欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (8): 2210-2224.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.21057

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

外源海藻糖对灌浆期高温胁迫下小麦旗叶生理特性和产量的影响

李宇星(), 马亮亮, 张月, 秦博雅, 张文静, 马尚宇, 黄正来(), 樊永惠()   

  1. 安徽农业大学农学院 / 农业农村部黄淮南部小麦生物学与遗传育种重点实验室, 安徽 合肥 230036
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-28 接受日期:2023-02-10 出版日期:2023-08-12 网络出版日期:2023-02-27
  • 通讯作者: 黄正来,樊永惠
  • 作者简介:E-mail: 18702289708@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省科技重大专项(202003a06020014);安徽省自然科学基金项目(2008085QC118);国家自然科学基金联合基金项目(U19A2021);安徽农业大学稳定和引进人才科研项目(YJ2018-38);安徽农业大学青年基金重点项目(03087060)

Effects of exogenous trehalose on physiological characteristics and yield of wheat flag leaves under high temperature stress at grain filling stage

LI Yu-Xing(), MA Liang-Liang, ZHANG Yue, QIN Bo-Ya, ZHANG Wen-Jing, MA Shang-Yu, HUANG Zheng-Lai(), FAN Yong-Hui()   

  1. College of Agriculture, Anhui Agricultural University / Key Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Breeding in the South of Huanghe-Huaihe Rivers, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hefei 230036, Anhui, China
  • Received:2022-08-28 Accepted:2023-02-10 Published:2023-08-12 Published online:2023-02-27
  • Contact: HUANG Zheng-Lai,FAN Yong-Hui
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the Major Science and Technology Projects of Anhui Province(202003a06020014);Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province(2008085QC118);Joint Fund Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China(U19A2021);Scientific Research Project for Stabilizing and Introducing Talents of Anhui Agricultural University(YJ2018-38);Key Project of the Youth Fund of Anhui Agricultural University(03087060)

RichHTML

33

PDF

448

摘要：

为探究外源海藻糖(TRE)对高温胁迫下灌浆期不同耐性小麦品种旗叶生理特性和产量的影响作用, 于2020—2022年在安徽农业大学高新技术农业园进行试验, 选用前期筛选得的耐热性差异显著的敏感型小麦品种泛麦5号(Fanmai 5, FM5)和耐热型小麦品种淮麦33 (Huaimai 33, HM33)作为试验材料, 设置叶面喷施清水+不高温(CK1)、清水+灌浆期高温胁迫(CK2)、10 mmol L-1海藻糖+灌浆期高温胁迫(T10H)、15 mmol L-1海藻糖+灌浆期高温胁迫(T15H)和20 mmol L-1海藻糖+灌浆期高温胁迫(T20H)共5个处理。结果表明, 在高温胁迫条件下, 绿叶面积、叶绿素相对含量(SPAD)和干物质积累量均显著下降, 与非高温逆境相比, 高温胁迫下小麦产量显著下降, 穗数和穗粒数无显著变化, 千粒重是减产的主导因素。与喷清水相比, 喷施海藻糖后产量较高温胁迫处理有所提升, 各器官干物质积累量提高, 丙二醛(MDA)含量降低, 超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化物酶(POD)和过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性提高, 变化幅度在品种间存在差异, 耐热品种的SPAD值降幅与丙二醛的增幅较小, 但CAT活性的增幅较大, 因而减产幅度较小。进一步的分析表明, 净光合速率(Pn)、气孔导度(Gs)、蒸腾速率(Tr)、SPAD、SOD及POD和千粒重呈极显著正相关关系, MDA和产量呈极显著负相关关系。这些结果表明高温胁迫通过降低Pn、Gs和Tr抑制小麦的光合作用, 减少光合产物的生成, 造成最终的减产。喷施TRE, Pn、Gs、Tr、SPAD和CAT是降低高温胁迫伤害的主要指标, 敏感品种缓解效果明显。此外, 开花期喷施浓度15 mmol L-1海藻糖效果最好。该研究结果可为海藻糖对灌浆期高温胁迫下小麦光合响应差异机制和小麦抗氧化代谢提供理论依据。

关键词: 小麦, 高温胁迫, 海藻糖, 旗叶, 产量

Abstract:

In order to investigate the effect of exogenous trehalose (TRE) on the physiological characteristics and yield of flag leaves of wheat varieties with different tolerance under high temperature stress during grain filling period, the experiments were conducted in the high-tech agricultural park of Anhui Agricultural University from 2020 to 2022. The sensitive wheat varieties Fanmai 5 (FM5) and heat-resistant wheat varieties Huaimai 33 (HM33) with significant difference in heat resistance were selected as the experimental materials, there were five treatments of spraying water + non high temperature (CK1), water + high temperature stress (CK2), 10 mmol L-1 trehalose + high temperature stress (T10H), 15 mmol L-1 trehalose + high temperature stress (T15H), and 20 mmol L-1 trehalose + high temperature stress (T20H) on the leaf surface. The results showed that under high temperature stress conditions, compared to non-high temperature adversity, the green leaf area, chlorophyll relative content (SPAD), and dry matter accumulation were significantly decreased, wheat yield was significantly reduced, spike number, and spike grain number did not change significantly, and 1000-grain weight was the dominant factor in yield reduction. Compared to water spraying, the yield after spraying trehalose was higher than that under high temperature stress, the accumulation of dry matter in various organs was increased, the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) was decreased, the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) were increased, and the range of change was different among varieties. The decrease of SPAD value of heat-resistant varieties was smaller than that of malondialdehyde, but the increase of CAT activity was larger, indicating the production reduction was small. Further analysis showed that the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), transpiration rate (Tr), SPAD, SOD, and POD had an extremely significant positive correlation with 1000-grain weight, while MDA had an extremely significant negative correlation with yield. These results suggested that high temperature stress inhibited photosynthesis in wheat by reducing Pn, Gs, and Tr, decreasing photosynthetic product production and causing eventual yield reduction. Spraying TRE, Pn, Gs, Tr, SPAD, and CAT were the main indicators to reduce the injury caused by high temperature stress, and the mitigation effect of sensitive varieties was obvious. In addition, the effect of spraying 15 mmol L-1 trehalose at flowering stage was the best. The results could provide a theoretical basis for the mechanism of wheat photosynthetic response difference and wheat antioxidant metabolism under high temperature stress during trehalose filling stage.

Key words: wheat, high temperature stress, trehalose, flag leaf, yield

表1

播种前试验田0~20 cm土壤养分含量"

年度
Year		 全氮
Total N
(g kg-1)		 有机质
Organic matter
(g kg-1)		 有效磷
Available phosphorous
(mg kg-1)		 碱解氮
Alkali hydrolyzed
nitrogen (mg kg-1)		 速效钾
Rapidly available potassium (mg kg-1)
2020-2021 0.89 14.21 21.51 77.15 238.11
2021-2022 1.03 13.07 18.25 64.41 203.51

图1

2021-2022试验期间试验地棚内/棚外平均温度(A, B)和棚内/棚外温度变化动态图(C, D)"

图2

外源海藻糖对灌浆期高温胁迫下小麦产量及其构成因素的影响 CK1: 叶面喷等量清水+不高温; CK2: 喷等量清水+高温; T10H: 喷10 mmol L-1海藻糖+灌浆期高温胁迫; T15H: 喷15 mmol L-1海藻糖+灌浆期高温胁迫; T20H: 喷20 mmol L-1海藻糖+灌浆期高温胁迫。不同小写字母代表同一时期不同处理间达到显著水平(P < 0.05)。FM5: 泛麦5号; HM33: 淮麦33。"

表2

外源海藻糖对灌浆期高温胁迫下小麦产量和产量构成因素的方差分析"

变异来源
Source of variation		 自由度
Degrees of freedom		 产量
Yield		 穗粒数
Kernels per ear		 千粒重
1000-kernel weight		 穗数
Harvest ear number
年份 Year (Y) 1 ** ** ns ns
品种 Hybrid (H) 1 ** ** ** ns
处理 Treatment (T) 4 ** ns ** ns
Y×H 1 ** ** ns ns
Y×T 4 ** ns ns ns
H×T 4 ** ns ** ns

表3

2021年外源海藻糖对灌浆期高温胁迫下小麦成熟期干物质积累量的影响"

品种
Hybrid		 处理
Treatment		 旗叶
Flag leaf		 余叶
Remaining leaf		 茎
Stem		 穗
Spike
HM33 CK1 0.48±0.01 a 1.55±0.05 a 8.03±0.10 a 19.15±0.37 a
CK2 0.44±0.02 a 1.22±0.02 d 6.71±0.07 d 13.21±0.14 e
T10H 0.45±0.01 a 1.35±0.01 bc 7.20±0.14 bc 15.78±0.29 c
T15H 0.46±0.01 a 1.44±0.04 b 7.51±0.13 b 16.89±0.44 b
T20H 0.45±0.01 a 1.29±0.01 cd 7.04±0.06 cd 14.51±0.09 d
FM5 CK1 0.42±0.01 a 1.05±0.02 a 7.01±0.24 ab 14.92±0.32 a
CK2 0.37±0.01 a 0.72±0.01 d 5.11±0.27 c 11.95±0.12 c
T10H 0.31±0.03 b 0.89±0.01 c 7.27±0.10 ab 12.39±0.08 bc
T15H 0.41±0.01 a 0.99±0.02 b 6.45±0.27 b 13.12±0.30 b
T20H 0.38±0.01 a 0.85±0.02 c 7.41±0.31 a 12.14±0.16 c

表4

2022年外源海藻糖对灌浆期高温胁迫下小麦成熟期干物质积累量的影响"

