作物学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 1279-1285.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.94001
靳舒荣1,2,王艳玫1,2,常悦1,2,王月华1,2,李加纳1,2,倪郁1,2,*(
)
JIN Shu-Rong1,2,WANG Yan-Mei1,2,CHANG Yue1,2,WANG Yue-Hua1,2,LI Jia-Na1,2,NI Yu1,2,*(
)
摘要:
油菜“源”器官中光合产物向籽粒转移的效率是提高油菜收获指数的关键环节, 而“源”器官中淀粉酶活性影响同化物向籽粒的运输强度。β-淀粉酶(β-amylase, BAM)及其基因家族成员与油菜高收获指数形成之间的关系还不清楚。本研究选择高产高收获指数型、高产低收获指数型、低产低收获指数型3类油菜品种, 在终花期后5、10、15、20、25 d分别取茎杆、叶片、角果皮与种子, 分析β-淀粉酶活性及其基因家族成员的表达水平。结果表明, β-淀粉酶活性在所检测“源”器官中酶活性总体随发育时期增加。高收获指数型油菜叶片、角果皮中的β-淀粉酶活性显著高于低收获指数型油菜。β-淀粉酶基因家族中, BAM1、BAM4与BAM5在油菜茎、叶及角果皮中的表达量总体随发育时期增加。花后25 d时, BAM1与BAM3在高收获指数油菜叶片、角果皮中的表达量显著高于低收获指数油菜。BAM4与BAM5在高收获指数油菜角果皮中的表达量分别于花后15 d与20 d开始显著高于低收获指数油菜。综合分析认为, BAM1和BAM3可能通过促进叶片与角果皮淀粉分解而加强光合产物向籽粒的运输强度; BAM4与BAM5可能主要通过作用于角果皮淀粉分解而调控光合产物向籽粒的运输。BAM4与BAM5也可能参与了油菜种子中淀粉的调控。
| [1] |
Hay R K M . Harvest index: a review of its use in plant breeding and crop physiology. Annu Appl Biol, 1995,126:197-216.
doi: 10.1111/aab.1995.126.issue-1 |
| [2] | 袁婺洲, 官春云 . 油菜角果内的淀粉酶活性与有关同化物转运的调控. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报, 1995,18(3):74-79. |
| Yuan W Z, Guan C Y . Regulation of assimilates transportation by amylase activity in rapeseed pods. J Nat Sci Univ Norm Hunan, 1995,18(3):74-79 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [3] | 袁婺洲, 官春云 . 影响油菜收获指数的几个生理因子. 作物学报, 1997,23:580-586. |
| Yuan W Z, Guan C Y . Harvest index in rapeseed affected by a few physiological factors. Acta Agron Sin, 1997,23:580-586 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [4] |
Yu T S, Zeeman S C, Thorneycroft D, Fulton D C, Dunstan H, Lue W L, Hegemann B, Tung S Y, Umemoto T, Chapple A, Tsai D L, Wang S M, Smith A M, Chen J, Smith S M . alpha-Amylase is not required for breakdown of transitory starch in Arabidopsis leaves. J Biol Chem, 2005,280:9773-9779.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413638200 |
| [5] |
Weise S E, Kim K S, Stewart R P, Sharkey T D . β-Maltose is the metabolically active anomer of maltose during transitory starch degradation. Plant Physiol, 2005,137:756-761.
doi: 10.1104/pp.104.055996 |
| [6] |
Scheidig A, Fröhlich A, Schulze S, Lloyd J R, Kossmann J . Down regulation of a chloroplast-targeted β-amylase leads to a starch-excess phenotype in leaves. Plant J, 2002,30:581-591.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01317.x |
| [7] |
Streb S, Zeeman S C . Starch metabolism in Arabidopsis. Arab Book, 2012,10:e0160.
