欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (8): 1238-1247.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.02001

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

盐胁迫下粳稻品种南粳9108分蘖特性及其与群体生产力的关系

韦还和1,葛佳琳1,张徐彬1,孟天瑶2,陆钰1,李心月1,陶源1,丁恩浩1,陈英龙1,戴其根1,*()   

  1. 1江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室/江苏省作物栽培生理重点实验室/江苏省粮食作物现代产业技术协同创新中心/扬州大学水稻产业工程技术研究院, 扬州大学, 江苏扬州225009
    2扬州大学教育部农业与农产品安全国际合作联合实验室/扬州大学农业科技发展研究院, 扬州大学, 江苏扬州225009
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-09 接受日期:2020-04-15 出版日期:2020-08-12 网络出版日期:2020-04-26
  • 通讯作者: 戴其根
  • 作者简介:E-mail: hhwei@yzu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技支撑计划项目(2015BAD01B03);江苏省重点研发计划项目(BE2015337);江苏省重点研发计划项目(BE2016370);国家自然科学基金项目(31901448);江苏省高等学校自然科学研究面上项目(19KJB210004);江苏高校优势学科建设工程项目

Tillering characteristics and its relationships with population productivity of japonica rice Nanjing 9108 under salinity stress

WEI Huan-He1,GE Jia-Lin1,ZHANG Xu-Bin1,MENG Tian-Yao2,LU Yu1,LI Xin-Yue1,TAO Yuan1,DING En-Hao1,CHEN Ying-Long1,DAI Qi-Gen1,*()   

  1. 1Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology/Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops/Research Institute of Rice Industrial Engineering Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
    2Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agro-product Safety, Ministry of Education/Institute of Agricultural Science and Technological Development, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2020-01-09 Accepted:2020-04-15 Published:2020-08-12 Published online:2020-04-26
  • Contact: Qi-Gen DAI
  • Supported by:
    National Key Technology Support Program of China(2015BAD01B03);Key Research and Development Program of Jiangsu Province(BE2015337);Key Research and Development Program of Jiangsu Province(BE2016370);National Natural Science Foundation of China(31901448);Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China(19KJB210004);Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

RichHTML

26

PDF

627

摘要：

旨在明确盐胁迫下水稻分蘖发生与成穗规律及其优势叶位, 为沿海滩涂水稻高产栽培的分蘖合理利用与调控提供依据。以江苏沿海滩涂大面积种植的常规粳稻南粳9108为试材, 设置对照(盐浓度0)、中盐(盐浓度0.15%)和高盐(盐浓度0.3%)环境, 比较研究盐逆境下水稻分蘖发生与成穗特性及其对群体产量的贡献。结果表明, 对照、中盐和高盐处理的两年平均产量(t hm-2)分别为9.7、7.4和4.2; 中盐和高盐处理的穗数、每穗粒数、结实率和千粒重均显著低于对照。与对照相比, 中盐和高盐处理下拔节、抽穗和成熟期群体茎蘖数和成穗率均较低。对照的分蘖利用以一次分蘖和二次分蘖为主, 一次分蘖发生在第3至第7叶位, 第4至第6叶位是分蘖发生与成穗的优势叶位, 二次分蘖则以1/4和1/5蘖位优势较强; 盐胁迫的分蘖利用以一次分蘖为主, 第4至第6叶位是分蘖发生与成穗的优势叶位。盐胁迫下各蘖位的穗长、每穗粒数、着粒密度、一次枝粳数及粒数、二次枝粳数及粒数均低于对照。与对照相比, 盐胁迫下水稻单株成穗数少、个体和群体生长协调性差、穗型小, 最终单株和群体产量低。

关键词: 盐胁迫, 水稻, 分蘖特性, 群体生产力

Abstract:

