作物学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (01): 126-136.
张海燕1,2,段文学2,解备涛2,董顺旭2,汪宝卿2,史春余1,*,张立明3,*
ZHANG Hai-Yan1,2,DUAN Wen-Xue2,XIE Bei-Tao2,DONG Shun-Xu2,WANG Bao-Qing2,SHI Chun-Yu1,*,ZHANG Li-Ming3,*
摘要:
在人工控水条件下, 以抗旱品种济薯21和不抗旱品种济紫薯1号为试验材料, 设置全生育期干旱胁迫(DS)、发根分枝期干旱胁迫(DS1)、蔓薯并长期干旱胁迫(DS2)、快速膨大期干旱胁迫(DS3) 4个处理, 全生育期正常灌水(WW)为对照, 研究其对甘薯内源激素及块根产量的影响。结果表明, 与对照相比, 2个品种不同年份的所有干旱胁迫处理的鲜薯和薯干产量均显著下降。其中, DS薯干产量减产幅度最大, 济薯21和济紫薯1号3年平均分别减产44.62%和56.21%; 其次是DS1, 减产32.03%和44.03%; 再次是DS2, 减产30.41%和39.39%; DS3的减产幅度最小, 为13.66%和17.88%。抗旱品种济薯21的减产幅度小于不抗旱品种济紫薯1号。干旱胁迫抑制了甘薯地上部生长及块根的形成和膨大, 两个品种的单株叶片数、蔓长、地上部干重、地下部干重和块根淀粉率, 与对照相比, 各时期均表现为, DS的减少幅度最大, 其次是DS1和DS2, DS3的减少幅度最小。不同时期干旱胁迫均引起叶片和块根中GA、IAA和ZR含量下降, ABA含量上升。地上部干重与叶片GA、IAA和ZR含量呈显著正相关, 与ABA含量呈显著负相关; 地下部干重与块根GA、IAA和ZR含量呈显著正相关, 与ABA含量呈显著负相关。总之, 不同时期干旱胁迫均导致甘薯产量下降, 且胁迫时间越早, 对甘薯内源激素和块根产量的影响越大, 发根分枝期是甘薯对水分最敏感的时期。
[1]张宪初, 王胜亮, 吕军杰, 张春强. 旱地水分田供需状况及增产措施研究. 干旱地区农业研究, 1999, 17(4): 93–97 Zhang X C, Wang S L, Lyu J J, Zhang C Q. Research on field water supply and requirement condition of dryland sweet potato and yield-increasing method. Agric Res Arid Areas, 1999, 17(4): 93–97 (in Chinese with English abstract) [2]Lewthwaite S L, Triggs C M. Sweetpotato cultivar response to prolonged drought. Agron New Zeal, 2012, 42: 1–10 [3]江苏省农业科学院, 山东省农业科学院. 中国甘薯栽培学. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1984. pp 51–56 Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Chinese Sweetpotato Cultivation. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 1984. pp 51–56 (in Chinese) [4]张天年, 吴旭银, 武宝悦, 王文颇. 不同土壤含水量对甘薯生长的影响. 河北农业技术师范学院学报, 1993, 7(3): 11–17 Zhang T N, Wu X Y, Wu B Y, Wang W P. The influence of different soil water content on growth of sweet potato. J Hebei Agrotech Teachers Coll, 1993, 7(3): 11–17 (in Chinese with English abstract) [5]肖利贞. 土壤干旱对甘薯生育及产量的影响. 华北农学报, 1995, 10(2) : 106–110 Xiao L Z. Influence of soil aridity on the growth, development and yield of sweet potato. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 1995, 10(2): 106–110 (in Chinese with English abstract) [6]李长志, 李欢, 刘庆, 史衍玺. 不同生长时期干旱胁迫甘薯根系生长及荧光生理的特性比较. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22: 511–517 Li C Z, Li H, Liu Q, Shi Y X. Comparison of root development and fluorescent physiological characteristics of sweet potato exposure to drought stress in different growth stages. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2016, 22: 511–517 (in Chinese with English abstract) [7]郑海青, 王玉泉. 闽东南甘薯生产与气象条件关系的研究. 中国农业气象, 1996, 17(3): 14–18 Zheng H Q, Wang Y Q. Study on the relation between the production of sweet potato and meteorological conditions in southeast of Fujian. Chin J Agrometeorol, 1996, 17(3): 14–18 (in Chinese with English abstract) [8]Velikova V, Yordanov I, Tsonev T. Plant responses to drought, acclimation, and stress tolerance. Photosynthetica, 2000, 38: 171–186 [9]Shao H B, Chu L Y, Jaleel C A, Manlvannan P, Panneerselvam R, Shao M A. Understanding water deficit stress-induced changes in the basic metabolism of higher plants-biotechnologically and sustainably improving agriculture and ecoenvironment in arid regions of the globe. Crit Rev Biotech, 2009, 29: 131–151 [10]Pustovoitova T N. Changes in the levels of IAA and ABA in cucumber leaves under progressive soil drought. Russ J Plant Physiol, 2004, 51: 513–517 [11]Xie Z J, Jiang D, Jiang D, Cao W X, Dai T B, Jing Q. Relationships of endogenous plant hormones to accumulation of grain protein and starch in winter wheat under different post-anthesis soil water statuses. Plant Growth Regul, 2003, 41: 117–127 [12]徐云姬, 顾道健, 张博博, 张耗, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 玉米果穗不同部位籽粒激素含量及其与胚乳发育和籽粒灌浆的关系. 