doi: 10.1199/tab.0160 |
| [8] | 申鸽子 . 不同生境下油菜高收获指数的激素平衡与调控. 西南大学硕士学位论文, 重庆, 2016. |
| Shen G Z . Balance and Regulation of Hormones of High Harvest Index Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) in Different Environments. MS Thesis of Southwest University, Chongqing, China, 2016 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [9] | 李加纳, 卢坤, 荐红举, 梁颖, 陆军花, 彭柳, 申鸽子, 张烨, 张超, 杨博, 张莉 . 油菜收获指数研究进展. 中国油料作物学报, 2018,40:640-648. |
| Li J N, Lu K, Jian H J, Liang Y, Lu J H, Peng L, Shen G Z, Zhang Y, Zhang C, Yang B, Zhang L . Research advances on harvest index of Brassica napus L. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2018,40:640-648 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [10] |
Allen E J, Morgan D G, Ridgman W I . A physiological analysis of the growth of oilseed rape. J Agric Sci, 1971,77:339-341.
doi: 10.1017/S0021859600024515 |
| [11] | Chapman J F, Daniels R W, Scarisbrick D H . Field studies on 14C assimilate fixation and movement in oil-seed rape (B. napus). J Agric Sci, 1984,102:23-31. |
| [12] | Pechan P A, Morgan D G . Defoliation and its effects on pod and seed development in oil seed rape (Brassica napus L.). J Exp Bot, 1985,36:458-468. |
| [13] | Tayo T O, Morgan D G . Factors influencing flower and pod development in oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.). J Agric Sci, 1979,92:363-373. |
| [14] |
Smith S M, Fulton D C, Chia T, Thorneycroft D, Chapple A, Dunstan H, Hylton C, Zeeman S C, Smith A M . Diurnal changes in the transcriptome encoding enzymes of starch metabolism provide evidence for both transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of starch metabolism in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiol, 2004,136:2687-2699.
doi: 10.1104/pp.104.044347 |
| [15] |
Monroe J D, Storm A R . The Arabidopsis β-amylase (BAM) gene family: Diversity of form and function. Plant Sci, 2018,276:163-170.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.08.016 |
| [16] |
Fulton D C, Stettler M, Mettler T, Vaughan C K, Li J, Francisco P, Gil M, Reinhold H, Eicke S, Messerli G, Dorken G, Halliday K, Smith A M, Smith S M, Zeeman S C . β-amylase 4, a noncatalytic protein required for starch breakdown, acts upstream of three active beta-amylases in Arabidopsis chloroplasts. Plant Cell, 2008,20:1040-1058.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.056507 |
| [17] |
Lao N T, Schoneveld O, Mould R M, Hibberd J M, Gray J C, Kavanagh T A . An Arabidopsis gene encoding a chloroplast- targeted β-amylase. Plant J, 1999,20:519-527.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00625.x |
| [18] |
Valerio C, Costa A, Marri L, Issakidis-Bourguet E, Pupillo P, Trost P, Sparla F . Thioredoxin-regulated β-amylase (BAM1) triggers diurnal starch degradation in guard cells, and in mesophyll cells under osmotic stress. J Exp Bot, 2011,62:545-555.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq288 |
| [19] |
Horrer D, Flütsch S, Pazmino D, Matthews J S, Thalmann M, Nigro A, Leonhardt N, Lawson T, Santelia D . Blue light induces a distinct starch degradation pathway in guard cells for stomatal opening. Curr Biol, 2016,26:362-370.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.036 |
| [20] |
Kaplan F, Guy C L . RNA interference of Arabidopsis beta- amylase 8 prevents maltose accumulation upon cold shock and increases sensitivity of PSII photochemical efficiency to freezing stress. Plant J, 2005,44:730-743.
doi: 10.1111/tpj.2005.44.issue-5 |
| [21] |
Monroe J D, Storm A R, Badley E M, Lehman M D, Platt S M, Saunders L K, Schmitz J M, Torres C E . β-amylase 1 and β-amylase3 are plastidic starch hydrolases in Arabidopsis that seem to be adapted for different thermal, pH, and stress conditions. Plant Physiol, 2014,166:1748-1763.