This study was conducted to clarify the characteristics for occurrence of rice tillers, its dominant leaf positions, and panicle formation under salinity stress, and to provide a basis for the rational utilization and regulation of rice tillers for high-yield cultivation methods in tidal flat area. Conventional japonica rice Nanjing 9108 was used with three salinity treatments, namely, Control (CK, 0 salt concentration), Medium-salinity stress (MS, 0.15% salt concentration), and high-salinity stress (HS, 0.3% salt concentration) to compare the tillering and panicle formation characteristics and its contribution to population yield under salinity stress. As a result, the average yields (t hm-2) of CK, MS, and HS were 9.7, 7.4, and 4.2 across two years, respectively; the number of panicles, spikelets per panicle, percentage of filled grains, and 1000-grain weight in MS and HS treatments were significantly lower than those in CK. Compared with CK, the number of tillers at jointing, heading, and maturity and percentage of productive tillers in MS and HS treatments were decreased. For CK, the primary tillers emerged from the 3rd leaf to 7th leaf on the main stem, with higher tiller emerging rate and more panicles from the 4th leaf to 6th leaf among them, and secondary tillers mainly emerged and earbeared from 1/4 and 1/5 tiller position; as for MS and HS, tillers are mainly primary ones emerging from the 4th to 6th leaf as the dominant position for the tiller occurrence and earbearing. The mean value of panicle length, total grains, grain density, and number of grains and its total grains on the primary and secondary branches in MS and HS treatments were both lower than those in CK. Our results suggest that, salinity stress caused lower number of panicles per plant, inferior growth of individuals and populations, smaller panicle types, and finally lower grain yield.

Key words: salinity stress, rice, tillering characteristics, population productivity

表1

盐胁迫对水稻产量及其构成因素的影响"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 穗数
Number of
panicles
(×104 hm-2)		 每穗粒数
Spikelets per
panicle		 颖花量
Number of spikelets
(×107 hm-2)		 结实率
Percentage of filled grains (%)		 千粒重
1000-
grain
weight (g)		 实产
Actual yield
(t hm-2)		 成熟期
干物重
Biomass
accumulation at maturity
(t hm-2)		 收获
指数
Harvest index
2018 对照 CK 359.5 a 133.6 a 48.0 a 90.5 a 23.9 a 9.7 a 16.6 a 0.503 c
中盐 MS 335.1 b 112.4 b 37.7 b 88.7 ab 22.7 b 7.3 b 12.0 b 0.524 b
高盐 HS 293.7 c 87.2 c 25.6 c 82.6 b 21.2 c 4.3 c 6.7 c 0.549 a
2019 对照 CK 344.3 a 135.3 a 46.6 a 91.4 a 24.2 a 9.6 a 16.2 a 0.511 c
中盐 MS 323.1 b 115.7 b 37.4 b 88.2 b 23.1 b 7.4 b 11.9 b 0.533 b
高盐 HS 277.5 c 84.9 c 23.6 c 83.5 c 21.6 c 4.1 c 6.4 c 0.553 a

表2

盐胁迫对水稻关键生育期群体茎蘖数的影响"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 群体茎蘖数 Tiller number of rice population (×104 hm-2)
拔节期Jointing 抽穗期Heading 成熟期Maturity
2018 对照 CK 459.1 a 365.9 a 359.5 a
中盐 MS 443.3 b 351.5 b 335.1 b
高盐 HS 404.5 c 314.3 c 293.7 c
2019 对照 CK 450.1 a 350.4 a 344.3 a
中盐 MS 439.6 b 339.1 b 323.1 b
高盐 HS 388.7 c 296.5 c 277.5 c

图1

盐胁迫对水稻成穗率的影响 CK: 对照; MS: 中盐; HS: 高盐。处理间标以不同小写字母的值在5%水平差异显著。"

表3

盐胁迫对水稻分蘖发生及成穗率的影响"

叶位
Leaf position		 分蘖发生率 Emerging rate (%) 分蘖成穗率 Panicle rate (%)
对照 CK 中盐 MS 高盐 HS 对照 CK 中盐 MS 高盐 HS
3/0 27.78 16.67 40.00 33.33
4/0 94.44 83.33 66.67 70.59 73.33 75.00
5/0 100.00 100.00 100.00 88.89 88.89 83.33
6/0 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 94.44
7/0 77.78 61.11 38.89 28.57 18.18 14.29
1/4 66.67 55.56 44.44 50.00 30.00 25.00
2/4 38.89 16.67 11.11 14.29 33.33
3/4 22.22 5.56 25.00
1/5 66.67 22.22 11.11 33.33 25.00 50.00
2/5 22.22 11.11 5.56
1/6 11.11 11.11 50.00 50.00

