333 at crop closing period more significantly increased yield of the two varieties. PP333 treatment reduced seed number per pod, while enhanced pods per plant, 1000-grain weight and yield. At the same time, PP333 treatment increased root crown diameter, root-top ratio (fresh) and snapping resistance, whereas it reduced plant height and culm lodging index, resulting in reduced angle of plant lodging, which indicates an improvement in the resistance of root and stem lodging. Silique shattering resistance was increased due to increased silique water content, silique dry weight and delayed pod maturity. In summary, the crop closing period and 150 mg L–1 PP333 are the best treatment time and concentration for significantly enhancing the abilities of lodging resistance, silique shattering resistance and yield, which could meet rapeseed mechanized production.

Key words: Rapeseed, Paclobutrazol, Yeld, Culm lodging index, Silique shatter resistance, Mechanical harvest

[1]王新发. 我国抗裂角机收油菜新品种培育获突破. 中国油料作物学报, 2009, 31(2): 106

Wang X F. Silique shatter mechanical harvest new varieties of rapeseed breakthrough. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2009, 31(2): 106 (in Chinese)

[2]黄胜东, 姚金保, 姚国才, 杨学明, 钱存鸣, 周朝飞. 多效唑拌种对小麦形态及增产效应探讨. 江苏农业科学, 2001, (2): 16–18

Huang S D, Yao J B, Yao G C, Yang X M, Qian C M, Zhou C F. MET dressing investigate the morphology and yield effect of wheat. Jiangsu Agric Sci, 2001, (2): 16–18 (in Chinese)

[3]Rajala A, Peltonen-Sainio P. Plant growth regulator effects on spring cereal root and shoot growth. Agron J, 2001, 93: 936–943

[4]Armstrong E L, Nicol H I. Reducing height and lodging in rapeseed with growth regulators. Austr J Exp Agric, 1991, 31: 245–250

[5]Baylis A D, Hutleybull P D. The effects of a paclobutrazol based growth regulator on the yield, quality and ease of management of oilseed rape. Ann Appl Biol, 1991, 118: 445–452

[6]Zhou W, Ye Q. Physiological and yield effects of uniconazole on winter rape (Brassica napus L.). J Plant Growth Regul, 1996, 15: 69–73

[7]孙华光, 钱敏珍, 严卫古, 刘葛山, 徐建明, 王礼门. 油菜应用多效唑培育壮苗和防倒伏的效果. 中国油料, 1994, (3): 40–42

Sun H G, Qian M Z, Yan W G, Liu G S, Xun J M, Wang L M. Effects of MET on development of rape. Oil Crops China, 1994, (3): 40–42 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8]Guo P Z, Jian X C, Bull D A. The effects of timing of N application and plant growth regulators on morphogenesis and yield formation in wheat. Plant Growth Regul, 2001, 35: 239–245

[9]Pinthus M J. Lodging in wheat, barley and oats: the phenomenon, its causes, and preventive measure. Adv Agron, 1973, 25: 209–263

[10]Crook M J, Ennos A R. The effect of nitrogen and growth regulators on stem and root characteristics associated with lodging in two cultivars of winter wheat.J. Exp Bot, 1995, 46: 931–938

[11]Rajala A, Peltonen-Sainio P, Onnela M, Jackson M. Effects of applying stem shortening plant growth regulators to leaves on root elongation by seedlings of wheat, oat and barley: mediation by ethylene. Plant Growth Regul, 2002, 38: 51–59

[12]Tripathi S C, Sayre K D, Kaul J N, Narang R S. Growth and morphology of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) culms and their association with lodging: effects of genotypes, N levels and Ethephon. Field Crops Res, 2003, 84: 271–290

[13]Acreche M M, Slafer G A. Lodging yield penalties as affected by breeding in Mediterranean wheats. Field Crops Res, 2011, 122: 40–48

[14]Peng D L, Chen X G, Yin Y P. Lodging resistance of winter wheat(Triticum aestivum L.): lignin accumulation and its related enzymes activities due to the application of paclobutrazol or gibberellin acid. Field Crops Res, 2014, 157: 1–7

[15]张喜娟, 李红娇, 李伟娟, 徐正进, 陈温福, 张文忠, 王嘉宇. 北方直立穗型粳稻抗倒性的研究. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42: 2305–2313