作物学报, 2013, 39: 1452–1461 Xu Y J, Gu D J, Zhang B B, Zhang H, Wang Z Q, Yang J C. Hormone contents in kernels at different positions on an ear and their relationship with endosperm development and kernel filling in maize. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39: 1452–1461 (in Chinese with English abstract) [13]罗宏海, 韩焕勇, 张亚黎, 张旺锋. 干旱和复水对膜下滴灌棉花根系及叶片内源激素含量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24: 1009-1016 Luo H H, Han H Y, Zhang Y L, Zhang W F. Effects of drought and re-watering on endogenous hormone contents of cotton roots and leaves under drip irrigation with mulch. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2013, 24: 1009–1016 (in Chinese with English abstract) [14]周宇飞, 王德权, 陆樟镳, 王娜, 王艺陶, 李丰先, 许文娟, 黄瑞冬. 干旱胁迫对持绿性高粱光合特性和内源激素ABA、CTK 含量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47: 655–663 Zhou Y F, Wang D Q, Lu Z B, Wang N, Wang Y T, Li F X, Xu W J, Huang R D. Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics and endogenous hormone ABA and CTK contents in green-stayed sorghum. Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47: 655–663 (in Chinese with English abstract) [15]张明生, 谢波, 谈峰. 水分胁迫下甘薯内源激素的变化与品种抗旱性的关系. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35: 498–501 Zhang M S, Xie B, Tan F. Relationship between changes on endogenous hormone of sweetpotato under water stress and drought resistance. Sci Agric Sin, 2002, 35: 498–501 (in Chinese with English abstract) [16]王庆美, 张立明, 王振林. 甘薯内源激素变化与块根形成膨大的关系. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38: 2414–2420 Wang Q M, Zhang L M, Wang Z L. Formation and thickening of tuberous roots in relation to the endogenous hormone concentrations in sweetpotato. Sci Agric Sin, 2005, 38: 2414–2420 (in Chinese with English abstract) [17]Nakatani M, Komeichi M. Changes in the endogenous level of zeatin riboside, abscisic acid and indole acetic acid during formation and thickening of tuberous roots in sweetpotato. Jpn J Crop Sci, 1991, 60: 91–100 [18]钮福祥, 华希新, 郭小丁, 邬景禹, 李洪民, 丁成伟. 甘薯品种抗旱性生理指标及其综合评价初探. 作物学报, 1996, 22: 392–398 Niu F X, Hua X X, Guo X D, Wu J Y, Li H M, Ding C W. Studies on several physiological indexes of the drought re-sistance of sweet potato and its comprehensive evaluation. Acta Agron Sin, 1996, 22: 392–398 (in Chinese with English abstract) [19]陈京. 抗旱性不同的甘薯品种对渗透胁迫的生理响应. 作物学报, 1999, 25: 232–236 Chen J. Physiological response for different drought resis-tance of sweet potato under osmotic stress. Acta Agron Sin, 1999, 25: 232–236 (in Chinese with English abstract) [20]Zhang M S, Xie B, Tan F. Relationship between changes of endogenous hormone in sweet potato under water stress and variety drought-resistance. Agric Sci China, 2002, 1: 626–630 [21]张明生, 谢波, 戚金亮, 谈锋, 张启堂, 杨永华.甘薯植株形态、生长势和产量与品种抗旱性的关系. 热带作物学报, 2006, 27(1): 39–43 Zhang M S, Xie B, Qi J L, Tan F, Zhang Q T, Yang Y H. Relationship of drought resistance of sweet potato with its plant type, growth vigour and yield under water stress. Chin J Trop Crops, 2006, 27(1): 39–43 (in Chinese with English abstract) [22]张明生, 彭忠华, 谢波, 谈锋, 张启堂, 付玉凡, 杨春贤, 杨永华. 甘薯离体叶片失水速率及渗透调节物质与品种抗旱性的关系. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37: 152–156 Zhang M S, Peng Z H, Xie B, Tan F, Zhang Q T, Fu Y F, Yang C X, Yang Y H. Relationship between water loss rate of cutting leaves and osmotic regulators under water stress and drought resistance in sweet potato. Sci Agric Sin, 2004, 37: 152–156 (in Chinese with English abstract) [23]Kim S H, Mizuno K, Fujimural T. Regulated expression of ADP lucose pyrophosphorylase and chalcone synthase during root development in sweetpotato. Plant Growth Regul, 2002, 38: 173–179 [24]Chowdhury S R, Singh R, Kundu D K, Antony E, Thakur A K, Verma H N. Growth, dry matter and yield of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) as influence by soil mechanical impedance and mineral nutrition under different irrigation regimes. Adv Hortic Sci, 2002, 16: 25–29 [25]李冀南, 李朴芳, 孔海燕, 熊俊兰, 王绍明, 熊友才. 干旱胁迫下植物根源化学信号研究进展. 生态学报, 2011, 31: 2610–2620 Li J N, Li P F, Kong H Y, Xiong J L, Wang S M, Xiong Y C. Current progress in eco-physiology of root-sourced chemical signal in plant under drought stress. Acta Ecol Sin, 2011, 31: 2610–2620 (in Chinese with English abstract) [26]袁振, 汪宝卿, 姜瑶, 解备涛, 董顺旭, 张海燕, 段文学, 王庆美, 张立明. 甘薯耐旱性品种苗期筛选及耐旱性指标研究. 山东农业科学, 2015, 47(3): 22–26 Yuan Z, Wang B Q, Jiang Y, Xie B T, Dong S X, Zhang H Y, Duan W X, Wang Q M, Zhang L M. Seedling screening of drought resistance varietiesof sweetpotato and drought resistance index research. Shandong Agric Sci, 2015, 47(3): 22–26 (in Chinese with English abstract) [27]陈建勋, 王晓峰. 植物生理学实验指导(第2版). 广州: 华南理工大学出版社, 2006. pp 64–66 Chen J X, Wang X F. Guidance of Plant Physiological Experiment, 2nd edn. Guangzhou: South China University of Techno?logy Publishers, 2006. pp 64–66 (in Chinese) [28]谈锋, 张启堂, 陈京, 李坤培. 甘薯品种抗旱适应性的数量分析. 作物学报, 1991, 17: 394–398 Tan F, Zhang Q T, Chen J, Li K P. Quantitative analysis of adaptability of drought resistance in sweet potato cultivars. Acta Agron Sin, 1991, 17: 394–398 (in Chinese with English abstract) [29]赵春江, 康书江, 王纪华, 郭晓维, 李鸿祥. 植物内源激素对小麦叶片衰老的调控机理研究. 华北农学报, 2000, 15(2): 53–56 Zhao C J, Kang S J, Wang J H, Guo X W, Li H X. Hormone regulation mechanism on wheat leaf aging. Agron J North China, 2000, 15(2): 53–56 (in Chinese with English abstract) [30]段留生, 田晓莉. 作物化学控制原理与技术. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2005. pp 40–45 Duan L S, Tian X L. Crop Chemical Regulation Mechanism and Technique. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2005. pp 40–45 (in Chinese) [31]Schussler J R, Brenner M L, Brun W A. Relationship of endogenous abscisic acid to sucrose level and seed growth rate of soybeans. Plant Physiol, 1991, 96: 1308–1313 [32]Lee B T, Martin P, Bangerth F. Phytohormone levels in the florets of a single wheat spikelet during preanthesis development relationships to grain set. J Exp Bot, 1988, 39: 927–933 [33]Jackson M B. Positive and negative messages from roots induce foliar desiccation and stomatal closure inflooded pea plants. J Exp Bot, 1983, 34: 483–506 [34]Guan L Q, Scandalios J G. Effect of the plant growth regulator abscisic acid high osmoticum on the developmental ex-pression of the maize catalase genes. Physiol Plant, 1998, 104: 413–422 [35]沈元月, 黄从林, 张秀海, 曹呜庆. 植物抗旱的分子机制研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2002, 10(1): 30–34 Shen Y Y, Huang C L, Zhang X H, Cao M Q. Plant drought tolerance molecular mechanism. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2002, 10(1): 30–34 (in Chinese with English abstract) [36]李卓杰. 植物激素及其应用. 广州: 中山大学出版社, 1993. pp 10–56 Li Z J. Plant Hormone and Application. Guangzhou: Zhong-shan University Press, 1993. pp 10–56 (in Chinese) [37]张立明, 王庆美, 何钟佩. 脱毒和生长调节剂对甘薯内源激素含量及块根产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40: 70–77 Zhang L M, Wang Q M, He Z P. Effects of virus-eliminating and plant growth regulators on the endogenous level of hor-mone and tuber root yield of sweetpotato. Sci Agric Sin, 2007, 40: 70–77 (in Chinese with English abstract) [38]Xu X, Lammeren A M V, Vermeer E, Vreuqdenhil D. The role of gibberellin abscisic acid, and sucrose in the regulation of potato tuber formation in vitro. Plant Physiol, 1998, 117: 575–584 [39]刘梦云, 毛雪飞, 门福义, 蒙美莲, 胡志全.马铃薯块茎内源激素变化与块茎增大生长的相关规律. 华北农学报, 1997, 12(2): 86–92 Lui M Y, Mao X F, Men F Y, Meng M L, Hu Z Q. Correlation law between the change of intrinsic hormones of potato tuber and growth of the tuber. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 1997, 12(2): 86–92 (in Chinese with English abstract) [40]李良俊, 潘恩超, 许超, 叶枝荣, 曹碚生. 莲藕膨大过程中内源激素、水杨酸和多胺含量的变化. 园艺学报, 2006, 33: 1106–1108 Li L J, Pan E C, Xu C, Ye Z R, Cao B S. Changes of endogenous hormones, polyamines and salicylic acid content during rhizome development of Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. Acta Hortic Sin, 2006, 33: 1106–1108 (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 胡艳娟, 薛丹, 耿嫡, 朱末, 王天穹, 王晓雪. 水稻OsCDF1基因突变效应及其基因组变异分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2362-2372. |
[2] | 房孟颖, 任粱, 卢霖, 董学瑞, 武志海, 闫鹏, 董志强. 乙矮合剂对粒用高粱根系建构和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2528-2538. |
[3] | 李亦扬, 李远, 赵子胥, 张鼎顺, 杜嘉宁, 吴淑娟, 孙思琦, 陈媛, 张祥, 陈德华, 刘震宇. 土壤增氮对棉铃对位叶Bt杀虫蛋白含量影响及氮代谢机制[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2505-2516. |
[4] | 张丽华, 张经廷, 董志强, 侯万彬, 翟立超, 姚艳荣, 吕丽华, 赵一安, 贾秀领. 不同降水年型水分运筹对冬小麦产量及其构成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2539-2551. |
[5] | 张刁亮, 杨昭, 胡发龙, 殷文, 柴强, 樊志龙. 复种绿肥在不同灌水水平下对小麦籽粒品质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2572-2581. |
[6] | 杨毅, 何志强, 林佳慧, 李洋, 陈飞, 吕长文, 唐道彬, 周全卢, 王季春. 椰糠施用量对土壤理化性状和甘薯产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2517-2527. |
[7] | 苏一钧, 赵路宽, 唐芬, 戴习彬, 孙亚伟, 周志林, 刘亚菊, 曹清河. 378份甘薯引进种遗传多样性及群体结构分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2582-2593. |
[8] | 陈力, 王靖, 邱晓, 孙海莲, 张文浩, 王天佐. 不同耐旱性紫花苜蓿干旱胁迫下生理响应和转录调控的差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2122-2132. |
[9] | 曹玉军, 刘志铭, 兰天娇, 刘小丹, 魏雯雯, 姚凡云, 吕艳杰, 王立春, 王永军. 吉林省不同年代玉米品种光合生理特性对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2183-2195. |
[10] | 杨晓慧, 王碧胜, 孙筱璐, 侯靳锦, 徐梦杰, 王志军, 房全孝. 冬小麦对水分胁迫响应的模型模拟与节水滴灌制度优化[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2196-2209. |
[11] | 李宇星, 马亮亮, 张月, 秦博雅, 张文静, 马尚宇, 黄正来, 樊永惠. 外源海藻糖对灌浆期高温胁迫下小麦旗叶生理特性和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2210-2224. |
[12] | 贾瑞雪, 陈伊航, 张荣, 唐朝臣, 王章英. 超高效液相色谱法同时测定甘薯中13种类胡萝卜素的含量[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2259-2274. |
[13] | 刘世洁, 杨习文, 马耕, 冯昊翔, 韩志栋, 韩潇杰, 张晓燕, 贺德先, 马冬云, 谢迎新, 王丽芳, 王晨阳. 灌水和施氮对冬小麦根系特征及氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2296-2307. |
[14] | 魏正欣, 刘昌燕, 陈宏伟, 李莉, 孙龙清, 韩雪松, 焦春海, 沙爱华. 基于干旱胁迫转录组信息的蚕豆ASPAT基因家族分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7): 1871-1881. |
[15] | 韦金贵, 郭瑶, 柴强, 殷文, 樊志龙, 胡发龙. 水氮减量密植玉米的产量及产量构成[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7): 1919-1929. |
|