品种
Hybrid		 处理
Treatment		 旗叶
Flag leaf		 倒二叶
Inverted second leaf		 倒三叶
Inverted
clover		 余叶
Remaining leaves		 倒一节
Backward
section		 余节
Residual stem		 穗
Spike
HM33 CK1 0.45±0.01 ab 0.56±0.01 ab 0.52±0.01 a 0.49±0.01 a 2.68±0.08 a 5.15±0.18 a 17.90±0.63 a
CK2 0.45±0.00 ab 0.54±0.01 b 0.45±0.02 b 0.23±0.01 c 2.42±0.03 b 4.73±0.13 ab 13.05±0.25 b
T10H 0.47±0.01 a 0.58±0.02 a 0.55±0.01 a 0.27±0.02 c 2.66±0.02 a 4.24±0.24 bc 16.56±0.51 a
T15H 0.47±0.01 a 0.48±0.02 c 0.52±0.01 a 0.36±0.01 b 2.66±0.07 a 4.62±0.22 abc 16.93±0.75 a
T20H 0.43±0.00 b 0.44±0.00 c 0.54±0.01 a 0.35±0.02 b 2.42±0.01 b 4.10±0.11 c 14.57±0.15 b
FM5 CK1 0.40±0.00 a 0.45±0.05 ab 0.31±0.01 a 0.21±0.01 a 2.34±0.08 a 5.48±0.42 a 14.10±0.55 a
CK2 0.35±0.02 a 0.46±0.01 a 0.20±0.01 b 0.02±0.00 c 2.03±0.05 b 4.06±0.46 a 11.67±0.20 b
T10H 0.39±0.05 a 0.38±0.00 bc 0.32±0.01 a 0.24±0.02 a 2.23±0.14 ab 4.81±0.17 a 11.77±0.14 b
T15H 0.43±0.02 a 0.45±0.01 ab 0.33±0.02 a 0.13±0.01 b 2.21±0.01 ab 4.53±0.39 a 12.65±0.52 b
T20H 0.39±0.02 a 0.34±0.01 c 0.30±0.06 a 0.11±0.01 b 2.02±0.12 b 4.77±0.48 a 11.74±0.28 b

表5

2021年外源海藻糖对灌浆期高温胁迫下小麦各器官干物质积累量变化率的影响"

品种
Hybrid		 处理
Treatment		 全株总叶片
Total leaves of the whole plant		 旗叶
Flag leaf		 余叶
Remaining leaf		 茎
Stem		 穗
Spike
HM33 CK2 -18.04±2.86 a -7.84±2.07 a -21.12±3.35 a -16.45±1.43 a -19.84±2.36 a
T10H -11.13±1.88 bc -5.53±2.84 a -12.71±3.08 b -10.33±2.87 bc -16.94±1.20 a
T15H -6.43±1.74 c -4.12±3.78 a -7.05±1.68 c -6.58±0.98 c -11.91±3.67 b
T20H -14.67±1.87 ab -6.43±4.22 a -17.07±2.67 ab -12.38±1.60 ab -18.59±1.48 a
FM5 CK2 -26.02±1.15 a -17.57±4.80 a -31.23±1.41 a -27.19±1.32 a -31.00±0.99 a
T10H -18.53±1.56 b -12.80±3.25 ab -14.97±2.06 b -6.01±6.48 b -24.18±1.32 b
T15H -5.02±1.44 c -2.92±5.50 b -5.68±2.65 c -4.02±4.45 b -11.85±0.64 d
T20H -16.15±1.61 b -9.21±5.56 b -18.72±3.20 b -7.53±6.88 b -17.59±1.62 c

表6

2022年外源海藻糖对灌浆期高温胁迫下小麦各器官干物质积累量变化率的影响"

品种
Hybrid		 处理
Treatment		 全株总叶片
Total leaves of the whole plant		 上三叶
Upper clover		 旗叶
Flag leaf		 倒二叶
Inverted second leaf		 倒三叶
Inverted clover		 余叶
Remaining leaves		 茎
Stem		 倒一节
Backward section		 余节
Residual stem		 穗
Spike
HM33 CK2 ‒17.43±0.63 a ‒6.07±0.27 a ‒7.29±1.39 a ‒21.71±9.14 a ‒13.46±1.81 a ‒23.10±2.31 a ‒16.76±1.23 a ‒9.58±2.53 a ‒8.03±4.84 a ‒16.90±4.27 a
T10H ‒7.51±1.44 c ‒4.65±2.10 a ‒4.97±1.07 a ‒4.31±0.01 b ‒4.24±3.70 b ‒15.77±2.21 b ‒8.69±3.19 ab ‒0.77±0.26 b ‒17.87±3.21 a ‒16.33±2.81 a
T15H ‒9.75±0.86 bc ‒4.24±1.31 a ‒3.30±3.34 b ‒3.86±3.35 b ‒2.78±0.40 b ‒6.99±1.81 c ‒7.05±2.10 b ‒0.51±2.77 b ‒10.33±3.21 a ‒9.84±6.30 a
T20H ‒13.11±1.46 b ‒7.91±1.64 a ‒4.15±1.86 ab ‒14.82±3.18 ab ‒5.19±2.63 b ‒19.36±4.55 ab ‒12.01±2.11 ab ‒9.48±2.82 a ‒20.37±1.48 a ‒16.63±2.16 a
FM5 CK2 ‒24.40±0.54 a ‒12.85±1.59 a ‒14.85±5.11 a ‒22.03±1.95 a ‒16.09±4.89 a ‒28.27±1.36 a ‒22.31±2.44 a ‒13.95±3.18 a ‒26.33±3.06 a ‒26.99±2.21 a
T10H ‒13.28±3.72 bc ‒6.55±2.68 a ‒4.10±5.00 b ‒4.64±9.18 c ‒3.99±1.79 b ‒15.06±5.53 b ‒12.38±9.59 a ‒5.38±2.88 b ‒10.95±9.78 a ‒17.17±5.38 a
T15H ‒6.18±2.18 c ‒5.36±7.45 a ‒3.92±2.42 b ‒3.59±11.27 c ‒2.10±2.53 b ‒6.65±6.17 c ‒9.47±6.66 a ‒5.02±2.95 b ‒10.91±15.25 a ‒5.26±4.99 b
T20H ‒16.19±2.73 ab ‒11.01±3.08 ab ‒5.48±6.57 b ‒13.93±8.23 b ‒9.25±3.07 a ‒15.65±10.31 b ‒13.60±4.57 a ‒13.10±2.55 a ‒17.20±5.31 a ‒18.38±3.22 a