Zhang X J, Li H Q, Li W J, Xu Z J, Chen W F, Zhang W Z, Wang J Y. The lodging resistance of erect panicle japonica rice in northern China. Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42: 2305–2313 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16]Baker C J, Berry P M, Spink J H, Sylvester Bradley R, Griffin J M, Scott R K, Clare R W. A method for the assessment of the risk of wheat lodging. Theor Biol, 1998, 194: 587–603

[17]Sterling M, Baker C J, Berry P M, Wadec A. An experimental investigation of the lodging of wheat. Agric For Meteorol, 2003, 119: 149–165

[18]崔嘉成, 刘佳, 梅德圣, 李云昌, 付丽, 彭鹏飞, 王军, 胡琼. 甘蓝型油菜裂角相关性状的遗传与相关分析. 作物学报, 2013, 39: 1791–1798

Cui J C, Liu J, Mei D S, Li Y C, Fu L, Peng P F, Wang J, Hu Q. Genetic and correlation analysis on pod shattering traits in Brassica napus L. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39: 1791–1798 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]任廷波, 赵继献. 不同施氮量与多效唑喷施时期对优质杂交油菜产量和品质的影响. 贵州农业科学, 2012, 40(4): 81–84

Ren T B, Zhao J X. Effects of different nitrogen level and foliage dressing paclobutrazol at different growth stage on yield and quality of quality hybrid rape. Guizhou Agric Sci, 2012, 40(4): 81–84 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[20]刘慧杰, 苟文峰. 多效唑对甘蓝型油菜不同品种(系)的效应研究. 陕西农业科学, 1992, 17(2): 16–18

Liu H J, Gou W F. Effect of MET on different Brassica varieties. Shanxi Agric Sci, 1992, 17(2): 16–18 (in Chinese)

[21]魏凤珍, 李金才, 王成雨, 屈会娟, 沈学善. 氮肥运筹模式对小麦茎秆抗倒性能的影响. 作物学报, 2008, 34: 1080–1085

Wei F Z, Li J C, Wang C Y, Qu H J, Shen X S. Effects of nitrogenous fertilizer application model on culm lodging resistance in winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34: 1080–1085 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[22]Morgan C L, Bruce D M, Child R D, Landbrooke Z L, Arthur A E. Genetic variation for pod shatter resistance among lines of oilseed rape developed from synthetic B. napus. Field Crops Res, 1998, 58: 153–165

[23]孟倩, 董军刚, 黄伟男, 段海峰, 张博, 解芳宁, 董振生. 密度和播期对甘蓝型油菜角果抗裂性的影响. 西北农业学报, 2013, 11: 37–41

Meng Q, Dong J G, Huang W N, Duan H F, Zhang B, Xie F N, Dong Z S. Effects of planting density and sowing date on the shatter resistance of Brassica napus pods. Acta Agric Boreali–Occidents Sin, 2013, 11: 37–41 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[1] 陈松余, 丁一娟, 孙峻溟, 黄登文, 杨楠, 代雨涵, 万华方, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnCNGC基因家族鉴定及其在核盘菌侵染和PEG处理下的表达特性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1357-1371.
[2] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[3] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[4] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[5] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[6] 秦璐, 韩配配, 常海滨, 顾炽明, 黄威, 李银水, 廖祥生, 谢立华, 廖星. 甘蓝型油菜耐低氮种质筛选及绿肥应用潜力评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1488-1501.
[7] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[8] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[9] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[10] 黄伟, 高国应, 吴金锋, 刘丽莉, 张大为, 周定港, 成洪涛, 张凯旋, 周美亮, 李莓, 严明理. 芥菜型油菜BjA09.TT8BjB08.TT8基因调节类黄酮的合成[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1169-1180.
[11] 雷新慧, 万晨茜, 陶金才, 冷佳俊, 吴怡欣, 王家乐, 王鹏科, 杨清华, 冯佰利, 高金锋. 褪黑素与2,4-表油菜素内酯浸种对盐胁迫下荞麦发芽与幼苗生长的促进效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1210-1221.
[12] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[13] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[14] 石育钦, 孙梦丹, 陈帆, 成洪涛, 胡学志, 付丽, 胡琼, 梅德圣, 李超. 通过CRISPR/Cas9技术突变BnMLO6基因提高甘蓝型油菜的抗病性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 801-811.
[15] 袁大双, 邓琬玉, 王珍, 彭茜, 张晓莉, 姚梦楠, 缪文杰, 朱冬鸣, 李加纳, 梁颖. 甘蓝型油菜BnMAPK2基因的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 840-850.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!