表4

盐胁迫下水稻单株成穗数的茎蘖组成"

叶位
Leaf position		 对照 CK 中盐 MS 高盐 HS
个数 Number 比例 Rate (%) 个数 Number 比例 Rate (%) 个数 Number 比例 Rate (%)
单株成穗数
No. of productive tillers per plant		 4.61 a 4.00 b 3.50 c
主穗Main stem (0/0) 1.00 21.69 1.00 25.00 1.00 28.57
3/0 0.11 2.41 0.06 1.39
4/0 0.67 14.46 0.61 15.28 0.50 14.29
5/0 0.89 19.28 0.89 22.22 0.83 23.81
6/0 1.00 21.69 1.00 25.00 0.94 26.98
7/0 0.22 4.82 0.11 2.78 0.06 1.59
一次分蘖合计
Primary tillers in total		 2.89 62.67 2.67 66.67 2.33 66.67
1/4 0.33 7.24 0.17 4.17 0.11 3.17
2/4 0.06 1.21 0.06 1.39
3/4 0.06 1.21
1/5 0.22 4.78 0.06 1.39 0.06 1.59
1/6 0.06 1.21 0.06 1.39
二次分蘖合计
Secondary tillers in total		 0.72 15.64 0.33 8.33 0.17 4.76

表5

盐胁迫下水稻各叶位茎蘖对群体产量的贡献"

叶位
Leaf position		 对照 CK 中盐 MS 高盐 HS
产量
Yield (t hm-2)		 比例
Rate (%)		 产量
Yield (t hm-2)		 比例
Rate (%)		 产量
Yield (t hm-2)		 比例
Rate (%)
群体产量
Population productivity		 9.65 a 7.35 b 4.20 c
主穗Main stem (0/0) 2.32 24.05 2.12 28.86 1.36 32.45
3/0 0.22 2.31 0.10 1.33
4/0 1.33 13.76 1.06 14.44 0.51 12.18
5/0 1.95 20.20 1.65 22.48 1.01 24.16
6/0 2.18 22.64 1.75 23.83 1.15 27.37
7/0 0.38 3.93 0.17 2.25 0.04 0.89
一次分蘖合计
Primary tillers in total		 6.06 62.84 4.73 64.34 2.71 64.61
1/4 0.65 6.76 0.27 3.66 0.08 1.92
2/4 0.09 0.91 0.07 0.99
3/4 0.08 0.86
1/5 0.36 3.72 0.08 1.12 0.04 1.02
1/6 0.08 0.86 0.08 1.02
二次分蘖合计
Secondary tillers in total		 1.27 13.11 0.50 6.80 0.12 2.94

表6

盐胁迫对水稻各叶位茎蘖穗部性状的影响"