doi: 10.1104/pp.114.246421 |
| [22] | Monroe J D, Breault J S, Pope L E, Torres C E, Gebrejesus T B, Berndsen C E, Storm A R . Arabidopsis β-amylase 2 is a K+-requiring, catalytic tetramer with sigmoidal kinetics . Plant Physiol, 2017,175:1125-1135. |
| [23] | Laby R J, Kim D, Gibson S I . The ram1 mutant of Arabidopsis exhibits severely decreased β-amylase activity. Plant Physiol, 2001,127:1798-1807. |
| [24] | 黄露, 陶诗顺, 张敏, 姜磊, 彭雅利 . 甘蓝型杂交油菜收获指数及其品种间差异性研究. 江苏农业科学, 2011, (1):95-97. |
| Huang L, Tao S S, Zhang M, Jiang L, Peng Y L . Differences analysis of harvest and varieties of Brassica napus L. Jiangsu Agric Sci, 2011, (1):95-97 (in Chinese with English abstract). |
| [1] | 马毅娜, 吴晓明玉, 李藕琪, 王圆, 陈丽, 张盈川, 赵伦, 文静, 傅廷栋, 沈金雄. Bna-miR1040-EIF3A模块调控油菜开花时间的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 349-362. |
| [2] | 詹戈锐, 余文, 李锋, 武明珠, 徐馨, 罗朝鹏, 巫升鑫, 杨军, 张智强, 王中. 烟草NtWRKY6基因响应ABA表达及其调控多酚合成的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 446-458. |
| [3] | 景秀清, 蔡永朵, 邓宁, 赵晓东, 翟飞红, 曾群. 藜麦RopGEF家族基因的鉴定及表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 28-43. |
| [4] | 王彬, 蒙姜宇, 邱浩良, 贺亚军, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnaDUF579基因家族的鉴定与表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2100-2110. |
| [5] | 夏琦, 郭滢, 王坤美, 王思忆, 巨建业, 彭雅雯, 刘忠松, 夏石头. 甘蓝型油菜种子和种皮中水杨酸含量与原花色素积累的关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1189-1197. |
| [6] | 王晓琳, 刘忠松, 康雷, 杨柳. 甘蓝型油菜角果长度和每角粒数基因定位以及角果皮转录组动态分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 888-899. |
| [7] | 张琴, 戴成, 马朝芝. 生长素响应报告基因转化甘蓝型油菜及各组织GUS动态信号分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 667-675. |
| [8] | 张恒, 冯雅岚, 田文仲, 郭彬彬, 张均, 马超. 小麦TaSnRK基因家族鉴定及在局部根区干旱下的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 632-649. |
| [9] | 孙程明, 周晓婴, 陈锋, 张维, 王晓东, 彭琦, 郭月, 高建芹, 胡茂龙, 付三雄, 张洁夫. 长链非编码RNA (lncRNA)在甘蓝型油菜分枝角度调控中的功能分析与预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 559-567. |
| [10] | 黄绒, 周渠晨, 陈楚铭, 罗倩, 易东, 杜常欢, 黄祥宇, 盛锋, 杜雪竹. 过表达BnNRT2.3-like对油菜氮素吸收利用及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3184-3197. |
| [11] | 巨建业, 杨柳, 陈浩, 康雷, 夏石头, 刘忠松. 单细胞核转录组分析揭示油菜种皮分化过程和种子颜色差异原因[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2860-2874. |
| [12] | 张雯, 李玉, 王创, 石磊, 丁广大. 甘蓝型油菜磷转运蛋白BnaPT48的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2983-2995. |
| [13] | 胡志康, 舒雨, 王会, 杨莹莹, 廖俊宇, 刘佳, 成洪涛, 郭晨, 张园园, 刘胜毅, 胡琼, 梅德圣, 李超. 甘蓝型油菜苗期耐碱性种质综合鉴定与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2681-2692. |
| [14] | 王晨, 贺丹, 姚敏, 邱萍, 何昕, 熊兴华, 康雷, 刘忠松, 钱论文. 基于转录组分析鉴定甘蓝型油菜开花候选基因以及BnaCOR27功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2693-2704. |
| [15] | 徐林珊, 郜耿东, 王宇, 王家星, 杨吉招, 武亚瑞, 张宵寒, 常影, 李真, 谢雄泽, 龚德平, 王晶, 葛贤宏. 甘蓝型油菜漆酶基因家族成员表达模式及与茎秆抗折力的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 134-148. |
|
||