图3

外源海藻糖对灌浆期高温胁迫下小麦旗叶绿叶面积(A, B)和叶绿素相对含量(C, D)的影响 处理同图2。不同小写字母代表同一时期不同处理间在0.05概率水平差异显著。FM5: 泛麦5号; HM33: 淮麦33。"

图4

外源海藻糖对灌浆期高温胁迫下小麦旗叶净光合速率(A, B)、气孔导度(C, D)和蒸腾速率(E, F)的影响 处理同图2。不同小写字母代表同一时期不同处理间在0.05概率水平差异显著。FM5: 泛麦5号; HM33: 淮麦33。"

表7

外源海藻糖对灌浆期高温胁迫下小麦光合参数的方差分析"

变异来源
Source of variation		 自由度
Degrees of freedom		 净光合速率
Net photosynthetic rate		 气孔导度
Stomatal
conductance		 蒸腾速率
Transpiration
rate		 绿叶面积
Green leaf area		 叶绿素相对含量
Relative chlorophyll content
花后天数
Days after anthesis (D)		 1 ** ** ** ** **
品种Hybrid (H) 1 ** ns ** ** **
处理Treatment (T) 4 ** ** ** ** **
D×H 1 ** * ** ** **
D×T 4 * ns ** ** **
H×T 4 ns ns ns * ns
D×H×T 4 ns ns ns ** ns

图5

外源海藻糖对灌浆期高温胁迫下小麦旗叶丙二醛含量的影响 处理同图2。不同小写字母代表同一时期不同处理间在0.05概率水平差异显著。FM5: 泛麦5号; HM33: 淮麦33。"

图6

外源海藻糖对灌浆期高温胁迫下小麦旗叶SOD (A, B)和POD (C, D)和CAT (E, F)活性的影响 处理同图2。不同小写字母代表同一时期不同处理间在0.05概率水平差异显著。FM5: 泛麦5号; HM33: 淮麦33。"

表8

产量及其构成因素和光合参数与抗氧化特性因子的相关性分析"