处理
Treatment		 叶位
Leaf position		 穗长
PL (cm)		 总粒数
TG		 结实率
PFG (%)		 着粒密度
GD
(grain cm-1)		 一次枝梗
Primary branch		 二次枝梗
Secondary branch
枝粳数
NB		 枝梗粒数
TG		 枝粳数
NB		 枝梗粒数 TG
对照 CK 0/0 18.2 161.3 91.1 8.9 12.0 74.1 30.0 87.2
3/0 16.4 139.8 90.9 8.5 12.0 72.9 22.0 66.9
4/0 17.2 141.6 89.1 8.2 13.0 78.7 24.0 62.9
5/0 18.1 155.2 89.5 8.6 13.0 77.4 28.0 77.8
6/0 17.5 153.4 90.2 8.8 12.0 76.8 26.0 76.6
7/0 16.7 122.4 88.2 7.3 10.0 63.4 21.0 59.0
1/4 16.2 139.8 88.6 8.6 11.0 66.7 24.0 73.1
2/4 15.8 114.1 87.6 7.2 10.0 58.7 22.0 55.4
3/4 14.8 106.9 88.5 7.2 11.0 62.3 17.0 44.6
1/5 15.3 116.5 88.7 7.6 11.0 62.4 18.0 54.1
1/6 14.6 107.0 88.9 7.3 10.0 60.8 16.0 46.2
平均值 Mean 16.4 a 132.5 a 89.2 a 8.0 a 11.4 a 68.6 a 22.5 a 64.0 a
中盐 MS 0/0 16.8 145.8 90.4 8.7 12.0 74.1 25.0 71.7
3/0 15.8 122.6 89.4 7.8 10.0 59.4 19.0 63.2
4/0 15.7 121.2 89.0 7.7 10.0 61.3 21.0 59.9
5/0 16.2 128.9 89.6 8.0 12.0 71.5 22.0 57.4
6/0 15.8 122.4 88.9 7.7 13.0 66.7 21.0 55.7
7/0 15.6 104.8 88.4 6.7 11.0 65.6 15.0 39.2
1/4 15.8 114.5 87.6 7.2 10.0 56.6 22.0 57.9
2/4 14.1 93.3 87.5 6.6 9.0 53.4 16.0 39.9
1/5 15.6 106.7 86.6 6.8 12.0 68.7 14.0 38.0
1/6 14.1 98.5 85.2 7.0 10.0 58.6 14.0 39.9
平均值 Mean 15.6 ab 115.9 b 88.3 ab 7.4 ab 10.9 ab 63.6 b 18.9 b 52.3 b
高盐 HS 0/0 15.7 121.6 84.5 7.7 10.0 61.2 21.0 60.4
4/0 14.6 93.5 82.5 6.4 9.0 53.1 16.0 40.4
5/0 15.1 111.0 82.7 7.4 11.0 63.4 18.0 47.6
6/0 15.4 109.5 83.8 7.1 11.0 67.9 14.0 41.6
7/0 11.7 62.4 81.6 5.3 10.0 48.9 4.0 13.5
1/4 12.7 67.7 80.7 5.3 10.0 55.6 5.0 12.1
1/5 12.5 70.7 82.3 5.7 9.0 48.9 9.0 21.8
平均值 Mean 14.0 b 90.9 c 82.6 b 6.4 b 10.0 b 57.0 c 12.4 c 33.9 c
[1] Liu L L, Zhu Y, Tang L, Cao W X, Wang E L. Impacts of climate changes, soil nutrients, variety types and management practices on rice yield in East China: A case study in the Taihu region. Field Crops Res, 2013,149:40-48.
[2] 王才林, 张亚东, 赵凌, 路凯, 朱镇, 陈涛, 赵庆勇, 姚姝, 周丽慧, 赵春芳, 梁文化, 孙明法, 严国红. 耐盐碱水稻研究现状、问题与建议. 中国稻米, 2019,25(1):1-6.
Wang C L, Zhang Y D, Zhao L, Lu K, Zhu Z, Chen T, Zhao Q Y, Yao S, Zhou L H, Zhao C H, Liang W H, Sun M F, Yan G H. Research status, problems and suggestions on salt-alkali tolerant rice. Chin Rice, 2019,25(1):1-6 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] 周根友, 翟彩娇, 邓先亮, 张蛟, 张振良, 戴其根, 崔士友. 盐逆境对水稻产量、光合特性及品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2018,32:146-154.
Zhou G Y, Zhai C J, Deng X L, Zhao J, Zhang Z L, Dai Q G, Cui S Y. Performance of yield, photosynthesis and grain quality of japonica rice cultivars under salinity stress in micro- plots. Chin J Rice Sci, 2018,32:146-154 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] Ashraf M, Athar H R, Harris P J C, Kwon T R. Some prospective strategies for improving crop salt tolerance. Adv Agron, 2008,97:45-110.
[5] 孙现军, 姜奇彦, 胡正, 张惠媛, 徐长兵, 邸一恒, 韩龙植, 张辉. 水稻资源全生育期耐盐性鉴定筛选. 作物学报, 2019,45:1656-1663.
Sun X J, Jiang Q Y, Hu Z, Zhang H Y, Xu C B, Di Y H, Han L Z, Zhang H. Screening and identification of salt-tolerant rice germplasm in whole period. Acta Agron Sin, 2019,45:1656-1663 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] 沙汉景, 胡文成, 贾琰, 王新鹏, 田雪飞, 于美芳, 赵宏伟. 外源水杨酸、脯氨酸和γ-氨基丁酸对盐胁迫下水稻产量的影响. 作物学报, 2017,43:1677-1688.
Sha H J, Hu W C, Jia Y, Wang X P, Tian X F, Yu M F, Zhao H W. Effect of exogenous salicylic acid, proline, and γ-aminobutyric acid on yield of rice under salt stress. Acta Agron Sin, 2017,43:1677-1688 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] 凌启鸿. 盐碱地种稻有关问题的讨论. 中国稻米, 2018,24(4):1-2.