生理指标
Physiological index		 产量
Yield		 穗粒数
Kernels per ear		 千粒重
1000-kernel weight		 穗数
Harvest ear number
净光合速率(Pn) 0.75** 0.18 0.91** -0.44
气孔导度(Gs) 0.82** 0.25 0.97** -0.51
蒸腾速率(Tr) 0.93** 0.47 0.92** -0.61
绿叶面积 Green leaf area 0.11* -0.56 0.69* 0.19
叶绿素相对含量(SPAD) SPAD value 0.93** 0.44 0.94** -0.64
丙二醛(MDA)含量MDA content -1.00** -0.70 -0.79** 0.77
超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性 SOD activity 0.89** 0.34 0.97** -0.55
过氧化物酶(POD)活性 POD activity 0.82** 0.23 0.97** -0.43
过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性 CAT activity 0.99** 0.76 0.73* -0.74
[1] 张玉. 浅析小麦种植技术推广意义及有效途径. 种子科技, 2018, 36(5): 1.
Zhang Y. Analysis on the significance and effective way of popularizing wheat planting technology. Seed Sci Tech, 2018, 36(5): 1. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.15258/sst
[2] 缪文卿. 确保口粮绝对安全的思考. 当代农村财经, 2021, (5): 41-42.
Miu W Q. Thoughts on ensuring the absolute safety of rations. Contemporary Rur Finance Eeon, 2021, (5): 41-42. (in Chinese)
[3] Chen Z, Galli M, Gallavotti A. Mechanisms of temperature regulated growth and thermotolerance in crop species. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2022, 65: 102-134.
[4] 曹彩云, 党红凯, 郑春莲, 郭丽, 李科江, 马俊永. 灌浆期高温胁迫对小麦灌浆的影响及叶面喷剂的缓解作用. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24: 1103-1113.
Cao C Y, Dang H K, Zheng C L, Guo L, Li K J, Ma J Y. Impact of high temperature stress on grain-filling and the relief effect of foliage sprays during grain-filling stage of wheat. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2016, 24: 1103-1113. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] 李世平. 冬小麦耐热性及相关性状数量位点遗传剖析. 西北农林科技大学博士学位论文, 陕西西安, 2013.
Li S P. Genetic Dissection of Quantitative Traits Loci Fir Heat Tolerance Index and Traits Associated with Heat Tolerance in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PhD Dissertation of Northwest A&F University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China, 2013. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] 滕中华, 智丽, 宗学凤, 王三根, 何光华. 高温胁迫对水稻灌浆结实期叶绿素荧光,抗活性氧活力和稻米品质的影响. 作物学报, 2008, 34: 1662-1666.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01662
Teng Z H, Zhi L, Zong X F, Wang S G, He G H. Effects of high temperature on chlorophyll fluorescence, active oxygen resistance activity, and grain quality in grain-filling periods in rice plants. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34: 1662-1666. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01662
[7] 岳鹏莉. 花后高温干旱胁迫对冬小麦淀粉合成特性的影响. 河南农业大学硕士学位论文, 河南郑州, 2017.
Yue P L. Effect of High Temperature and Drought Stress on Starch Synthesis Characteristics after Flowering of Winter Wheat. MS Thesis of Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 石晓丽, 史文娇. 极端高温对黄淮海平原冬小麦产量的影响. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32: 259-269.
Shi X L, Shi W J. Impacts of extreme high temperature on winter wheat yield in the Huang-Huai-Hai plain. J Ecol Rur Environ, 2016, 32: 259-269. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 严菊芳. 干旱条件下冷型小麦的农田热量平衡及小气候特征. 西北农林科技大学硕士学位论文, 陕西西安, 2009.
Yan J F. Heat balance of cold type wheat under drought conditions and microclimate characteristics. MS Thesis of Northwest A&F University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China, 2009. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] Müller J, Aeschbacher R A, Sprenger N, Wiemken B A. Disaccharide- mediated regulation of sucrose: fructan-6-fructosyltransferase, a key enzyme of fructan synthesis in barley leaves. Plant Physiol, 2000, 123(1): 265-273.
pmid: 10806243
[11] Guido V, Oliver F, Louis J R D B, Thomas B, Andres W, Aeschbacher R A, Astrid W. Trehalose metabolism in Arabidopsis: occurrence of trehalose and molecular cloning and characterization of trehalose-6-phosphate synthase homologues. J Exp Bot, 2001, 52: 1817-1826.
pmid: 11520870
[12] Garg A K. Trehalose accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance levels to different abiotic stresses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003, 99: 15898-15903.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.252637799
[13] Schluepmann H, Dijken A V, Aghdasi M, Wobbes B, Smeekens P S. Trehalose mediated growth inhibition of Arabidopsis seedlings is due to trehalose-6-phosphate accumulation. Plant Physiol, 2004, 135: 879-890.
doi: 10.1104/pp.104.039503 pmid: 15181209
[14] Abdallah M S, Abdelgawad Z A, El-Bassiouny H. Alleviation of the adverse effects of salinity stress using trehalose in two rice varieties. S Afr J Bot, 2016, 103: 275-282.
doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2015.09.019
[15] 周林, 郭尚, 杨臻, 杨杰, 王华, 南晓洁. 外源海藻糖对高温胁迫下双孢蘑菇菌株生长的促进效应与耐高温株系筛选. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(1): 154-160.
Zhou L, Guo S, Yang Z, Yang J, Wang H, Nan X J. Effect of exogenous trehalose on growth of Agaricus bisporus strain under high temperature stress and screening of high temperature resistant strains. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2019, 32(1): 154-160. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] 庞椿朋, 叶亮, 马健, 路涛, 杨宗艺, 齐明芳. 海藻糖对高温下番茄幼苗叶片光合作用的调控作用. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 45(21): 143-146.
Pang C P, Ye L, Ma J, Lu T, Yang Z Y, Qi M F. Effects of trehalose on photosynthesis of tomato seedling leaves under high temperature. Jiangsu Agric Sci, 2022, 45(21): 143-146. (in Chinese)
[17] 樊永惠, 李宇星, 马亮亮, 吕钊彦, 武倩倩, 张文静, 马尚宇, 黄正来. 灌浆期高温胁迫下外源水杨酸对小麦旗叶抗氧化生理特性的影响. 核农学报, 2022, 36: 1878-1886.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2022.09.1878
Fan Y H, Li Y X, Ma L L, Lyu Z Y, Wu Q Q, Zhang W J, Ma S Y, Huang Z L. Effects of exogenous salicylic acid on antioxidant physiological characteristics of wheat flag leaves under high temperature stress at grain filling stage. Acta Agric Nucl Sin, 2022, 36: 1878-1886. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] 唐秀巧, 王静静, 龙媛媛, 翁颖, 陈浩然, 李金才, 宋有洪, 李金鹏. 花后喷施KH2PO4对灌浆期高温胁迫下小麦根系生理特性及产量的影响. 核农学报, 2022, 36: 1685-1691.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2022.08.1685
Tang X Q, Wang J J, Long Y Y, Weng Y, Chen H R, Li J C, Song Y H, Li J P. Effect of spraying KH2PO4 after anthesis on root physiological characteristics and yield of wheat under high temperature stress at grain filling stage. Acta Agric Nucl Sin, 2022, 36: 1685-1691. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] 杨璞, 高彩红. 外源一氧化氮对逆境胁迫下小麦的保护效应. 天津农业科学, 2020, 26(5): 27-31.
Yang P, Gao C H. Protective effect of exogenous nitric oxide on wheat under adversity stress. J Tianjin Agric Sci, 2020, 26(5): 27-31. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] 陈静, 姜敬贤, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控. 作物学报, 2022, 48: 1502-1515.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.13021
Chen J, Jiang J X, Ren B C, Liu B, Liu P, Zhang J W. Regulation of leaf-spraying glycine betaine on yield formation and antioxidation of summer maize sowed in different dates. Acta Agron Sin, 2022, 48: 1502-1515. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.13021
[21] 杨东清, 王振林, 倪英丽, 尹燕枰, 蔡铁, 杨卫兵, 彭佃亮, 崔正勇, 江文文. 高温和外源ABA对不同持绿型小麦品种籽粒发育及内源激素含量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47: 2109-2125.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.11.005
Yang D Q, Wang Z L, Ni Y L, Yin Y P, Cai T, Yang W B, Peng D L, Cui Z Y, Jiang W W. Effect of high temperature stress and spraying exogenous ABA post-anthesis on grain filling and grain yield in different types of stay-green wheat. Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47: 2109-2125. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] Lalit S, Chander S S. Tween-20 modified acacia nelotica and Oryza sativa biomass for enhanced biosorption of Cr(VI) in aqueous environment. Tenside Surfact Det, 2015, 52: 41-53.
[23] Zheljazkov V D, Astatkie T, Jeliazkova E. Effect of foliar application of methyl jasmonate and extracts of juniper and sagebrush on essential oil yield and composition of ‘native’ spearmint. Hortscience Pub Am Soc Horti Sci, 2013, 48(4): 462-465.
[24] 王潭刚, 孙婷, 王冀川, 李慧琴, 高振, 石元强. 播期和密度对滴灌冬小麦群体结构与抗倒特性的影响. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33: 193-202.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.02.02
Wang T G, Sun T, Wang J C, Li H Q, Gao Z, Shi Y Q. Effects of sowing date and density on population structure and lodging resistance of winter wheat under drip irrigation. Acta Agric Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33: 193-202. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.02.02
[25] Xu M Z, Liu X, Yu L Q, Liu S Q, Zeng L M. Physiological analysis on mechanisms of cold-tolerance of Dongxiang wild rice (I). Agric Sci Technol, 2010, 38: 5012-5014. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26] Giannopolitis C N, Ries S K.Superoxide dismutase: I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol, 1972, 59: 309-314.
doi: 10.1104/pp.59.2.309
[27] 王伟玲, 王展, 王晶英. 植物过氧化物酶活性测定方法优化. 实验室研究与探索, 2010, 29(4): 21-23.
Wang W L, Wang Z, Wang J Y. Optimization of determination method of peroxidase activity in plant. Res Explor Lab, 2010, 29(4): 21-23. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28] Hammerschmidt R, Nuckles E M, Ku J. Association of enhanced peroxidase activity with induced systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum lagenarium. Physiol Plant Path, 1982, 20: 73-76.