Ling Q H. Discussion on the related problems of rice planting in saline-alkali soil. Chin Rice, 2018,24(4):1-2 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] 徐晨, 凌风楼, 徐克章, 武志海, 刘晓龙, 安久海, 赵兰坡. 盐胁迫对不同水稻品种光合特性和生理生化特性的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2013,27:280-286.
Xu C, Ling F L, Xu K Z, Wu Z H, Liu X L, An J H, Zhao L P. Effects of salt stress on photosynthetic characteristics and physiological and biochemical traits of different rice varieties. Chin J Rice Sci, 2013,27:280-286 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] Zeng L H, Shannon M C. Effects of salinity on grain yield and yield components of rice at different seeding densities. Agron J, 2000,92:418-423.
[10] Gregorio G B, Senadhira D, Mendoza R D, Manigbas N L, Roxas J P, Guerta C Q. Progress in breeding for salinity tolerance and associated abiotic stresses in rice. Field Crops Res, 2002,76:91-101.
[11] 吕伟生, 曾勇军, 石庆华, 潘晓华, 黄山, 商庆银, 谭雪明, 李木英, 胡水秀. 机插早稻分蘖成穗特性及基本苗公式参数研究. 作物学报, 2016,42:427-436.
Lyu W S, Zeng Y J, Shi Q H, Pan X H, Huang S, Shang Q Y, Tan X M, Li M Y, Hu S X. Tillering and panicle formation characteristics of machine-transplanted early rice and its parameters of basic population formulae. Acta Agron Sin, 2016,42:427-436 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 韦还和, 李超, 张洪程, 孙玉海, 孟天瑶, 杨筠文, 马荣荣, 王晓燕, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕. 水稻甬优12超高产群体分蘖特性及其与群体生产力的关系. 作物学报, 2014,40:1819-1829.
Wei H H, Li C, Zhang H C, Sun Y H, Meng T Y, Yang J W, Ma R R, Wang X Y, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y. Tillering characteristics and its relationship with population productivity of super-high yield rice population of Yongyou 12. Acta Agron Sin, 2014,40:1819-1829 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 宋云生, 张洪程, 戴其根, 杨大柳, 郭保卫, 朱聪聪, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 胡加敏, 吴爱国, 蒋晓鸿. 水稻机栽钵苗单穴苗数对分蘖成穗及产量的影响. 农业工程学报, 2014,30(10):37-47.
Song Y S, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Yang D L, Guo B W, Zhu C C, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Hu J M, Wu A G, Jiang X H. Effect of rice potted-seedlings per hole by mechanical transplanting on tillers emergence, panicles formation and yield. Trans CSAE, 2014,30(10):37-47 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 雷小龙, 刘利, 刘波, 黄光忠, 马荣朝, 任万军. 杂交籼稻机械化种植的分蘖特性. 作物学报, 2014,40:1044-1055.
Lei X L, Liu L, Liu B, Huang G Z, Ma R C, Ren W J. Tillering characteristics of indica hybrid rice under mechanized planting. Acta Agron Sin, 2014,40:1044-1055 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 许轲, 唐磊, 张洪程, 郭保卫, 霍中洋, 戴其根, 魏海燕, 韦还和. 不同机械直播方式对水稻分蘖特性及产量的影响. 农业工程学报, 2014,30(13):43-52.
Xu K, Tang L, Zhang H C, Guo B W, Huo Z Y, Dai Q G, Wei H Y, Wei H H. Effect of different mechanical direct seeding methods on tiller characteristics and yield of rice. Trans CSAE, 2014,30(13):43-52 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] 熊瑞恒, 杭玉浩, 王强盛, 许国春, 刘欣, 武皞. 麦秸还田配施基蘖氮肥提高机插超级粳稻分蘖成穗及产量. 农业工程学报, 2015,31(18):136-146.
Xiong R H, Hang Y H, Wang Q S, Xu G C, Liu X, Wu H. Wheat straw returned combined with nitrogen as base fertilizers and topdressing at tiller stage improving the tiller emergency, earbearing traits and yield for machine-transplanted super japonica rice. Trans CSAE, 2015,31(18):136-146 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 王萌萌, 杨沈斌, 江晓东, 王应平, 陈德, 黄维, 于庚康, 石春林. 光温要素对水稻群体茎蘖增长动态影响的分析及模拟. 作物学报, 2016,42:82-92.
Wang M M, Yang S B, Jiang X D, Wang Y P, Chen D, Huang W, Yu G K, Shi C L. Analysis and simulation of impact of light and temperature on rice tillering. Acta Agron Sin, 2016,42:82-92 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] 孙成明, 庄恒扬, 杨连新, 杨洪建, 黄建晔, 董桂春, 朱建国, 王余龙. FACE水稻茎蘖动态模型. 应用生态学报, 2006,17:1448-1452.
Sun C M, Zhuang H Y, Yang L X, Yang H J, Huang J Y, Dong G C, Zhu J G, Wang Y L. Dynamic model of rice tiller in FACE. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2006,17:1448-1452 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] Huang M, Yang C L, Ji Q M, Jiang L G, Tan J L, Li Y Q. Tillering responses of rice to plant density and nitrogen rate in a subtropical environment of southern China. Field Crops Res, 2013,149:187-192.
[20] Ao H J, Peng S B, Zou Y B, Tang Q Y, Visperas R M. Reduction of unproductive tillers did not increase the grain yield of irrigated rice. Field Crops Res, 2010,116:108-115.
[21] 吕伟生, 曾勇军, 石庆华, 潘晓华, 黄山, 商庆银, 谭雪明, 李木英, 胡水秀. 基于机插晚稻分蘖成穗特性获取基本苗定量参数. 农业工程学报, 2016,32(1):30-37.
Lyu W S, Zeng Y J, Shi Q H, Pan X H, Huang S, Shang Q Y, Tan X M, Li M Y, Hu S X. Calculation of quantitative parameters of basic population of machine-transplanted late rice based on its tillering and panicle formation characteristics. Trans CSAE, 2016,32(1):30-37 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] 荆培培, 崔敏, 秦涛, 周在中, 戴其根. 土培条件下不同盐分梯度对水稻产量及其生理特性的影响. 中国稻米, 2017,23(4):26-33.
Jing P P, Cui M, Qin T, Zhou Z Z, Dai Q G. Effects of different saline stress on yield and physiological properties of rice in soil culture. Chin Rice, 2017,23(4):26-33 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 李景蕻, 李刚华, 杨从党, 王绍华, 刘正辉, 王强盛, 丁艳锋. 增加土壤温度对高海拔生态区水稻分蘖成穗及产量形成的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2010,24:36-42.
Li J H, Li G H, Yang C D, Wang S H, Liu Z H, Wang Q S, Ding Y F. Effects of temperature increase of soil on productive tiller percentage and yield of rice in high altitude ecological area. Chin J Rice Sci, 2010,24:36-42 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] 钟旭华, 彭少兵, Sheehy J E, 刘鸿先. 水稻群体成穗率与干物质积累动态关系的模拟研究. 中国水稻科学, 2001,15:107-112.
Zhong X H, Peng S B, Sheehy J E, Liu H X. Relationship between productive tiller percentage and biomass accumulation in rice ( Oryza sativa L.): a simulation approach. Chin J Rice Sci, 2001,15:107-112 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] 袁奇, 于林惠, 石世杰, 邵建国, 丁艳锋. 机插秧每穴栽插苗数对水稻分蘖与成穗的影响. 农业工程学报, 2007,23(10):121-125.
Yuan Q, Yu L H, Shi S J, Shao J G, Ding Y F. Effects of different tiller production planting seedlings per hill on outgrowth and quantities of machine-transplanted rice. Trans CSAE, 2007,23(10):121-125 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26] 李杰, 张洪程, 龚金龙, 常勇, 吴桂成, 郭振华, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕. 稻麦两熟地区不同栽培方式超级稻分蘖特性及其与群体生产力的关系. 作物学报, 2011,37:309-320.