doi: 10.1016/0048-4059(82)90025-X
[29] 岳鹏莉, 王晨阳, 卢红芳, 刘卫星, 马耕, 王强, 胡阳阳. 灌浆期高温干旱胁迫对小麦籽粒淀粉积累的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36: 1489-1496.
Yue P L, Wang C Y, Lu H F, Liu W X, Ma G, Wang Q, Hu Y Y. Effect of heat and drought stress on starch accumulation during grain filling stage. J Triticeae Crops, 2016, 36: 1489-1496. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30] 曹彩云, 党红凯, 郑春莲, 李科江, 马俊永. 阶段高温对不同小麦品种产量的影响及其耐热性差异研究. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40: 351-364.
Cao C Y, Dang H K, Zheng C L, Li K J, Ma J Y. Impacts of high temperature in different periods on yield and evaluation of heat tolerance in wheat varieties. J Triticeae Crops, 2020, 40: 351-364. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31] 吴翠平, 贺明荣, 张宾, 张洪华, 刘永环. 氮肥基追比与灌浆中期高温胁迫对小麦产量和品质的影响. 西北植物学报, 2007, 27: 4734-4739.
Wu C P, He M R, Zhang B, Zhang H H, Liu Y H. Effects of nitrogen dressing ratios and heat stress during the middle period of grain filling on wheat grain yield and quality. Acta Bot Boreali-Occident Sin, 2007, 27: 4734-4739. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32] 郭艳艳, 段巍巍. 不同冬小麦品种籽粒胚乳增殖和灌浆对粒重的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2018, 38(1): 84-89.
Guo Y Y, Duan W W. Studies on endosperm development and grain filling characteristics in different winter wheat varieties. J Triticeae Crops, 2018, 38(1): 84-89. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33] 刘书仁, 郭世荣, 程玉静, 刘超杰, 王丽萍, 束胜. 外源脯氨酸对高温胁迫下黄瓜幼苗叶片AsA-GSH循环和光合荧光特性的影响. 西北植物学报, 2010, 30: 309-316.
Liu S R, Guo S R, Cheng Y J, Liu C J, Wang L P, Shu S. Effects of exogenous proline on the ascorbat-glutahione cycle and photosynthetic fluorescence characteristics in leaves of cucumber seedlings under high temperature stress. Acta Bot Boreali-Occident Sin, 2010, 30: 309-316. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34] 李哲, 姜沣益, 代梦雪, 李宇星, 张文静, 马尚宇, 黄正来, 樊永惠. 外源海藻糖对高温胁迫小麦干物质积累和籽粒灌浆的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2022, 42: 614-622.
Li Z, Jiang F Y, Dai M X, Li Y X, Zhang W J, Ma S Y, Huang Z L, Fan Y H. Effect of exogenous trehalose on dry matter accumulation and grain filling of wheat under heat stress. J Triticeae Crops, 2022, 42: 614-622. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35] 罗宏海, 李俊华, 张宏芝, 何在菊, 勾玲, 张旺锋. 源库调节对新疆高产棉花产量形成期光合产物生产与分配的影响. 棉花学报, 2009, 21: 371-377.
Luo H H, Li J H, Zhang H Z, He Z J, Gou L, Zhang W F. Effects of source and sink manipulation on transportation and allocation of leaf photosynthetic products during flowering and boll-setting stage in high-yield cotton of Xinjiang. Cotton Sci, 2009, 21: 371-377. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36] 何丽香, 傅兆麟, 宫晶, 孙常玉. 小麦灌浆期上三叶叶绿素含量与产量和品质的关系. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(15): 183-187.
He L X, Fu Z L, Gong J, Sun C Y. Relationship between chlorophyll contention of top-three leaves at different times of grain filling stage and grain yield and quality traits in wheat. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2014, 30(15): 183-187. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37] 王磊. 硫化氢信号对干旱胁迫下十字花科植物光合作用的调节. 山西大学硕士学位论文, 山西太原, 2020.
Wang L. Regulation of Hydrogen Sulfide Signal on Photosynthesis of Brassicaceae Plants under Drought Stress. MS Thesis of Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38] 胡凡波, 刘玲, 隆小华, 刘兆普. 外源NO对NaCl胁迫下长春花幼苗生物量和叶绿素荧光的影响. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30: 1620-1626.
Hu F B, Liu L, Long X H, Liu Z P. Effects of exogenous nitric oxide on biomass and chlorophyll fluorescence of catharanthus roseus seedlings under NaCl stress. Chin J Ecol, 2011, 30: 1620-1626. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[39] 姜磊, 李焕勇, 张芹, 张会龙, 乔艳辉, 张华新, 杨秀艳. AM真菌对盐碱胁迫下杜梨幼苗生长与生理代谢的影响. 南京林业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2020, 44(6): 152-160.
Jiang L, Li H Y, Zhang Q, Zhang H L, Qiao Y H, Zhang H X, Yang X Y. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi on the growth and physiological metabolism of Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge seedlings under saline-alkaline stress. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2020, 44(6): 152-160. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[40] 李金花, 张春艳, 刘浩, 李永春. 海藻糖的特性及其在植物抗逆中的应用. 江西农业学报, 2011, 23(6): 25-27.
Li J H, Zhang C Y, Liu H, Li Y C. Characteristics of trehalose and its application in improving stress tolerance of plants. Acta Agric Jiangxi, 2011, 23(6): 25-27. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[41] 赵文静. 高低温胁迫对紫花苜蓿幼苗光合作用和光保护机制的影响. 新疆农业大学硕士学位论文, 新疆乌鲁木齐, 2021.