Li J, Zhang H C, Gong J L, Chang Y, Wu G C, Guo Z H, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y. Tillering characteristics and its relationships with population productivity of super rice under different cultivation methods in rice-wheat cropping areas. Acta Agron Sin, 2011,37:309-320 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] Wang J J, Dai Q X, Shang J L, Jin X L, Sun Q, Zhou G S, Dai Q G. Field-scale rice yield estimation using sentinel-1A synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data in coastal saline region of Jiangsu province, China. Remote Sens, 2019,11:2274.
[28] 张瑞珍, 邵玺文, 童淑媛, 汪恒武, 齐春燕, 孙长占. 盐碱胁迫对水稻源库与产量的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2006,20:116-118.
Zhang R Z, Shao X W, Tong S Y, Wang H W, Qi C Y, Sun C Z. Effect of saline alkali stress on source-sink and yield of rice. Chin J Rice Sci, 2006,20:116-118 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] 胡博文, 谷娇娇, 贾琰, 沙汉景, 张君颜, 黄书勤, 赵宏伟. 盐胁迫对寒地粳稻籽粒淀粉形成积累及产量的影响. 华北农学报, 2019,34(1):115-123.
Hu B W, Gu J J, Jia Y, Sha H J, Zhang J Y, Huang S Q, Zhao H W. Effect of salt stress on starch formation and yield of japonica rice in cold-region. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2019,34(1):115-123 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] 隗溟, 李冬霞. 水稻主茎节位分蘖及生产力补偿能力. 生态学报, 2013,33:7098-7107.
Wei M, Li D X. The compensation capacity of tillering and production of main stem nodes in rice. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013,33:7098-7107 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31] 黄丽芬, 陶晓婷, 高威, 王远玲, 庄恒扬. 江苏沿海地区减磷对机插常规粳稻产量形成及品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2014,28:632-638.
Huang L F, Tao X T, Gao W, Wang Y L, Zhuang H Y. Effect of reduced phosphorus fertilizer application on yield formation and quality of japonica rice in Jiangsu coastal region. Chin J Rice Sci, 2014,28:632-638 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[32] 张洪程, 龚金龙. 中国水稻种植机械化高产农艺研究现状及发展探讨. 中国农业科学, 2014,47:1273-1289.
Zhang H C, Gong J L. Research status and development discussion on high-yielding agronomy of mechanized planting rice in China. Sci Agric Sin, 2014,47:1273-1289 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[33] 田蕾, 陈亚萍, 刘俊, 马晓刚, 王娜, 杨兵, 李莹, 郭海东, 李娟, 胡慧, 张银霞, 李培富. 粳稻种质资源芽期耐盐性综合评价与筛选. 中国水稻科学, 2017,31:631-642.
Tian L, Chen Y P, Liu J, Ma X G, Wang N, Yang B, Li Y, Guo H D, Li J, Hu H, Zhang Y X, Li P F. Comprehensive evaluation and selection of rice (Oryza sativa japonica) germplasm for saline tolerance at germination stage. Chin J Rice Sci, 2017,31:631-642 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[6] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[7] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[8] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[9] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
[10] 雷新慧, 万晨茜, 陶金才, 冷佳俊, 吴怡欣, 王家乐, 王鹏科, 杨清华, 冯佰利, 高金锋. 褪黑素与2,4-表油菜素内酯浸种对盐胁迫下荞麦发芽与幼苗生长的促进效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1210-1221.
[11] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[12] 陈悦, 孙明哲, 贾博为, 冷月, 孙晓丽. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 781-790.
[13] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[14] 巫燕飞, 胡琴, 周棋, 杜雪竹, 盛锋. 水稻延伸因子复合体家族基因鉴定及非生物胁迫诱导表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 644-655.
[15] 陈云, 李思宇, 朱安, 刘昆, 张亚军, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 张伟杨, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 播种量和穗肥施氮量对优质食味直播水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 656-666.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2