Zhao W J. Effects of High and Low Temperature Stress on Photosynthesis and Photoprotection Mechanism of Medicago sativa at seedings period. MS Thesis of Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[42] 尹赜鹏, 鹿嘉智, 高振华, 齐明芳, 孟思达, 李天来. 番茄幼苗叶片光合作用、PSII电子传递及活性氧对短期高温胁迫的响应. 北方园艺, 2019, (5): 1-11.
Yin Z P, Lu J Z, Gao Z H, Qi M F, Meng S D, Li T L. Effects of Photosynthetic, PSII electron transport and reactive oxygen species on short-term high temperature stress in tomato seedlings. North Hortic, 2019, (5): 1-11. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[43] 张桂莲, 陈立云, 张顺堂, 肖应辉, 贺治洲, 雷东阳. 高温胁迫对水稻剑叶保护酶活性和膜透性的影响. 作物学报, 2006, 32: 1306-1310.
Zhang G L, Chen L Y, Zhang S T, Xiao Y H, He Z Z, Lei D Y. Effect of high temperature stress on protective enzyme activities and membrane permeability of flag leaf in rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2006, 32: 1306-1310. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[44] 罗音. 外源海藻糖提高小麦耐热性的生理机制研究. 山东农业大学博士学位论文, 山东泰安, 2007.
Luo Y. Studies on the Physiological Mechanisms of Heat Tolerance in Wheat Improved by Exogenous Trehalose. PhD Dissertation of Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, Shandong, China, 2007. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[45] 柳福智, 张迎芳, 陈垣. 外源海藻糖对NaHCO3胁迫下甘草幼苗生长调节及总黄酮含量的影响. 草业学报, 2021, 30(7): 148-156.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020269
Liu F Z, Zhang Y F, Chen Y. Effect of exogenous trehalose on growth regulation and total flavonoid content of Glycyrrhiza uralensis seedlings under NaHCO3 stress. Acta Prat Sin, 2021, 30(7): 148-156. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 胡艳娟, 薛丹, 耿嫡, 朱末, 王天穹, 王晓雪. 水稻OsCDF1基因突变效应及其基因组变异分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2362-2372.
[2] 房孟颖, 任粱, 卢霖, 董学瑞, 武志海, 闫鹏, 董志强. 乙矮合剂对粒用高粱根系建构和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2528-2538.
[3] 李亦扬, 李远, 赵子胥, 张鼎顺, 杜嘉宁, 吴淑娟, 孙思琦, 陈媛, 张祥, 陈德华, 刘震宇. 土壤增氮对棉铃对位叶Bt杀虫蛋白含量影响及氮代谢机制[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2505-2516.
[4] 张丽华, 张经廷, 董志强, 侯万彬, 翟立超, 姚艳荣, 吕丽华, 赵一安, 贾秀领. 不同降水年型水分运筹对冬小麦产量及其构成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2539-2551.
[5] 张刁亮, 杨昭, 胡发龙, 殷文, 柴强, 樊志龙. 复种绿肥在不同灌水水平下对小麦籽粒品质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2572-2581.
[6] 杨毅, 何志强, 林佳慧, 李洋, 陈飞, 吕长文, 唐道彬, 周全卢, 王季春. 椰糠施用量对土壤理化性状和甘薯产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2517-2527.
[7] 苏在兴, 黄忠勤, 高闰飞, 朱雪成, 王波, 常勇, 李小珊, 丁震乾, 易媛. 小麦矮秆突变体Xu1801的鉴定及其矮化效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2133-2143.
[8] 曹玉军, 刘志铭, 兰天娇, 刘小丹, 魏雯雯, 姚凡云, 吕艳杰, 王立春, 王永军. 吉林省不同年代玉米品种光合生理特性对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2183-2195.
[9] 杨晓慧, 王碧胜, 孙筱璐, 侯靳锦, 徐梦杰, 王志军, 房全孝. 冬小麦对水分胁迫响应的模型模拟与节水滴灌制度优化[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2196-2209.
[10] 刘琼, 杨洪坤, 陈艳琦, 吴东明, 黄秀兰, 樊高琼. 施氮量对糯和非糯小麦原粮品质、酿酒品质及挥发性风味物质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2240-2258.
[11] 林芬芳, 陈星宇, 周维勋, 王倩, 张东彦. 基于堆栈稀疏自编码器的小麦赤霉病高光谱遥感检测[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2275-2287.
[12] 刘世洁, 杨习文, 马耕, 冯昊翔, 韩志栋, 韩潇杰, 张晓燕, 贺德先, 马冬云, 谢迎新, 王丽芳, 王晨阳. 灌水和施氮对冬小麦根系特征及氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2296-2307.
[13] 韦金贵, 郭瑶, 柴强, 殷文, 樊志龙, 胡发龙. 水氮减量密植玉米的产量及产量构成[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7): 1919-1929.
[14] 张振, 石玉, 张永丽, 于振文, 王西芝. 土壤水分含量对小麦耗水特性和旗叶/根系衰老特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7): 1895-1905.
[15] 张露露, 张学美, 牟文燕, 黄宁, 郭子糠, 罗一诺, 魏蕾, 孙利谦, 王星舒, 石美, 王朝辉. 我国主要麦区小麦籽粒锰含量: 品种与土壤因素的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7): 1906-1918.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李绍清, 李阳生, 吴福顺, 廖江林, 李达模. 水稻孕穗期在淹涝胁迫下施肥的优化选择及其作用机理[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(01): 115 -120 .
[2] 王兰珍;米国华;陈范骏;张福锁. 不同产量结构小麦品种对缺磷反应的分析[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(06): 867 -870 .
[3] 杨建昌;张亚洁;张建华;王志琴;朱庆森. 水分胁迫下水稻剑叶中多胺含量的变化及其与抗旱性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(11): 1069 -1075 .
[4] 袁美;杨光圣;傅廷栋;严红艳. 甘蓝型油菜生态型细胞质雄性不育两用系的研究Ⅲ. 8-8112AB的温度敏感性及其遗传[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(03): 330 -335 .
[5] 王永胜;王景;段静雅;王金发;刘良式. 水稻极度分蘖突变体的分离和遗传学初步研究[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(02): 235 -239 .
[6] 王丽燕;赵可夫. 玉米幼苗对盐胁迫的生理响应[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(02): 264 -268 .
[7] 田孟良;黄玉碧;谭功燮;刘永建;荣廷昭. 西南糯玉米地方品种waxy基因序列多态性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(05): 729 -736 .
[8] 胡希远;李建平;宋喜芳. 空间统计分析在作物育种品系选择中的效果[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 412 -417 .
[9] 王艳;邱立明;谢文娟;黄薇;叶锋;张富春;马纪. 昆虫抗冻蛋白基因转化烟草的抗寒性[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 397 -402 .
[10] 郑希;吴建国;楼向阳;徐海明;石春海. 不同环境条件下稻米组氨酸和精氨酸的胚乳和母体植株QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(03): 369 -375 .
京ICP备15008789号-2